|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 29, 2017 15:12:06 GMT
This. Although you always had to be careful about which pic you chose - if a reverse search led back to other pages then *someone* would probably check it out. I know both Rapelulz and Anger-Kiwi got their info spread all over. But, as with those two, it generally only happened to people who were *trying* to be awful.
That said, given that my own picture made it here before I actually did and it's the same fellow doing the asking for more pics - I'd advise you dudes to lock it down. There's no bottom to that creep barrel - this is the guy who asks where people's kids sleep.
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Mar 29, 2017 15:35:22 GMT
He says as he comments on said people's Facebook pages... Maybe some people just seem awful to you because they call you an a-hole for using names like "Rapelulz" and "Anger-Kiwi"... You didn't quite win. But, thanks for playing... Here's the home version of the game... and a year supply of Turtle Wax.
|
|
|
Post by geode on Mar 29, 2017 15:42:09 GMT
1) Couldn't it be that Blade is trying to do "damage control".. and deny that it's actually him? 2) Does it really matter?... Isn't attempted murder still a crime?.. Even if it's not really Blade, wouldn't it still be for the best to get rid of someone who would willfully dox another poster... even if their sleuthing skills suck? We (the staff) have been discussing and debating all of this all night long. What are your answers to these questions? Should attempted murder carry the same sentence as actual murder? Does wanting or trying to commit a crime mean a crime has been committed? If someone links to a Facebook account that isn't mine and says it's me, have I been doxxed? I think there is one more possibility that nobody is bringing up, what if Superdude was fully aware that the Facebook page was not Blade's but just posting as a joke to wind him up? Perhaps he just found one at random and linked it knowing Blade would argue back? Also, I do not think the penalties for attempted murder are typically the same as actually committing murder. Intent is not the only factor in play in coming up with a sentence.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 29, 2017 15:46:16 GMT
No point in getting salty with me over someone else spreading your info. But, yes, it says a lot that two of a type have been the target of that dynamic. You and your "winning on the internet" fixation.
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Mar 29, 2017 15:52:40 GMT
You and your "winning on the internet" fixation. I'm the first person to say that "NOBODY EVER WINS" here... What we usually have is just a difference of opinions.... and nobody really wins an argument here... and that we're all pretty much losers for posting here in the first place. Just because you didn't win.. Doesn't mean that I think that I won. This has been explained to you before... but... You're an a-hole. We'll probably go over this again the next time you bring this up. He types... as he forgets that he just wrote that it also happened to him 2 minutes earlier.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 29, 2017 15:52:47 GMT
That's entirely possible. Although Supes also linked, in the past, pages that featured Blade scamming someone in an online purchase and some other page featuring his (incredibly amusing) Youtube channel subscriptions - it wouldn't surprise me if he found his actual FB page.
Supes is one of those guys who could probably use a break from the internet. Everything was srz bzness. Anger-Kiwi said some awful crap to him, no doubt, but even her using my own kid to make a paedo crack at me didn't see me charging off to go full-P.I. on her identity.
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Mar 29, 2017 15:54:46 GMT
there is no need to post pics on this new forum.
so you'll have to rely on domenastygay.com. like you always have.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 29, 2017 16:13:54 GMT
More often you tell people they "didn't win". Your fixation on winning on the internet is odd.
What are you talking about, Ochre Avenger? When has anyone every posted my personal info?
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 29, 2017 16:28:29 GMT
geodeI brought it up but I still think that if no one is in on the joke and superdude is adamant he's talking about Blade, it is slander/libel. If he posted it and then did nothing else, then it could be seen either way with the benefit of the doubt going to superdude perhaps. The thing too is that there's no way to have a direct correlation with this and an actual crime. If the admin states that doxing is a bannable offense and the offender thinks he is doxing, then I'm not sure how it is not doxing just because he was wrong. Honestly, he is revealing information on someone anyway, they just aren't aware they are a victim yet.
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Mar 29, 2017 16:28:56 GMT
More often you tell people they "didn't win". Your fixation on winning on the internet is odd. I don't really say that too often... or at all, really.. It was more of just a set up line for the "Thanks for playing... Here's the home game... and a year supply of Turtle Wax", ya dweeb. And repeating the same shit over again... Doesn't really make it true. given that my own picture made it here before I actually did
Quoth the raven... ever bore.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 29, 2017 16:34:49 GMT
Yet another example of your inability to own your shit. Calm down. Blade used a pic I provided. That's not doxxing, as was done to you and Ada. Follow the conversation.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 29, 2017 16:35:28 GMT
Can Cine make a post where he isn't talking about [or it isn't related to]Vegas Devil, Erjen, or myself?
I don't think so.
