Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2017 9:50:10 GMT
That's yourself you're describing, I've never murdered anyone or chose to see something I have. I'm not falling for lies, you're the deluded one who thinks O.J. killed Nicole and Ron which is ridiculous. You don't have an ounce of proof and yet think you're right because you can't see the obvious or even think for yourself and wish to get all your info from MSM who are exposed liars. You have no proof that reporters are telling the truth, it's just your delusions and thinking you have some insight because you were told what to believe. Only people who can't reason and prefer to believe evidence that isn't there and disbelieves evidence of a court of law's verdict thinks Simpson did it. You're only convincing yourself. Have fun with your game. I've already knocked every accusation you've thrown at me to the curb. I wonder what you'll come up with next. Hahahaha! What a child. Yes, it's ridiculous that this madman would kill her Childish is someone who's parroted MSM lo these many years. What's more is that you need someone to help you bully someone who disagrees with you and your stomping around and both of you having a hissy fit over me is telling me that I must be on the right track. Ironically there were two. As well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2017 10:45:42 GMT
Hahahaha! What a child. Yes, it's ridiculous that this madman would kill her Childish is someone who's parroted MSM lo these many years. What's more is that you need someone to help you bully someone who disagrees with you and your stomping around and both of you having a hissy fit over me is telling me that I must be on the right track. Ironically there were two. As well. Keeping informed isn't childish, saying you know something without one shred of evidence is childish "And finding DNA at a place where he lived is easy but still does NOT prove guilt. " Finding his blood drops at the scene does not prove guilt? You're too moronic to even bother with
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2017 12:05:28 GMT
Childish is someone who's parroted MSM lo these many years. What's more is that you need someone to help you bully someone who disagrees with you and your stomping around and both of you having a hissy fit over me is telling me that I must be on the right track. Ironically there were two. As well. Keeping informed isn't childish, saying you know something without one shred of evidence is childish "And finding DNA at a place where he lived is easy but still does NOT prove guilt. " Finding his blood drops at the scene does not prove guilt? You're too moronic to even bother with And yet you keep harping on and on and on with your moronic rage and insistence. Stomping away. Blood drops? Wow remind people to not bleed at any place they live or to learn to clot properly. You'd find anyone guilty of murder if they looked at you sideways! Now run along little kid. Stay in your bubble. Find a safe space or something. Not all black people have murdered someone. That's just a myth.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2017 16:43:52 GMT
Keeping informed isn't childish, saying you know something without one shred of evidence is childish "And finding DNA at a place where he lived is easy but still does NOT prove guilt. " Finding his blood drops at the scene does not prove guilt? You're too moronic to even bother with And yet you keep harping on and on and on with your moronic rage and insistence. Stomping away. Blood drops? Wow remind people to not bleed at any place they live or to learn to clot properly. You'd find anyone guilty of murder if they looked at you sideways! Now run along little kid. Stay in your bubble. Find a safe space or something. Not all black people have murdered someone. That's just a myth. Rage? Stomping? You're a joke. His blood was next to his bloody footprints at the murder scene, genius. You really know nothing
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2017 22:57:51 GMT
And yet you keep harping on and on and on with your moronic rage and insistence. Stomping away. Blood drops? Wow remind people to not bleed at any place they live or to learn to clot properly. You'd find anyone guilty of murder if they looked at you sideways! Now run along little kid. Stay in your bubble. Find a safe space or something. Not all black people have murdered someone. That's just a myth. Rage? Stomping? You're a joke. His blood was next to his bloody footprints at the murder scene, genius. You really know nothing You've expressed plenty of rage. Lots and lots. You really know nothing. It's you who can't wrap your head around the fact the story was spun and he could not say what he really saw. He was there but too late. Now if you're quite done, you're too moronic to bother with. You want to beat a dead horse, skull of steel. Or I mean bums. Same thing though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 0:39:57 GMT
Rage? Stomping? You're a joke. His blood was next to his bloody footprints at the murder scene, genius. You really know nothing You've expressed plenty of rage. Lots and lots. You really know nothing. It's you who can't wrap your head around the fact the story was spun and he could not say what he really saw. He was there but too late. Now if you're quite done, you're too moronic to bother with. You want to beat a dead horse, skull of steel. Or I mean bums. Same thing though. No, the story was not spun and he saw nothing but the two people he was murdering. If he was there and saw someone else killing them he would have been killed too, or does the mob normally leave witnesses? Don't bother replying because you can't and won't
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 10, 2017 1:31:52 GMT
