|
Post by hi224 on Mar 27, 2017 3:34:49 GMT
I say yay.
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Mar 27, 2017 3:52:19 GMT
Of course he did. Only amazingly dirt stupid morons would think otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 27, 2017 4:15:23 GMT
Prollyeah.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2017 6:43:13 GMT
I read a really good alternate theory. Nicole and her friend Ron were involved in some shady drug dealing situation. Ron worked as a busboy at the restaurant Nicole worked at (as a hostess). Ron got her into the drug scene to make some money but as is often the case, they smoked up the profits instead of selling it and giving a cut back to their supplier. The suppliers unfortunately for the unwitting Nicole were a Colombian cartel. This is why the murder scene resembled a Columbian necktie interrogation scene gone wrong more than a jealous husband crime of passion. Crime of passions usually start and end quickly in a flurry of emotion. Nicole and Ron were tortured for hours for information in a cold professional manner. Eventually the interrogators (yes plural not one person) murdered them out of frustration in a way South American cartels do it. The murder scene had multiple offenders not just one. OJ comes home. Sees the devastation, thinks he is next on their hitlist, freaks out and flees. Makes no sense for a jealous husband to flee from a scene of a crime which is in his own home. You have days to clean up the mess and remove the grisly remains. A third employee of the same restaurant was murdered in what looked like a professional hit around the same time. Two other employees have gone missing and another had their car set on fire. Probably not a coincidence.
|
|
inthepipe55
Sophomore
@inthepipe55
Posts: 374
Likes: 64
|
Post by inthepipe55 on Mar 27, 2017 11:46:49 GMT
I have to go with yes along with Casey Anthony. But one I'm not sure of is Amanda Knox.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Mar 27, 2017 19:18:54 GMT
I have to go with yes along with Casey Anthony. But one I'm not sure of is Amanda Knox. Amanda Knox is foolish but it's likely that the Italians muffed it up.
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Mar 27, 2017 22:27:27 GMT
Could be. I don't know. But his case - like those of Robert Blake and Michael Jackson - reveal a chilling fact about the justice system. Even though these three men were all found Not Guilty after lengthy trials and jail time (at least for Simpson and Blake), the assumption made by most people is that they are most certainly guilty. On the other hand, if a defendant is found guilty, the subject is considered to be closed.
It is disturbing how fragile is the assumption of innocence in our society. If a person is arrested, held in jail, indicted, and put on trial then that is almost always what is considered evidence of guilt even on those rare occasions that a person is found Not Guilty. Just the legal process convicts people.
Don't know whether or not Simpson, Blake, or Jackson are guilty but they were all cleared by a trial by jury. If you believe in the law and justice, then shouldn't this end any discussion of guilt or innocence?
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 27, 2017 22:34:30 GMT
Could be. I don't know. But his case - like those of Robert Blake and Michael Jackson - reveal a chilling fact about the justice system. Even though these three men were all found Not Guilty after lengthy trials and jail time (at least for Simpson and Blake), the assumption made by most people is that they are most certainly guilty. On the other hand, if a defendant is found guilty, the subject is considered to be closed. It is disturbing how fragile is the assumption of innocence in our society. If a person is arrested, held in jail, indicted, and put on trial then that is almost always what is considered evidence of guilt even on those rare occasions that a person is found Not Guilty. Just the legal process convicts people. Don't know whether or not Simpson, Blake, or Jackson are guilty but they were all cleared by a trial by jury. If you believe in the law and justice, then shouldn't this end any discussion of guilt or innocence?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2017 22:39:59 GMT
I believe it was OJ's son, Jason Simpson. All the evidence matches up. Jason Simpson was known to have a temper and a hatred of Nicole. He's had his own fair share of crimes on his rap sheet, as well. He certainly was capable of committing such a violent crime.
If you look at it that way, it makes sense. The DNA. Why the glove was in OJ's backyard. He was just doing what any father would do, covering for his son.
