Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2017 13:31:56 GMT
I wasn't even involved in any debate. He sort of started on me. He also started with the name calling and shouting, or bold font to indicate shouting. I replied. I'm not even going to try to figure out why he's so angry with anyone who believes OJ is innocent. I couldn't care less if people carry a grudge about it all.
I would NOT want him to PM me. That's not entirely accurate. I made a statement about factors that show OJ Simpson is guilty. Then you responded by trying to deconstruct my points. It went back and forth. Then I said that your mobster theory sounds "tin foil hat", a descriptive or slang term for conspiracy theory. There was no insult or anger inferred. You responded by getting highly upset that I suggested it could be conspiracy theory and told me to "F*** off!" amongst other insults. That's where the exchange of insults started. Go back over the thread very carefully. You will see that that's what happened. Post edit: Bold font doesn't necessarily indicate shouting. In fact it's usually used for point emphasis. I never use bold font to imply shouting personally. I always use it to emphasize the most important, vital points in my post. Especially when I feel it offers indisputable proof to my point. If you thought that was supposed to indicate shouting, that was definitely a misunderstanding. Stop trying to justify insulting me. You insulted me and my reply was appropriate. You then got even more huffed up. Calling someone a tin foil hat marked especially in bold is an insult, so you go up-thread and see for yourself. That term is meant to be taken as an insult. It's derogatory, meant to silence your opponent by creating a fear in someone that they may be not be seeing something clearly. But I know what I saw, clear now as it was then, I might add. Furthermore it was completely wrong of you since the term implies that I am following someone's made up theories. That is simply not the case with me! |
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on May 13, 2017 13:57:06 GMT
Okay. Fair enough. The tone of the thread does stink. I'm dropping out of this thread after this post... If you can't sense your own frustration and anger in your posts and even the admin did, no point at pointing a finger at Sleepy for hers. There are 3 pointing right back at your own. Â Like I said, the insults started with @sleepinsleepyhollow. I never claimed I wasn't guilty of insults. If you look back over the thread you will see that's the truth. We are both guilty of words that are harsh insults. Yet you only see fit to reprimand me about it. When you demonstrate that you're not biased against me and in favor of her, then I'll consider apologizing. But not until then. Why should I? (Admin also said something to her also if you look back over the thread). |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2017 14:22:29 GMT
Wow. So as long as everyone else dismisses me and feels the same hatred for me as you do, you'll apologize to them. Also my reply was to an insult. On my behalf it wasn't even an insult. Telling someone to fuck off isn't calling them any names. I was done after you broke out the tin foil. I was mocking you thereafter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on May 13, 2017 14:24:26 GMT
That's not entirely accurate. I made a statement about factors that show OJ Simpson is guilty. Then you responded by trying to deconstruct my points. It went back and forth. Then I said that your mobster theory sounds "tin foil hat", a descriptive or slang term for conspiracy theory. There was no insult or anger inferred. You responded by getting highly upset that I suggested it could be conspiracy theory and told me to "F*** off!" amongst other insults. That's where the exchange of insults started. Go back over the thread very carefully. You will see that that's what happened. Post edit: Bold font doesn't necessarily indicate shouting. In fact it's usually used for point emphasis. I never use bold font to imply shouting personally. I always use it to emphasize the most important, vital points in my post. Especially when I feel it offers indisputable proof to my point. If you thought that was supposed to indicate shouting, that was definitely a misunderstanding. Stop trying to justify insulting me. You insulted me and my reply was appropriate. You then got even more huffed up. Calling someone a tin foil hat marked especially in bold is an insult, so you go up-thread and see for yourself. That term is meant to be taken as an insult. It's derogatory, meant to silence your opponent by creating a fear in someone that they may be not be seeing something clearly. But I know what I saw, clear now as it was then, I might add. Furthermore it was completely wrong of you since the term implies that I am following someone's made up theories. That is simply not the case with me! Nope, I at the end of the statement was "...tin foil hat." in bold. In other words I was saying the theory is tin foil hat. And the bold was to draw attention to what the theory seems like. It doesn't say "you're a tin foil hat". You should educate yourself on message boards writing etiquette. The only thing that is considered shouting is writing in all caps. You took the statement the wrong way. You are welcome to believe what you want. You already have proven that you believe your opinions as facts rather what actually happens or anything else anyone says. You are a very unreasonable person. You keep claiming some dream you had is a fact. No judge, lawyer, psychiatrist or