|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Feb 27, 2019 16:30:05 GMT
^^^This. I've yet to actually see any of the Brie Larson/Captain Marvel haters not be so form of a snarky, whioly, phony outrage filled douchebag, toxic manbaby I don't want to get political, but these toxic manchildren have to be conservatards / Trump supporters filled with testosterone and anti feminist. I'm a Conservative Republican and I can't wait to see Captain Marvel. I also have plenty of testosterone (thank goodness).
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Feb 27, 2019 16:34:08 GMT
The Nolanites? ... Nolanites... Now, that's a name I've not heard in a long time. A long time. |
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Feb 27, 2019 17:19:27 GMT
RT is protecting Captain Marvel and punishing Alita Battle Angel. They are blocking reviews written for Alita from audiences since Monday. mcu movies have been protected fro so long. look at ant man 2 the reviews make no sense.
to change your entire system? so embarrassing.
|
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Feb 27, 2019 17:29:13 GMT
I don't want to get political, but these toxic manchildren have to be conservatards / Trump supporters filled with testosterone and anti feminist. I'm a Conservative Republican and I can't wait to see Captain Marvel. I also have plenty of testosterone (thank goodness). See, that's what I like to see! 
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Feb 27, 2019 17:56:53 GMT
You mean , users were using site as attended. Saying you are not interested in a film is not attacking. No one would have even paid much attention to it if it wasn't for MSM peddling a false narrative that trolls were attacking a film cause it starred a woman. But trolls are attacking the film. Captain Marvel's audience score is inaccurate because of trolls. A month or so ago the interest rate was 99%, then it slipped all the way down to 30% of audiences interested. It slipped down because more and more people are disinterested inseeing the movie. That's not trolling. |
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Feb 27, 2019 18:00:40 GMT
But trolls are attacking the film. Captain Marvel's audience score is inaccurate because of trolls. A month or so ago the interest rate was 99%, then it slipped all the way down to 30% of audiences interested. It slipped down because more and more people are disinterested inseeing the movie. That's not trolling. No. 'Captain Marvel' Targeted by Trolls
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Feb 27, 2019 18:19:06 GMT
are people stupid enough to think that Rotten Tomatoes which is a private company with its rules and user terms of service was gonna let people run rampant like that. How did people run rampant? RT put 2 buttons on each movie site - Want to See and Don't Want to See. Most people voted Don't Want to See. That's not running rampant or trolling. RT removed the buttons simply because Disney didn't like the poll results. It's similar to Ted Wells' investigation into Tom Brady's cheating in DeflateGate. When Wells was hired as the independent investigator, Patriots' owner Robert Kraft himself praised Wells for his integrity. Then when Wells came back with his findings that Brady was guilty of cheating, Kraft and the Patriots attacked Wells' integrity. But it wasn't because they thought Wells lacked integrity. It was because they simply didn't like the findings that Wells came back with so they attacked Wells for that. RT knows those results are accurate and not trolling. RT simply doesn't like those results so RT removed the buttons and called it trolling to try to protect Captain Marvel. |
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Feb 27, 2019 19:19:24 GMT
RT is protecting Captain Marvel and punishing Alita Battle Angel. They are blocking reviews written for Alita from audiences since Monday. mcu movies have been protected fro so long. look at ant man 2 the reviews make no sense.
to change your entire system? so embarrassing.
Are you suggesting that 'Alita: Battle Angel' is somehow better than 'Ant-Man and the Wasp'? Because I can tell you, it's not.
|
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Feb 27, 2019 19:27:43 GMT
mcu movies have been protected fro so long. look at ant man 2 the reviews make no sense.
to change your entire system? so embarrassing.
Are you suggesting that 'Alita: Battle Angel' is somehow better than 'Ant-Man and the Wasp'? Because I can tell you, it's not. Summers8 lives in a fantasy where he's always right on what films are considered good and ones that are not. Differing opinions are like fiction to him. |
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Feb 27, 2019 19:28:35 GMT
man of steel was more consistent hate or love it at least from the first arc or scene in the film you knew the direction. it a better made movie than iron man 3 with better writing to iron man 3.
people who want a movie to be judged on its own merit are not trolls. disney and the media are blurring this line to protect movies like black panther and captain marvel from any criticism other movies do get.
Man of Steel better writing than Iron Man 3?  "So, we're done measuring dicks?" "I WILL FIND HIM!!!!!" "I just think he's kind of hot." Also, 'Man of Steel' turns into a CGI destruction porn during the 3rd act.
|
|
|
|
Post by cricket on Feb 27, 2019 19:39:58 GMT
Man of Steel better writing than Iron Man 3? "So, we're done measuring dicks?" "I WILL FIND HIM!!!!!" "I just think he's kind of hot." Also, 'Man of Steel' turns into a CGI destruction porn during the 3rd act.