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Mar 27, 2017 22:50:27 GMT
I read a really good alternate theory. Nicole and her friend Ron were involved in some shady drug dealing situation. Ron worked as a busboy at the restaurant Nicole worked at (as a hostess). Ron got her into the drug scene to make some money but as is often the case, they smoked up the profits instead of selling it and giving a cut back to their supplier. The suppliers unfortunately for the unwitting Nicole were a Colombian cartel. This is why the murder scene resembled a Columbian necktie interrogation scene gone wrong more than a jealous husband crime of passion. Crime of passions usually start and end quickly in a flurry of emotion. Nicole and Ron were tortured for hours for information in a cold professional manner. Eventually the interrogators (yes plural not one person) murdered them out of frustration in a way South American cartels do it. The murder scene had multiple offenders not just one. OJ comes home. Sees the devastation, thinks he is next on their hitlist, freaks out and flees. Makes no sense for a jealous husband to flee from a scene of a crime which is in his own home. You have days to clean up the mess and remove the grisly remains. A third employee of the same restaurant was murdered in what looked like a professional hit around the same time. Two other employees have gone missing and another had their car set on fire. Probably not a coincidence. DNA? OJ with gun to his head? OJ's confession to numerous friends and others that he killed her? Come on Takeshi you can't possibly believe that nonsense you just posted. None of that even matches the timeline of the murders. You might as well suggest a werewolf killed them. That would be more believable.
A jury of bigots bullied the few honest jurors into letting a vicious women beating piece of shit go free.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2017 22:59:23 GMT
I believe it was OJ's son, Jason Simpson. All the evidence matches up. Jason Simpson was known to have a temper and a hatred of Nicole. He's had his own fair share of crimes on his rap sheet, as well. He certainly was capable of committing such a violent crime. If you look at it that way, it makes sense. The DNA. Why the glove was in OJ's backyard. He was just doing what any father would do, covering for his son. I agree,but he probably did i for OJ so they both were involved and guilty of murder.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 2:14:02 GMT
I read a really good alternate theory. Nicole and her friend Ron were involved in some shady drug dealing situation. Ron worked as a busboy at the restaurant Nicole worked at (as a hostess). Ron got her into the drug scene to make some money but as is often the case, they smoked up the profits instead of selling it and giving a cut back to their supplier. The suppliers unfortunately for the unwitting Nicole were a Colombian cartel. This is why the murder scene resembled a Columbian necktie interrogation scene gone wrong more than a jealous husband crime of passion. Crime of passions usually start and end quickly in a flurry of emotion. Nicole and Ron were tortured for hours for information in a cold professional manner. Eventually the interrogators (yes plural not one person) murdered them out of frustration in a way South American cartels do it. The murder scene had multiple offenders not just one. OJ comes home. Sees the devastation, thinks he is next on their hitlist, freaks out and flees. Makes no sense for a jealous husband to flee from a scene of a crime which is in his own home. You have days to clean up the mess and remove the grisly remains. A third employee of the same restaurant was murdered in what looked like a professional hit around the same time. Two other employees have gone missing and another had their car set on fire. Probably not a coincidence. DNA? OJ with gun to his head? OJ's confession to numerous friends and others that he killed her? Come on Takeshi you can't possibly believe that nonsense you just posted. None of that even matches the timeline of the murders. You might as well suggest a werewolf killed them. That would be more believable.
A jury of bigots bullied the few honest jurors into letting a vicious women beating piece of shit go free.
"DNA?" You think its strange they'd find OJ's dna in his own home? "OJ with gun to his head?" Irrelevant. "Come on Takeshi you can't possibly believe that nonsense you just posted." When did I say that I did? "None of that even matches the timeline of the murders." Prove it. "A jury of bigots bullied the few honest jurors into letting a vicious women beating piece of shit go free." You sound a little biased there. Don't you feel at least a little hypocritical judging others as being biased?
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Mar 28, 2017 5:47:42 GMT
DNA? OJ with gun to his head? OJ's confession to numerous friends and others that he killed her? Come on Takeshi you can't possibly believe that nonsense you just posted. None of that even matches the timeline of the murders. You might as well suggest a werewolf killed them. That would be more believable.
A jury of bigots bullied the few honest jurors into letting a vicious women beating piece of shit go free.
"DNA?" You think its strange they'd find OJ's dna in his own home? "OJ with gun to his head?" Irrelevant. "Come on Takeshi you can't possibly believe that nonsense you just posted." When did I say that I did? "None of that even matches the timeline of the murders." Prove it. " A jury of bigots bullied the few honest jurors into letting a vicious women beating piece of shit go free." You sound a little biased there. Don't you feel at least a little hypocritical judging others as being biased? The blood of both victims were found on the gloves found at his house as well as OJ's dna. Am I biased against low life garbage men that viciously beat women on numerous occasions? Gosh I guess I am. Do I feel hypocritical judging anyone that would ignore overwhelming evidence just because the accused is the same skin color as they are? Not at all. I don't think anyone gets a free pass for being bigoted. I'm not black or white but if OJ was green and a jury made up mainly of green folks ignored evidence I would call them bigots too.