psychologist would interpret a dream as facts. No rational person would. The fact that the very second I implied that your theory dream is just a conspiracy theory you told me to "F*** off!" You and your friend who is following you around by the nose now can claim and view it however you want. The facts are all their because the written evidence of the posts are there showing exactly what specific words were used and who started the profanity. I'm done anyway. You've proven that you believe in the imagination of your dreams over any reality of facts and evidence. The only thing you've been doing is claiming everything else should be questioned, not trusted, or disbelieved because it doesn't harmonize with the imaginings of your dream. Nothing personal, take it as an insult or not but, I'm not wasting any more time with a person who has proven themselves to be clinically irrational. You can go back to convincing your friend that your imagination is factual evidence stronger than anything that's occurred in reality.... 👋 |
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on May 13, 2017 14:27:14 GMT
Wow. So as long as everyone else dismisses me and feels the same hatred for me as you do, you'll apologize to them. Also my reply was to an insult. On my behalf it wasn't even an insult. Telling someone to fuck off isn't calling them any names. I was done after you broke out the tin foil. I was mocking you thereafter. So saying the words "tin foil hat" in bold is an insult, but telling someone to "f*** off" isn't?... Guess which one is a message board violation. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2017 14:39:02 GMT
Stop trying to justify insulting me. You insulted me and my reply was appropriate. You then got even more huffed up. Calling someone a tin foil hat marked especially in bold is an insult, so you go up-thread and see for yourself. That term is meant to be taken as an insult. It's derogatory, meant to silence your opponent by creating a fear in someone that they may be not be seeing something clearly. But I know what I saw, clear now as it was then, I might add. Furthermore it was completely wrong of you since the term implies that I am following someone's made up theories. That is simply not the case with me! Nope, I at the end of the statement was "...tin foil hat." in bold. In other words I was saying the theory is tin foil hat. And the bold was to draw attention to what the theory seems like. It doesn't say "you're a tin foil hat". You should educate yourself on message boards writing etiquette. The only thing that is considered shouting is writing in all caps. You took the statement the wrong way. You are welcome to believe what you want. You already have proven that you believe your opinions as facts rather what actually happens or anything else anyone says. You are a very unreasonable person. You keep claiming some dream you had is a fact. No judge, lawyer, psychiatrist or psychologist would interpret a dream as facts. No rational person would. The fact that the very second I implied that your theory dream is just a conspiracy theory you told me to "F*** off!" You and your friend who is following you around by the nose now can claim and view it however you want. The facts are all their because the written evidence of the posts are there showing exactly what specific words were used and who started the profanity. I'm done anyway. You've proven that you believe in the imagination of your dreams over any reality of facts and evidence. The only thing you've been doing is claiming everything else should be questioned, not trusted, or disbelieved because it doesn't harmonize with the imaginings of your dream. Nothing personal, take it as an insult or not but, I'm not wasting any more time with a person who has proven themselves to be clinically irrational. You can go back to convincing your friend that your imagination is factual evidence stronger than anything that's occurred in reality.... 👋 Reality and facts are not what you're playing by. I know my own reality and you parrot other people's opinions and lynch mob mentality as reality. Just stop. You're not making any ground here. Imagination? No, shit layer hat, you keep confusing something random with something of my own design. Really you need to get some help with your head. I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. That's your pitfall of your thinking right there! In your box you sit with no perception of an outside that box. TC has already spoken of what he thinks, which is he will not condemn OJ. You have. Why try to make me be what steers TC's thoughts? I never tried. That's the difference, I don't need anyone else's permission to know and think for myself. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2017 14:41:16 GMT
Wow. So as long as everyone else dismisses me and feels the same hatred for me as you do, you'll apologize to them. Also my reply was to an insult. On my behalf it wasn't even an insult. Telling someone to fuck off isn't calling them any names. I was done after you broke out the tin foil. I was mocking you thereafter. So saying the words "tin foil hat" in bold is an insult, but telling someone to "f*** off" isn't?... Guess which one is a message board violation. Saying the word "fuck" is not a violation. Saying to someone " tin foil hat" is an insult. It was meant to be taken as a "fuck you" as the term is derogatory. I simply responded in kind. |
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on May 13, 2017 14:53:01 GMT
