|
|
Post by kuatorises on Mar 28, 2017 12:58:31 GMT
Definitely. The only reason he got off, is because of the american jury system, where anyone can be a jury member, even how stupid or uneducated they are.Is this different from any other country? I'm not saying it's not stupid, I just don't think it's simply an American thing. |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Mar 28, 2017 13:01:34 GMT
Sweetie, being smart and educated is not a a synonym for bigot. *patting your head* You seem to be unaware that there is more effective ways than the jury system. Time to learn something about the world perhaps? Every post you make is either pathetic vitriol or self aggrandizing nonsense that is only impressive to yourself. You're obviously a very sad angry person that tries to hide her insecurities and loneliness with lies and failed attempts at mean spirited insults. It's odd that a person as smart and educated as yourself fails to see how transparent you are when everyone else can.
Perhaps your trite act seems fresh in whatever backwater village you exist in but I doubt it. That's your cue to make what you think is a really biting comment and then pat yourself on the back. Too bad there's never anyone else around to pat it for you because you're in desperate need of a hug. Maybe this will help. 
You're talking about yourself, right? Because all you do here is complain and insult. You bitch and moan constantly. And for some bizarre reason, you seem to think you are particularly intelligent. There was nothing about the comment that you quoted that was bigoted. |
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Mar 28, 2017 15:31:13 GMT
Every post you make is either pathetic vitriol or self aggrandizing nonsense that is only impressive to yourself. You're obviously a very sad angry person that tries to hide her insecurities and loneliness with lies and failed attempts at mean spirited insults. It's odd that a person as smart and educated as yourself fails to see how transparent you are when everyone else can.
Perhaps your trite act seems fresh in whatever backwater village you exist in but I doubt it. That's your cue to make what you think is a really biting comment and then pat yourself on the back. Too bad there's never anyone else around to pat it for you because you're in desperate need of a hug. Maybe this will help.
You're talking about yourself, right? Because all you do here is complain and insult. You bitch and moan constantly. And for some bizarre reason, you seem to think you are particularly intelligent. There was nothing about the comment that you quoted that was bigoted. I vaguely remember disagreeing with your opinion on a tv show or movie which upset you greatly for some odd reason. You seem to get upset at anyone who has a differing opinion than you. Do you follow all of them around and post snarky comments or just a select few?
If you have stumbled across the poster you're defending more than a handful of times then you know she has a hatred for Americans. She also has said hateful things about vegans, vegetarians, men, married people, liberals, conservatives, children and pretty much anyone that isn't a goose stepping Nordic that agrees with whatever she is prattling on and on and on about. I'm not a vegan or a vegetarian or a conservative etc... but that doesn't make bigotry aimed at them okay in my opinion. Obviously you feel differently. I'm okay with that too. If you want to be a bigot then be a bigot but own that bigotry.
If blind hatred towards members of a group based on generalities doesn't constitute bigotry to you then sadly you are not as smart as you think you are. Then again you are the guy who keeps insisting that transgendered people are all mentally ill so bigotry is something you are quite comfortable with. You also have a fondness for hyperbole but as your avatar indicates, subtlety is not your thing.
I'm sure I'm wasting my time trying to reason with a guy who thinks an avatar of some type of turd creature is hilarious and clever but I'm an eternal optimist.
Now then, do you think OJ killed Nicole or did you just want to snipe at me?
|
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Mar 28, 2017 15:33:53 GMT
You're talking about yourself, right? Because all you do here is complain and insult. You bitch and moan constantly. And for some bizarre reason, you seem to think you are particularly intelligent. There was nothing about the comment that you quoted that was bigoted. I vaguely remember disagreeing with your opinion on a tv show or movie which upset you greatly for some odd reason. You seem to get upset at anyone who has a differing opinion than you. Do you follow all of them around and post snarky comments or just a select few?
If you have stumbled across the poster you're defending more than a handful of times then you know she has a hatred for Americans. She also has said hateful things about vegans, vegetarians, men, married people, liberals, conservatives, children and pretty much anyone that isn't a goose stepping Nordic that agrees with whatever she is prattling on and on and on about. I'm not a vegan or a vegetarian or a conservative etc... but that doesn't make bigotry aimed at them okay in my opinion. Obviously you feel differently. I'm okay with that too. If you want to be a bigot then be a bigot but own that bigotry.
If blind hatred towards members of a group based on generalities doesn't constitute bigotry to you then sadly you are not as smart as you think you are. Then again you are the guy who keeps insisting that transgendered people are all mentally ill so bigotry is something you are quite comfortable with. You also have a fondness for hyperbole but as your avatar indicates, subtlety is not your thing.
I'm sure I'm wasting my time trying to reason with a guy who thinks an avatar of some type of turd creature is hilarious and clever but I'm an eternal optimist.
