|
Post by poutinep on Jan 3, 2019 6:10:17 GMT
So even Marvel doesn't package TWS, CW, and IW as a trilogy, which further proves my point that the OP is just trying to cherry-pick 3 random MCU movies to compare against the TDK trilogy. The 3 movies he picked were all directed by the Russos and featured Captain America. That's not random. But it didn't work because the TDK trilogy is still universally considered to be far superior to any MCU movies. You keep saying universally superior but that isn't so. For something to be considered a trilogy, you have to be able to buy the 3 movies as a box set from most vendors. LOL wtf no. Dictionary tril·o·gy /ˈtriləjē/ noun noun: trilogy; plural noun: trilogies a group of three related novels, plays, films, operas, or albums.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jan 3, 2019 6:15:35 GMT
The Winter Soldier and Civil War are already two installments of the Captain America trilogy, and even Marvel sells them as a three movie collection set. Infinity War is the third installment of The Avengers film series and is a follow-up to several movies, not just Captain America. I ignored the quotes because I felt it was wrong to use the word trilogy so loosely. So even Marvel doesn't package TWS, CW, and IW as a trilogy, which further proves my point that the OP is just trying to cherry-pick 3 random MCU movies to compare against the TDK trilogy. But it didn't work because the TDK trilogy is still universally considered to be far superior to any MCU movies. You must have me on ignore, since I already explained to you how the selection was not Cherry picked at all... unless you know of any other MCU movies directed by the Russos.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Jan 3, 2019 6:32:18 GMT
Can you please express what is so great about TDK? Most everything really. The direction, the cinematography, the use of practical effects with very little CGI, the acting, the musical score, the action sequences particularly the chase, the villain, the pacing, that they were able to make it that dark and intense while keeping it a PG-13, the interrogation scene and more. Its a long movie and yet it never drags, there's hardly a dull moment in the movie. It has one worthwhile flaw which is Christian Bales Batman voice and that's about it. There won't be ever be another superhero better than it. They've made 60 other superhero movies since then and it's still considered the best of the lot even now. It is to superhero movies what The Lion King is to Disney movies in that you go on Google and search for the "Top 10 Disney movies" and The Lion King won't necessarily be the #1 on every list but it will be on every list and it will be #1 on more of them than any other movie.
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Jan 3, 2019 8:56:39 GMT
TDK > TWS/CW > BB > IW > TDKR. Overall, I'd have to say the Russo's.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Jan 3, 2019 9:42:53 GMT
Hmmmm ... that’s a tough one. It all depends on how you weigh each entry. According to the research I did in another thread;
TDK is the best of the bunch. Followed closely by BB, TWS, CW and IW. TDKR is kinda the Fredo of the bunch.
The Nolan movies have the highest and the lowest points, while the Russo movies are consistently great. It would be wimping out to call it a tie, so factoring in that it was more Heath Ledgers performance and less Nolan’s effort that elevated TDK above the others, I’m going to give the nod to the Russo Brothers.
A couple other contributing thoughts ...
We’re really only half way through the Russo’s magnus opus. When Infinity War concludes it will undoubtedly be the greatest, most ambitious, and most successful superhero movie(s) ever made. Does anyone (excluding the retarded among us) seriously doubt that for a second?
The Russo’s have done a brilliant job working within a Marvel universe that is populated by many different superheroes. Nolan took the easy approach and jettisoned all of the DC universe so he could create a believable place to tell his Batman story. The moment you introduce a flying alien or a guy that talks to fishes, the Nolan Batman universe collapses in a fit of giggles.
Hmmm ... maybe it’s not so tough after all. Russo’s, easily.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Jan 3, 2019 9:46:03 GMT
Can you please express what is so great about TDK? Most everything really. The direction, Nolan irritates me. Every movie of his I see makes me want to see a different movie by someone else I find was done better. His characterization drives me crazy. His characters behave in contrived manner The film that made me notice the cinematography was The Great Train Robbery (78). This one didnt speak to me. Burton has a far more unique style I do not get this bitch. I will turn 59 this year & remember the NUMEROUS reports about stunt people injured & killed doing practical stunts so one thing I prefer about films now is not reading someone died like Brandon Lee making the Crow. The Crow has more unified presentation, for that matter. Nope. Ledger got the Oscar because he died & the Academy was making up for not giving him the win for Brokeback. It's creeping up on 2AM. I will pick this up later
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Jan 3, 2019 10:05:36 GMT
Whether he won the Oscar or not, his acting was phenomenal in the movie, his performance got universal praise and the character remains memorable to this day.
