|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 11, 2017 6:16:08 GMT
The discussion or discourse was between you and sleepy and was not my battle. I know you can handle yourself and it is just a discussion thread and you had a disagreement with her. She was rude to you, you retorted back. Whatever I would have said, or our connection with each other wasn't something I felt necessary to bring up. You have bunsofsteel and perhaps your tail is caught between your legs. Come back at her with a vengeance. I guess I'm being too sensitive. I just can't believe you would take her seriously when her only information on this case came from "visions"I have sent you a pm. I did find that part amusing; but I brushed that off, due to other aspects of her posts. I don't always believe what the media plugs towards us and the part that disturbs me the most, is the gory and brutal manner of the deaths. Would OJ have been mad enough to do something like that and what was his "realistic" motive for wanting to kill both Nicole and Ron in that manner? I still want to know if he didn't do it, why did he end up on the scene that night? It wouldn't be to see his kids, as it was later in the evening and they were asleep? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2017 6:32:33 GMT
Toasted Cheese thank you for the PM. Well, like I said, Simpson was obsessed with Nicole and stalking her. He was in a rage for not being included to sit with the family or invited afterwards to go to dinner after Sidney's recital. His girlfriend had left a message breaking up with him and he was coked up. You heard how he was yelling and scaring her during that 911 call. He didn't even care that his kids were asleep. He had been physically rough with her before and Nicole's sister witnessed one time when he threw her against a wall as she testified to in court. Nicole even told someone that he was going to kill her and get away with it
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 11, 2017 10:26:33 GMT
Toasted Cheese thank you for the PM. Well, like I said, Simpson was obsessed with Nicole and stalking her. He was in a rage for not being included to sit with the family or invited afterwards to go to dinner after Sidney's recital. His girlfriend had left a message breaking up with him and he was coked up. You heard how he was yelling and scaring her during that 911 call. He didn't even care that his kids were asleep. He had been physically rough with her before and Nicole's sister witnessed one time when he threw her against a wall as she testified to in court. Nicole even told someone that he was going to kill her and get away with it That is freaky. I read in a timeline that OJ had a friend staying at his place and they went out for Macdonalds at one stage and got home at 9.45pm. A limo came to pick him up around 10.25pm so he could go to the airport. Simpson didn't answer the buzzer and when he rang his boss, he was told to wait because he is always late. Simpson didn't answer the buzzer until 11.00pm and apparently told the driver he had overslept. Simpson had an alibi when he got home at 9.45pm and if the killings happened at 10.15pm—which I think the defense argued happened later—then would 75mins be enough time for OJ to do what he was accused of and get back home to catch his limo? The timeline I read, apparently OJ told him he had overslept and had just gotten out of the shower. Why would he go to sleep at 9.45pm, if he knew a limo was coming for him to pick him up?
How far was it from Simpson's property to Nicole's?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2017 12:01:58 GMT
Toasted Cheese thank you for the PM. Well, like I said, Simpson was obsessed with Nicole and stalking her. He was in a rage for not being included to sit with the family or invited afterwards to go to dinner after Sidney's recital. His girlfriend had left a message breaking up with him and he was coked up. You heard how he was yelling and scaring her during that 911 call. He didn't even care that his kids were asleep. He had been physically rough with her before and Nicole's sister witnessed one time when he threw her against a wall as she testified to in court. Nicole even told someone that he was going to kill her and get away with it That is freaky. I read in a timeline that OJ had a friend staying at his place and they went out for Macdonalds at one stage and got home at 9.45pm. A limo came to pick him up around 10.25pm so he could go to the airport. Simpson didn't answer the buzzer and when he rang his boss, he was told to wait because he is always late. Simpson didn't answer the buzzer until 11.00pm and apparently told the driver he had overslept. Simpson had an alibi when he got home at 9.45pm and if the killings happened at 10.15pm—which I think the defense argued happened later—then would 75mins be enough time for OJ to do what he was accused of and get back home to catch his limo? The timeline I read, apparently OJ told him he had overslept and had just gotten out of the shower. Why would he go to sleep at 9.45pm, if he knew a limo was coming for him to pick him up?
OJ timeline
How far was it from Simpson's property to Nicole's?
