|
Post by hehatesshe on Jan 14, 2019 21:26:39 GMT
The 4 best teams in the NFL this season are clearly the Saints, Rams, Chiefs, and Chargers. So that's 4 possible Super Bowl matchups, 1 of which is Chargers vs Rams. So there's a 25% chance of a Chargers vs Rams Super Bowl What is the chance that the superbowl will be Chargers V Rams now? I love how silent you become with your face red and your pants around your ankles.
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Jan 17, 2019 1:48:41 GMT
What does everybody else here think ?
|
|
|
Post by mecano04 on Jan 17, 2019 3:15:26 GMT
Chiefs, because LDT could be back among others.
|
|
GiantFan1980
Junior Member
@scifi1980
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 4,476
|
Post by GiantFan1980 on Jan 17, 2019 3:53:58 GMT
Pulling for the Chiefs but I picked the Patriots. Patriots aren't done until they are done.
|
|
|
Post by nutsberryfarm 🏜 on Jan 17, 2019 4:02:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Jan 17, 2019 19:58:15 GMT
The Patriots have not been good on the road this year. The Chiefs win. Yep. Aside from the fact that Brady is 0-3 in AFC Championship Games on the road, the Pats are 3-5 on the road this season. Under .500 on the road this season. The Chiefs win easily. You already said the 2001 road victory doesn't count, but I'm confused as to why the 2004 victory in the road vs the 15-1 Steelers doesn't count? Or did you just forget about it? Or...OR... do you just really like being pantsed?
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 17, 2019 20:14:39 GMT
Yep. Aside from the fact that Brady is 0-3 in AFC Championship Games on the road, the Pats are 3-5 on the road this season. Under .500 on the road this season. The Chiefs win easily. You already said the 2001 road victory doesn't count, but I'm confused as to why the 2004 victory in the road vs the 15-1 Steelers doesn't count? Or did you just forget about it? Or...OR... do you just really like being pantsed? 2004 vs the Steelers wasn't an AFC Championship Game. We're talking about AFC Championship Games. When you play an AFC Championship Game on the road, you're usually playing against the #1 seed, the best team in the conference. And this year, Kansas City is the best team in the AFC. Brady and Belichick have struggled on the road in AFC Championship Games. Moreover, Brady and Belichick are only 3-5 on the road this season. So the Pats aren't a good road team this season and thus unlikely to end their road losing streak in AFC Championship Games.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Jan 17, 2019 20:41:23 GMT
You already said the 2001 road victory doesn't count, but I'm confused as to why the 2004 victory in the road vs the 15-1 Steelers doesn't count? Or did you just forget about it? Or...OR... do you just really like being pantsed? 2004 vs the Steelers wasn't an AFC Championship Game. We're talking about AFC Championship Games. When you play an AFC Championship Game on the road, you're usually playing against the #1 seed, the best team in the conference. And this year, Kansas City is the best team in the AFC. Brady and Belichick have struggled on the road in AFC Championship Games. More AH fan gobbledygook Ok, but no. You are very, very wrong. And then you doubled down on it. Classic. www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/200501230pit.htm
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 17, 2019 20:57:12 GMT
2004 vs the Steelers wasn't an AFC Championship Game. We're talking about AFC Championship Games. When you play an AFC Championship Game on the road, you're usually playing against the #1 seed, the best team in the conference. And this year, Kansas City is the best team in the AFC. Brady and Belichick have struggled on the road in AFC Championship Games. More AH fan gobbledygook If losing 3 straight AFC Championship Games on the road isn't considered "struggling", then what do you call it? Facts are facts: 2006 - Patriots played for the AFC Championship in Indianapolis and lost to a QB with the initials PM. 2013 - Patriots played for the AFC Championship in Denver and lost to a QB with the initials PM. 2015 - Patriots played for the AFC Championship in Denver and lost to a QB with the initials PM. 2018 - Patriots (3-5 on the road this season) play for the AFC Championship in Kansas City and will lose to a QB with the initials PM.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Jan 17, 2019 21:04:04 GMT
Don't move the goal posts, AssHat. You were wrong. Very wrong. Then you were too stoopid to double check yourself before you doubled down on your stooooooopidness.
I think you like being pantsed.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Jan 18, 2019 1:48:48 GMT
Brady and Belichick are only 3-5 on the road this season. So the Pats aren't a good road team this season and thus unlikely to end their road losing streak in AFC Championship Games. The Chargers were a great road team this year. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 18, 2019 2:03:40 GMT
Brady and Belichick are only 3-5 on the road this season. So the Pats aren't a good road team this season and thus unlikely to end their road losing streak in AFC Championship Games. Past performance is not indicative of future results. That's what I've been telling all the people who picked the Pats to win, saying that Kansas City has a past history of losing in the playoffs. But while Brady and Belichick were present during the last 3 Pats AFC Championship Games on the road (all of which were losses), Patrick Mahomes wasn't present for any of the Chiefs' previous playoff losses. In fact, the Chiefs are undefeated in the playoffs whenever Patrick Mahomes starts. So history would favor the Chiefs (who have never lost a playoff game that Patrick Mahomes started) over the Pats (who have lost 3 straight AFC Championship Games on the road and are just 3-5 on the road this season).
