|
Post by Arlon10 on Mar 31, 2017 16:15:28 GMT
I wish you'd put that on a bumper sticker on your car so everyone would know which one of us is the childish idiot. You're making the same mistake I just corrected ArArArchStanton for. Simply because you have no evidence does not mean no one else can have any either. That's a very serious and obvious brain defect to think that way. Please seek professional help.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2017 16:25:29 GMT
I wish you'd put that on a bumper sticker on your car so everyone would know which one of us is the childish idiot. Thanks for the sentiment, but I'm happy with my Darwin fish. Yes, but YOU don't have evidence of it. You like to claim you do, but your total inability to produce any demonstrated that you're a damn liar.
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Mar 31, 2017 16:36:34 GMT
Yes, but YOU don't have evidence of it. You like to claim you do, but your total inability to produce any demonstrated that you're a damn liar. You still aren't understanding that simply because I won't show you something does not mean that I can't know it. Do you believe that any of your married friends have sex? I'm certain they never showed you, or I hope they never showed you. Yet you believe they have sex based on the evidence that they're married. All you have is that god has never revealed himself to you. Maybe you aren't important enough.
|
|
j2
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@j2
Posts: 628
Likes: 149
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by j2 on Mar 31, 2017 17:32:31 GMT
I wish you'd put that on a bumper sticker on your car so everyone would know which one of us is the childish idiot. Thanks for the sentiment, but I'm happy with my Darwin fish. Yes, but YOU don't have evidence of it. You like to claim you do, but your total inability to produce any demonstrated that you're a damn liar. Those words are not reliable and they have at least one statement which cannot be proven easily (if at any rate at all).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2017 17:45:47 GMT
You still aren't understanding that simply because I won't show you something does not mean that I can't know it. Excuses excuses... In fact, I have 100% certain proof that you are lying. I won't show it to you, of course. You're not important enough. But I definitely have it.
|
|
vernuf
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@vernuf
Posts: 310
Likes: 34
|
Post by vernuf on Mar 31, 2017 18:30:25 GMT
Yes, but YOU don't have evidence of it. You like to claim you do, but your total inability to produce any demonstrated that you're a damn liar. You still aren't understanding that simply because I won't show you something does not mean that I can't know it. Do you believe that any of your married friends have sex? I'm certain they never showed you, or I hope they never showed you. Yet you believe they have sex based on the evidence that they're married. All you have is that god has never revealed himself to you. Maybe you aren't important enough. wea·sel words noun words or statements that are intentionally ambiguous or misleading.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2017 18:42:21 GMT
Those words are not reliable and they have at least one statement which cannot be proven easily (if at any rate at all). But I can prove it. I have complete and total proof that Arlon has no proof. It's a certainty.
|
|
j2
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@j2
Posts: 628
Likes: 149
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by j2 on Mar 31, 2017 19:34:33 GMT
Those words are not reliable and they have at least one statement which cannot be proven easily (if at any rate at all). But I can prove it. I have complete and total proof that Arlon has no proof. It's a certainty. Well, then in that case the words and the statement I mentioned would prove true. I'd like to see that proof you have.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2017 19:48:03 GMT
But I can prove it. I have complete and total proof that Arlon has no proof. It's a certainty. Well, then in that case the words and the statement I mentioned prove true. I'd like to see that proof you have. I'm sure you would, but just as Arlon isn't required to provide his proof, I see no reason why I am required to show mine. But of course, this in no way shows that I don't have the proof. Right?
|
|
j2
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@j2
Posts: 628
Likes: 149
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by j2 on Mar 31, 2017 20:34:10 GMT
Well, then in that case the words and the statement I mentioned prove true. I'd like to see that proof you have. I'm sure you would, but just as Arlon isn't required to provide his proof, I see no reason why I am required to show mine. But of course, this in no way shows that I don't have the proof. Right? That's right. And that is why your words remain unreliable and at least one statement in those words remains very hard to prove, if it can be proven at all. So you are the one in the false or in weakness with your words, not necessarily Arlon10.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2017 20:41:12 GMT
But my words aren't unreliable. I told you, I have proof.
|
|
j2
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@j2
Posts: 628
Likes: 149
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by j2 on Mar 31, 2017 21:07:08 GMT
But my words aren't unreliable. I told you, I have proof. Regardless of what you say, it is as it is. Your words are unreliable because you affirm something about Arlon10 which you have no way of knowing for sure, and at least one statement you made with those words is very hard to prove. As far as those words of yours are concerned, you are the one in the false or in a very weak position at best. Your words once again:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2017 21:30:41 GMT
But I don't understand. Again you say affirm something about Arlon10 which I have no way of knowing for sure. But I keep tellin gyou that I DO know for sure, I have the proof.