Good question. Did you also read that the limo driver saw him walking toward then entering the house? Then the lights went on. Suuuure he overslept. I read that Simpson and Nicole lived 2 miles from one another |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 11, 2017 12:33:01 GMT
Good question. Did you also read that the limo driver saw him walking toward then entering the house? Then the lights went on. Suuuure he overslept. I read that Simpson and Nicole lived 2 miles from one another. Yes, and there are too many deceits he appears to have told, as though he was covering his tracks. If he got home at 9.45pm with his friend who was staying in the guest house and we know he was at the scene of the crime, it appears that he had snuck away and gone to Nicole's and 2 miles is what, only 5 mins drive away. Why would he then choose to kill her and Goldman in the gruesome manner that he did? That is just crazy and was he that mad at the time in order to be capable of doing this. He snuck away for a reason, but if his intention was to kill Nicole at the time, why choose a knife and so viciously? He knew he had a limo booked to take him to the airport. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2017 12:41:55 GMT
Good question. Did you also read that the limo driver saw him walking toward then entering the house? Then the lights went on. Suuuure he overslept. I read that Simpson and Nicole lived 2 miles from one another. Yes, and there are too many deceits he appears to have told, as though he was covering his tracks. If he got home at 9.45pm with his friend who was staying in the guest house and we know he was at the scene of the crime, it appears that he had snuck away and gone to Nicole's and 2 miles is what, only 5 mins drive away. Why would he then choose to kill her and Goldman in the gruesome manner that he did? That is just crazy and was he that mad at the time in order to be capable of doing this. He snuck away for a reason, but if his intention was to kill Nicole at the time, why choose a knife and so viciously? He knew he had a limo booked to take him to the airport. Who can understand obsession and the mind of a narcissist? Using a knife means it's personal. If you want to see their wounds up close I can post them here |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 11, 2017 23:14:52 GMT
Yes, and there are too many deceits he appears to have told, as though he was covering his tracks. If he got home at 9.45pm with his friend who was staying in the guest house and we know he was at the scene of the crime, it appears that he had snuck away and gone to Nicole's and 2 miles is what, only 5 mins drive away. Why would he then choose to kill her and Goldman in the gruesome manner that he did? That is just crazy and was he that mad at the time in order to be capable of doing this. He snuck away for a reason, but if his intention was to kill Nicole at the time, why choose a knife and so viciously? He knew he had a limo booked to take him to the airport. Who can understand obsession and the mind of a narcissist? Using a knife means it's personal. If you want to see their wounds up close I can post them here If he used a knife in the manner that he did to kill 2 people, he would have also got very bloody himself in the process. He would have also had to discard\dispose of his clothing and change. It would have been very, very messy. Do you know if the knife was found at the scene, or was that lost? I read somewhere the other day, that a knife has been found buried near by and is being forensic tested. Is there the possibility that he didn't actually kill her herself, but knew it was going to happen and curiosity or guilt got the better of him and that is why he went over to her house? Goldman just unfortunately happened to come by with her glasses and got caught up in it. Please don't post those pictures Madama Butterfly, as much as I don't mind fake gruesomeness in a movie, reality is a different story....yuck!  edition.cnn.com/2007/US/law/12/11/court.archive.simpson14/index.html?_s=PM:US |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2017 23:51:08 GMT
Toasted Cheese You're right, a blood soaked glove was found at the scene and since he lost that glove that's probably why his finger got cut. He had wet clothes in the machine at home and it's thought that he disposed of the rest of the items at the airport. When he came back home after the killings he scaled his wall and hit the wall where Kato lived, Kato heard it. The other bloody glove was found there on the side of the house as well. Fuhrman found the glove and since he had made a recording for a screen play and used the word nigger, the defense used that to their advantage. There was no evidence that he framed Simpson but the jurors must have thought that he did I have a morbid curiosity which is why I wanted to see the extent of their injuries
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 12, 2017 0:00:32 GMT
Toasted Cheese You're right, a blood soaked glove was found at the scene and since he lost that glove that's probably why his finger got cut. He had wet clothes in the machine at home and it's thought that he disposed of the rest of the items at the airport. When he came back home after the killings he scaled his wall and hit the wall where Kato lived, Kato heard it. The other bloody glove was found there on the side of the house as well. Fuhrman found the glove and since he had made a recording for a screen play and used the word nigger, the defense used that to their advantage. There was no evidence that he framed Simpson but the jurors must have thought that he did I have a morbid curiosity which is why I wanted to see the extent of their injuries Thanks for filling me in. The wet clothes would have still had blood stains I presume. Blood is difficult to wash out. I think one of the gloves was torn. Did they fit OJ's hands? I didn't trust that Fuhrman guy for some reason, and why would he plead the fifth to straight forward answers? That is usually an admission of cover up or wrong doing. He was a phony! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 0:11:02 GMT
