Why science and atheists fall short in explaining consciousness.

As an atheist, I tend to defend any religion against hypocritical attacks from people of another religion. That includes Christianity. But I ridicule them all equally, because belief in any of them IS ridiculous.

You have not cited a single scrap of evidence which contradicts the current materialist consensus in science regarding consciousness. Not once in your entire, worthless "contributions" to these boards. You don't even know what it would look like.

That'll be an easy name to remember.  Blue is my favorite color, and I drank a Stella for breakfast.  And it was so good that I'm having one more for dessert. 

I'm finally getting to watch Stanley Kubrick's "Eyes Wide Shut" after all these years.  Got it on pause right now.  See y'all later, and play nice while I'm gone.

Their denial of reality is pretty simple, actually. 


Humans are control freaks. Why? Because of the fall, because we're in the flesh, playing in the Devil's field of dreams.


That explains the denial of reality that atheists have. They need to control, or feel they have control, even over the devil's ball park.


So, they have to abandon Math and Logic. This is best done by switching terms around. Replacing "soul" and "spirit" with "self awareness", "consciousness", and so forth.

And you'll notice they'll change the definition back and forth from material to immaterial, thinking they've made a point, when in fact the only point they made is how ignorant they appear to the more rational souls who aren't afraid to seek truth.

Atheists detest the truth. 

The atheist will call the "soul" a "self awareness" and try to put it in a material form. This is fine to play God, long as you realize you are a deluded idiot that can't change reality, but the atheist thinks he is god, and can make reality.

Even the data on the brain proves them incorrect. There is never any one place in the brain that is used for any function, nor is there one place for all functions, nor one neuron for all functions. When the soul (think of it as a meter reader, or as "meter reading" if you think of the soul as a verb, which originally a soul was thought to be in ancient days) has an activity to read in the brain, there are always at least two spots simultaneously being stimulated, usually more, and never the same spot for all activity.


Proof in itself that the "meter reader" is not material. Yet there are some people on this very board so retarded that they claim this substantiates their delusions of materialism, and they think they can vote on it, four or five idiots against one rational mind, and that makes them correct. That's Western culture. They're all Donald Trump clones. Now I have nothing against Donald Trump and his clones, but they're fools with too many resources and too much authority.  I wouldn't be surprised if the poster called "Faustus" was Donald Trump himself. They're 100% alike you have to admit.

But Trump has millions of people just like him. They want to be in control, and they're out of control. Goz, Faustus, Trump, all clones of each other in spirit, we have to admit. 


Faustus and his fellow uneducated, arrogant mob refuse to keep the definition of a term the same. If Faustus is at bat and I throw a strike and he swings and misses, he will say, "No, that's not a strike. That's not a baseball. That's a worm. It's a worm, so that's not a strike on me. That's a worm, yes it is. My mommy says it's a worm. Wah! That's not a baseball! Wah! That's a worm, so I caught a fish. Where's my fish? Wah!"

The reality is that I struck him out, but he will cry and whine, and five other brats on this board will all chime in with him and say, "Wah, that's a worm! That's not a baseball. That's a worm, and he caught a fish! Give him his fish! Wah!".

But then when they pick it up, they say "This is a baseball. It's a baseball now." A minute later. "It's not a baseball. It's a worm. Wah!"

That's what they do when they keep changing definitions. Only they want to change a verb into a noun. That's how out of control and out of touch with reality they are.

No offense.

If you look through posts in this thread there is one poster who stands out for arrogant pomposity.

And where did anybody (except perhaps you) suggest something comes out of nothing? Science would say that the big bang (if that is the genesis of our universe), before and just after, and consciousness are indeterminate because there is no evidence to hypothesise what happened then.

And if you want to lay odds on who did what when, my own supreme being, of whom I have made my avatar) has an equal chance of creating consciousness (as well as a delicious sauce) as whatever you cunjure up.