Now then, do you think OJ killed Nicole or did you just want to snipe at me?
No, I get upset when I encounter miserable assholes who treat people like garbage; and seem to think they have a right to do so. You are a piece of shit. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 16:55:43 GMT
poelzig here is a quote for you to take to heart: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle. I agree with kuatorises.
|
|
|
|
Post by chalk2 on Mar 28, 2017 18:04:00 GMT
I'll keep this simple and uncomplicated. Hell Yes!
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 29, 2017 6:50:22 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 8:12:16 GMT
Definitely. The only reason he got off, is because of the american jury system, where anyone can be a jury member, even how stupid or uneducated they are.
I don't think you understand why we have juries.
Why do you think they bring in random people instead of having trained legal professionals act as jurors?
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Mar 29, 2017 9:42:25 GMT
I am scared by some of the animosity a couple here are expressing lets all be civil yeah?
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Mar 29, 2017 9:50:43 GMT
"DNA?" You think its strange they'd find OJ's dna in his own home? "OJ with gun to his head?" Irrelevant. "Come on Takeshi you can't possibly believe that nonsense you just posted." When did I say that I did? "None of that even matches the timeline of the murders." Prove it. " A jury of bigots bullied the few honest jurors into letting a vicious women beating piece of shit go free." You sound a little biased there. Don't you feel at least a little hypocritical judging others as being biased? The blood of both victims were found on the gloves found at his house as well as OJ's dna. Am I biased against low life garbage men that viciously beat women on numerous occasions? Gosh I guess I am. Do I feel hypocritical judging anyone that would ignore overwhelming evidence just because the accused is the same skin color as they are? Not at all. I don't think anyone gets a free pass for being bigoted. I'm not black or white but if OJ was green and a jury made up mainly of green folks ignored evidence I would call them bigots too.
I do respect your right to voice your opinion of course. I just don't happen to agree with you on this subject.
Wait--what do sanitation workers have to do with it? |
|
|
|
Post by yezziqa on Mar 29, 2017 23:44:40 GMT
You actually think that being able to read is the same thing as being educated!  Then let me tell you that it is not. And stupidity is not a mental issue. |
|
|
|
Post by yezziqa on Mar 29, 2017 23:45:55 GMT
Definitely. The only reason he got off, is because of the american jury system, where anyone can be a jury member, even how stupid or uneducated they are.Is this different from any other country? I'm not saying it's not stupid, I just don't think it's simply an American thing. Yes, it's different. |
|
|
|
Post by yezziqa on Mar 29, 2017 23:49:05 GMT
Definitely. The only reason he got off, is because of the american jury system, where anyone can be a jury member, even how stupid or uneducated they are.
I don't think you understand why we have juries.
Why do you think they bring in random people instead of having trained legal professionals act as jurors?
Those trained don't act like jurors, they understand the evidence presented. The jury in the trial didn't. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 29, 2017 23:51:07 GMT
You actually think that being able to read is the same thing as being educated! Then let me tell you that it is not. And stupidity is not a mental issue. You said "anyone can be a jury member," but apparently that isn't the case. I'm sorry if being wrong upsets you. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2017 0:06:22 GMT
I read a really good alternate theory. Nicole and her friend Ron were involved in some shady drug dealing situation. Ron worked as a busboy at the restaurant Nicole worked at (as a hostess). Ron got her into the drug scene to make some money but as is often the case, they smoked up the profits instead of selling it and giving a cut back to their supplier. The suppliers unfortunately for the unwitting Nicole were a Colombian cartel. This is why the murder scene resembled a Columbian necktie interrogation scene gone wrong more than a jealous husband crime of passion. Crime of passions usually start and end quickly in a flurry of emotion. Nicole and Ron were tortured for hours for information in a cold professional manner. Eventually the interrogators (yes plural not one person) murdered them out of frustration in a way South American cartels do it. The murder scene had multiple offenders not just one. OJ comes home. Sees the devastation, thinks he is next on their hitlist, freaks out and flees. Makes no sense for a jealous husband to flee from a scene of a crime which is in his own home. You have days to clean up the mess and remove the grisly remains. A third employee of the same restaurant was murdered in what looked like a professional hit around the same time. Two other employees have gone missing and another had their car set on fire. Probably not a coincidence. There's no evidence that Nicole and Ron were dealing drugs. Simpson no longer lived there with Nicole. He dripped blood at the scene from the deep cut on his finger. He was stalking Nicole. Nicole was afraid of him and said she thought he was going to kill her. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2017 0:21:44 GMT
"DNA?" You think its strange they'd find OJ's dna in his own home? "OJ with gun to his head?" Irrelevant. "Come on Takeshi you can't possibly believe that nonsense you just posted." When did I say that I did? "None of that even matches the timeline of the murders." Prove it. " A jury of bigots bullied the few honest jurors into letting a vicious women beating piece of shit go free." You sound a little biased there. Don't you feel at least a little hypocritical judging others as being biased? The blood of both victims were found on the gloves found at his house as well as OJ's dna. Am I biased against low life garbage men that viciously beat women on numerous occasions? Gosh I guess I am. Do I feel hypocritical judging anyone that would ignore overwhelming evidence just because the accused is the same skin color as they are? Not at all. I don't think anyone gets a free pass for being bigoted. I'm not black or white but if OJ was green and a jury made up mainly of green folks ignored evidence I would call them bigots too.