Nope, I at the end of the statement was "...tin foil hat." in bold. In other words I was saying the theory is tin foil hat. And the bold was to draw attention to what the theory seems like. It doesn't say "you're a tin foil hat". You should educate yourself on message boards writing etiquette. The only thing that is considered shouting is writing in all caps. You took the statement the wrong way. You are welcome to believe what you want. You already have proven that you believe your opinions as facts rather what actually happens or anything else anyone says. You are a very unreasonable person. You keep claiming some dream you had is a fact. No judge, lawyer, psychiatrist or psychologist would interpret a dream as facts. No rational person would. The fact that the very second I implied that your theory dream is just a conspiracy theory you told me to "F*** off!" You and your friend who is following you around by the nose now can claim and view it however you want. The facts are all their because the written evidence of the posts are there showing exactly what specific words were used and who started the profanity. I'm done anyway. You've proven that you believe in the imagination of your dreams over any reality of facts and evidence. The only thing you've been doing is claiming everything else should be questioned, not trusted, or disbelieved because it doesn't harmonize with the imaginings of your dream. Nothing personal, take it as an insult or not but, I'm not wasting any more time with a person who has proven themselves to be clinically irrational. You can go back to convincing your friend that your imagination is factual evidence stronger than anything that's occurred in reality.... 👋 Reality and facts are not what you're playing by. I know my own reality and you parrot other people's opinions and lynch mob mentality as reality. Just stop. You're not making any ground here. Imagination? No, shit layer hat, you keep confusing something random with something of my own design. Really you need to get some help with your head. I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. That's your pitfall of your thinking right there! In your box you sit with no perception of an outside that box. TC has already spoken of what he thinks, which is he will not condemn OJ. You have. Why try to make me be what steers TC's thoughts? I never tried. That's the difference, I don't need anyone else's permission to know and think for myself. No... you choose to perceive it as such. I've stated court testimony, evidence, and forensic/autopsy facts. If you choose to view it as parroting mob mentality and corrupt media, that is your choice (not the only logical conclusion). There's no need for me to say anymore because what I just said sums up the problem... your chosen perception. You would do well to continue to discuss this with Toasted Cheese because it's well established that you will keep repeating the same things and choosing the same perception no matter what's said or factually presented. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2017 15:02:30 GMT
Reality and facts are not what you're playing by. I know my own reality and you parrot other people's opinions and lynch mob mentality as reality. Just stop. You're not making any ground here. Imagination? No, shit layer hat, you keep confusing something random with something of my own design. Really you need to get some help with your head. I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. That's your pitfall of your thinking right there! In your box you sit with no perception of an outside that box. TC has already spoken of what he thinks, which is he will not condemn OJ. You have. Why try to make me be what steers TC's thoughts? I never tried. That's the difference, I don't need anyone else's permission to know and think for myself. No... you choose to perceive it as such. I've stated court testimony, evidence, and forensic/autopsy facts. If you choose to view it as parroting mob mentality and corrupt media, that is your choice (not the only logical conclusion). There's no need for me to say anymore because what I just said sums up the problem... your chosen perception. You would do well to continue to discuss this with Toasted Cheese because it's well established that you will keep repeating the same things and choosing the same perception no matter what's said or factually presented. Still you present no facts. OJ was found not guilty. That is a fact. Another fact...I saw this happen and OJ wasn't even a factor in the unfolding of the event I saw. I could pick the two killers out of a line-up. That is reality as I know it and there's nothing wrong with my eyes. My sleep patterns. Nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on May 13, 2017 15:30:50 GMT
So saying the words "tin foil hat" in bold is an insult, but telling someone to "f*** off" isn't?... Guess which one is a message board violation. Saying the word "fuck" is not a violation. Saying to someone " tin foil hat" is an insult. It was meant to be taken as a "fuck you" as the term is derogatory. I simply responded in kind. So you have mind reading powers now? You're going to tell me, the person who thought it, created it, and wrote it what the intent was?.... 😂 This is exactly what I'm talking about. Your only truths, facts, and reality is your imagination and personal perception... That's the sign of an unreasonable person: someone who chooses not accept anything beyond their imagination, personal perception, or opinion (no matter how grounded in fact or evidence it is). |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2017 17:28:29 GMT
