|
|
Post by summers8 on Nov 12, 2018 12:19:31 GMT
To those who will say I am a blind hater. listen. this stuff is a waste. what marvel could have done is ditch this stuff and reboot and revolutionize the poor marvel animation. Disney is so obsessed with their cinematic crossover characters they want to milk the cow out of it even if it means the cow is getting sick.
we get it. this characters Loki, Scarlet Witch, Falcom and the rest have been in movies. we don't need to see them again anywhere else especially when Marvel is failing in the other deportments namely animation or games.
Disney should have ditched this streaming stuff and put the resources and money to marvel animation or even marvel video games,why do we have to see this characters online again when we see them in movies, also when we can just get great sets of animated movies that will be stand alone and self contained which will be a bigger contribution to the marvel lore than streaming videos of cinematic universe characters we see in movie all the time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Nov 12, 2018 12:51:20 GMT
I blame Netflix and Hulu for this. It's because of their popularity and success that a lot of these companies are jumping on the Streaming bandwagon.
I mean even fucking Warner Brothers is releasing their own streaming service next year.
It's fucking ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Nov 12, 2018 13:09:39 GMT
Marvel is going to a very minority in the Disney+ Service. 21 MCU movies and 4 possible shows. What 20ish animated movies? And some cartoons that was on DisneyXD. Lets over estimate with 100 titles for Marvel. Now think of the 1000's of tv shows and movies Disney has produced over the years. Now add the 1000's of fox tv shows they own the streaming rights to. Now add to that the 1000's of Twenty Century Fox movies had.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Nov 12, 2018 15:09:15 GMT
I blame Netflix and Hulu for this. It's because of their popularity and success that a lot of these companies are jumping on the Streaming bandwagon. I mean even fucking Warner Brothers is releasing their own streaming service next year. It's fucking ridiculous. No it's just capitalism. I mean, when in Rome... |
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Nov 12, 2018 16:36:27 GMT
So instead of trying something new amd unprecedented by giving their secondary movie characters their own series, further building their cinematic universe by expanding on already loved characters, you want the MCU to instead spend time and money on an old, smaller niche market where they would need to start from scratch, making shows that nobody asked for?
That's some next level stupidity right there. The kind of stupidity that could drive entire companies bankrupt.
Besides, there's no such thing as a Marvel streaming service. This is how i know you're simply trolling.
|
|
|
|
Post by hobowar on Nov 12, 2018 18:23:03 GMT
I won't be using it.
You're still a cvnt, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 12, 2018 20:39:51 GMT
I blame Netflix and Hulu for this. It's because of their popularity and success that a lot of these companies are jumping on the Streaming bandwagon. I mean even fucking Warner Brothers is releasing their own streaming service next year. It's fucking ridiculous. It also has to do with people cutting the cord. Not many are watching regular tv/cable anymore. I only watch Hulu and barely Netflix. Then you have Netflix going more into original content and less other stuff. It's pretty much the same thing that the other studios are doing. And studios doing it like this let's people pick and choose what they want to see on a semi regular. If you are a Star Wars fan, why have Netflix when there is only Clone Wars and The Last Jedi (for now). Star Trek fan? Get the CBS one. |
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 12, 2018 20:41:41 GMT
To those who will say I am a blind hater. listen. this stuff is a waste. what marvel could have done is ditch this stuff and reboot and revolutionize the poor marvel animation. Disney is so obsessed with their cinematic crossover characters they want to milk the cow out of it even if it means the cow is getting sick. we get it. this characters Loki, Scarlet Witch, Falcom and the rest have been in movies. we don't need to see them again anywhere else especially when Marvel is failing in the other deportments namely animation or games. Disney should have ditched this streaming stuff and put the resources and money to marvel animation or even marvel video games,why do we have to see this characters online again when we see them in movies, also when we can just get great sets of animated movies that will be stand alone and self contained which will be a bigger contribution to the marvel lore than streaming videos of cinematic universe characters we see in movie all the time. So you aren't going to get it to watch the Fox X-men movies anytime you want? What about the 90s animated series? You do know that those shows aren't going to be the only things on Disney+, right? |
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 12, 2018 21:44:53 GMT
(NBC News Channel) -- Disney says Disney+ will be the name of its new streaming service, which will bundle together content from numerous Disney brands, including Pixar, Marvel, Star Wars and National Geographic.
www.wtvy.com/content/news/More-details-on-Disney-streaming-service-Disney-500259782.html
At first I thought that Disney was going to pull a fast one and offer several separate streaming services, one for each of its brands. But it seems like it will instead put all of its brands onto the one service.
If that's the case then it makes it the one other service (besides Netflix itself) that I might actually pay for. If it has ALL THAT CONTENT then it might just be worth it. Disney, Pixar, Star Wars, Marvel, National Geographic and ORIGINAL PROGRAMING? What's not to like?