Him aside, everyone else put in a great acting performance that gets overlooked because of how good he was.
And people always prefer practical effects. The Truck flip is so please compared to what you get in most superhero movies but it's more impressive because they actually did it.
Its why these Mission Impossible movies get praise now because all these stunts are down for real. Now just CGI mixed with a green background.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Jan 3, 2019 13:57:38 GMT
One of the complaints about IW is that there are too many characters in it that dont get enough or any development within the context of the story, like Captain America and Banner. In fact the only ones who do get a proper arc are Thor, Gamora and Thanos.
That has never been a problem with Nolan, his characters have good all round treatment in ensemble films. In TDKR he balanced Blake, Bruce, Bane, Talia, Selen, Gordon and Alfred all very well and if he directed IW he would have made it a better movie im sure. If Russos directed TDK, it wouldnt have been as good.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Jan 3, 2019 16:10:56 GMT
Can you please express what is so great about TDK? Most everything really. The direction, the cinematography, the use of practical effects with very little CGI, So I don't have a problem with CGI saving lives. As the director told Burt Reynolds when he practically killed himself going over the falls in Deliverance-it still looked like a dummy going over the falls. There isn't acting in every movie? Or the acting in TDK is superior to the acting in all of the other superhero movies ever made? For my money it was no better or worse than most movies. Lots of movies have a great score. Nightmare Before Christmas. Thor's music is very good. I have the soundtrack. Burton tends to have good music in his films. That Batman of his which I happen to think is far darker than TDK. Is that the one where he is being chased by cops on his motorcycle, cape billowing behind him, or was that DKR? Yeah. No. Sorry. I had hair halfway down my thighs. Do you know how often it caught in stuff? Doors? Not to mention when I lived in snow country if I went out right after I washed my hair, it turned into a helmet. It was like a board hanging down my back. And I did my share of floor length skirts. All skirts tend to get caught in doors so one has to be careful. But that damned batcape not getting wrapped up in those motorcycle wheels? That's magic. Sorry. It wasn't Ledger's best role. As far as Jokers go, it comes in behind Nicholson's. Has no one seen Heathers? It's JD. JD committed his murders to advance his theory that the only place diverse social castes could get along was in heaven. Joker (honest, isn't the vocal delivery similar to Christan Slater) does all his stuff to prove everyone is equally rotten inside. Nicholson's went insane on the screen. 2 bit thug became someone who lost all inhibitions, killing whoever he felt like, even his own chief henchman. Hell, Mick on Ray Donovan is more of a villain, betraying his kids for his own gain when it benefits him. Not really for me. I still see Avengers as the superhero movie one cant cut anything from. Batman Returns was darkee. Oh hell, I hate that. Sorry, but Gordon says they aren't going to give him any reason to get out on a technicality so they let him keep the makeup on? I look at mug shots most every day. No one is allowed to keep costume style makeup on. That stuff would have been ordered scrubbed off. Yet Gordon allows a vigilante he doesn't know the identity of into the room to beat Joker up? So much for technicalities getting him out on the streets as an excuse to keep the makeup on. They needed it for the plot. Disagree. I love Thor. Paid to see it 8 times in the theater. I admit others do not find it as engrossing. The makeup. The vigilante interrogation The cape on a motorcycle What hospital would not keep someone with damaga as extreme as Dent's was in a medically induced coma? At least heavily sedated? Yes they have. Batfans love their hero's movies. I know I love First Avenger & Thor more than most because those are my heroes. I prefer the Crow to TDK It'll crack. Future generations won't leave it on its pedestal theyshootpictures.com/gf1000_700-601.htm667. My Life as a Dog 668 Great Escape 666 Superman The Movie was a re-entry at 685 (out of 1000), proving opinions on movies shift. I don't tend to re-watch Disney that much. Strange. I will watch Rise of the Guardians whenever I catch it on the air. I love Megamind. Never tire of it. I hit a point on Disney when I was taking my kid to them where I grew weary of the formula. It became so damned visible. Laugh here. Danger here, but not too dangerous. Endearing moment...they have pulling heartstrings to a science & I have to be in the mood for the manipulation Forget Pixar. Brave made me cry so I don't watch it often, but Toy Story & the rest? They don't move me I was never much for popular. I like what I like. I loved Solo. I hope it grows in reputation, but I still place it close to the top of films I saw this year. Its the only one I wanted to pay to see a 3rd time in a theater this year. Unless you count Greatest Showman. I saw that 3 times, but it started in December 2017. Think it was twice this year. Similar to Thor, it's a redemption story. One can argue there was a bit of redemption in Solo where he helps the rebels . It resonates for me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2019 16:18:48 GMT
Civil War & IW were both avg in terms of entertainment & bloated as hell imo. Captain America: TWS is definitely my favorite MCU film so far though and I gotta give the Russo bros credit for directing it the way they did with that one but it can't hold a candle to Nolan's TDK trilogy . Sorry not sorry . Nolan's trilogy is one of the best trilogies ever (of any genre) from beginning to end .
