Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 13:13:11 GMT
Nevermind with that wuzywhatziz. It doesn't have a clue, pulling things out of the media's storytelling when all these things could be easily explained in any other normal circumstances. No the scene was in the kitchen. Very vividly that is the one place that cements it for me personally. OJ walked in on the gruesome scene. He also fled the scene. There was a whole lot more going on than what is told. That jerk had already convicted OJ before the trial was even over. From the reports I have heard and read, it was outside her home where the bodies were found. So what was it? Yes, there are many more layers to what was being told and I feel that OJ walked in on the gruesome scene too and then panicked thinking that he would be the one the fingers would be pointed at. The murders were very brutal and like some have suggested, gangland style. The other thing I question though, was OJ aware that they were going to happen? Why did he just happen to stumble upon their bodies? What was his reasoning for being there? They were close by an outside door but the killing took place in the kitchen. Both from behind. OJ didn't stumble upon the scene as if he were just casually coming home. He already knew something was wrong, but not knowing what exactly. So in a panic, after seeing all that, yes he fled and he probably would have spilled the beans on the whole thing except that he knew they would kill his kids next. It was a mob hit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on May 10, 2017 16:29:31 GMT
Exactly, TC. This is the crime scene: That is disturbing. I had never heard of it being in the kitchen before, unless that was outside the kitchen entry. That's because it didn't happen in the kitchen. @sleepsinsleepyhalkow is a tin foil hat who keeps insisting on this silly conspiracy theory that has no evidence to support it. There hasn't been one finding from law enforcement, court case documents, the CSI that did the scene, private investigators, or independent experts that substantiates this "the mob killed them from behind in the kitchen" conspiracy theory! And 'sleeps in a hallow' or whatever her/his name is, will never produce anything other than that tired claim in a tone and phrasing that suggests that it's fact. They've been spewing this nonsense insistently for 3 pages on this thread and not backing any of it up with anything but the same lame insistence.... he/she specializes in alternative facts!
|
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on May 10, 2017 16:44:41 GMT
From the reports I have heard and read, it was outside her home where the bodies were found. So what was it? Yes, there are many more layers to what was being told and I feel that OJ walked in on the gruesome scene too and then panicked thinking that he would be the one the fingers would be pointed at. The murders were very brutal and like some have suggested, gangland style. The other thing I question though, was OJ aware that they were going to happen? Why did he just happen to stumble upon their bodies? What was his reasoning for being there? They were close by an outside door but the killing took place in the kitchen. Both from behind. OJ didn't stumble upon the scene as if he were just casually coming home. He already knew something was wrong, but not knowing what exactly. So in a panic, after seeing all that, yes he fled and he probably would have spilled the beans on the whole thing except that he knew they would kill his kids next. It was a mob hit. Still spewing your alternative facts I see. I'm still waiting for an iota of court case documentation, CSI results, law enforcement evidence, private investigator evidence, independent expert statements, off-record witness testimony, scientific study... that supports or corroborates this theory. I already know... you got nothing... but tin foil hat alternative facts!But I'll be waiting for what I know you don't have anyway. 😴💤
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 18:25:50 GMT
Exactly, TC. This is the crime scene: That is disturbing. I had never heard of it being in the kitchen before, unless that was outside the kitchen entry. That was the front entryway of the house 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 18:36:28 GMT
Nevermind with that wuzywhatziz. It doesn't have a clue, pulling things out of the media's storytelling when all these things could be easily explained in any other normal circumstances. No the scene was in the kitchen. Very vividly that is the one place that cements it for me personally. OJ walked in on the gruesome scene. He also fled the scene. There was a whole lot more going on than what is told. That jerk had already convicted OJ before the trial was even over. From the reports I have heard and read, it was outside her home where the bodies were found. So what was it? Yes, there are many more layers to what was being told and I feel that OJ walked in on the gruesome scene too and then panicked thinking that he would be the one the fingers would be pointed at. The murders were very brutal and like some have suggested, gangland style. The other thing I question though, was OJ aware that they were going to happen? Why did he just happen to stumble upon their bodies? What was his reasoning for being there? If Simpson walked in after the killing then why was there a deep cut on his finger that dripped blood next to his shoe prints? He's a liar and lied about owning the Bruno Maglis. His girlfriend left him a message breaking up with him and Nicole didn't invite him to sit with them at the recital so he was in a coked up rage. Sleepy saw these visions of what happened and claims the media gave a spin which is ludicrous 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 22:54:21 GMT
That is disturbing. I had never heard of it being in the kitchen before, unless that was outside the kitchen entry. That's because it didn't happen in the kitchen. @sleepsinsleepyhalkow is a tin foil hat who keeps insisting on this silly conspiracy theory that has no evidence to support it. There hasn't been one finding from law enforcement, court case documents, the CSI that did the scene, private investigators, or independent experts that substantiates this "the mob killed them from behind in the kitchen" conspiracy theory! And 'sleeps in a hallow' or whatever her/his name is, will never produce anything other than that tired claim in a tone and phrasing that suggests that it's fact. They've been spewing this nonsense insistently for 3 pages on this thread and not backing any of it up with anything but the same lame insistence.... he/she specializes in alternative facts! Says the Kool-Aid drinking club leader. FYI the very same MSM right as that day was unfolding let it slip that they were murdered while standing in the kitchen. All you have, nitwit, is a bunch of spewing that MSM has fed you. You haven't produced one single shred of proof of anything but keep claiming that you have. Talk about tin foil! You're completely wrapped in it!