As for whether or not they should put that money into something else? Don't worry. Its Disney. They WILL!
|
|
|
|
Post by kleinreturns on Nov 12, 2018 23:11:00 GMT
So instead of trying something new amd unprecedented by giving their secondary movie characters their own series, further building their cinematic universe by expanding on already loved characters, you want the MCU to instead spend time and money on an old, smaller niche market where they would need to start from scratch, making shows that nobody asked for? That's some next level stupidity right there. The kind of stupidity that could drive entire companies bankrupt. Besides, there's no such thing as a Marvel streaming service. This is how i know you're simply trolling. Summers8 got owned!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Nov 12, 2018 23:19:13 GMT
(NBC News Channel) -- Disney says Disney+ will be the name of its new streaming service, which will bundle together content from numerous Disney brands, including Pixar, Marvel, Star Wars and National Geographic.
www.wtvy.com/content/news/More-details-on-Disney-streaming-service-Disney-500259782.html
At first I thought that Disney was going to pull a fast one and offer several separate streaming services, one for each of its brands. But it seems like it will instead put all of its brands onto the one service.
If that's the case then it makes it the one other service (besides Netflix itself) that I might actually pay for. If it has ALL THAT CONTENT then it might just be worth it. Disney, Pixar, Star Wars, Marvel, National Geographic and ORIGINAL PROGRAMING? What's not to like?
As for whether or not they should put that money into something else? Don't worry. Its Disney. They WILL!
don't forget all the Back Catalog of Fox Films and Tv shows... Avatar, they could finally put the 21st Century Fox logo at the beginning of all the new Stars now if they wanted (just a side bonus) Planet of the Apes, Alien, Predator, etc Tv shows too... “Modern Family” — Airs on ABC, produced by 20th Century Fox Television “Speechless” — Airs on ABC, co-produced by Fox and ABC “This Is Us” — Airs on NBC, produced by Fox “Empire” — Airs on Fox, produced by Fox “The X-Files” (revived) — Airs on and produced by Fox “The Gifted” — Airs on and produced by Fox “The Americans” — Airs on FX, produced by FX Productions “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia” — Airs on FX, produced by FX Productions “The Simpsons” — Produced by Fox Television Animation “Family Guy” — Produced by Fox Television Animation “Bob’s Burgers” — Produced by Fox Television Animation “American Dad!” — Produced by Fox Television Animation “King of the Hill” — Produced by Fox Television Animation “24” “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” “Hill Street Blues” “M_A_S*H” “The Mary Tyler Moore Show” “The Shield” And a crap ton more. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2018 0:17:01 GMT
I'll live without it. I've given my dizzying levels of money and greed speech a dozen times now. If I'm going to consume anything from Disney or Marvel it had better be in theater form because I'm not shilling out for Disney's own private Netflix equivalent. If they pump out original content, then missing out is a risk I'll just have to take.
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 13, 2018 4:27:58 GMT
I'll live without it. I've given my dizzying levels of money and greed speech a dozen times now. If I'm going to consume anything from Disney or Marvel it had better be in theater form because I'm not shilling out for Disney's own private Netflix equivalent. If they pump out original content, then missing out is a risk I'll just have to take. Well I'd love to see that new Star Trek Discovery show, but I'm not paying for a service just to watch one show. So I guess I'll just wait until they put it out on DVD. I'm with you... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2018 4:31:45 GMT
To those who will say I am a blind hater. listen. this stuff is a waste. what marvel could have done is ditch this stuff and reboot and revolutionize the poor marvel animation. Disney is so obsessed with their cinematic crossover characters they want to milk the cow out of it even if it means the cow is getting sick. we get it. this characters Loki, Scarlet Witch, Falcom and the rest have been in movies. we don't need to see them again anywhere else especially when Marvel is failing in the other deportments namely animation or games. Disney should have ditched this streaming stuff and put the resources and money to marvel animation or even marvel video games,why do we have to see this characters online again when we see them in movies, also when we can just get great sets of animated movies that will be stand alone and self contained which will be a bigger contribution to the marvel lore than streaming videos of cinematic universe characters we see in movie all the time. Your very presence making this post will probably make several people sign up for it out of spite for you. |
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Nov 13, 2018 4:48:59 GMT
So instead of trying something new amd unprecedented by giving their secondary movie characters their own series, further building their cinematic universe by expanding on already loved characters, you want the MCU to instead spend time and money on an old, smaller niche market where they would need to start from scratch, making shows that nobody asked for? That's some next level stupidity right there. The kind of stupidity that could drive entire companies bankrupt. Besides, there's no such thing as a Marvel streaming service. This is how i know you're simply trolling. that's why you mcu fans are ignorant and dont know anything about comics mythology. all you know is disney product placement mcu movies. it is not about niche, it is about lore and expanding a universe.Take X-Men, spiderman, batman they have succeeded in everything, there is a reason why they dont need cinematic universes or cross overs and each have their own separate universe without needing to rely on other series. they had good comics, good games, good movies, good animation. mcu series dont. everything about them begins and ends with their cross over movies that dont even have any identity.