I do respect your right to voice your opinion of course. I just don't happen to agree with you on this subject.
From things the jury said I could tell they didn't like Nicole. I think they didn't care that he killed her and were impressed with his celebrity. They were biased |
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Mar 30, 2017 1:30:03 GMT
The blood of both victims were found on the gloves found at his house as well as OJ's dna. Am I biased against low life garbage men that viciously beat women on numerous occasions? Gosh I guess I am. Do I feel hypocritical judging anyone that would ignore overwhelming evidence just because the accused is the same skin color as they are? Not at all. I don't think anyone gets a free pass for being bigoted. I'm not black or white but if OJ was green and a jury made up mainly of green folks ignored evidence I would call them bigots too.
I do respect your right to voice your opinion of course. I just don't happen to agree with you on this subject.
Wait--what do sanitation workers have to do with it?  That actually took longer than I thought it would. I feel badly I accidently disparaged garbage men by comparing them to the evil wife beater and probable murderer OJ Simpson. |
|
flasuss
Sophomore
@flasuss
Posts: 323
Likes: 147
 
|
Post by flasuss on Mar 30, 2017 1:47:30 GMT
A jury of bigots bullied the few honest jurors into letting a vicious women beating piece of shit go free." You sound a little biased there. Don't you feel at least a little hypocritical judging others as being biased? In OJ: Made in America, one of the jurors admitted she only vote not guilty as revenge for Rodney King and said that 90% of the jurors voted for the same reason. She also said she didn't care Nicole was beaten and had no respect for a woman that "lets herself be beaten up". Anyway, only a complete idiot believes he didn't do it, specially after If I Did It. But I guess if even 9/11 has imbeciles looking for attention and thinking of themselves smarter than everyone saying "The towers didn't fall/Bin Laden is innocent/Israel is the responsible", etc, it's inevitable people would doubt that too. |
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Mar 30, 2017 2:31:05 GMT
A jury of bigots bullied the few honest jurors into letting a vicious women beating piece of shit go free." You sound a little biased there. Don't you feel at least a little hypocritical judging others as being biased? In OJ: Made in America, one of the jurors admitted she only vote not guilty as revenge for Rodney King and said that 90% of the jurors voted for the same reason. She also said she didn't care Nicole was beaten and had no respect for a woman that "lets herself be beaten up". Anyway, only a complete idiot believes he didn't do it, specially after If I Did It. But I guess if even 9/11 has imbeciles looking for attention and thinking of themselves smarter than everyone saying "The towers didn't fall/Bin Laden is innocent/Israel is the responsible", etc, it's inevitable people would doubt that too. Exactly! It's amazing that even though the jurors ADMITTED IT, I had 2 different posters saying I was a "miserable asshole" and "a piece of shit" for repeating what the jurors said themselves. I wouldn't be surprised if both of them spew more pejoratives at me since apparently pointing the FACTS out makes me and possibly you or mulva worse than a wife beating murderous low life like OJ. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2017 3:05:17 GMT
In OJ: Made in America, one of the jurors admitted she only vote not guilty as revenge for Rodney King and said that 90% of the jurors voted for the same reason. She also said she didn't care Nicole was beaten and had no respect for a woman that "lets herself be beaten up". Anyway, only a complete idiot believes he didn't do it, specially after If I Did It. But I guess if even 9/11 has imbeciles looking for attention and thinking of themselves smarter than everyone saying "The towers didn't fall/Bin Laden is innocent/Israel is the responsible", etc, it's inevitable people would doubt that too. Exactly! It's amazing that even though the jurors ADMITTED IT, I had 2 different posters saying I was a "miserable asshole" and "a piece of shit" for repeating what the jurors said themselves. I wouldn't be surprised if both of them spew more pejoratives at me since apparently pointing the FACTS out makes me and possibly you or mulva worse than a wife beating murderous low life like OJ. While revenge for Rodney King had something to do with it, it was mainly the incompetence of the prosecution. They made constant error after error. Denouncing Mark Fuhrman. OJ trying on the gloves. The destruction of the DNA guy's credibility. The list goes on and on. They were unable to convince the jury that O.J. was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, the defense had put too much doubt into their minds. |
|
