|
Post by hehatesshe on Jan 21, 2019 21:54:32 GMT
The more likely that these streaks will be broken once more. No, it's not any more likely. NO NFL team has gone undefeated since the 1972 Dolphins did it. That doesn't mean it's any more likely that another NFL team will go undefeated. On the contrary, the fact that no teams since the 1971 Cowboys and 1972 Dolphins have been able to win a Super Bowl the year after losing means that it's very uncommon and thus less likely that it will happen again. And when was the last time a team made it to 4 out of 5 super bowls? Who am I kidding, you won't respond. That's alright, continue posting aimlessly.
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Jan 21, 2019 22:02:33 GMT
Which one? Choose wisely! Brian Allen C.J. Anderson Mark Barron Austin Blythe Michael Brockers Marqui Christian Brandin Cooks Blake Countess Justin Davis Aaron Donald Samson Ebukam Gerald Everett Dante Fowler John Franklin-Myers Jared Goff Todd Gurley Bryce Hager Rob Havenstein Johnny Hekker Tyler Higbee Troy Hill Khadarel Hodge John Johnson Sebastian Joseph-Day Lamarcus Joyner John Kelly Micah Kiser Justin Lawler Cory Littleton Matt Longacre Sean Mannion Jake McQuaide Johnny Mundt JoJo Natson Joe Noteboom Obo Okoronkwo Marcus Peters Josh Reynolds Nickell Robey-Coleman Rodger Saffold Sam Shields Tanzel Smart Ndamukong Suh John Sullivan Aqib Talib Ethan Westbrooks Andrew Whitworth Darious Williams Ramik Wilson Robert Woods Trevon Young Greg Zuerlein
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 21, 2019 22:11:53 GMT
No, it's not any more likely. NO NFL team has gone undefeated since the 1972 Dolphins did it. That doesn't mean it's any more likely that another NFL team will go undefeated. On the contrary, the fact that no teams since the 1971 Cowboys and 1972 Dolphins have been able to win a Super Bowl the year after losing means that it's very uncommon and thus less likely that it will happen again. And when was the last time a team made it to 4 out of 5 super bowls? The Bills went to 4 out of 4 Super Bowls.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 21, 2019 22:14:52 GMT
No, it's not any more likely. NO NFL team has gone undefeated since the 1972 Dolphins did it. That doesn't mean it's any more likely that another NFL team will go undefeated. On the contrary, the fact that no teams since the 1971 Cowboys and 1972 Dolphins have been able to win a Super Bowl the year after losing means that it's very uncommon and thus less likely that it will happen again. Well then, it will be even MORE impressive when it happens! That's like saying it'll be impressive when someone breaks Joe DiMaggio's 56-game hitting streak or it'll be impressive when another NFL team goes undefeated and wins the Super Bowl. Except that hasn't happened since DiMaggio had his 56-game hitting streak and since the 1972 Dolphins went undefeated. Some achievements are just rare and will never happen again.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Jan 21, 2019 22:58:58 GMT
And when was the last time a team made it to 4 out of 5 super bowls? The Bills went to 4 out of 4 Super Bowls. Wow, that's a long time ago since any team has gone to 4 super bowls in a 5 year span. Who was even president then? A guess some things that haven't happened in a while can happen again.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Jan 22, 2019 1:10:51 GMT
Well then, it will be even MORE impressive when it happens! That's like saying it'll be impressive when someone breaks Joe DiMaggio's 56-game hitting streak or it'll be impressive when another NFL team goes undefeated and wins the Super Bowl. Except that hasn't happened since DiMaggio had his 56-game hitting streak and since the 1972 Dolphins went undefeated. Some achievements are just rare and will never happen again. Wow! ... and I thought this was just another Super Bowl. I didn't realize it had such historic significance for the Patriots. If the Patriots win this game, it will be an achievement comparable to Joe DiMaggio's 56 game hitting streak. You heard it here first, folks!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2019 4:34:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by millar70 on Jan 22, 2019 5:00:25 GMT
Jack Youngblood
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 23, 2019 8:02:46 GMT
Does St. Louis want Los Angeles to win? Yes, because New England cheated St. Louis out of a 2nd Super Bowl title with SpyGate.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Jan 23, 2019 8:12:41 GMT
Does St. Louis want Los Angeles to win? Yes, because New England cheated St. Louis out of a 2nd Super Bowl title with SpyGate. No they didn't. Don't be silly. The commissioner's office sent out the memo in 2007 because everybody was video tapping from a spot they shouldn't be. They wanted to remind everybody that they can still video tape opposing teams' signals, just not from the sideline. So to recap: everyone was doing it, everyone is still recording signals, and the patriots have been to 6 super bowls since the league reminded them an extra time that they cannot record signals from the sidelines. I'm glad I could clear up your confusion.
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Jan 23, 2019 17:03:18 GMT
Does St. Louis want [ the Rams ] to win? Yes.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 23, 2019 17:50:07 GMT
Yes, because New England cheated St. Louis out of a 2nd Super Bowl title with SpyGate. No they didn't. Don't be silly. The commissioner's office sent out the memo in 2007 because everybody was video tapping from a spot they shouldn't be. They wanted to remind everybody that they can still video tape opposing teams' signals, just not from the sideline. Nope. 1st, not everyone taped from the sidelines like the Pats did. 2nd, the Pats continued to illegally tape from the sidelines even after the memo was sent out. Eric Mangini, who reported the Pats for cheating in SpyGate, caught the Pats illegally taping in Week 1 of the 2007 season, after the memo was sent out. Bottom line: New England cheated St. Louis out of a 2nd Super Bowl title with SpyGate so Yes, St. Louis is rooting for the Rams to win Super Bowl LIII.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Jan 23, 2019 21:12:14 GMT
No they didn't. Don't be silly. The commissioner's office sent out the memo in 2007 because everybody was video tapping from a spot they shouldn't be. They wanted to remind everybody that they can still video tape opposing teams' signals, just not from the sideline. Nope. 1st, not everyone taped from the sidelines like the Pats did. 2nd, the Pats continued to illegally tape from the sidelines even after the memo was sent out. Eric Mangini, who reported the Pats for cheating in SpyGate, caught the Pats illegally taping in Week 1 of the 2007 season, after the memo was sent out. Bottom line: New England cheated St. Louis out of a 2nd Super Bowl title with SpyGate so Yes, St. Louis is rooting for the Rams to win Super Bowl LIII.No they didn't. Don't be silly. The commissioner's office sent out the memo in 2007 because everybody was video tapping from a spot they shouldn't be. Many people much smarter than you have said this. They wanted to remind everybody that they can still video tape opposing teams' signals, just not from the sideline. So to recap: everyone was doing it, everyone is still recording signals, and the patriots have been to 6 super bowls since the league reminded them an extra time that they cannot record signals from the sidelines. I'm glad I could clear up your confusion.
|
|