|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 27, 2018 18:46:03 GMT
I know atheists like to believe that all the intricacies of existence are the result of something totally random that just happened with no rhyme or reason.
Just because they can't see a pattern in something, their limitations deduce that it's therefore 'random'. They are so arrogant that if they don't understand something, then they pass it off as 'random' or 'brain chemicals'. Lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Nov 27, 2018 18:56:50 GMT
I know atheists like to believe that all the intricacies of existence are the result of something totally random that just happened with no rhyme or reason.
Just because they can't see a pattern in something, their limitations deduce that it's therefore 'random'. They are so arrogant that if they don't understand something, then they pass it off as 'random' or 'brain chemicals'. Lol.
"totally random that just happened with no rhyme or reason."
What do you mean by "random"? I dunno much about cosmological evolution, but I can tell you biological evolution is hardly random, at least in regards to natural selection.
"Just because they can't see a pattern in something"
What patterns? Simply because you perceive some sort of "patterns" in nature (that's what I'm assuming you're refering to) is not in itself evidence of divine creation. That's just simply evidence of you pereceiving patterns probably because you so desperately want them to be there (confirmation bias)
"They are so arrogant that if they don't understand something, then they pass it off as 'random' or 'brain chemicals'. Lol."
I could very easily reverse that on to you. Don't understand something? Just say "God did it" to fill in the gap. Naturalistic science is far more emcompassing than "random" or "brain chemicals".
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 27, 2018 19:01:33 GMT
I know atheists like to believe that all the intricacies of existence are the result of something totally random that just happened with no rhyme or reason.
Just because they can't see a pattern in something, their limitations deduce that it's therefore 'random'. They are so arrogant that if they don't understand something, then they pass it off as 'random' or 'brain chemicals'. Lol.
"totally random that just happened with no rhyme or reason."
What do you mean by "random"? I dunno much about cosmological evolution, but I can tell you biological evolution is hardly random, at least in regards to natural selection.
"Just because they can't see a pattern in something"
What patterns? Simply because you perceive some sort of "patterns" in nature (that's what I'm assuming you're refering to) is not in itself evidence of divine creation. That's just simply evidence of you pereceiving patterns probably because you so desperately want them to be there (confirmation bias)
"They are so arrogant that if they don't understand something, then they pass it off as 'random' or 'brain chemicals'. Lol."
I could very easily reverse that on to you. Don't understand something? Just say "God did it" to fill in the gap. Naturalistic science is far more emcompassing than "random" or "brain chemicals".
You could, but you would look like an idiot.
Patterns don't occur without some kind of intelligence that 'coded' it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2018 19:01:56 GMT
I know atheists like to believe that all the intricacies of existence are the result of something totally random that just happened with no rhyme or reason.
No, you don't know that. You merely wish it were true. |
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Nov 27, 2018 19:02:54 GMT
"totally random that just happened with no rhyme or reason."
What do you mean by "random"? I dunno much about cosmological evolution, but I can tell you biological evolution is hardly random, at least in regards to natural selection.
"Just because they can't see a pattern in something"
What patterns? Simply because you perceive some sort of "patterns" in nature (that's what I'm assuming you're refering to) is not in itself evidence of divine creation. That's just simply evidence of you pereceiving patterns probably because you so desperately want them to be there (confirmation bias)
"They are so arrogant that if they don't understand something, then they pass it off as 'random' or 'brain chemicals'. Lol."
I could very easily reverse that on to you. Don't understand something? Just say "God did it" to fill in the gap. Naturalistic science is far more emcompassing than "random" or "brain chemicals".
You could, but you would look like an idiot.
Patterns don't occur without some kind of intelligence that 'coded' it.
"You could, but you would look like an idiot."
Not really, you've made several posts of you basically saying just that.
"Patterns don't occur without some kind of intelligence that 'coded' it."
You haven't actaully explained what you mean by "patterns". Give examples.
|
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Nov 27, 2018 19:15:22 GMT
I know atheists like to believe that all the intricacies of existence are the result of something totally random that just happened with no rhyme or reason. No atheist has ever made this argument. Of course, for theists with limited intelligence, it's much easier to attack a strawman than to deal with real arguments from real atheists. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Nov 27, 2018 19:16:31 GMT
A year or two ago I posted a video (which I might be able to find again) with accidents and near-accidents as evidence that randomness is not random and reality as we know it is a 3D simulation.
As expected, it was pooh-poohed by the RFS peanut gallery, and my comrades on the board remained silent as if to say, "I don't know this guy."