I do respect your right to voice your opinion of course. I just don't happen to agree with you on this subject.
|
|
maryjane541
Sophomore
@maryjane541
Posts: 161
Likes: 104
|
Post by maryjane541 on Mar 28, 2017 6:20:02 GMT
I believe he did. He got away with it because his lawyers were able to make the majority of the jurors believe the evidence was planted. Once it came out that one of the first investigators on the scene was racist he won.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 6:50:10 GMT
"DNA?" You think its strange they'd find OJ's dna in his own home? "OJ with gun to his head?" Irrelevant. "Come on Takeshi you can't possibly believe that nonsense you just posted." When did I say that I did? "None of that even matches the timeline of the murders." Prove it. " A jury of bigots bullied the few honest jurors into letting a vicious women beating piece of shit go free." You sound a little biased there. Don't you feel at least a little hypocritical judging others as being biased? The blood of both victims were found on the gloves found at his house as well as OJ's dna. Am I biased against low life garbage men that viciously beat women on numerous occasions? Gosh I guess I am. Do I feel hypocritical judging anyone that would ignore overwhelming evidence just because the accused is the same skin color as they are? Not at all. I don't think anyone gets a free pass for being bigoted. I'm not black or white but if OJ was green and a jury made up mainly of green folks ignored evidence I would call them bigots too.
I do respect your right to voice your opinion of course. I just don't happen to agree with you on this subject.
"if OJ was green and a jury made up mainly of green folks ignored evidence I would call them bigots too." You do realize that^ is a bigoted statement, right?
|
|
|
Post by yezziqa on Mar 28, 2017 6:52:01 GMT
Definitely. The only reason he got off, is because of the american jury system, where anyone can be a jury member, even how stupid or uneducated they are.
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Mar 28, 2017 8:29:23 GMT
Definitely. The only reason he got off, is because of the american jury system, where anyone can be a jury member, even how stupid or uneducated they are. Speaking of bigots. This chick is a textbook example.
|
|
|
Post by yezziqa on Mar 28, 2017 8:36:20 GMT
Definitely. The only reason he got off, is because of the american jury system, where anyone can be a jury member, even how stupid or uneducated they are. Speaking of bigots. This chick is a textbook example. Sweetie, being smart and educated is not a a synonym for bigot. *patting your head* You seem to be unaware that there is more effective ways than the jury system. Time to learn something about the world perhaps?
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Mar 28, 2017 9:31:46 GMT
Speaking of bigots. This chick is a textbook example. Sweetie, being smart and educated is not a a synonym for bigot. *patting your head* You seem to be unaware that there is more effective ways than the jury system. Time to learn something about the world perhaps? Every post you make is either pathetic vitriol or self aggrandizing nonsense that is only impressive to yourself. You're obviously a very sad angry person that tries to hide her insecurities and loneliness with lies and failed attempts at mean spirited insults. It's odd that a person as smart and educated as yourself fails to see how transparent you are when everyone else can.
Perhaps your trite act seems fresh in whatever backwater village you exist in but I doubt it. That's your cue to make what you think is a really biting comment and then pat yourself on the back. Too bad there's never anyone else around to pat it for you because you're in desperate need of a hug. Maybe this will help.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 28, 2017 12:43:34 GMT
"DNA?" You think its strange they'd find OJ's dna in his own home? "OJ with gun to his head?" Irrelevant. "Come on Takeshi you can't possibly believe that nonsense you just posted." When did I say that I did? "None of that even matches the timeline of the murders." Prove it. " A jury of bigots bullied the few honest jurors into letting a vicious women beating piece of shit go free." You sound a little biased there. Don't you feel at least a little hypocritical judging others as being biased? The blood of both victims were found on the gloves found at his house as well as OJ's dna. Am I biased against low life garbage men that viciously beat women on numerous occasions? Gosh I guess I am.
"He's going to kill me and he's going to get away with it." Nicole Brown Simpson
|
|