Toasted Cheese Fuhrman's lawyer must have advised him to plead the fifth because of his use of the word nigger and once you plead the fifth you can't answer anything. What I heard is that he hit Nicole and she fainted then he pulled her head back and cut her throat. He also cut Ron Goldman's throat and he had many stab wounds. I don't know about the clothes in the washer. Since the blood was still wet the stains probably did come out. There were socks with blood on them in his room. I once saw a photo of Simpson wearing the gloves while broadcasting on the field and they looked a bit short which is probably why they came off. I saw Mark Fuhrman when I worked at the airport, he walked by the shop I worked at and smiled
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 0:29:45 GMT
Says the Kool-Aid drinking club leader. FYI the very same MSM right as that day was unfolding let it slip that they were murdered while standing in the kitchen. All you have, nitwit, is a bunch of spewing that MSM has fed you. You haven't produced one single shred of proof of anything but keep claiming that you have. Talk about tin foil! You're completely wrapped in it! Where is this so-called MSM report that they were killed in the kitchen? (I already know you can't provide it because it doesn't exist). And yet you still haven't even produced so much as one credible reference to suggest any truth to what you say. I already have given you a number of references to trial evidence and forensic evidence. But since that's not enough (despite the fact that you haven't given me anything in return), try looking at the autopsy reports for both Ron Goldman and Nichole Brown Simpson. All the wounds on their bodies were from the side or from the front! None of them were from behind! So much for your "they were killed from behind in the kitchen" theory!... Oops!... Idiot much? Gullible much? Stop wasting your time. Nobody's buying your crackpot conspiracy theory. Nobody's drinking your tin foil hat punch but you. Go chase Bigfoot or something..... 😂 Says the guy who's one of the biggest crackpots around! You can't provide any proof that contradicts their verdict and you, as lame joe of the public, has already swallowed that Kool Aid! And the SAME courts agree that OJ wasn't the killers. There were plenty of reports that were stifled but they were shut up. Go look for the boogeyman. Maybe you can chase after Tony Todd? I don't serve tin foil anything. That's your specialty. Courtesy a corrupt police force and an owned media whose specialty is to lie. BTW; I never said the wounds were on their backs. I said the victims were approached from behind. But you haven't been able to read and comprehend one single sentence since your reading comprehension skills just don't exist!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 0:32:57 GMT
I guess I'm being too sensitive. I just can't believe you would take her seriously when her only information on this case came from "visions"I have sent you a pm. I did find that part amusing; but I brushed that off, due to other aspects of her posts. I don't always believe what the media plugs towards us and the part that disturbs me the most, is the gory and brutal manner of the deaths. Would OJ have been mad enough to do something like that and what was his "realistic" motive for wanting to kill both Nicole and Ron in that manner? I still want to know if he didn't do it, why did he end up on the scene that night? It wouldn't be to see his kids, as it was later in the evening and they were asleep? A dream. And that user is too hostile to have any kind of a conversation with. It's its way of the highway. Police have also used those same techniques before to solve crimes. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 0:34:54 GMT
LOL so friends have to agree with you on everything and if they don't you disown them. TC is better off without you. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 0:37:48 GMT
I am not taking any sides at all on this Madame Buns. Sleepy has her pov that I don't entirely disagree with, and I am open to your opinions and the others that feel OJ is as guilty as sin. There are plenty of questions that have gone unanswered. Some googling search may assist with answering this, but I can't find what I want to know. If the manner of her approach to you has challenged or upset you, and the insults that she thrown around at you and the other poster who have disagreed with her, that is her doing not mine. I can't change how she chooses to communicate her pov. She just feels very strongly about something as you do. The difference is, it is at the opposite end of the spectrum though. I am sitting in the middle here. I don't feel right about condemning somebody if I don't know the whole picture, especially if it has nothing to do with me and is an old story. I would be the the one who has to live with that judgement. Correction; the insults were thrown at me. The same two users (if they are two separate users) started with the insults toward me. They have also been hostile from the start because I wasn't buying their crap. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 0:52:22 GMT
