|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Jan 7, 2019 14:16:22 GMT
All things considered, the Eagles are lucky they are only trailing 6-3 at the half. I know it is over now, but WHAT? How? They were dominating them actually. They were shooting themselves in the foot. The Bears had no penalties in the half and the Eagles were able to actually drive, unlike the Bears, but turned the ball over twice. If anything, the Bears were lucky to be winning at the half. How is turning the ball over twice 'dominating' the other team? You said the Bears had no shot in this game. It came down to the football bouncing the wrong way off the crossbar. Just be happy your team won the game, no reason to create false narratives to make the win look more impressive. Sometimes you have to win ugly. |
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Jan 7, 2019 14:40:06 GMT
I know it is over now, but WHAT? How? They were dominating them actually. They were shooting themselves in the foot. The Bears had no penalties in the half and the Eagles were able to actually drive, unlike the Bears, but turned the ball over twice. If anything, the Bears were lucky to be winning at the half. How is turning the ball over twice 'dominating' the other team? You said the Bears had no shot in this game. It came down to the football bouncing the wrong way off the crossbar. Just be happy your team won the game, no reason to create false narratives to make the win look more impressive. Sometimes you have to win ugly. It was a tough game and a great game. I loved it, but the Eagles were outplaying the Bears in the first half and were just shooting themselves in the foot. They had more yards and all of the penalties, since the Bears had none in the first half. This was opposed to the Bears, who seemingly couldn't even get a first down and got 3 of their points on a drive where every first down was a penalty against the Eagles. Sure, it was a tough and ugly game, but I am wondering why the poster said that the Eagles should be lucky it was 6-3. If anything, the Bears were the lucky ones. Also, either way, I was right. The Eagles won the game like I said they would. |
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Jan 7, 2019 15:08:04 GMT
How is turning the ball over twice 'dominating' the other team? You said the Bears had no shot in this game. It came down to the football bouncing the wrong way off the crossbar. Just be happy your team won the game, no reason to create false narratives to make the win look more impressive. Sometimes you have to win ugly. It was a tough game and a great game. I loved it, but the Eagles were outplaying the Bears in the first half and were just shooting themselves in the foot. They had more yards and all of the penalties, since the Bears had none in the first half. This was opposed to the Bears, who seemingly couldn't even get a first down and got 3 of their points on a drive where every first down was a penalty against the Eagles. Sure, it was a tough and ugly game, but I am wondering why the poster said that the Eagles should be lucky it was 6-3. If anything, the Bears were the lucky ones. Also, either way, I was right. The Eagles won the game like I said they would. You weren't right. Last week you said the Bears had no shot. It came down to a missed FG that hit the upright as well as the crossbar. Hardly a lock. |
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Jan 7, 2019 15:43:46 GMT
It was a tough game and a great game. I loved it, but the Eagles were outplaying the Bears in the first half and were just shooting themselves in the foot. They had more yards and all of the penalties, since the Bears had none in the first half. This was opposed to the Bears, who seemingly couldn't even get a first down and got 3 of their points on a drive where every first down was a penalty against the Eagles. Sure, it was a tough and ugly game, but I am wondering why the poster said that the Eagles should be lucky it was 6-3. If anything, the Bears were the lucky ones. Also, either way, I was right. The Eagles won the game like I said they would. You weren't right. Last week you said the Bears had no shot. It came down to a missed FG that hit the upright as well as the crossbar. Hardly a lock. Except I was. I guaranteed an Eagles victory and they won. How they won is unimportant. |
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Jan 7, 2019 16:00:35 GMT
You weren't right. Last week you said the Bears had no shot. It came down to a missed FG that hit the upright as well as the crossbar. Hardly a lock. Except I was. I guaranteed an Eagles victory and they won. How they won is unimportant. Just like the Celtics had no shot against the Sixers last year. |
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Jan 7, 2019 16:30:15 GMT
Except I was. I guaranteed an Eagles victory and they won. How they won is unimportant. Just like the Celtics had no shot against the Sixers last year. The funny thing is that I have had an AMAZING two years in sports with my predictions. It has actually been uncanny. I have been right like 90% of the time, which is nearly impossible in sports. Of course I made one wrong prediction and everyone acts like I am always wrong. The Sixers SHOULD have won that series. They had more talent. Their lack of experience showed and Brown was outcoached. I won a lot of money last year betting on the Eagles over the Falcons. I was 100% positive they would win that game and they did. I picked the Sixers over Miami in five games, which is exactly what happened. I have been pretty good lately with my predictions. Also, I picked the Eagles against the Bears and it was my lock of this week, where I was 3-1. Sure it was closer than I thought and the Eagles had to get lucky, but they still won. |
|