Saying the word "fuck" is not a violation. Saying to someone " tin foil hat" is an insult. It was meant to be taken as a "fuck you" as the term is derogatory. I simply responded in kind. So you have mind reading powers now? You're going to tell me, the person who thought it, created it, and wrote it what the intent was?.... 😂 This is exactly what I'm talking about. Your only truths, facts, and reality is your imagination and personal perception... That's the sign of an unreasonable person: someone who chooses not accept anything beyond their imagination, personal perception, or opinion (no matter how grounded in fact or evidence it is). All you are doing and continue to do is sling mud at me. It's an insult. There is no other way to take the term other than an insult! You just want to keep calling me names and telling me off. You have NO facts while you harass me with your opinion about me. I clearly bother you but you keep pounding away with your name calling. To what end? To have the last word, of course! If anything - YOU are the tin foil hat. As the term "tin foil hat" has become associated with paranoia and conspiracy theories like the ones you've posted regarding OJ. |
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on May 13, 2017 18:43:51 GMT
So you have mind reading powers now? You're going to tell me, the person who thought it, created it, and wrote it what the intent was?.... 😂 This is exactly what I'm talking about. Your only truths, facts, and reality is your imagination and personal perception... That's the sign of an unreasonable person: someone who chooses not accept anything beyond their imagination, personal perception, or opinion (no matter how grounded in fact or evidence it is). All you are doing and continue to do is sling mud at me. It's an insult. There is no other way to take the term other than an insult! You just want to keep calling me names and telling me off. You have NO facts while you harass me with your opinion about me. I clearly bother you but you keep pounding away with your name calling. To what end? To have the last word, of course! If anything - YOU are the tin foil hat. As the term "tin foil hat" has become associated with paranoia and conspiracy theories like the ones you've posted regarding OJ. I have had bloggers accuse me of following a tin foil hat theory. I didn't snap at them or cuss them out for their opinion. And you are the first person I've had to be so easily offended for the use of the term and respond with profanity and personal insults. Take that for what you will. Obviously nothing is going to come of this but misunderstanding, finger-pointing, and disagreement. Feel free to continue to throw blame at me and finger-point if it makes you feel like I was the sole guilty party and you are the noble victim. Feel free to rehash your argument and frame it as if you are totally right and I'm totally wrong. I'm so over it already. I won't be responding anymore. 👋😶 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2017 19:52:21 GMT
All you are doing and continue to do is sling mud at me. It's an insult. There is no other way to take the term other than an insult! You just want to keep calling me names and telling me off. You have NO facts while you harass me with your opinion about me. I clearly bother you but you keep pounding away with your name calling. To what end? To have the last word, of course! If anything - YOU are the tin foil hat. As the term "tin foil hat" has become associated with paranoia and conspiracy theories like the ones you've posted regarding OJ. I have had bloggers accuse me of following a tin foil hat theory. I didn't snap at them or cuss them out for their opinion. And you are the first person I've had to be so easily offended for the use of the term and respond with profanity and personal insults. Take that for what you will. Obviously nothing is going to come of this but misunderstanding, finger-pointing, and disagreement. Feel free to continue to throw blame at me and finger-point if it makes you feel like I was the sole guilty party and you are the noble victim. Feel free to rehash your argument and frame it as if you are totally right and I'm totally wrong. I'm so over it already. I won't be responding anymore. 👋😶 , You and I know you know what you're talking about. If someone wants to think they know what happened, let them. There's no changing someone else's mind. We know the truth and that's all that matters. Simpson is where he belongs and I'm glad for that, the lard ass |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2017 19:57:40 GMT
You suck at this. I can't even make heads or tails of that mess you post. You can't use the functions, the garble is just you throwing insults again. You have not proven a thing except how unhinged you are. I sure hope you're not a lawyer because facts allude you and seeing reports that you like to put your own twist on is just as laughable. You're so desperate on your paper balcony. You put a lot of effort into your witch hunt, and anyone that crashes your party gets this treatment. Please realize that nothing you say will convince me. But you carry on and on and on. If someone won't believe your BS, yeah they have it coming alright! You sure showed us! Once again, they were grabbed from behind. They were held while the knifes came out. And there were two of them. It's so funny that while Nicole was being killed that Ron just waited for his turn if OJ was the killer. Funny that. Yeah. You suck at this. You suck entirely. Actually, Ron walked up when Nicole was getting killed and tried to help her and ended up getting murdered. He was a good guy returning her mom's glasses and was at the wrong place at the wrong time |