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 10, 2017 22:58:18 GMT
If Simpson walked in after the killing then why was there a deep cut on his finger that dripped blood next to his shoe prints? He's a liar and lied about owning the Bruno Maglis. His girlfriend left him a message breaking up with him and Nicole didn't invite him to sit with them at the recital so he was in a coked up rage. Sleepy saw these visions of what happened and claims the media gave a spin which is ludicrous. We hear about OJ having a deep cut on his finger, but how did he get the cut? Has that been explained or made public? If he had a few drops of blood at the scene, wouldn't that be like finding a needle in a haystack amongst all the other blood? If OJ did kill them, it would be understandable why he was there, or has it been explained what he was doing over at her house that night after the murders? It can't have been a coincidence or was it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 22:59:24 GMT
From the reports I have heard and read, it was outside her home where the bodies were found. So what was it? Yes, there are many more layers to what was being told and I feel that OJ walked in on the gruesome scene too and then panicked thinking that he would be the one the fingers would be pointed at. The murders were very brutal and like some have suggested, gangland style. The other thing I question though, was OJ aware that they were going to happen? Why did he just happen to stumble upon their bodies? What was his reasoning for being there? If Simpson walked in after the killing then why was there a deep cut on his finger that dripped blood next to his shoe prints? He's a liar and lied about owning the Bruno Maglis. His girlfriend left him a message breaking up with him and Nicole didn't invite him to sit with them at the recital so he was in a coked up rage. Sleepy saw these visions of what happened and claims the media gave a spin which is ludicrous  Aaaand your point is? Oh that's right you got none. Cuts prove murder! Who knew? Not like fleeing in panic, falling and scurrying in fear. Naaaah. No it's gotta be murder. Are you sure you're not that other tin foil spouting projectionist?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 23:01:16 GMT
Hahahaha! Yeah, that's it! Wow! Just amazing!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 23:08:27 GMT
If Simpson walked in after the killing then why was there a deep cut on his finger that dripped blood next to his shoe prints? He's a liar and lied about owning the Bruno Maglis. His girlfriend left him a message breaking up with him and Nicole didn't invite him to sit with them at the recital so he was in a coked up rage. Sleepy saw these visions of what happened and claims the media gave a spin which is ludicrous. We hear about OJ having a deep cut on his finger, but how did he get the cut? Has that been explained or made public? If he had a few drops of blood at the scene, wouldn't that be like finding a needle in a haystack amongst all the other blood? If OJ did kill them, it would be understandable why he was there, or has it been explained what he was doing over at her house that night after the murders? It can't have been a coincidence or was it? Goo luck getting any kind of a truthful answer from that user. I applaud you though for questioning everything the news and a very corrupt police force says. When you question it means you can think for yourself unlike some. If you defy them though, you'll get the insults, constant stream of nasty and all that goes with it. The CIA are the ones who came up with the "conspiracy theory" phrasing and coined it. That's to keep any opposition from their dirty secrets and it's been in play for decades. Just like calling someone a racist is designed to shut down the argument. As you see, those two users are not in the slightest bit interested in any kind of debate. They are only here to force their beliefs and act like jackasses toward those who disagree with them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 23:09:28 GMT
Hahahaha! Yeah, that's it! Wow! Just amazing! I really bother you. Good. Glad to be a thorn in your side.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 10, 2017 23:13:23 GMT
Says the Kool-Aid drinking club leader. FYI the very same MSM right as that day was unfolding let it slip that they murdered while standing in the kitchen. All you have, nitwit, is a bunch of spewing that MSM has fed you. You haven't produced one single shred of proof of anything but keep claiming that you have. Talk about tin foil! You're completely wrapped in it! You have some clever retorts sleepy. I am attempting to not take any direct stance regarding these murders and who committed them. Until I know more details and facts, other than what the media has fed us and wanted us to hear, this whole charade reeks of deceit and corruption from pretty much all parties involved and that includes the law and the justice system, both the criminal and civil trials. I also do not feel invested in any care factor over these people that were murdered. I am open to the comments of those that believe OJ was guilty of the crime, and also those that are looking at things from a flexible angle regarding conspiracy theories like yours. I don't feel comfortable condemning somebody over something, when I feel ambivalent and do not feel certain about what really transpired that night. That is the route the jury took and perhaps considering the confounded circumstances in this case, in hindsight, it was probably the best one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 23:21:24 GMT
