|
Post by hobowar on Jan 30, 2019 18:00:34 GMT
All they have to do is make him kinda accurate to the comics and they've topped him. Like how they made Stark, Parker, Quill, Ego, Hank Pymm, Ultron, Thor etc etc etc etc etc? You don't understand any of those character's, you stupid little monkey.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Jan 30, 2019 18:01:45 GMT
Like how they made Stark, Parker, Quill, Ego, Hank Pymm, Ultron, Thor etc etc etc etc etc? You don't understand any of those character's, you stupid little monkey. Look whose talking, a pathetic little low IQ racoon
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Jan 30, 2019 18:05:54 GMT
All they have to do is make him kinda accurate to the comics and they've topped him. Like how they made Stark, Parker, Quill, Ego, Hank Pymm, Ultron, Thor etc etc etc etc etc? Nearly accurate to the comics, from their physical appearance to their costumes?
|
|
|
Post by kleinreturns on Jan 30, 2019 18:10:58 GMT
Doesnt matter. Nothing disney do will be able to top Jackmans Wolverine. Let them try Meh, as much as I enjoyed Jackman's Wolverine let's be honest, he was far from the perfect Wolverine. There are many things the new version could do better on. Heck, if they make the series like they did Daredevil and Punisher then it would already be a big improvement. Plus Jackman never looked the part. He always came off as too clean and pretty boyish, his "sideburns/mutton chops" were consistently awful looking as was his faux Elvis head hair. Plus i hate the way they had Wolverine jumping at people it always looked too cgi and fake.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Jan 30, 2019 18:16:25 GMT
You don't understand any of those character's, you stupid little monkey. Look whose talking, a pathetic little low IQ racoon Gentlemen, there’s no need for name calling here. Let’s try to keep it civil. Although, I must say the phrase “low IQ” does evoke a grin as my current Commander in Chief is quite fond of the term.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Jan 30, 2019 18:17:39 GMT
Meh, as much as I enjoyed Jackman's Wolverine let's be honest, he was far from the perfect Wolverine. There are many things the new version could do better on. Heck, if they make the series like they did Daredevil and Punisher then it would already be a big improvement. Plus Jackman never looked the part. He always came off as too clean and pretty boyish, his "sideburns/mutton chops" were consistently awful looking as was his faux Elvis head hair. Plus i hate the way they had Wolverine jumping at people it always looked too cgi and fake. To be fair, it was the state of the art in wire work at the time.
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Jan 30, 2019 18:19:18 GMT
Meh, as much as I enjoyed Jackman's Wolverine let's be honest, he was far from the perfect Wolverine. There are many things the new version could do better on. Heck, if they make the series like they did Daredevil and Punisher then it would already be a big improvement. Plus Jackman never looked the part. He always came off as too clean and pretty boyish, his "sideburns/mutton chops" were consistently awful looking as was his faux Elvis head hair. Plus i hate the way they had Wolverine jumping at people it always looked too cgi and fake. Jackman never looked the part? LMAO.
jackman has now made wolverine iconic even more than ever, he never physically looked the part but had the acting and traits down. people will remember and respect wolverine. after what disney has done to RDJ in the iron man role? he is no jackman.
the difference is jackman got to act the hell out of the films and got better and better. what has mcu being doing with iron man?
Are mcu fanatic saying he looks fake after mcu movies are their play station games wolverine on the internet huh? so how will mcu adapt e is for exnticiton again? real xmen stories or disney jokey stories? what is mcu xmen about?
same old same old with you. all trash talk no intellectual substance. yawn
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Jan 30, 2019 18:20:39 GMT
Like how they made Stark, Parker, Quill, Ego, Hank Pymm, Ultron, Thor etc etc etc etc etc? Nearly accurate to the comics, from their physical appearance to their costumes? Story arcs, motivations, personality traits.
|
|
|
Post by kleinreturns on Jan 30, 2019 18:22:41 GMT
All they have to do is make him kinda accurate to the comics and they've topped him. Like how they made Stark, Parker, Quill, Ego, Hank Pymm, Ultron, Thor etc etc etc etc etc? like how origins made Wolverine and Sabretooth brothers, and Deadpool Barakapool instead??? or how Rogue was made into a weak whiny loser in the series or how Colossus (before Deadpool) was never Russian or how Shaw was a Nazi, instead of the comic book accurate Hellfire Club leader or how Pryo wasn't Australian or how Jean has the phoenix already inside her in X3 or how Pierce in Logan wasn't a Hellfire Club member and the Reavers weren't comicbook accurate or how Quicksilver was American and named "Peter" with no twin sister and Trask being a midget in DOFP or having Magneto being a horseman for Apocalypse, when Magneto killed Apocalypse in the AOA storyline and had Apocalypse as his b!tch the the House of M storyline
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Jan 30, 2019 18:22:47 GMT
wolverine tv show? is the character too violent for their disneu kids movies? Like Wolverine scared sh!tless over a cat and having that cat cutely lick his claws was so "violent"..... nahhhhh... or yawn. just trash talking.