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on May 13, 2017 21:42:57 GMT
I have had bloggers accuse me of following a tin foil hat theory. I didn't snap at them or cuss them out for their opinion. And you are the first person I've had to be so easily offended for the use of the term and respond with profanity and personal insults. Take that for what you will. Obviously nothing is going to come of this but misunderstanding, finger-pointing, and disagreement. Feel free to continue to throw blame at me and finger-point if it makes you feel like I was the sole guilty party and you are the noble victim. Feel free to rehash your argument and frame it as if you are totally right and I'm totally wrong. I'm so over it already. I won't be responding anymore. 👋😶 , You and I know you know what you're talking about. If someone wants to think they know what happened, let them. There's no changing someone else's mind. We know the truth and that's all that matters. Simpson is where he belongs and I'm glad for that, the lard ass Totally agreed!... I was sorry to see you go through those condescending responses from @sleepinsleepyhollow where she talked to you like you were a naive, gullible idiot about everything you said and presented concerning the OJ case. That's one of the reasons I probably got a little carried away with the insults. It's ironic that she got so easily offended when I accused her dream of being a conspiracy theory, then she felt so entitled to talk to you with such condescending disrespect! Anyway, you're right. We both know OJ is guilty and it's not worth continuing with @sleepinsleepyhollow anymore. I'm not going to respond to her anymore. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2017 22:15:46 GMT
Thank you, Waxer-n-boil, I appreciate your support. You and I are on the same wavelength and we don't have our head in the clouds. There is plenty of evidence that shows Simpson's guilt and being the type of spoiled, entitled, narcissistic person that he is, it's not a reach to think he's capable of doing what he did. Especially considering how he abused and belittled the mother of his children. It was only a matter of time and that's what Nicole feared |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 13, 2017 22:40:36 GMT
If you can't sense your own frustration and anger in your posts and even the admin did, no point at pointing a finger at Sleepy for hers. There are 3 pointing right back at your own. Like I said, the insults started with @sleepinsleepyhollow . I never claimed I wasn't guilty of insults. If you look back over the thread you will see that's the truth. We are both guilty of words that are harsh insults. Yet you only see fit to reprimand me about it. When you demonstrate that you're not biased against me and in favor of her, then I'll consider apologizing. But not until then. Why should I? (Admin also said something to her also if you look back over the thread). I am not interested, nor do I care in you apologizing to me. I have barely even engaged you personally in this thread over any of your points and claims made. Admin only said something to Sleepy when she made a direct response to him, in her own defense. Admin picked you right out, off the bat. I can't speak for the admin, but perhaps you pushed a few of his buttons as well over your tone and manner of posts. Hey, I can get firery and aggressive at times in some of my posts, but you got called out on it, and something you perhaps need to humble yourself into. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2017 22:49:20 GMT
Like I said, the insults started with @sleepinsleepyhollow . I never claimed I wasn't guilty of insults. If you look back over the thread you will see that's the truth. We are both guilty of words that are harsh insults. Yet you only see fit to reprimand me about it. When you demonstrate that you're not biased against me and in favor of her, then I'll consider apologizing. But not until then. Why should I? (Admin also said something to her also if you look back over the thread). I am not interested, nor do I care in you apologizing to me. I have barely even engaged you personally in this thread over any of your points and claims made. Admin only said something to Sleepy when she made a direct response to him, in her own defense. Admin picked you right out, off the bat. I can't speak for the admin, but perhaps you pushed a few of his buttons as well over your tone and manner of posts. Hey, I can get firery and aggressive at times in some of my posts, but you got called out on it, and something you perhaps need to humble yourself into. No, not you, you Rascal! |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 13, 2017 22:57:22 GMT
I am not interested, nor do I care in you apologizing to me. I have barely even engaged you personally in this thread over any of your points and claims made. Admin only said something to Sleepy when she made a direct response to him, in her own defense. Admin picked you right out, off the bat. I can't speak for the admin, but perhaps you pushed a few of his buttons as well over your tone and manner of posts. Hey, I can get firery and aggressive at times in some of my posts, but you got called out on it, and something you perhaps need to humble yourself into. No, not you, you Rascal! Never! I am an angel and as good as gold me.   |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2017 23:03:18 GMT
Never! I am an angel and as good as gold me. Yes, I knew that |
|