Says the Kool-Aid drinking club leader. FYI the very same MSM right as that day was unfolding let it slip that they murdered while standing in the kitchen. All you have, nitwit, is a bunch of spewing that MSM has fed you. You haven't produced one single shred of proof of anything but keep claiming that you have. Talk about tin foil! You're completely wrapped in it! You have some clever retorts sleepy. I am attempting to not take any direct stance regarding these murders and who committed them. Until I know more details and facts, other than what the media has fed us and wanted us to hear, this whole charade reeks of deceit and corruption from pretty much all parties involved and that includes the law and the justice system, both the criminal and civil trials. I also do not feel invested in any care factor over these people that were murdered. I am open to the comments of those that believe OJ was guilty of the crime, and also those that are looking at things from a flexible angle regarding conspiracy theories like yours. I don't feel comfortable condemning somebody over something, when I feel ambivalent and do not feel certain about what really transpired that night. That is the route the jury took and perhaps considering the confounded circumstances in this case, in hindsight, it was probably the best one. Like you, I have no stakes in this. Also do not care about any of these people, least of all OJ. I have no dogs in this race. My stance however is not based on any of the conspiracy theories. Mine is absolute of what I saw. If it weren't for that, I'd not even say anything. But I was given a glimpse for whatever reason. I will stand my ground as I know what I saw. The events that lead to that event will be known. All things will be known.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 10, 2017 23:27:53 GMT
We hear about OJ having a deep cut on his finger, but how did he get the cut? Has that been explained or made public? If he had a few drops of blood at the scene, wouldn't that be like finding a needle in a haystack amongst all the other blood? If OJ did kill them, it would be understandable why he was there, or has it been explained what he was doing over at her house that night after the murders? It can't have been a coincidence or was it? ... I applaud you though for questioning everything the news and a very corrupt police force says. When you question it means you can think for yourself unlike some...the CIA are the ones who came up with the "conspiracy theory" phrasing and coined it. That's to keep any opposition from their dirty secrets and it's been in play for decades. Just like calling someone a racist is designed to shut down the argument... And in this case, from what we were told, that Fuhrman detective's own alleged corrupt behavior with tampering with the evidence put a big dirty splat on the prosecutor's case. That guy looked cold and soulless to me. OJ did have a crackerjack team of lawyers, one's which he could afford. Had he not been in that position, he most likely would have fried. This also brings up plenty of other issues regarding the so-called justice system and fair trials. There is also no fairness or equality in the dangerous games these lawyers and judges may play with others lives.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2017 2:26:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on May 11, 2017 3:27:37 GMT
That's because it didn't happen in the kitchen. @sleepsinsleepyhalkow is a tin foil hat who keeps insisting on this silly conspiracy theory that has no evidence to support it. There hasn't been one finding from law enforcement, court case documents, the CSI that did the scene, private investigators, or independent experts that substantiates this "the mob killed them from behind in the kitchen" conspiracy theory! And 'sleeps in a hallow' or whatever her/his name is, will never produce anything other than that tired claim in a tone and phrasing that suggests that it's fact. They've been spewing this nonsense insistently for 3 pages on this thread and not backing any of it up with anything but the same lame insistence.... he/she specializes in alternative facts! Says the Kool-Aid drinking club leader. FYI the very same MSM right as that day was unfolding let it slip that they were murdered while standing in the kitchen. All you have, nitwit, is a bunch of spewing that MSM has fed you. You haven't produced one single shred of proof of anything but keep claiming that you have. Talk about tin foil! You're completely wrapped in it! Where is this so-called MSM report that they were killed in the kitchen? (I already know you can't provide it because it doesn't exist). And yet you still haven't even produced so much as one credible reference to suggest any truth to what you say. I already have given you a number of references to trial evidence and forensic evidence. But since that's not enough (despite the fact that you haven't given me anything in return), try looking at the autopsy reports for both Ron Goldman and Nichole Brown Simpson. All the wounds on their bodies were from the side or from the front! None of them were from behind! So much for your "they were killed from behind in the kitchen" theory!... Oops!... Idiot much? Gullible much? Stop wasting your time. Nobody's buying your crackpot conspiracy theory. Nobody's drinking your tin foil hat punch but you. Go chase Bigfoot or something..... 😂