The theatrics you throw out there, good grief. You don't get it. Never will. He's not a role model and not perfect but he's not what the media has told you. And I don't have any stakes in this or dogs in the race. I never knew of him until 1994. The liars and murderers are great in numbers; the faces of what people hold as peers in society. Theatrics? Look who's talking. There are good reasons why he was on trial for murder and the jury in the civil trial found him liable. People with common sense know that a man who stalks, beats his wife, leaves blood evidence at the scene and was the only one Nicole was afraid of is the one who killed her. I just had a listen to this and I think the dispatcher did a great job at getting Nicole to stay on the line. She knew all the right things to say and got her talk and open up and was genuinely compassionate. That would be a difficult job to do. What that clip shows is OJ's rage at the time, it however doesn't provide any "absolute" proof of his guilt regarding her murder. People can go off at others all the time and don't kill them. I also don't believe that Nicole herself was squeaky clean and it is her death that tends to bring on bleeding hearts. Her boyfriend was killed as well, yet for some reason, Nicole tends to get all the sympathy votes. Goldman didn't know her for long and whatever their relationship was, or how dubious it was, or he himself may have been, his death could still be considered equally tragic. I think Nicole just gets all the pity because she was female and the domestic abuse aspect of her relationship with OJ got all hyped up by the media. She made a conscious decision to get with him, she was young and naive at the time, but that is on her onus. She paid a big price and if she wasn't with Goldman, would things have escalated like they did? What did she want from him?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 1:53:39 GMT
Theatrics? Look who's talking. There are good reasons why he was on trial for murder and the jury in the civil trial found him liable. People with common sense know that a man who stalks, beats his wife, leaves blood evidence at the scene and was the only one Nicole was afraid of is the one who killed her. I just had a listen to this and I think the dispatcher did a great job at getting Nicole to stay on the line. She knew all the right things to say and got her talk and open up and was genuinely compassionate. That would be a difficult job to do. What that clip shows is OJ's rage at the time, it however doesn't provide any "absolute" proof of his guilt regarding her murder. People can go off at others all the time and don't kill them. I also don't believe that Nicole herself was squeaky clean and it is her death that tends to bring on bleeding hearts. Her boyfriend was killed as well, yet for some reason, Nicole tends to get all the sympathy votes. Goldman didn't know her for long and whatever their relationship was, or how dubious it was, or he himself may have been, his death could still be considered equally tragic. I think Nicole just gets all the pity because she was female and the domestic abuse aspect of her relationship with OJ got all hyped up by the media. She made a conscious decision to get with him, she was young and naive at the time, but that is on her onus. She paid a big price and if she wasn't with Goldman, would things have escalated like they did? What did she want from him? Yes, it doesn't show absolute proof, the blood evidence does that. Nicole had called the restaurant they were at because her mother left her glasses there. She asked Ron if he would drop them off and that's why he showed up. Yes, Nicole did eventually get with him but wouldn't have known it would cost her her life
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 10, 2017 5:46:17 GMT
Yes, it doesn't show absolute proof, the blood evidence does that. Nicole had called the restaurant they were at because her mother left her glasses there. She asked Ron if he would drop them off and that's why he showed up. Yes, Nicole did eventually get with him but wouldn't have known it would cost her her life How did OJ end up at the scene, if he claims he didn't murder them? The murders were outside her home I believe. What was he doing there?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 7:59:23 GMT
You've expressed plenty of rage. Lots and lots. You really know nothing. It's you who can't wrap your head around the fact the story was spun and he could not say what he really saw. He was there but too late. Now if you're quite done, you're too moronic to bother with. You want to beat a dead horse, skull of steel. Or I mean bums. Same thing though. No, the story was not spun and he saw nothing but the two people he was murdering. If he was there and saw someone else killing them he would have been killed too, or does the mob normally leave witnesses? Don't bother replying because you can't and won't I WILL fucking reply because I can! You keep throwing your own spin on it when I've already pointed it out. He wasn't there WHEN they were killed. He came after. He also knows who they were. The mob is just another word for thugs who kill on orders. Why don't you just get a clue and stop listening to the media?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 8:04:26 GMT
Yes, it doesn't show absolute proof, the blood evidence does that. Nicole had called the restaurant they were at because her mother left her glasses there. She asked Ron if he would drop them off and that's why he showed up. Yes, Nicole did eventually get with him but wouldn't have known it would cost her her life How did OJ end up at the scene, if he claims he didn't murder them? The murders were outside her home I believe. What was he doing there? Nevermind with that wuzywhatziz. It doesn't have a clue, pulling things out of the media's storytelling when all these things could be easily explained in any other normal circumstances. No the scene was in the kitchen. Very vividly that is the one place that cements it for me personally. OJ walked in on the gruesome scene. He also fled the scene. There was a whole lot more going on than what is told. That jerk had already convicted OJ before the trial was even over.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 10:04:10 GMT