The Dark Knight 10/10 Batman Begins 9/10 TDKR 8.5/10 CA:TWS 8/10 IW 7/10 Civil War 6.5/10 (kinda cooled on this one over the years cause the stakes weren't that high in it. just a Disney cash grab to go against BvS)
|
|
|
Post by merh on Jan 3, 2019 16:24:42 GMT
Whether he won the Oscar or not, his acting was phenomenal in the movie, his performance got universal praise and the character remains memorable to this day. Him aside, everyone else put in a great acting performance that gets overlooked because of how good he was. You know where I realized Ledger was incredible? Brothers Grimm. I had seen him in Knights Tale & 10 Things & Patriot, but I did not realize that was him until I saw the credits roll. My kid wanted to see it because it was Monty Python linked. I recognized Matt Damon. That was where I discovered Ledger had an amazing chameleon ability to become his role, not an actor interpreting a part What's the line in MiB about a person is smart but people are stupid? I saw SO MUCH REALLY BAD practical effects on my childhood. Ever watch old 60s tv shows? Where you can see the damned wire in the invisible effects? Where you can see the actor throw himself on the table in a fight? My theory is the reason Marvel didn't really succeed until CGI was their heroes needed it to look real. Batman & Superman Hollywood has faked for decades. Ever see that 70s Spiderman series? The wallcrawling was cringeworthy. So no. I don't prefer practical effects because they were all there was in my childhood. You guys are so damned spoiled.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jan 3, 2019 18:23:43 GMT
One of the complaints about IW is that there are too many characters in it that dont get enough or any development within the context of the story, like Captain America and Banner. In fact the only ones who do get a proper arc are Thor, Gamora and Thanos. That has never been a problem with Nolan, his characters have good all round treatment in ensemble films. In TDKR he balanced Blake, Bruce, Bane, Talia, Selen, Gordon and Alfred all very well and if he directed IW he would have made it a better movie im sure. If Russos directed TDK, it wouldnt have been as good. Nah. Blake, Selena, Gordon and Alfred all had very minimal development in TDKR. Heck, even Batman didn't really get that much development at all in TDKR. Nolan has not directed any movie with an ensemble cast as huge as CW or IW that convinces me he can do a better job at it than the Russos.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Jan 3, 2019 18:33:06 GMT
One of the complaints about IW is that there are too many characters in it that dont get enough or any development within the context of the story, like Captain America and Banner. In fact the only ones who do get a proper arc are Thor, Gamora and Thanos. That has never been a problem with Nolan, his characters have good all round treatment in ensemble films. In TDKR he balanced Blake, Bruce, Bane, Talia, Selen, Gordon and Alfred all very well and if he directed IW he would have made it a better movie im sure. If Russos directed TDK, it wouldnt have been as good. Nah. Blake, Selena, Gordon and Alfred all had very minimal development in TDKR. Heck, even Batman didn't really get that much development at all in TDKR. Nolan has not directed any movie with an ensemble cast as huge as CW or IW that convinces me he can do a better job at it than the Russos. Selena went from a petty thief who thinks about herself to someone who put others (Gotham and Bruce) first. Blake went from someone who was a believer in the justice system and police force to someone who lost faith when he witnessed what happened to Batman by the end. Alfred started out by trying to convince Bruce from not returning as the dark knight and took the step of leaving him. But by the end he realised that Batman needed to stop Bane and that he was finally able to escape and live the life he hoped he would. Russos dont have anywhere near the same ability in their work to handle character arcs and intertwine them into a singular story cohesively.
