so did OJ kill Nicole

Whatever you say. There was evidence of others being there and more than one person in the world bought those guy's shoes. But they're not even a factor. Have fun now. Buh bye.

Really? Where did it say that there was evidence of anyone else being there in any legal proceedings?

Simpson was the only person in California who owned a pair of those shoes!! The timeline it would take someone from out of state to come in, commit the murders and leave vs the time that they were last alive to when the bodies were discovered eliminates the possibility that any other person owning those shoes could've done it! They proved this in civil court.

Sorry your tin foil hat theory got shot down.

Well your post makes no sense and you're grasping at straws. Again the shoe thing you're clinging to is redundant. Seeing the aftermath is still not a crime. Or should we prosecute you for seeing what you have seen some odd years ago?

It was over drugs and as I've stated already, he already knew what happened and who they were. The world could not know in his mind. He loved his kids. He's not a monster.

"Finally, I've offered the reality of what I know and what I saw to my mind".



Oh! Well then, I'm convinced. A man who loves his kids doesn't batter their mother

Theatrics? Look who's talking. There are good reasons why he was on trial for murder and the jury in the civil trial found him liable. People with common sense know that a man who stalks, beats his wife, leaves blood evidence at the scene and was the only one Nicole was afraid of is the one who killed her

You never brought facts to the table, just outright judgement of a man that was found not guilty. Those seem to be facts you're ignoring because you've let public opinion sway you and of course fake news which has been going on for a long time. And your ridiculous hyperbole with your "levitate" analogy proves you've got nothing.

You're the one arguing against facts. I simply deducted. And finding DNA at a place where he lived is easy but still does NOT prove guilt. You're the delusional one acting out your rage and losing debates. By your bold font insults you already lost the debate. FACT. And talk about conspiracy theories! You're full of them since nothing you've said proves anything and heavily relies on circumstantial evidence. You've been drinking the Kool-Aid of what MSM has fed you.

Laughing in a court of law? Me? You seem very insecure with your childish retort and assumptions. It seems that the lawyers weren't laughed out of court and that they seemed to have a backstory of the whys and whatnot, all the while following the law.

So whatever this kangeroo court you've got going there where people who disagree with you is to be laughed at shows the fascist attitude you have. I haven't taken you seriously though, so I guess we're even. A guy who dresses in Star Wars costumes would be laughed at in more places than a courtroom.

But the reality is, he was black and had that line of black thinking and they tend to be violent, however, he didn't kill her. It was two thugs of a lowlife drug cartel. He's guilty of hiding these criminals but he never aided them. I have no problem with you remaining ignorant.

Seems like someone can't face the truth. What can you expect from someone who defends a sociopath. You keep on defending a wife beating murderer, that's how he got acquitted, from people like you who are so impressed by a celebrity that they're blinded to the truth

That's Simpson you're describing, I've never murdered anyone. I'm not falling for lies, you're the deluded one who thinks the mob killed Nicole and Ron which is ridiculous. You don't have an ounce of proof and yet think you're right because you can't see the obvious. You have no proof that reporters are lying, it's just your delusions and thinking you have some gift. Only people who can't reason and prefer to believe evidence that isn't there and disbelieves evidence that is there thinks Simpson didn't do it. You're only convincing yourself

I brought out facts that came out, some in the criminal trial, and all in the civil trial. He was found guilty in the civil trial. So much for your theory of using rumors and public opinion. Do you understand what facts really are? Once again you've invested in a big speech to try and deconstruct what I've said, but you've offered no facts or proof or evidence or legal action or criminal investigation to support your theory. Just a hypothesis. Actually calling it a hypothesis is giving your theory too much credit. A hypothesis is a scientific guess, and there's no science in your theory. Just hyperbole and innuendo.

You probably think that there was a second gunman on the grassy knoll. There's living aliens from outer space being kept at Area 51. Tupac is still alive. And Elvis Presley and Michael Jackson were both aliens who took human form.

- You really take people's avatar is being a literal representation of their public identity? More evidence that I'm dealing with a tin foil hat crackpot.

- OJ had that black line of thinking that tends to be violent? That explains why every time I walk past a black man in a mall I get punched out and mugged! That explains why 100% of white women at Walmart get purse snatched by black men! Poor Mariah Carey! All those bruises and broken bones weren't from her falling down the steps. She divorced Nick Cannon because it came from him. But that's just a cultural thing coming from Nick!
😂

- And the evidence of these 2 mob thugs was? Who did the criminal investigation? What are there names? And if the mob is that good that they can kill Ron Goldman and Nichole Simpson without a shred of evidence being tied back to them, not even suspicion, and perfectly frame OJ; why didn't they kill OJ to make sure he didn't talk (especially since he went to prison for another charge)?


This would be the part where you ignore all of these facts and sound logic and claim that I'm drinking the KoolAid. Then reclaim your tin foil hat theory rumor is a fact because you say so and believe so.... Can't top that kind of evidence!
🙄