No, the story was not spun and he saw nothing but the two people he was murdering. If he was there and saw someone else killing them he would have been killed too, or does the mob normally leave witnesses? Don't bother replying because you can't and won't I WILL fucking reply because I can! You keep throwing your own spin on it when I've already pointed it out. He wasn't there WHEN they were killed. He came after. He also knows who they were. The mob is just another word for thugs who kill on orders. Why don't you just get a clue and stop listening to the media? The rage, tsk, tsk. He came after they were killed and dripped his blood there. You really are in your own little world. And you give yourself too much credit. There's nothing to suggest that Ron and Nicole were involved in drugs to get them killed. NOTHING.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 10:17:36 GMT
Yes, it doesn't show absolute proof, the blood evidence does that. Nicole had called the restaurant they were at because her mother left her glasses there. She asked Ron if he would drop them off and that's why he showed up. Yes, Nicole did eventually get with him but wouldn't have known it would cost her her life How did OJ end up at the scene, if he claims he didn't murder them? The murders were outside her home I believe. What was he doing there? Exactly, TC. This is the crime scene 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 10:22:17 GMT
I WILL fucking reply because I can! You keep throwing your own spin on it when I've already pointed it out. He wasn't there WHEN they were killed. He came after. He also knows who they were. The mob is just another word for thugs who kill on orders. Why don't you just get a clue and stop listening to the media? The rage, tsk, tsk. He came after they were killed and dripped his blood there. You really are in your own little world. And you give yourself too much credit. There's nothing to suggest that Ron and Nicole were involved in drugs to get them killed. NOTHING. Rage on. I thought you were going to ignore me? You see I'm not falling for your bullshit narratives. He didn't "drip" that's another bullshit MSM fake bullshit. Stop guzzling the Kool-Aid. And furthermore I never suggested that Nicole was involved with drugs but her friend sure was, and it wasn't because he was an addict either. But nevermind. You've drank the Kool-Aid they fed you. Stop trying to force that shit on me!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 10:23:53 GMT
How did OJ end up at the scene, if he claims he didn't murder them? The murders were outside her home I believe. What was he doing there? Exactly, TC. This is the crime scene They were killed while standing in the kitchen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 10:25:49 GMT
The rage, tsk, tsk. He came after they were killed and dripped his blood there. You really are in your own little world. And you give yourself too much credit. There's nothing to suggest that Ron and Nicole were involved in drugs to get them killed. NOTHING. Rage on. I thought you were going to ignore me? You see I'm not falling for your bullshit narratives. He didn't "drip" that's another bullshit MSM fake bullshit. Stop guzzling the Kool-Aid. And furthermore I never suggested that Nicole was involved with drugs but her friend sure was, and it wasn't because he was an addict either. But nevermind. You've drank the Kool-Aid they fed you. Stop trying to force that shit on me! Wrong! I sure as hell am not going to drink the Kool-Aid you're feeding me. You don't expect anyone to, do you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 10:26:58 GMT
The rage, tsk, tsk. He came after they were killed and dripped his blood there. You really are in your own little world. And you give yourself too much credit. There's nothing to suggest that Ron and Nicole were involved in drugs to get them killed. NOTHING. Rage on. I thought you were going to ignore me? You see I'm not falling for your bullshit narratives. He didn't "drip" that's another bullshit MSM fake bullshit. Stop guzzling the Kool-Aid. And furthermore I never suggested that Nicole was involved with drugs but her friend sure was, and it wasn't because he was an addict either. But nevermind. You've drank the Kool-Aid they fed you. Stop trying to force that shit on me! Wrong. I'm sure as hell not going to believe someone like you
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 12:01:58 GMT
So you're a liar then. You said yourself that you were going to be through but here you are! Now even replying TWICE with the same flailing nonsense. I really don't care what you believe. I'm also not the one posting a bunch of MSM bullshit either.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 10, 2017 12:16:22 GMT
How did OJ end up at the scene, if he claims he didn't murder them? The murders were outside her home I believe. What was he doing there? Nevermind with that wuzywhatziz. It doesn't have a clue, pulling things out of the media's storytelling when all these things could be easily explained in any other normal circumstances. No the scene was in the kitchen. Very vividly that is the one place that cements it for me personally. OJ walked in on the gruesome scene. He also fled the scene. There was a whole lot more going on than what is told. That jerk had already convicted OJ before the trial was even over. From the reports I have heard and read, it was outside her home where the bodies were found. So what was it? Yes, there are many more layers to what was being told and I feel that OJ walked in on the gruesome scene too and then panicked thinking that he would be the one the fingers would be pointed at. The murders were very brutal and like some have suggested, gangland style. The other thing I question though, was OJ aware that they were going to happen? Why did he just happen to stumble upon their bodies? What was his reasoning for being there?
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 10, 2017 12:19:08 GMT
How did OJ end up at the scene, if he claims he didn't murder them? The murders were outside her home I believe. What was he doing there? Exactly, TC. This is the crime scene: That is disturbing. I had never heard of it being in the kitchen before, unless that was outside the kitchen entry.
|
|