|
Post by charzhino on Mar 6, 2019 11:22:05 GMT
The top critics, who have more status and are therefore less likely to feel oblidged to drop a CBM movie a better review than it deserves, are currently standing at 63% with an average score of 6.08/10. Those figures sound more reflective of how good the movie actually is.
Scott Mendelson (one of the biggest big franchise dick suckers of all time) said it's like a phase 1 movie FGS. All the reviews Ive read are saying its decent not great. 55-65% sounds reflective of that not what its at now. But we know why, because its a women solo movie so has to be automatically given more leniency
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Mar 6, 2019 11:23:43 GMT
well is this not what we have been saying, mcu movies are too predictable because the plots are so basic even their great winter solider, you can see everything coming but CM must be 100x worse. that review is a 5/10 if it was a fox, wb and sony movie. It would be rotten like they gave for Apocalypse and Man of Steel or very best a passing grade for Aquaman
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Mar 6, 2019 11:33:48 GMT
The top critics, who have more status and are therefore less likely to feel oblidged to drop a CBM movie a better review than it deserves, are currently standing at 63% with an average score of 6.08/10. Those figures sound more reflective of how good the movie actually is.
Scott Mendelson (one of the biggest big franchise dick suckers of all time) said it's like a phase 1 movie FGS. All the reviews Ive read are saying its decent not great. 55-65% sounds reflective of that not what its at now. But we know why, because its a women solo movie so has to be automatically given more leniency That and the fact that there are so many lower end of the totem pole reviewers registered on RT these days. Those dudes can't afford to give a big franchise movie a splat if they want to get invited back to early screenings and press junkets. Established critics give much less of a fuck.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Mar 6, 2019 12:01:05 GMT
The top critics, who have more status and are therefore less likely to feel oblidged to drop a CBM movie a better review than it deserves, are currently standing at 63% with an average score of 6.08/10. Those figures sound more reflective of how good the movie actually is.
Why? The Top Critics are only such because RT believes they have influence and have awarded them the title. It is no indication at all that their review is any more valid or accurate. Take a look at which known critics and publications have NOT been invited to be, or accepted to be, a Top Critic
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Mar 6, 2019 14:28:32 GMT
ah yes, the sexist card. well if we can live through the race card pulled with black panther, we can live through the sexist card with captain marvel. You did not get that i was being sarcastic and that was my point with what i wrote ? summers8 rarely gets anything.
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Mar 6, 2019 14:34:59 GMT
All I know is that a lot of the fresh reviews are borderline rotten. Essentially saying, it's pretty bad, but there are a couple good scenes that save it. That doesn't exactly inspire confidence. EXACTLY. we have even proven it.
This mcu fanatics are still denying there is no bias to their movies. if this was an xmen or dc movie it will be rotten like 30%
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Mar 6, 2019 16:36:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Mar 6, 2019 16:56:06 GMT
Average rating is down to 6.94/10. So in-between Ant-man and Ant-man and the Wasp.
On an unrelated note. Man of Steel actually has a higher average rating than Thor Dark World and yet the former has a 56% and the latter a 67% so that's some bullshit.
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Mar 6, 2019 17:28:52 GMT
Top critics dropped to 60%. I think the issue with critics is they had 10 years to do female mcu film, if you wait that long it better be great. Mediocracy is not gonna cut it for this seminal event.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Mar 6, 2019 17:32:20 GMT
Average rating is down to 6.94/10. So in-between Ant-man and Ant-man and the Wasp. On an unrelated note. Man of Steel actually has a higher average rating than Thor Dark World and yet the former has a 56% and the latter a 67% so that's some bullshit. I like both Ant-Man films btw. That just means 67% of critics actually gave it a thumbs up while only 56% gave thumbs up to Man of Steel. I think Man of Steel score is justify. You love it or you hate it.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Mar 6, 2019 17:48:32 GMT
That just means 67% of critics actually gave it a thumbs up while only 56% gave thumbs up to Man of Steel. I think Man of Steel score is justify. You love it or you hate it. I still think it's a flawed way of doing things though. Man of Steel technically received better reviews than Thor Dark World so there shouldn't be such a disparity in the % score. It has better reviews than Incredible Hulk as well but that has a 67%. Ant-man and the Wasp has a 88% to Infinity Wars 85% but the latter has a much better average rating of 7.58.