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 11, 2017 5:04:52 GMT
I am not taking any sides at all on this Madame Buns. Sleepy has her pov that I don't entirely disagree with, and I am open to your opinions and the others that feel OJ is as guilty as sin. There are plenty of questions that have gone unanswered. Some googling search may assist with answering this, but I can't find what I want to know. If the manner of her approach to you has challenged or upset you, and the insults that she thrown around at you and the other poster who have disagreed with her, that is her doing not mine. I can't change how she chooses to communicate her pov. She just feels very strongly about something as you do. The difference is, it is at the opposite end of the spectrum though. I am sitting in the middle here. I don't feel right about condemning somebody if I don't know the whole picture, especially if it has nothing to do with me and is an old story. I would be the the one who has to live with that judgement.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2017 5:07:06 GMT
I am not taking any sides at all on this Madame Buns. Sleepy has her pov that I don't entirely disagree with, and I am open to your opinions and the others that feel OJ is as guilty as sin. There are plenty of questions that have gone unanswered. Some googling search may assist with answering this, but I can't find what I want to know. If the manner of her approach to you has challenged or upset you, and the insults that she thrown around at you and the other poster who have disagreed with her, that is her doing not mine. I can't change how she chooses to communicate her pov. She just feels very strongly about something as you do. The difference is, it is at the opposite end of the spectrum though. I am sitting in the middle here. I don't feel right about condemning somebody if I don't know the whole picture, especially if it has nothing to do with me and is an old story. I would be the the one who has to live with that judgement. It's the fact that she insulted me in her posts to you and you said nothing. I'm sorry you don't want to defend a friend
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on May 11, 2017 5:43:02 GMT
I am not taking any sides at all on this Madame Buns. Sleepy has her pov that I don't entirely disagree with, and I am open to your opinions and the others that feel OJ is as guilty as sin. There are plenty of questions that have gone unanswered. Some googling search may assist with answering this, but I can't find what I want to know. If the manner of her approach to you has challenged or upset you, and the insults that she thrown around at you and the other poster who have disagreed with her, that is her doing not mine. I can't change how she chooses to communicate her pov. She just feels very strongly about something as you do. The difference is, it is at the opposite end of the spectrum though. I am sitting in the middle here. I don't feel right about condemning somebody if I don't know the whole picture, especially if it has nothing to do with me and is an old story. I would be the the one who has to live with that judgement. It's the fact that she insulted me in her posts to you and you said nothing. I'm sorry you don't want to defend a friend The discussion or discourse was between you and sleepy and was not my battle. I know you can handle yourself and it is just a discussion thread and you had a disagreement with her. She was rude to you, you retorted back. Whatever I would have said, or our connection with each other wasn't something I felt necessary to bring up. You have bunsofsteel and perhaps your tail is caught between your legs. Come back at her with a vengeance.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2017 5:59:57 GMT
It's the fact that she insulted me in her posts to you and you said nothing. I'm sorry you don't want to defend a friend The discussion or discourse was between you and sleepy and was not my battle. I know you can handle yourself and it is just a discussion thread and you had a disagreement with her. She was rude to you, you retorted back. Whatever I would have said, or our connection with each other wasn't something I felt necessary to bring up. You have bunsofsteel and perhaps your tail is caught between your legs. Come back at her with a vengeance. I guess I'm being too sensitive. I just can't believe you would take her seriously when her only information on this case came from "visions"
|
|