let get real. this. this is movie pg 13
is disney saying they can do this with wolverine? he will now be on the internet. LMAO
So how will disney adapt the mutant massacre again.
notice when you ask mcu fans simple question, they change the topic and just attack you. that how bad mcu movies are. their fans cant even talk about it. so sad.
yawn....bring on matt reeves batman. please.
|
|
|
Post by kleinreturns on Jan 30, 2019 18:25:54 GMT
Like Wolverine scared sh!tless over a cat and having that cat cutely lick his claws was so "violent"..... nahhhhh... or yawn. just trash talking.
let get real. this. this is movie pg 13
is disney saying they can do this with wolverine? he will now be on the internet. LMAO
So how will disney adapt the mutant massacre again.
notice when you ask mcu fans simple question, they change the topic and just attack you. that how bad mcu movies are. their fans cant even talk about it. so sad.
yawn....bring on matt reeves batman. please.
or it was an excuse by Singer to get Hugh Jackman naked. He never got Wolverine right and you know it.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Jan 30, 2019 18:26:05 GMT
Like how they made Stark, Parker, Quill, Ego, Hank Pymm, Ultron, Thor etc etc etc etc etc? like how origins made Wolverine and Sabretooth brothers, and Deadpool Barakapool instead??? or how Rogue was made into a weak whiny loser in the series or how Colossus (before Deadpool) was never Russian or how Shaw was a Nazi, instead of the comic book accurate Hellfire Club leader or how Pryo wasn't Australian or how Jean has the phoenix already inside her in X3 or how Pierce in Logan wasn't a Hellfire Club member and the Reavers weren't comicbook accurate or how Quicksilver was American and named "Peter" with no twin sister and Trask being a midget in DOFP or having Magneto being a horseman for Apocalypse, when Magneto killed Apocalypse in the AOA storyline and had Apocalypse as his b!tch the the House of M storyline Never said Fox xmen films have got everything pitch perfect but MCU stans like to claim otherwise about their own roster. And Apocalypse wasn't meant to be an adaptation of AoA
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jan 30, 2019 18:39:28 GMT
Plus Jackman never looked the part. He always came off as too clean and pretty boyish, his "sideburns/mutton chops" were consistently awful looking as was his faux Elvis head hair. Plus i hate the way they had Wolverine jumping at people it always looked too cgi and fake. Jackman never looked the part? LMAO.
jackman has now made wolverine iconic even more than ever, he never physically looked the part but had the acting and traits down. people will remember and respect wolverine. after what disney has done to RDJ in the iron man role? he is no jackman.
the difference is jackman got to act the hell out of the films and got better and better. what has mcu being doing with iron man?
Are mcu fanatic saying he looks fake after mcu movies are their play station games wolverine on the internet huh? so how will mcu adapt e is for exnticiton again? real xmen stories or disney jokey stories? what is mcu xmen about?
same old same old with you. all trash talk no intellectual substance. yawn
No, he didn't look the part. Anyone who's a true fan of the comic character acknowledges this. They did the best they could with hair and beard but in the end Jackman looks far too suave and smooth compared to comic Wolverine. Jackman got ripped for the part but he was slim and ripped whereas Wolverine is ripped but stocky. Heavily muscled. Jackman's voice is too light and smooth compared to Wolverine's gravelly tone. Ofcourse there's the height. Jackman walks completely erect, like a model, whereas Logan is normally drawn with a hunched, thuggish posture. And even Jackman's berserk scenes seem a bit too tame for what you'd expect of Wolverine. If you saw Hardy in Warrior, that's closer to how I'd imagine Wolverine's default intensity would be when fighting. Now I'm not hating on Jackman's Wolverine. I'm still thankful for what we've gotten from him over the years. I'm just pointing out that movie Wolverine is a far cry from comic Wolverine.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jan 30, 2019 18:41:08 GMT
Meh, as much as I enjoyed Jackman's Wolverine let's be honest, he was far from the perfect Wolverine. There are many things the new version could do better on. Heck, if they make the series like they did Daredevil and Punisher then it would already be a big improvement. Dont think they will go down Punisher route. Far from perfect when looking through MCU tinted glasses. MCU tinted glasses? How bout comic tinted glasses or Marvel tinted glasses?
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Jan 30, 2019 18:43:26 GMT
Plus Jackman never looked the part. He always came off as too clean and pretty boyish, his "sideburns/mutton chops" were consistently awful looking as was his faux Elvis head hair. Plus i hate the way they had Wolverine jumping at people it always looked too cgi and fake. Jackman never looked the part? LMAO.
jackman has now made wolverine iconic even more than ever, he never physically looked the part but had the acting and traits down. people will remember and respect wolverine. after what disney has done to RDJ in the iron man role? he is no jackman.
the difference is jackman got to act the hell out of the films and got better and better. what has mcu being doing with iron man?