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Jan 3, 2019 18:59:43 GMT
The Russo’s have done a brilliant job working within a Marvel universe that is populated by many different superheroes. Nolan took the easy approach and jettisoned all of the DC universe so he could create a believable place to tell his Batman story. The moment you introduce a flying alien or a guy that talks to fishes, the Nolan Batman universe collapses in a fit of giggles.Hmmm ... maybe it’s not so tough after all. Russo’s, easily.I think it collapsed in a fit of giggles when they introduced a guy dressed as a bat fighting a clown.
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Jan 3, 2019 19:01:00 GMT
One of the complaints about IW is that there are too many characters in it that dont get enough or any development within the context of the story, like Captain America and Banner. In fact the only ones who do get a proper arc are Thor, Gamora and Thanos. That has never been a problem with Nolan, his characters have good all round treatment in ensemble films. In TDKR he balanced Blake, Bruce, Bane, Talia, Selen, Gordon and Alfred all very well and if he directed IW he would have made it a better movie im sure. If Russos directed TDK, it wouldnt have been as good. There were 17 movies worth of character development before IW. Avengers IW was the climax.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2019 20:17:48 GMT
The Nolan Batman movies. I'd put The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises above any of the Russo movies. In fact I'd put them above any other superhero movies period. I would put Civil War and Infinity War above Batman Begins though. Can you please express what is so great about TDK? I doubt it. If a movie doesn't click, it doesn't click. A lot of people don't like movies that are loved and revered by others. I've given up long ago the idea that any one movie could possibly be above it all. A good chunk of people's favorite/least favorite movie lists usually includes a section of masterpieces and or loved movies that they just don't get. I've heard dozens of people say they're just not into The Dark Knight and it's all water under the bridge to me.
I don't like Forrest Gump. No amount of analysis of the movie is going to change the fact that I don't like Tom Hank's face. There's bound to be some people you just don't like or don't trust; they make you uneasy or uncomfortable. Law of averages suggests some of them are bound to be celebrities.
The Dark Knight for me was a near masterfully done story that rarely waned. I think it took an awfully long time in the first two acts so the third act felt a rushed, but for me the story was a crowd-pleasing affair. I had to join the internet to find out that Batman's scratchy voice was a thing. I thought Aaron Eckhart did terrific. Heath Ledger, terrific and subsequently lobbed into the overrated category because of the supposition that his performance was greeted more kindly because he died. That's an argument that never came naturally to me; I never felt inclined to believe people were more generous than he deserved because he died. It doesn't add to the mystique or the narrative to me. Christian Bale was fine. It'd be nice if Katie Holmes stuck around because recasting is tricky but Maggie Gylenhaal (in my opinion) is a better actress anyways.
For me, The Dark Knight and the other two took their time, maybe too much, but they took their time to tell the story they wanted. It takes attention span. I think that Batman Begins had better structure and pacing than The Dark Knight, but The Dark Knight swung for the fences. I liked Nolan's interpretation of Batman as a strong, stoic figure, and the movies themselves just made me thankful that some writers and directors have the talent and the courage to tell these stories. The fact that it filled theaters is irrelevant to me; if I were the only person on earth who watched them I'd still feel the same way. Likewise with the IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes ratings. They mean nothing to me.
Everything I've said applies to the MCU as well. Criticisms about them being the same movie 20 times are so wrong they don't dignify a response. As internet people and message board opinion people, none of us are beyond being baited and trolled. So as far as I'm concerned, if I'm going to be baited into responding, I need real bait. I need a real worm, not some fake plastic shiny shit from the fishing section at Wal-Mart.
Everything I've said applies to the MCU three-four fold as well. I have a big imagination and the MCU gives me food for thought or years. It's a giant canvas with which to imagine and explore and be inspired. With the exception of maybe a few comic book movies, the vast majority of all of them turn my brain to Christmas lights.