also mcu should not be a failure in games and animation and they are. they keep focusing on their movies that are barely having any impact anymore.if u think I am wrong, look at spiderman , by the end of the year he would have had
an excellent video game thanks to sony
a promising extension of his movie universe thanks to venom and sony
potentially a great animation (into the spiderverse) thanks to sony
what does mcu have outside of their disney comedy movies?
at this point, homecoming is the least interesting thing about spiderverse,
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2018 4:55:54 GMT
So instead of trying something new amd unprecedented by giving their secondary movie characters their own series, further building their cinematic universe by expanding on already loved characters, you want the MCU to instead spend time and money on an old, smaller niche market where they would need to start from scratch, making shows that nobody asked for? That's some next level stupidity right there. The kind of stupidity that could drive entire companies bankrupt. Besides, there's no such thing as a Marvel streaming service. This is how i know you're simply trolling. that's why you mcu fans are ignorant and dont know anything about comics mythology. all you know is disney product placemen mcu movies. it is not about niche, it is about lore and expanding a universe.Take X-Men, spiderman, batman they have succeeded in everything, there is a reason why they dont need cinematic universes or cross overs and each have their own separate universe without needing to rely on other series. they had good comics, good games, good movies, good animation. mcu series dont. everything about them begins and ends with their cross over movies that dont even have any identity.
also mcu should not be a failure in games and animation and they are. they keep focusing on their movies that are barely having any impact anymore.
if u think I am wrong, look at spiderman , by the end of the year he would have had
an excellent video game thanks to sony
a promising extension of his movie universe thanks to venom and sony
potentially a great animation (into the spiderverse) thanks to sony
what does mcu have outside of their disney comedy movies?
at this point, homecoming is the least interesting thing about spiderverse,
Okay, seriously, scabab, you let him talk to people this way? |
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Nov 13, 2018 5:30:36 GMT
So instead of trying something new amd unprecedented by giving their secondary movie characters their own series, further building their cinematic universe by expanding on already loved characters, you want the MCU to instead spend time and money on an old, smaller niche market where they would need to start from scratch, making shows that nobody asked for? That's some next level stupidity right there. The kind of stupidity that could drive entire companies bankrupt. Besides, there's no such thing as a Marvel streaming service. This is how i know you're simply trolling. that's why you mcu fans are ignorant and dont know anything about comics mythology. all you know is disney product placemen mcu movies. it is not about niche, it is about lore and expanding a universe.Take X-Men, spiderman, batman they have succeeded in everything, there is a reason why they dont need cinematic universes or cross overs and each have their own separate universe without needing to rely on other series. they had good comics, good games, good movies, good animation. mcu series dont. everything about them begins and ends with their cross over movies that dont even have any identity.
also mcu should not be a failure in games and animation and they are. they keep focusing on their movies that are barely having any impact anymore.
if u think I am wrong, look at spiderman , by the end of the year he would have had
an excellent video game thanks to sony
a promising extension of his movie universe thanks to venom and sony
potentially a great animation (into the spiderverse) thanks to sony
what does mcu have outside of their disney comedy movies?
at this point, homecoming is the least interesting thing about spiderverse,
Dude, you're a guy who thinks tight, black leather outfits are the epitome of great superhero costumes. You don't know shit about comics mythology. In the end, we all know you're just bitter that the MCU is going to give us another first: transitioning their movie IPs into tv shows to make them even more successful and bringing in more money than any games or animated movies can make them. We all know you would have praised the hell out of it had Fox thought of it first. But they didn't, and you can't stomach the idea of the MCU finding new and inventive ways on how to make successful shows. Where I'm from there's a term we use for people as salty as you: butthurt |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 13, 2018 12:14:03 GMT
Simmer down, there's no need to be name calling each other, you aren't in school. Why even post on the MCU board if you have a problem with the opinions of MCU fans?
Marvel Streaming Service? Is that Disney+? If they can make some good original content for it that they wouldn't have made otherwise then let them be. I download it all from Pirate Bay anyway so it's only my gain.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Nov 13, 2018 19:28:41 GMT
On a side note, I remember reading an article that stated Disney+ will be significantly cheaper than Netflix. Considering that I'm only paying around $10 for Netflix, this makes Disney+ pretty affordable.
|
|
havenless
Sophomore
@havenless
Posts: 717
Likes: 312
 
|
Post by havenless on Nov 13, 2018 21:19:00 GMT
I’ll probably get it, especially if there’s a ton of Fox/Disney/MCU movies on it. Would it be weird if they had the X-Men movies and Avengers movies both next to each other in the Disney action category? What a crazy world.
|
|
