|
|
Post by hi224 on Feb 13, 2019 9:15:27 GMT
he would've been a solid Mills perhaps.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Feb 13, 2019 9:41:42 GMT
He probably would have been more effective in the ending.
|
|
|
|
Post by mslo79 on Feb 13, 2019 9:55:41 GMT
Who knows, but one things for sure... that movie is overrated like Fincher movies are in general.
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Feb 13, 2019 11:20:02 GMT
Who knows, but one things for sure... that movie is overrated like Fincher movies are in general. I like Fincher's work, but I agree that this and Fight Club, while good films, aren't the masterpieces that people make them out to be. For the case of this film, I don't think it gets really compelling until John Doe shows up. Before that, and while it's entertaining enough to keep interest, it feels like standard police mystery stuff with the retiring cop going on one last assignment to stop a major killer. |
|
|
|
Post by Fox in the Snow on Feb 13, 2019 11:34:25 GMT
Maybe, but I think Pitt is the better choice of the two. As big as Pitt is, relative to Cruise it's easier to forget it's him in his roles. Tom shines through more as himself, which is not what was wanted/needed for this role.
|
|
