|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Apr 5, 2017 10:07:17 GMT
No, I mean the UN has specifically implicated Syria previously with war crimes, authorised moreover at the highest level.
Claiming that Assad is 'not so bad' compared to other murderous rulers is like comparing arsenic to rat poison and given the nature of the crimes is really moot in any case.
I am sure you have your own reasons for special pleading and not seeing Assad as a murderous dictator who has owned chemical weapons, has a track record of their alleged use and had a convenient means for their delivery. (Or perhaps, like so many in Trumpton, you rely for news on the Russians? They do seem to have influencers everywhere lol..) Either way your rejection of an obvious attribution for a heinous war crime on this occasion just appears bloody minded, especially in the light of what can be most reasonably deduced from the circumstances. 'Accidentally releasing' the gas from hitting supposed rebel factory supplies of chemical weapons, or whatever the claim is, seems a little weak and disingenuous. But I guess someone has to believe it in this world of post-truth.
Because that is an effective and least problematic delivery method at a distance - especially for a side facing no opposition in the enemy's skies and which has previously held such weapons.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 5, 2017 10:08:30 GMT
What reason did they have to do it? They have even less reason now than in 2013. In 2013 they were winning the war then even without the Russians. Now, with the Russians on their side and the war almost over, what would be the point? The war isn't "almost over". Oh, sure it is. Globalist scumbags tried for years to overthrow the government of Syria using Western-backed jihadist puppets, and they are now almost defeated and driven out of Syria. Don't you keep up with the news?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 5, 2017 10:11:17 GMT
No, I mean the UN has specifically implicated Syria previously with war crimes, authorised moreover at the highest level.
Claiming that Assad is 'not so bad' compared to other murderous rulers is like comparing arsenic to rat poison and given the nature of the crimes is really moot in any case.
I am sure you have your own reasons for special pleading and not seeing Assad as a murderous dictator who has owned chemical weapons, has a track record of their alleged use and had a convenient means for their delivery. (Or perhaps, like so many in Trumpton, you rely for news on the Russians? They do seem to have influencers everywhere lol..) Either way your rejection of an obvious attribution for a heinous war crime on this occasion just appears bloody minded, especially in the light of what can be most reasonably deduced from the circumstances. 'Accidentally releasing' the gas from hitting supposed rebel factory supplies of chemical weapons, or whatever the claim is, seems a little weak and disingenuous. But I guess someone has to believe it in this world of post-truth.
Because that is an effective and least problematic delivery method at a distance - especially for a side facing no opposition in the enemy's skies and which has previously held such weapons. Perhaps, but it doesn't rule out another form of delivery.
|
|
puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on Apr 5, 2017 10:11:30 GMT
The war isn't "almost over". Oh, sure it is. Globalist scumbags tried for years to overthrow the government of Syria using Western-backed jihadist puppets, and they are now almost defeated and driven out of Syria. Don't you keep up with the news? Erjen, random muppets posting youtube videos isnt "the news".
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 5, 2017 10:14:13 GMT
Oh, sure it is. Globalist scumbags tried for years to overthrow the government of Syria using Western-backed jihadist puppets, and they are now almost defeated and driven out of Syria. Don't you keep up with the news? Erjen, random muppets posting youtube videos isnt "the news". And globalist talking heads on CNN and MSN are "the news?"
|
|
puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on Apr 5, 2017 10:18:39 GMT
Erjen, random muppets posting youtube videos isnt "the news". And globalist talking heads on CNN and MSN are "the news?" More so than unqualified, no knowledge nobodies on youtube, nowhere near any information from Syria. Absolutely. But hey, you still think you saw a different surface of the moon for a while, despite it being physically impossible, axis wobble and all.
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Apr 5, 2017 10:20:37 GMT
The Russian defence ministry acknowledged that Syrian planes had attacked the town of Khan Sheikhoun in Idlib province. As one example, a chemical weapons expert, Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, has told the BBC that the Russian version of events was "pretty fanciful". The idea that a nerve gas like Sarin could spread after a weapons manufacturing process had been bombed was "unsustainable", he added. To me, it just sounds fanciful. Syria's civil war has raged for more than six years, with no political solution in sight.
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Apr 5, 2017 10:23:23 GMT
The war isn't "almost over". Oh, sure it is. Globalist scumbags tried for years to overthrow the government of Syria using Western-backed jihadist puppets, and they are now almost defeated and driven out of Syria. Don't you keep up with the news? I do keep up with the news, that's how I know the war is not nearly over. The Syrian government still only controls a small proportion of the country.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 5, 2017 10:27:02 GMT
The Russian defence ministry acknowledged that Syrian planes had attacked the town of Khan Sheikhoun in Idlib province. As one example, a chemical weapons expert, Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, has told the BBC that the Russian version of events was "pretty fanciful". The idea that a nerve gas like Sarin could spread after a weapons manufacturing process had been bombed was "unsustainable", he added. To me, it just sounds fanciful. Syria's civil war has raged for more than six years, with no political solution in sight. Then we'll have to agree to disagree.
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Apr 5, 2017 10:31:46 GMT
The Russian defence ministry acknowledged that Syrian planes had attacked the town of Khan Sheikhoun in Idlib province. As one example, a chemical weapons expert, Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, has told the BBC that the Russian version of events was "pretty fanciful". The idea that a nerve gas like Sarin could spread after a weapons manufacturing process had been bombed was "unsustainable", he added. To me, it just sounds fanciful. Syria's civil war has raged for more than six years, with no political solution in sight. Then we'll have to agree to disagree. Best speak to the Russians before making a decision like that.
|
|
|
Post by Jonesy1 on Apr 5, 2017 11:43:45 GMT
And all it took for you to come to that conclusion is a single YouTube video. Haha. I'm surprised he can't find a YouTube video showing that Nibiru did it.
|
|