|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Oct 22, 2018 21:29:40 GMT
People had been breeding plants and animals for centuries before Darwin's theory. There is an example of breeding flocks in the Bible. See Jacob tending Laban's flocks. So no, the "nuts" would not be surprised at anything you have to say even if it happened. 1) Evolution cannot explain the origin of life itself. 2) No established religion takes everything in the Bible literally. 3) Science is inadequate to solve most issues in society. 4) The Earth is round. 1) IT isn't supposed to. 2) So? 3) Such as? 4) Not quite. So the OP is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Oct 22, 2018 22:17:21 GMT
1) IT isn't supposed to. 2) So? 3) Such as? 4) Not quite. So the OP is ridiculous. Well, I agree, but why do you think your list proves it?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Oct 23, 2018 8:50:50 GMT
… and yet the science and facts of global warming is accepted everywhere that factual evidence counts except perhaps conspiracy theory videos on YouTube, alarmist opinion piece in junk web sites, and Conservative politics which is led by the nose by big business in the form of the coal and oil industries. ( ie fossil fuel producers) You should once again be embarrassed however you are not alone with Trump and other uber-Capitalists beside you in your error. I guess it doesn't matter to you as you are childless For the rest of us, we actually care about the world we are creating for those to follow us. It's not accepted me and many others. We see it for the con game that it is. Speaking of Trump, what do you think of his attack on Syria? I was very much opposed to it. What do you think of his support for national ID cards? I am opposed to that as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2018 10:47:48 GMT
Let's say we are still around and alive for the next natural, physical change that happens to our bodies. We will probably have pictorial evidence of what we look like now. So will the creationist nuts finally accept evolution or will they somehow say that God did it? No evidence could make a creationist nut accept evolution.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rodney Farber on Oct 23, 2018 11:00:08 GMT
Let's say we are still around and alive for the next natural, physical change that happens to our bodies. We will probably have pictorial evidence of what we look like now. So will the creationist nuts finally accept evolution or will they somehow say that God did it? Perhaps you do not realize how sloooooooow evolution is. Every generation is the next natural, physical change. Do you have exactly the same DNA as either of your parents?
If you had a photograph of each ancestors going back some 50,000 generations, you would be unable to determine at what point the physical change occurred even though the oldest generation would probably not resemble you in any way.
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Oct 23, 2018 18:20:13 GMT
Let's say we are still around and alive for the next natural, physical change that happens to our bodies. We will probably have pictorial evidence of what we look like now. So will the creationist nuts finally accept evolution or will they somehow say that God did it? Perhaps you do not realize how sloooooooow evolution is. Every generation is the next natural, physical change. Do you have exactly the same DNA as either of your parents?
If you had a photograph of each ancestors going back some 50,000 generations, you would be unable to determine at what point the physical change occurred even though the oldest generation would probably not resemble you in any way.
That's been the common cop out explanation, something to appease the ignorant masses, and when you're a naïve kid, you buy it, because it's told by the official establishment. But further research shows the lack of Science here. First, it's not objective. It's merely "wishful thinking" for those who want to explain it away easily. It's like seeing litter at a park, then waiting for someone to arrive afterwards and then blame that person for littering. It's just "convenience", not "science". You can go back 50,000 generations, but there's no scientific or logical rational by laws of Physics that explain a new species developing. There still has to be Magic involved. Much has been made by the official "experts' of organisms having geographic separation for generations, thus magically creating a new species that doesn't mate with the one on the other side of the ocean. Yet Europeans easily mate with Cherokee and Iroquois. Oops. Got to change the premise and make it "thousands of generation". That's "convenience". There's no credibility. It's just wishful thinking. In order to become a completely different species, the mutation becomes an organism that won't continue its line past another generation. So, the mutation has to have an identical twin. Except the identical twin is the same sex, by Nature. Evolutionists have tried to challenge this, and have sabotaged results of tests to fit their agenda. Why? Won't find the answer in the natural world.
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Oct 23, 2018 21:11:55 GMT
I don't … and yet the science and facts of global warming is accepted everywhere that factual evidence counts except perhaps conspiracy theory videos on YouTube, alarmist opinion piece in junk web sites, and Conservative politics which is led by the nose by big business in the form of the coal and oil industries. ( ie fossil fuel producers) You should once again be embarrassed however you are not alone with Trump and other uber-Capitalists beside you in your error. I guess it doesn't matter to you as you are childless For the rest of us, we actually care about the world we are creating for those to follow us. It's not accepted me and many others. We see it for the con game that it is.Speaking of Trump, what do you think of his attack on Syria? I was very much opposed to it. What do you think of his support for national ID cards? I am opposed to that as well. Of course you don't accept it. You are an ignorant ill educated moron who believes conspiracy theories! I don't approve of ANYTHING Trump does. - period- He too is another ignorant ill educated moron.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rodney Farber on Oct 24, 2018 16:10:34 GMT
Perhaps you do not realize how sloooooooow evolution is. Every generation is the next natural, physical change. Do you have exactly the same DNA as either of your parents? If you had a photograph of each ancestors going back some 50,000 generations, you would be unable to determine at what point the physical change occurred even though the oldest generation would probably not resemble you in any way.
That's been the common cop out explanation, something to appease the ignorant masses, and when you're a naïve kid, you buy it, because it's told by the official establishment. But further research shows the lack of Science here. First, it's not objective. It's merely "wishful thinking" for those who want to explain it away easily. It's like seeing litter at a park, then waiting for someone to arrive afterwards and then blame that person for littering. It's just "convenience", not "science". You can go back 50,000 generations, but there's no scientific or logical rational by laws of Physics that explain a new species developing. There still has to be Magic involved. ... It must be magic. The Bible has been preaching creation for thousands of years and along comes this whack-a-doodle, Charles Darwin, and, within a generation, bamboozles the entire scientific community that the 2500 year-old book of Bronze-age folklore got it wrong. Darwin and Galileo were just con men out to make a buck.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrellaguru on Oct 31, 2018 14:50:01 GMT
Let's say we are still around and alive for the next natural, physical change that happens to our bodies. We will probably have pictorial evidence of what we look like now. So will the creationist nuts finally accept evolution or will they somehow say that God did it?
They'll say that we're still humans so there has been no actual change in "kind" like a dog changing into a cat, so it doesn't count.
|
|