I did not like the resolution/end to the story as shown through The Dark Knight Rises. I didn't like that it began 8 years later, that it had a injured and redemption capturing arc; I thought The Legend of Korra even did it better. But I gave the edge to Nolan because as a director I think he employs visual tropes and interesting techniques that are uniquely his. All of his movies have an identifiable stamp that if I didn't know it was his movie, I'd probably guess. My only criticism of the Russo movies is that I sometimes think the movies are so complex on a technical front that the movies sometimes seem more like technical accomplishments than narrative ones. But I also think Chris Evans as Captain America is one of the greatest things since sliced bread and the MCU is one of the best things going. What I said about taking the time to fit a narrative, the MCU has the chutzpa to span the story over an unprecedented number of entries and it's just excellent.
Also, while probably not the best, my actual favorite legit Batman movie is Batman Returns. Different era and all but I love it.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Jan 3, 2019 22:56:51 GMT
Nolan has not directed any movie with an ensemble cast as huge as CW or IW that convinces me he can do a better job at it than the Russos. An interesting exercise ... trying to imagine a Russo TDK and a Nolan IW. Assuming they both had the same script, budget and cast to work with, I can very easily see a Russo TDK that was every bit as good as Nolan’s. I also think Nolan would struggle with managing the large MCU universe ... and I’d be afraid there would be too much Interstellar in a Nolan IW. Both are tops at their craft. We’re just picking nits at this point.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Jan 4, 2019 0:20:29 GMT
I doubt it. If a movie doesn't click, it doesn't click. Pretty much this really. The Dark Knight has a staggering 9.0/10 on IMDb. I was just about to say that it's been #4 movie on there for about a decade but now I see it's actually gone up to #3 now. Its #1 on more superhero movie rankings than any other movie and it has the best reviews of any other superhero movie. Whether people agree or not, it is the consensus that it is the best. If someone doesn't take to it then they don't though. Spirited Away is considered one of the greatest animated movies of all time. I've watched it twice and for the life of me I don't know how and I never will.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jan 4, 2019 0:34:37 GMT
Nolan has not directed any movie with an ensemble cast as huge as CW or IW that convinces me he can do a better job at it than the Russos. An interesting exercise ... trying to imagine a Russo TDK and a Nolan IW. Assuming they both had the same script, budget and cast to work with, I can very easily see a Russo TDK that was every bit as good as Nolan’s. I also think Nolan would struggle with managing the large MCU universe ... and I’d be afraid there would be too much Interstellar in a Nolan IW. Both are tops at their craft. We’re just picking nits at this point. I think Nolan is better at making scenes look more epic. Heck, he made a clown shooting a gun at a guy wearing a bat costume riding a motorcycle look epic. So while I think the Russo's can make a TDK movie that has just as much meat and depth to it, I don't think they can make it "look" as good as Nolan. On the other hand, like I said, I don't see Nolan successfully juggling as many characters as the Russo's did for CW and IW. TDKR had a decent amount of characters (yet nowhere near the amount in IW) and it was already chock-full of inconsistencies and lazy writing. In the end, I think a Russo TDK would work better than a Nolan IW.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jan 4, 2019 0:43:50 GMT
Nah. Blake, Selena, Gordon and Alfred all had very minimal development in TDKR. Heck, even Batman didn't really get that much development at all in TDKR. Nolan has not directed any movie with an ensemble cast as huge as CW or IW that convinces me he can do a better job at it than the Russos. Selena went from a petty thief who thinks about herself to someone who put others (Gotham and Bruce) first. Blake went from someone who was a believer in the justice system and police force to someone who lost faith when he witnessed what happened to Batman by the end. Alfred started out by trying to convince Bruce from not returning as the dark knight and took the step of leaving him. But by the end he realised that Batman needed to stop Bane and that he was finally able to escape and live the life he hoped he would. Russos dont have anywhere near the same ability in their work to handle character arcs and intertwine them into a singular story cohesively. Heck, if that's all it takes to for characters to be considered having good development then: Dr. Strange went from seflishly being all about protecting the time gem to willingly sacrificing it to save Tony's and Peter's lives. Wanda went from stubbornly refusing to let Vision die to forcing herself to kill him for the greater good. Quill went from refusing to kill Gamora to also forcing himself to kill her (even if it didn't work). Rocket went from someone who wanted to "wiper" Thor off their windshield to someone who actually cared about him almost dying. Banner went from someone who relied on Hulk to fight his fights for him to actually winning his own fights. Parker went from somebody who was content taking out local bullies to someone willing to stop a universal threat. Rhodes went from a cripple who was originally for the accords to someone who gladly risked a court martial just to help out Captain America. I could go on but I hope you get the point.
|
|