It makes no sense to say that a person who has proof is unreliable because he can't have proof. You're talking nonsense.
"Yes, but YOU don't have evidence of it. You like to claim you do, but your total inability to produce any demonstrated that you're a damn liar."
Indeed, but like I said subsequently, now I have PROOF that he's lying.
I know you will not challenge this, as you did not challenge Arlon's claim.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 31, 2017 21:45:25 GMT
But my words aren't unreliable. I told you, I have proof. Regardless of what you say, it is as it is. Your words are unreliable because you affirm something about Arlon10 which you have no way of knowing for sure, and at least one statement you made with those words is very hard to prove. As far as those words of yours are concerned, you are the one in the false or in a very weak position at best. Your words once again: Graham stuck his foot in his mouth for the umpteenth time. ![](http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e41/imdbv2/imdbsmileys/laugh.gif)
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Mar 31, 2017 22:00:01 GMT
You're making the same mistake I just corrected ArArArchStanton for. Simply because you have no evidence does not mean no one else can have any either. That's a very serious and obvious brain defect to think that way. Please seek professional help. Actually I agree with that, so you didn't correct me.
The problem I've corrected you on, is that you don't have any evidence.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2017 22:04:02 GMT
Regardless of what you say, it is as it is. Your words are unreliable because you affirm something about Arlon10 which you have no way of knowing for sure, and at least one statement you made with those words is very hard to prove. As far as those words of yours are concerned, you are the one in the false or in a very weak position at best. Your words once again: Graham stuck his foot in his mouth for the umpteenth time. ![](http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e41/imdbv2/imdbsmileys/laugh.gif) I suppose a person as oblivious to truth and reality as you are would believe that. ![](http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e41/imdbv2/imdbsmileys/laugh.gif)
|
|
j2
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@j2
Posts: 628
Likes: 149
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by j2 on Mar 31, 2017 22:58:02 GMT
But I don't understand. Again you say affirm something about Arlon10 which I have no way of knowing for sure. But I keep tellin gyou that I DO know for sure, I have the proof. It makes no sense to say that a person who has proof is unreliable because he can't have proof. Just for clarity, keep in mind I don't say you're unreliable; just those words you said. And I did not say what you say now, by the way. Actually, you are now, because these (new words now) are your words, not mine. I already "challenged" it and told you I'd like to see such proof. Since you say you do have the proof but don't (want to) show it, then what I said about your words must stand. Keep in mind this is a mental exercise just for fun. I have no 'debate' with you or with Arlon10. From what you say, I see what you believe and I think I see Arlon10's position. Cheers.
|
|
zoilus
Junior Member
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@zoilus
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 1,683
|
Post by zoilus on Apr 1, 2017 0:27:31 GMT
How does that site prove anything? Is it official in some way? Do they represent all atheists? Does the owner of that site understand atheism better than others?
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Apr 1, 2017 1:11:39 GMT
Graham stuck his foot in his mouth for the umpteenth time. ![](http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e41/imdbv2/imdbsmileys/laugh.gif) I suppose a person as oblivious to truth and reality as you are would believe that. ![](http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e41/imdbv2/imdbsmileys/laugh.gif) You believe I'm lying. I believe you're lying. That is all. You're entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts. You have a total of three brain defects. One is that the "god" most people experience is not a concrete, physical object that anyone can "show" you. Your expectation is obviously for something even people who cannot grasp abstract concepts can "see." The brain defect in that case is not understanding abstract ideas. Another brain defect of yours is considering your point of view and beliefs as other than your own beliefs like they were "facts" until you decide otherwise. You believe that what are "facts" to you must be facts to everyone else. Your third brain defect is not seeing the concrete, physical proof of an intelligent designer which is not necessarily proof of a particular developed systematic approach to life known as a "religion."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2017 1:42:41 GMT
You believe I'm lying. I believe you're lying. That is all. You're entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts. You believe I'm lying? You're making the same mistake I just corrected j2 for. Simply because you have no evidence does not mean no one else can have any either. That's a very serious and obvious brain defect to think that way. Please seek professional help.
|
|