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 27, 2018 20:53:31 GMT
A year or two ago I posted a video (which I might be able to find again) with accidents and near-accidents as evidence that randomness is not random and reality as we know it is a 3D simulation. As expected, it was pooh-poohed by the RFS peanut gallery, and my comrades on the board remained silent as if to say, "I don't know this guy." Gee, Erjenious! Which of the #4308747357630 crap /conspiracy theory videos you have posted on here was THAT one? ...and why should anyone with half a brain care? It is blatantly obvious that people like you and Heeeeey know NOTHING of statistics or pretty much anything else of substance, so again ...why should anyone with half a brain care? |
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 27, 2018 22:35:58 GMT
A year or two ago I posted a video (which I might be able to find again) with accidents and near-accidents as evidence that randomness is not random and reality as we know it is a 3D simulation. As expected, it was pooh-poohed by the RFS peanut gallery, and my comrades on the board remained silent as if to say, "I don't know this guy." Gee, Erjenious! Which of the #4308747357630 crap /conspiracy theory videos you have posted on here was THAT one? ...and why should anyone with half a brain care? It is blatantly obvious that people like you and Heeeeey know NOTHING of statistics or pretty much anything else of substance, so again ...why should anyone with half a brain care? No one with half a brain cares, and you're Exhibit A.
The fact is, patterns (even like DNA) has to have been encoded by intelligence. It didn't just appear for shits and giggles.
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 27, 2018 22:46:07 GMT
Gee, Erjenious! Which of the #4308747357630 crap /conspiracy theory videos you have posted on here was THAT one? ...and why should anyone with half a brain care? It is blatantly obvious that people like you and Heeeeey know NOTHING of statistics or pretty much anything else of substance, so again ...why should anyone with half a brain care? No one with half a brain cares, and you're Exhibit A.
The fact is, (even like DNA) has to have been encoded by intelligence.
Who says so, and why? |
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 27, 2018 22:59:54 GMT
No one with half a brain cares, and you're Exhibit A.
The fact is, (even like DNA) has to have been encoded by intelligence.
Who says so, and why? Who cares 'who says so'? It's a self-evident fact. I don't have to hear from someone else that the sky is blue.
DNA and patterns that are embedded in nature and the cosmos are all a 'code' or 'language'. Neither could exist without having been embedded there by a higher intelligence, just like any other language. Language didn't create itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Nov 27, 2018 23:15:34 GMT
Who cares 'who says so'? It's a self-evident fact. I don't have to hear from someone else that the sky is blue.
DNA and patterns that are embedded in nature and the cosmos are all a 'code' or 'language'. Neither could exist without having been embedded there by a higher intelligence, just like any other language. Language didn't create itself.
You haven't shown any actual examples of these "patterns". When people use the word "code" to describe DNA, they're using figurative language, it's not like it's an actual written language or anything. |
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 27, 2018 23:27:23 GMT
Who cares 'who says so'? It's a self-evident fact. I don't have to hear from someone else that the sky is blue.
DNA and patterns that are embedded in nature and the cosmos are all a 'code' or 'language'. Neither could exist without having been embedded there by a higher intelligence, just like any other language. Language didn't create itself.
What is a 'self evident fact'? Is this a self evident fact? To me it is your opinion based on nothing other than your endemic confirmational bias. Language 'evolved. It DID create itself. No higher power involved. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_linguisticsIf you answer is where is the 'proof'? I invite you to post YOUR proof of a higher power initiating language in humans. Evolutionary anthropologists and I have evidence of evolution of language over time, now with ancillary biological sociological DNA and and neurological data. You? God did it? |
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Nov 28, 2018 0:00:59 GMT
How do you know we like to believe that? I hope you can give a reply that does not come across as arrogant.  |
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 28, 2018 0:06:14 GMT
Who cares 'who says so'? It's a self-evident fact. I don't have to hear from someone else that the sky is blue.
DNA and patterns that are embedded in nature and the cosmos are all a 'code' or 'language'. Neither could exist without having been embedded there by a higher intelligence, just like any other language. Language didn't create itself.
What is a 'self evident fact'? Is this a self evident fact? To me it is your opinion based on nothing other than your endemic confirmational bias. Language 'evolved. It DID create itself. No higher power involved. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_linguisticsIf you answer is where is the 'proof'? I invite you to post YOUR proof of a higher power initiating language in humans. Evolutionary anthropologists and I have evidence of evolution of language over time, now with ancillary biological sociological DNA and and neurological data. You? God did it?Yes.
Code doesn't write itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 28, 2018 0:10:11 GMT
What is a 'self evident fact'? Is this a self evident fact? To me it is your opinion based on nothing other than your endemic confirmational bias. Language 'evolved. It DID create itself. No higher power involved. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_linguisticsIf you answer is where is the 'proof'? I invite you to post YOUR proof of a higher power initiating language in humans. Evolutionary anthropologists and I have evidence of evolution of language over time, now with ancillary biological sociological DNA and and neurological data. You? God did it?Yes.
Code doesn't write itself.
No. Language as a form of 'code' and all other forms of code such as DNA 'evolved'. |
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Nov 28, 2018 0:11:24 GMT
Who cares 'who says so'? It's a self-evident fact. I don't have to hear from someone else that the sky is blue.
DNA and patterns that are embedded in nature and the cosmos are all a 'code' or 'language'. Neither could exist without having been embedded there by a higher intelligence, just like any other language. Language didn't create itself.