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Mar 29, 2017 16:37:59 GMT
Can Cine make a post where he isn't talking about [or it isn't related to]Vegas Devil, Erjen, or myself? I don't think so. pic?
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Mar 29, 2017 16:39:25 GMT
Can Cine make a post where he isn't talking about [or it isn't related to]Vegas Devil, Erjen, or myself? I don't think so. I don't know... but.. THIS MEANS I'M ANGRY.
Not really.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Mar 29, 2017 16:43:10 GMT
More often you tell people they "didn't win". Your fixation on winning on the internet is odd. I don't really say that too often... or at all, really.. It was more of just a set up line for the "Thanks for playing... Here's the home game... and a year supply of Turtle Wax", ya dweeb. And repeating the same shit over again... Doesn't really make it true. given that my own picture made it here before I actually did
Quoth the raven... ever bore. In the wacky world of Cinemachinery, it becomes true when he says it, and ninnies like us need to learn it through repetition. This thread got me to remembering how Scalvador swiped my name and my photo. Using my pic as the star-child from 2001 was actually kind of cool and imaginative I thought, but I wasn't going to give him the satisfaction of telling him so, and the bottom line is that I didn't give him permission to do it. And yet, he had plenty of defenders, and they argued that if I didn't want my photo stolen then I never should have uploaded it to Facebook. And it was the same when goz posted my earthly name, my physical address, my place of employment, and the last four digits of my phone number, and the old IMDB did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about it. I remember when Ben did that to you and I was one of the ones who reported it. He also did it to zenferret and two others. I have no use at all for zenferret, but it was still wrong. It's kind of nice to see this site taking it more seriously.
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Mar 29, 2017 16:49:32 GMT
Yet another example of your inability to own your shit. No... Just another example of you not being able to follow what is being said. The "joke" is "Thanks for playing. Here's a copy of the home game... and a year supply of Turtle Wax"...which usually follows the phrase "You didn't win" Dumbass. It's only a call to victory if you completely ignore everything I ever said about "winning/losing" here. But.. You're just that kind of a-hole that always does that same sort of sht. Why bother paying attention to what people actually say... when you can make yourself feel better about yourself by assuming what they actually mesn? Yeah.. Because that what that is. The same thing can be said about assuming people's emotions. Yeah.. And some might consider a personal picture of you as "info" in your "No point in getting salty with me over someone else spreading your info.".... a-hole. Conversation followed... Unfortunately, the lead is a dipsht.
|
|
|
Post by Sulla on Mar 29, 2017 16:51:41 GMT
I think there is one more possibility that nobody is bringing up, what if Superdude was fully aware that the Facebook page was not Blade's but just posting as a joke to wind him up? A similar thing happened just days before the IMDb boards went down. Some troll whose name escapes me appeared, posted a link and claimed it was ChucklesOToole's YouTube account complete with pics of some poor unsuspecting 20something year-old man. Eddie, Cash, fleets and I disputed his claim. Then he asked each of us to prove him wrong by showing him Chuckles' real pics or info. He even sent me a private message which I ignored. I noticed in his post-history that he made the same post on four other boards. So it's obvious he was fishing for info which would doubtless be used for no good purpose.
|
|
|
Post by geode on Mar 29, 2017 16:52:30 GMT
geode I brought it up but I still think that if no one is in on the joke and superdude is adamant he's talking about Blade, it is slander/libel. If he posted it and then did nothing else, then it could be seen either way with the benefit of the doubt going to superdude perhaps. The thing too is that there's no way to have a direct correlation with this and an actual crime. If the admin states that doxing is a bannable offense and the offender thinks he is doxing, then I'm not sure how it is not doxing just because he was wrong. Honestly, he is revealing information on someone anyway, they just aren't aware they are a victim yet. I think my possibility is different than what you brought up. In my instance Superdude doesn't care if anybody believes the FB link is really Blade, just that it bothers Blade. I might be outrageous and that was his point. If no real identities are involved it is impossible for slander or libel to be the case.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Mar 29, 2017 17:01:23 GMT
tpfkar Stuff you yourself posted previously, after you started up lying here too, right after you were making up things about other peoples' appearance and then lying when it was pointed out to you about your own appearance as the old board came down. The logic being - you freely lying about others' appearance, here's your actual self-provided appearance that you're denying, you crazy crazy long-suffering tourettes "victim". Doesn't matter that it's not doxing, it's against the board rules. But ze fax
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 29, 2017 17:03:56 GMT
geodeThe problem is he automatically involves others by publically posting it. I would understand if he was pm'ing Blade, but if he doesn't indicate he is kidding, it's best to think he wasn't kidding. He should be at least smart enough to know he was risking himself with violating the rules.
|
|