Let us never forget TORNADOCIDE. Even if it was infamously replaced by MARTHA. A jewel of film writing nevertheless.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Feb 27, 2019 19:42:05 GMT
are people stupid enough to think that Rotten Tomatoes which is a private company with its rules and user terms of service was gonna let people run rampant like that. How did people run rampant? RT put 2 buttons on each movie site - Want to See and Don't Want to See. Most people voted Don't Want to See. That's not running rampant or trolling. RT removed the buttons simply because Disney didn't like the poll results. It's similar to Ted Wells' investigation into Tom Brady's cheating in DeflateGate. When Wells was hired as the independent investigator, Patriots' owner Robert Kraft himself praised Wells for his integrity. Then when Wells came back with his findings that Brady was guilty of cheating, Kraft and the Patriots attacked Wells' integrity. But it wasn't because they thought Wells lacked integrity. It was because they simply didn't like the findings that Wells came back with so they attacked Wells for that. RT knows those results are accurate and not trolling. RT simply doesn't like those results so RT removed the buttons and called it trolling to try to protect Captain Marvel. Save the sports references for KKB. I don't really care.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2019 20:19:20 GMT
Welcome to my world, or at least part of it. Nothing about Marvel or the MCU is the straw that broke the camel's back, but I've been on about Rotten Tomatoes for years. Probably since the first time I saw a movie rated 100%. That's impossible, goddammit. Every bit as unrealistic as being rated 0.
I understand the algorithm makes it work, but it does not work for me to see unreasonably high ratings for regular movies. High and low ratings tell me something. 0 and 100 tell me nothing.
Last month I recommended my friend a movie to download, so he did, then before we watched it he mentioned apparently it's at 100% on Rotten Tomatoes, which bodes well for it. I recommended it and even thought ugh, that's stupid.
I guess that's why there's a critic score and audience score and even though I don't like the algorithm, the gap between them sometimes is more telling than either rating alone.
IMDb I generally find is more accurate, but not inscrutable either.
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Feb 27, 2019 20:30:26 GMT
Welcome to my world, or at least part of it. Nothing about Marvel or the MCU is the straw that broke the camel's back, but I've been on about Rotten Tomatoes for years. Probably since the first time I saw a movie rated 100%. That's impossible, goddammit. Every bit as unrealistic as being rated 0.
I understand the algorithm makes it work, but it does not work for me to see unreasonably high ratings for regular movies. High and low ratings tell me something. 0 and 100 tell me nothing.
Last month I recommended my friend a movie to download, so he did, then before we watched it he mentioned apparently it's at 100% on Rotten Tomatoes, which bodes well for it. I recommended it and even thought ugh, that's stupid.
I guess that's why there's a critic score and audience score and even though I don't like the algorithm, the gap between them sometimes is more telling than either rating alone.
IMDb I generally find is more accurate, but not inscrutable either.
Here's what RT should've done. I expressed this privately to a friend the other day, and the more I've thought about it the more certain I am that this would've eliminated a lot problems for them going forward: let the percentage stand at whatever it's going to wind up at by the time of CM's release; then, when the movie came out to the usual acclaim of MCU fans and the box office success that reliably accompanies it, they could've credibly claimed that the metric clearly failed the statistical standard for validity and wasn't reliably measuring what it was supposed to and, therefore, removed the feature under the pretense that they're retooling it. And then just never brought it back. No drama, Obama. Innit? ETA: can you think of a better way to've handled it? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2019 20:36:26 GMT
Welcome to my world, or at least part of it. Nothing about Marvel or the MCU is the straw that broke the camel's back, but I've been on about Rotten Tomatoes for years. Probably since the first time I saw a movie rated 100%. That's impossible, goddammit. Every bit as unrealistic as being rated 0.
I understand the algorithm makes it work, but it does not work for me to see unreasonably high ratings for regular movies. High and low ratings tell me something. 0 and 100 tell me nothing.
Last month I recommended my friend a movie to download, so he did, then before we watched it he mentioned apparently it's at 100% on Rotten Tomatoes, which bodes well for it. I recommended it and even thought ugh, that's stupid.
I guess that's why there's a critic score and audience score and even though I don't like the algorithm, the gap between them sometimes is more telling than either rating alone.
IMDb I generally find is more accurate, but not inscrutable either.
Here's what RT should've done. I expressed this privately to a friend the other day, and the more I've thought about it the more certain I am that this would've eliminated a lot problems for them going forward: let the percentage stand at whatever it's going to wind up at by the time of CM's release; then, when the movie came out to the usual acclaim of MCU fans and the box office success that reliably accompanies it, they could've credibly claimed that the metric clearly failed the statistical standard for validity and wasn't reliably measuring what it was supposed to and, therefore, removed the feature under the pretense that they're retooling it. And then just never brought it back. No drama, Obama. Innit? ETA: can you think of a better way to've handled it? That makes sense to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Feb 27, 2019 20:43:02 GMT
Here's what RT should've done. I expressed this privately to a friend the other day, and the more I've thought about it the more certain I am that this would've eliminated a lot problems for them going forward: let the percentage stand at whatever it's going to wind up at by the time of CM's release; then, when the movie came out to the usual acclaim of MCU fans and the box office success that reliably accompanies it, they could've credibly claimed that the metric clearly failed the statistical standard for validity and wasn't reliably measuring what it was supposed to and, therefore, removed the feature under the pretense that they're retooling it. And then just never brought it back. No drama, Obama. Innit? ETA: can you think of a better way to've handled it? That makes sense to me. You know? And then you can claim the metric/poll WAS bridgaded or troll-bombed to fuck or downvoted or whatever, if "5%"of users want to see it and it makes a hundred and sixty million bucks in three days or whatever without the fog of ambiguity ("ambiguity") and controversy ("controversy") surrounding the site as well as the damn movie. |
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Feb 27, 2019 21:11:26 GMT
Welcome to my world, or at least part of it. Nothing about Marvel or the MCU is the straw that broke the camel's back, but I've been on about Rotten Tomatoes for years. Probably since the first time I saw a movie rated 100%. That's impossible, goddammit. Every bit as unrealistic as being rated 0.