Are mcu fanatic saying he looks fake after mcu movies are their play station games wolverine on the internet huh? so how will mcu adapt e is for exnticiton again? real xmen stories or disney jokey stories? what is mcu xmen about?
same old same old with you. all trash talk no intellectual substance. yawn
What is with FoX-Men fans keep asking for Disney to adapt the E for Extinction storyline? As if Fox done it way better...oh wait, they never did.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Jan 30, 2019 18:48:04 GMT
nahhhhh... or yawn. just trash talking.
let get real. this. this is movie pg 13
is disney saying they can do this with wolverine? he will now be on the internet. LMAO
So how will disney adapt the mutant massacre again.
notice when you ask mcu fans simple question, they change the topic and just attack you. that how bad mcu movies are. their fans cant even talk about it. so sad.
yawn....bring on matt reeves batman. please.
or it was an excuse by Singer to get Hugh Jackman naked. He never got Wolverine right and you know it. He didn't get him right but, after a while, that was beside the point. Jackman's on-screen portrayal began to heavily influence how the character was drawn in the comic books. He was rendered as taller, less hairy and with a slimmer build (instead of a stocky one). The last artists to draw the character accurately (or at least per the intention of the original creator) was likely Sam Keith, Kent Willians, and Frank Quitely. In the early aughts, younger artists whose first exposure to the X-Men was the movies began to take over, and Jackman was their goto reference.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jan 30, 2019 18:57:15 GMT
Meh, as much as I enjoyed Jackman's Wolverine let's be honest, he was far from the perfect Wolverine. There are many things the new version could do better on. Heck, if they make the series like they did Daredevil and Punisher then it would already be a big improvement. Plus Jackman never looked the part. He always came off as too clean and pretty boyish, his "sideburns/mutton chops" were consistently awful looking as was his faux Elvis head hair. Plus i hate the way they had Wolverine jumping at people it always looked too cgi and fake. Yeah, I've always said Jackman's Wolverine looked closer to James Bond than Logan. And good call on his "jumping". I could forgive them for their earlier movies due to poorer movie effects but it never really got better. I guess my main complaint was that jackman never looked animalistic enough to pull off comic Wolverine.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Jan 30, 2019 19:06:52 GMT
Jackman never looked the part? LMAO.
jackman has now made wolverine iconic even more than ever, he never physically looked the part but had the acting and traits down. people will remember and respect wolverine. after what disney has done to RDJ in the iron man role? he is no jackman.
the difference is jackman got to act the hell out of the films and got better and better. what has mcu being doing with iron man?
Are mcu fanatic saying he looks fake after mcu movies are their play station games wolverine on the internet huh? so how will mcu adapt e is for exnticiton again? real xmen stories or disney jokey stories? what is mcu xmen about?
same old same old with you. all trash talk no intellectual substance. yawn
What is with FoX-Men fans keep asking for Disney to adapt the E for Extinction storyline? As if Fox done it way better...oh wait, they never did. E Is for Extinction is the first story arc in Grant Morrison's legendary run on New X-Men. It's a good story but, when re-read, it's clear to see that Morrison is finding his footing on the book. It's a bit overrated when the entirety of his (groundbreaking) run is considered. Even the title is a bit of a baffling non-sequitur. Yes, E is for Extinction... And? If they'd have dropped the E in extinction... It does roll off of the tongue though, and that, sadly, is likely why XMU fans are drawn to it. It also features many nameless and faceless mutants being murdered as does Fall of the Mutants, another go to story arc for XMU fans. If you go back even two year ago, not many hardcore XMU fans were even familiar with the story. Riot at Xavier's, which pits a younger, ultra-radical faction of Xavier's students against the more established X-Men, would be far more compelling thematically. There's also the fact that E Is for Extinction is exactly three issues in length. I would call it more of a set up for Imperial and New Worlds which followed and were much more satisfying stories.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Feb 1, 2019 1:00:12 GMT
Apropos of Mr. Jackman, whom I preferred in the following to whatever he was doing in X2:
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Feb 1, 2019 4:28:26 GMT
Reminds me of when WCW acquired Bret Hart hot on the heels of Montreal and then... put him in a midcard feud with Flair and then never toured anywhere in Canada. It's just like Star Wars: no self-control; totally short-sighted, shotgun stuff likely greenlit with no concrete and long-term story; pennywise but pound foolish from a creative standpoint.
"But why wouldn't we do Untitled Wolverine Project (2019) ASAP? It's for the sharehol -- er, the fans!!!!1"
|
|