What is a 'self evident fact'? Is this a self evident fact? To me it is your opinion based on nothing other than your endemic confirmational bias. Language 'evolved. It DID create itself. No higher power involved. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_linguisticsIf you answer is where is the 'proof'? I invite you to post YOUR proof of a higher power initiating language in humans. Evolutionary anthropologists and I have evidence of evolution of language over time, now with ancillary biological sociological DNA and and neurological data. You? God did it? You change the subject, as usual, to make yourself feel good. A bunch of feeble minded Homo Sapiens with PhDs congratulating themselves and raking in money from feebler minded Homo Sapien "sheep" proves nothing. Linguistics evolved, sure, from the Latin to English (which uses mostly Latin words), but the very origin of language you can't explain. Nor can your feeble minded co nit wits. You can pat each other on the back and shout like red necks over and over, and say "abra Kadabra, poof, I magically prove language evolved from nothing cause it ...uh, I proved it, poof". That doesn't make you correct. It just makes you delusionary. There is a tribe that communicates roughly with click noises. Over the centuries, they didn't "evolve" a school of language. When it comes to the first use of language, there are natural stumbling blocks. Most of all, speakers giving commands will communicate in terms of verbs, while listeners hear in terms of "nouns". A speaker points at a rock and says "fetch", and the listener sees the speaker point at the rock and think the speaker is calling the "rock" a "fetch". Even today, with most Americans attending schools to learn English for twelve years before college, there is a lack of communication, and proof of demonic activity in confusion by inducing dorks to try to distort the English language to make their own. Companies spend millions of dollars a year to teach employees to communicate with others better. How is this possible if people are taught the language long before? Until there is an actual basis of learning, a school, communication needs supernatural help. More so since we have proof of demonic confusion. Proof of the demons or devil for sure. Only the most retarded fool would deny that. If Gilligan and Mary Ann were stuck on a desert island since 1965 and came back in 2015 to their own country, they wouldn't understand half the conversation. That's not "evolution", that's "demonic distortion in order to cause confusion". |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2018 0:13:17 GMT
Are you talking about fate, like everything is destined to happened for a reason? and if so you are saying that atheists don't believe that and only think things in life happen randomly? Or do you mean that atheists think that the creation or cause of the universe was random and therefore has no no purpose or reason of its existence?
I believe the universe was "created" somehow, but I don't exactly believe it was God or anything supernatural that necessarily had to have created it. I see the possibility of an objective purpose, but I don't take it as a fact. I believe we can create our own purpose in life and to me that's all that matters. There are only just theories of how the universe came to be and why we are here. I don't think it's arrogant to have different viewpoints or beliefs about it as long as you don't claim them as a fact.
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 28, 2018 0:17:14 GMT
What is a 'self evident fact'? Is this a self evident fact? To me it is your opinion based on nothing other than your endemic confirmational bias. Language 'evolved. It DID create itself. No higher power involved. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_linguisticsIf you answer is where is the 'proof'? I invite you to post YOUR proof of a higher power initiating language in humans. Evolutionary anthropologists and I have evidence of evolution of language over time, now with ancillary biological sociological DNA and and neurological data. You? God did it? You change the subject, as usual, to make yourself feel good. A bunch of feeble minded Homo Sapiens with PhDs congratulating themselves and raking in money from feebler minded Homo Sapien "sheep" proves nothing. Linguistics evolved, sure, from the Latin to English (which uses mostly Latin words), but the very origin of language you can't explain. Nor can your feeble minded co nit wits. You can pat each other on the back and shout like red necks over and over, and say "abra Kadabra, poof, I magically prove language evolved from nothing cause it ...uh, I proved it, poof". That doesn't make you correct. It just makes you delusionary. There is a tribe that communicates roughly with click noises. Over the centuries, they didn't "evolve" a school of language. When it comes to the first use of language, there are natural stumbling blocks. Most of all, speakers giving commands will communicate in terms of verbs, while listeners hear in terms of "nouns". A speaker points at a rock and says "fetch", and the listener sees the speaker point at the rock and think the speaker is calling the "rock" a "fetch". Even today, with most Americans attending schools to learn English for twelve years before college, there is a lack of communication, and proof of demonic activity in confusion by inducing dorks to try to distort the English language to make their own. Companies spend millions of dollars a year to teach employees to communicate with others better. How is this possible if people are taught the language long before? Until there is an actual basis of learning, a school, communication needs supernatural help. More so since we have proof of demonic confusion. Proof of the demons or devil for sure. Only the most retarded fool would deny that. If Gilligan and Mary Ann were stuck on a desert island since 1965 and came back in 2015 to their own country, they wouldn't understand half the conversation. That's not "evolution", that's "demonic distortion in order to cause confusion". Do you seriously expect me to answer this diatribe of demonic detritus? Language evolved end of story. |
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Nov 28, 2018 1:41:29 GMT
I believe the word to describe you rhymes with shunt.
|
|