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Mar 6, 2019 17:56:16 GMT
lol..the positive fresh and not positive but actually negative. video explains it.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Mar 6, 2019 18:01:19 GMT
That just means 67% of critics actually gave it a thumbs up while only 56% gave thumbs up to Man of Steel. I think Man of Steel score is justify. You love it or you hate it. I still think it's a flawed way of doing things though. Man of Steel technically received better reviews than Thor Dark World so there shouldn't be such a disparity in the % score. It has better reviews than Incredible Hulk as well but that has a 67%. Ant-man and the Wasp has a 88% to Infinity Wars 85% but the latter has a much better average rating of 7.58. That's because MoS is more divisive that Thor TDW. More people disliked MoS than Thor TDW (thus the better percentage for TDW) but those who did like MoS really liked it, whereas those who liked TDW were a bit more so-so. So for those who gave MoS a passing mark, they also gave it higher scores whereas those who gave TDW passing marks weren't as generous with their scores. That doesn't change the fact that more critics still preferred Thor TDW over MoS.
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Mar 6, 2019 18:09:47 GMT
I still think it's a flawed way of doing things though. Man of Steel technically received better reviews than Thor Dark World so there shouldn't be such a disparity in the % score. It has better reviews than Incredible Hulk as well but that has a 67%. Ant-man and the Wasp has a 88% to Infinity Wars 85% but the latter has a much better average rating of 7.58. That's because MoS is more divisive that Thor TDW. More people disliked MoS than Thor TDW (thus the better percentage for TDW) but those who did like MoS really liked it, whereas those who liked TDW were a bit more so-so. So for those who gave MoS a passing mark, they also gave it higher scores whereas those who gave TDW passing marks weren't as generous with their scores. That doesn't change the fact that more critics still preferred Thor TDW over MoS. I was going to type up an overly long, boring post about Mean/Averages for Divisive vs Middle of the Road movie ratings. You sir beat me too it, and explained it more simply and concisely than I could.
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Mar 6, 2019 18:12:34 GMT
That's because MoS is more divisive that Thor TDW. More people disliked MoS than Thor TDW (thus the better percentage for TDW) but those who did like MoS really liked it, whereas those who liked TDW were a bit more so-so. So for those who gave MoS a passing mark, they also gave it higher scores whereas those who gave TDW passing marks weren't as generous with their scores. That doesn't change the fact that more critics still preferred Thor TDW over MoS. I was going to type up an overly long, boring post about Mean/Averages for Divisive vs Middle of the Road movie ratings. You sir beat me too it, and explained it more simply and consciously than I could. they seem more bad than divisive.
no dc or fox film will get a fresh score after getting called generic and medicore.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Mar 6, 2019 18:22:15 GMT
lol..the positive fresh and not positive but actually negative. video explains it. Apparently emphasising the odd word in a review, from just the summary and saying "sounds kinda negative" in a higher pitch is evidence!
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Mar 6, 2019 18:25:19 GMT
I was going to type up an overly long, boring post about Mean/Averages for Divisive vs Middle of the Road movie ratings. You sir beat me too it, and explained it more simply and consciously than I could. they seem more bad than divisive.
no dc or fox film will get a fresh score after getting called generic and medicore.
That's because the average, generic MCU movie is still a good, solid movie.... especially when compared to the average of Fox and DCEU. Fact.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Mar 6, 2019 18:30:12 GMT
I was going to type up an overly long, boring post about Mean/Averages for Divisive vs Middle of the Road movie ratings. You sir beat me too it, and explained it more simply and consciously than I could. they seem more bad than divisive.
no dc or fox film will get a fresh score after getting called generic and medicore.
But Aquaman got good reviews despite critics saying it was generic and mediocre.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 6, 2019 18:42:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Mar 6, 2019 18:48:05 GMT
darm....this critic thinks the comedy is way too much. thanks.lol
|
|