|
|
|
Post by DrKrippen on Jan 18, 2019 2:13:20 GMT
Chiefs
|
|
|
Post by sdm3 on Jan 18, 2019 2:50:15 GMT
Yep. Aside from the fact that Brady is 0-3 in AFC Championship Games on the road, the Pats are 3-5 on the road this season. Under .500 on the road this season. The Chiefs win easily. You already said the 2001 road victory doesn't count, but I'm confused as to why the 2004 victory in the road vs the 15-1 Steelers doesn't count? Or did you just forget about it? Or...OR... do you just really like being pantsed? Actually, he got this “Brady winless on the road in AFC Championship games” thing from me, and I plain forgot about that 2004 Steelers game. So that’s my bad.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Jan 18, 2019 3:20:19 GMT
You already said the 2001 road victory doesn't count, but I'm confused as to why the 2004 victory in the road vs the 15-1 Steelers doesn't count? Or did you just forget about it? Or...OR... do you just really like being pantsed? Actually, he got this “Brady winless on the road in AFC Championship games” thing from me, and I plain forgot about that 2004 Steelers game. So that’s my bad. See, I'd say maybe yes to that theory, but then the doofus doubled down on it. He was positive he was right. So positive that the thought of a 20 second google search seemed unnecessary.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Jan 19, 2019 16:46:44 GMT
Past performance is not indicative of future results. That's what I've been telling all the people who picked the Pats to win, saying that Kansas City has a past history of losing in the playoffs. But while Brady and Belichick were present during the last 3 Pats AFC Championship Games on the road (all of which were losses), Patrick Mahomes wasn't present for any of the Chiefs' previous playoff losses. In fact, the Chiefs are undefeated in the playoffs whenever Patrick Mahomes starts. So history would favor the Chiefs (who have never lost a playoff game that Patrick Mahomes started) over the Pats (who have lost 3 straight AFC Championship Games on the road and are just 3-5 on the road this season). So you’ve been telling people that past performance is not indicative of future results when you don’t even understand what past performance is not indicative of future results means. Win or lose, the one thing we can all be sure of is, the reason you give will be wrong.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 19, 2019 18:30:19 GMT
You already said the 2001 road victory doesn't count, but I'm confused as to why the 2004 victory in the road vs the 15-1 Steelers doesn't count? Or did you just forget about it? Or...OR... do you just really like being pantsed? Actually, he got this “Brady winless on the road in AFC Championship games” thing from me, and I plain forgot about that 2004 Steelers game. So that’s my bad. No problem. Even with that 1 win, Brady and Belichick are still only 1-3 in AFC Championship Games on the road. And the 3 losses have been in their last 3 AFC Championship Game road trips. More importantly, the Pats are just 3-5 on the road this season so the Pats are a bad road team this season and thus it's unlikely they'll snap their road losing streak in AFC Championship Games.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Jan 20, 2019 6:06:54 GMT
NOT TRUE about Tom Brady being 0-3 in AFC Championship Games on the road! In the 2001/2002 NFL Playoffs, He and the Patriots beat Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh in the AFC Championship Game and went on to win " SUPERBOWL 36" against the St.Louis Rams. Brady started that game against Pittsburgh but it was Bledsoe who came in and led a comeback win. And again, what the fuck are you taking about? The Patriots were up 7-3 when Brady was injured, and they didn't trail nor was the game tied at any point after he left. Brady left with an 84.3 QB rating, and Bledsoe had a 77.9 rating. Please, for the love of all that is good in this world, do some fucking research.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 20, 2019 6:25:49 GMT
Brady started that game against Pittsburgh but it was Bledsoe who came in and led a comeback win. And again, what the fuck are you taking about? The Patriots were up 7-3 when Brady was injured, and they didn't trail nor was the game tied at any point after he left. Brady left with an 84.3 QB rating, and Bledsoe had a 77.9 rating And Pittsburgh scored 17 points in that game. Bledsoe put up the other 17 points for the Pats. The final score was 24-17 so the Steelers would've won 17-7 if Bledsoe hadn't relieved Brady and put up the other 17 points.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 20, 2019 6:30:09 GMT
Brady started that game against Pittsburgh but it was Bledsoe who came in and led a comeback win. And again, what the fuck are you taking about? The Patriots were up 7-3 when Brady was injured So you're saying that Brady got credit for that win despite playing only the first 1/3 of the game. That would be equivalent to a starting pitcher getting credit for the win after pitching just 3 innings. Bledsoe did most of the work in that game so Bledsoe deserves the credit for that game. But once again, Brady takes credit for a win he didn't earn, just like all those titles he won by cheating and didn't earn.
|
|