I understand the algorithm makes it work, but it does not work for me to see unreasonably high ratings for regular movies. High and low ratings tell me something. 0 and 100 tell me nothing.
Last month I recommended my friend a movie to download, so he did, then before we watched it he mentioned apparently it's at 100% on Rotten Tomatoes, which bodes well for it. I recommended it and even thought ugh, that's stupid.
I guess that's why there's a critic score and audience score and even though I don't like the algorithm, the gap between them sometimes is more telling than either rating alone.
IMDb I generally find is more accurate, but not inscrutable either.
IMDB is not accurate either because of socks. one person can have 20 accounts and rate a film a 10 or a 1.
nothing is reliable, the only thing reliable is if a person can talk in full extent on the content of a movie or if there is a pattern about many complaints from other people that hate movies that also make movies.
for instance how do I know Interstellar is better than GOTG? Because Interstellar had some brains to it, it was directed by a person who had creative freedom to tell his story even with all the flaws. GOTG is just fun dumb down nonsense shited out by the disney cooperate factory and those darm jokes to make the movie goofy for kids? interstellar used a more serious approach , a better approach. that is why it is better. these are solid reasons.
why it is a better film. I dont give a darm what rotten tomatoes says. the substance had to speak for itself.
MCU fans were a funny bunch. they never listened to many film makers who have said or implied mcu movies are trash, they never listened to long tome marvel comic fans who spoke about how marvel was getting too silly and childish under disney but they chose to listen to critics who they cant even name.lol. at least we know who john landis, james cameron, ridley scott are.
|
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Feb 28, 2019 2:53:19 GMT
I love seeing all these triggered snowflake MRAs who can't do anything but whine about a movie that will be successful regardless.
|
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Feb 28, 2019 3:01:07 GMT
Welcome to my world, or at least part of it. Nothing about Marvel or the MCU is the straw that broke the camel's back, but I've been on about Rotten Tomatoes for years. Probably since the first time I saw a movie rated 100%. That's impossible, goddammit. Every bit as unrealistic as being rated 0.
I understand the algorithm makes it work, but it does not work for me to see unreasonably high ratings for regular movies. High and low ratings tell me something. 0 and 100 tell me nothing.
Last month I recommended my friend a movie to download, so he did, then before we watched it he mentioned apparently it's at 100% on Rotten Tomatoes, which bodes well for it. I recommended it and even thought ugh, that's stupid.
I guess that's why there's a critic score and audience score and even though I don't like the algorithm, the gap between them sometimes is more telling than either rating alone.
IMDb I generally find is more accurate, but not inscrutable either.
IMDB is not accurate either because of socks. one person can have 20 accounts and rate a film a 10 or a 1.
nothing is reliable, the only thing reliable is if a person can talk in full extent on the content of a movie or if there is a pattern about many complaints from other people that hate movies that also make movies.
for instance how do I know Interstellar is better than GOTG? Because Interstellar had some brains to it, it was directed by a person who had creative freedom to tell his story even with all the flaws. GOTG is just fun dumb down nonsense shited out by the disney cooperate factory and those darm jokes to make the movie goofy for kids? interstellar used a more serious approach , a better approach. that is why it is better. these are solid reasons.
why it is a better film. I dont give a darm what rotten tomatoes says. the substance had to speak for itself.
MCU fans were a funny bunch. they never listened to many film makers who have said or implied mcu movies are trash, they never listened to long tome marvel comic fans who spoke about how marvel was getting too silly and childish under disney but they chose to listen to critics who they cant even name.lol. at least we know who john landis, james cameron, ridley scott are.
So what were you telling others when Steven Spielberg AND Guillermo del Toro were praising a very film you claim to be "just fun dumb down nonsense shited out by the Disney cooperate factory"? I need to hear this.
|
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Feb 28, 2019 3:16:53 GMT
Are you suggesting that 'Alita: Battle Angel' is somehow better than 'Ant-Man and the Wasp'? Because I can tell you, it's not. Summers8 lives in a fantasy where he's always right on what films are considered good and ones that are not. Differing opinions are like fiction to him. And yet, his grammar and spellings are even worse than mine. If he/she is not a native English speaker, then I probably should stop making fun of him/her for that, but if he/she IS a native English speaker, then shame on him/her for being such a pretentious pseudo-intellectual.
|
|
