|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Dec 22, 2018 5:12:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Jep Gambardella on Dec 22, 2018 14:23:28 GMT
Good for her! Fuck (not literally, of course) that McKinnon person.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrFurious on Dec 22, 2018 14:45:36 GMT
Only read the big words but yeah, she's totally right. The worlds gone mad
|
|
|
|
Post by NJtoTX on Dec 22, 2018 15:10:28 GMT
I would think they should have to transition there as well. 2 years.
Renee Richards was a lousy tennis player, transitioned to female, and all of a sudden was contending.
|
|
|
|
Post by WullieFort on Dec 22, 2018 16:03:42 GMT
Well, with Trump as "Leader of the Free World", shit is the new "In thing"
|
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Dec 22, 2018 16:04:24 GMT
I would think they should have to transition there as well. 2 years. Renee Richards was a lousy tennis player, transitioned to female, and all of a sudden was contending. I hope this doesn't give power to actual transphobes in pushing their agenda. Transphobia is ripe among even the LGB community as evidenced by the recent case of London pride parade. The western society in particular has hard time accepting transgenderism. Even Iran doesn't have much problem with it. I for one support transgender completely. This particular person who spoke against Martina is wrong but not the movement itself. |
|
|
|
Post by orlandogardner on Dec 22, 2018 17:38:10 GMT
I'm all for people being who they want, or in most cases need, to be. You do you. But on this I agree with her. You may get to choose your gender in the non-sporting world but to believe you are entitled to compete as a woman after transitioning is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by weststigersbob on Dec 22, 2018 23:07:42 GMT
Transgender activists will see to it that womens sport eventually dies. It’s inevitable. Either a) enough biologically men start competing in women’s events and dominating them that it opens the flood gates and women’s events soon become essentially men’s events in skirts; or b) transgender athletes supported by the idiotic PC SJW leftists demand that “men’s” and “women’s” events be removed, as gendered sports is regressive. It’s replaced by “Open” events where men and women compete alongside and against each other. Then, obviously, in 90% of sports biological women are instantly obsolete simply because they aren’t as strong or fast as men. Only in ‘mind’ sports, or ‘accuracy’ sports - like Chess, Poker and Shooting will we see any female athletes competing at a high level.
|
|
|
|
Post by hoskotafe3 on Dec 23, 2018 5:16:20 GMT
I think in the secind scenario in the case of team sports they'd introduce quotas. In some sports this would be rejected completely by fans. In others it would become so normalised that you and I pointing out the standard had gone down compared to before the iintegration would be seen similar to old fossils complaining about the loss of drop kicks from the AFL or tbe loss of the srum as a meaningful contest between opposing packs in the NRL.
It would likely be the end of women in individual sporrs though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Feb 17, 2019 19:08:51 GMT
Bump for you, my dear fellow. Update here.
|
|