I am not taking any sides at all on this Madame Buns. Sleepy has her pov that I don't entirely disagree with, and I am open to your opinions and the others that feel OJ is as guilty as sin. There are plenty of questions that have gone unanswered. Some googling search may assist with answering this, but I can't find what I want to know. If the manner of her approach to you has challenged or upset you, and the insults that she thrown around at you and the other poster who have disagreed with her, that is her doing not mine. I can't change how she chooses to communicate her pov. She just feels very strongly about something as you do. The difference is, it is at the opposite end of the spectrum though. I am sitting in the middle here. I don't feel right about condemning somebody if I don't know the whole picture, especially if it has nothing to do with me and is an old story. I would be the the one who has to live with that judgement. Correction; the insults were thrown at me. The same two users (if they are two separate users) started with the insults toward me. They have also been hostile from the start because I wasn't buying their crap. No, you're the one who said I was describing myself when I said I've never murdered anyone. That was before I said anything insulting to you. Disagreeing isn't the same as insulting but you would make yourself the victim. You continually told TC not to believe me and called me "it". You're a repulsive piece of shit |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 0:54:49 GMT
Yes, and there are too many deceits he appears to have told, as though he was covering his tracks. If he got home at 9.45pm with his friend who was staying in the guest house and we know he was at the scene of the crime, it appears that he had snuck away and gone to Nicole's and 2 miles is what, only 5 mins drive away. Why would he then choose to kill her and Goldman in the gruesome manner that he did? That is just crazy and was he that mad at the time in order to be capable of doing this. He snuck away for a reason, but if his intention was to kill Nicole at the time, why choose a knife and so viciously? He knew he had a limo booked to take him to the airport. Who can understand obsession and the mind of a narcissist? Using a knife means it's personal. If you want to see their wounds up close I can post them here Your obsession with me is creepy. After saying you'd not bother with me you've been getting more hostile. Next you'll want to make some insane proclamations about silencing anyone who isn't following the narrative from MSM. Oh wait, yeah that's already happening. And what better way to silence your opposition than to call them names so to isolate them? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 0:57:31 GMT
Who can understand obsession and the mind of a narcissist? Using a knife means it's personal. If you want to see their wounds up close I can post them here Your obsession with me is creepy. After saying you'd not bother with me you've been getting more hostile. Next you'll want to make some insane proclamations about silencing anyone who isn't following the narrative from MSM. Oh wait, yeah that's already happening. And what better way to silence your opposition than to call them names so to isolate them? Yes, and you would never name call, don't flatter yourself, pinhead |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 1:03:13 GMT
Correction; the insults were thrown at me. The same two users (if they are two separate users) started with the insults toward me. They have also been hostile from the start because I wasn't buying their crap. No, you're the one who said I was describing myself when I said I've never murdered anyone. That was before I said anything insulting to you. Disagreeing isn't the same as insulting but you would make yourself the victim. You continually told TC not to believe me and called me "it". You're a repulsive piece of shit Piece of shit? Here is the hostility I know from you. In full view! #1 I compared the accusation of being accused of murder back at you. It was to show how easy it was when you don't even KNOW the person! It was a comparison. But if you took it literally, LOL! And you call others crazy! #2 I use the genderless "it" all the time. It works better that way since too many times SJW's flip out when you use he/she. You cannot do that anymore. Remember? #3 You and the other hostile user are too convinced but it's not enough. You have to force your beliefs while belittling others. Tin foil hats are worn by a lot of people these days. But I'm not one of them. I don't fear any entity reading my thoughts. I challenge. Something that seems unlikely from someone who's supposed to be a slave to the system. #4 I think you're a piece of shit. It's all even in the end. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 1:03:53 GMT
Your obsession with me is creepy. After saying you'd not bother with me you've been getting more hostile. Next you'll want to make some insane proclamations about silencing anyone who isn't following the narrative from MSM. Oh wait, yeah that's already happening. And what better way to silence your opposition than to call them names so to isolate them? Yes, and you would never name call, don't flatter yourself, pinhead Racist. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 1:05:39 GMT
No, you're the one who said I was describing myself when I said I've never murdered anyone. That was before I said anything insulting to you. Disagreeing isn't the same as insulting but you would make yourself the victim. You continually told TC not to believe me and called me "it". You're a repulsive piece of shit Piece of shit? Here is the hostility I know from you. In full view! #1 I compared the accusation of being accused of murder back at you. It was to show how easy it was when you don't even KNOW the person! It was a comparison. But if you took it literally, LOL! And you call others crazy! #2 I use the genderless "it" all the time. It works better that way since too many times SJW's flip out when you use he/she. You cannot do that anymore. Remember? #3 You and the other hostile user are too convinced but it's not enough. You have to force your beliefs while belittling others. Tin foil hats are worn by a lot of people these days. But I'm not one of them. I don't fear any entity reading my thoughts. I challenge. Something that seems unlikely from someone who's supposed to be a slave to the system. #4 I think you're a piece of shit. It's all even in the end. Well, aren't you just the epitome of tact. Hypocrite |
|
