|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jun 4, 2017 0:51:31 GMT
In other words, there is "no" self and the work needs to be done. There is no logical connection whatsoever between the evidence-free, mindless New Age nonsense which preceded this sentence and the meaning of this sentence itself. None. Perhaps you are attempting to find a complex and confounded meaning in something, when there is in fact no meaning. It just is and there is no "self", only in your sequestered and self-indulgent mindset.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jun 4, 2017 7:54:15 GMT
Um, I go right back to the beginning. That is the core source of it all, even if you are referring to the big bang. Very well, tell me more about the "5 elements". Space, action of stillness Air, action of movement Fire, action of transformation Water, action of fluidity Earth, action of cohesion Every part of our being, the world around us and the entire universe is comprised of these elements, both externally and internally. These elements also determine our individual constitution or dosha. It makes up the sum of our parts. The six tastes even contain these elements and that is why awareness of what foods we should eat and what is suitable for us can determine a healthy body, mind, spirit. You can check the internet regarding ayurveda and how taste and the elements can work in harmony with each other. At any rate, if you are interested, have a read of this: PANCHABUTA or FIVE ELEMENTS by Dr. Gautam Chatterjee PANCHABHUTA Or Five Elements. Our whole cosmic quest of the world and beyond starts from the point of panchabhuta (five elements) which then manifests in an enjoining manner to form the life force and then, later, those five elements disintegrates to ensue a celestical traverse at the Paramanu (atom) level. However, we will first try to understand these five elements which are Earth or Prithvi; Water or Jal ; Fire or Agni; Air or Vayu and then Ether or Akasha. Each of these Five elements has its own character and celestial elements which we will gauge in the following lines. Earth (Prithvi): One can touch earth and smell it too ! However, there are two types of earth one is Eternal or (nitya) which are in the form of atom (Paramanu).The other type is perishable (anitya) which exists in the form of Karya or Work at animate and inanimate levels. Symbolically speaking our body, sense organs are the earth which as a whole get the shape of Jiva or life but those are perishable. But elements or atoms are eternal as after death may we bury, or burn the body, all the atoms get disintegrated to come back to its original eternal form. So our body and its Karya or Work are perishable as the mountain or rock forms but the atom remains which are eternal. Water or Jal is the second element which again has two characters as in the Earth i.e. eternal in the shape of atom and Karya (Work) be it as river, pond or sea are perishable. As from sea or river water evaporates to be in the sky as cloud then again in the shape of rain it comes down on earth. So the eternal atom is only changing its karya or shape of work and what we see is the perishable form.From the sense organ perspective we can touch it to feel and taste it as well. The thrid element is Air or Vayu.Again it has two levels as earth and water i.e.eternal atom and perishable Karya. One can feel air, as we breath in or out.We feel the storm or strong breeze which are temporary but air at atomic level remains around us eternally. In the Purana there is a mention of 49 types of Maruts or winds.Seven are important namely 1. Pravaha 2 Avaha; 3,Udvaha 4. Samvaha; 5 Vivaha; 6 Parvaha and 7.Paravaha. The wind which takes the water from the ocean is called Udvaha. Fire or Agni is the fourth element of Indian Panchabhuta. Again it has eternal and perishable elements as we have seen above. The essential character of Fire is to generate heat.According to Hindu Mythology, Agni is one of the Eight guardians who guards our universe and is known as Asta- dik-palakas (Asta-eight, dik--Zone,Palaka-Guardian). The Fire is posited in the South East of the Universe. However, in Indian mythology there are mentions of various types of fires. The four important ones are fire of the earth, fire of the sky, fire of the stomach (can mean hunger and digestive power as well) and the fire we commonly use. Then comes the last of the Panchabhuta or five elements which is sound or ether. Ether is unique as it has only one character i.e. eternal. Ether is the carrier of sound be it man made or otherwise. One can hear it. As ether is the only eternal element of the five elements it attracted the attention of various sages. The concept of Akashvani or Devine sound which is heard by sages of higher order is related to this Ether or Akasha.The primordial mantra AUM then in modern times Raam or Shyaam are to work as linkages between Jivatma(life force--atman or soul) to Paramatman or (Omnipotent of supreme soul).The concept of sound and Mantra will be discussed in the next issue. Now we should concentrate on elements, other than five mentioned above which are very important to Hindu theological perspective. Those are Time(Kala) and Space (Sthan or Dik i.e. place and direction); Soul and Mind. Like ether Time and Space are eternal. Time or kala is common cause of all actions of all the elements and is eternal link of predetermined actions and happenings. Thus in Hindu astrologly the whole world and its course are equated with "time". The Direction or Dik are part of Space and North, South, West and East are eternal no matter the Universe undergoes whatever changes. Then the other element is Soul which is related with the knowledge system of man as jivatman and the eternal Knowledge of God or Paramatman(omnipotent).The last of the nine main elements is the manas or Mind. Its the sense-organ or path to experience the world eternally and otherwise. These sense organs are in the shape of eternal paramanu or atom and works is combinations to derive pleasure at worldly levels. These are the brief out line of main five elements and other four primary elements. It is said that our universe was created out of the manifestation of five elements. This was described in the Devigita very elaborately. Devigita proclaims that Shakti went about creating the world with 24 tattvas or elements. The five elements were born out of the primordial principle of unmanifested Sakti.The ether through which sound traverse was first element, which is also known as Sabda-rupa (form of sound). Second was Air or Vayu (Sparsharupa or a form which is felt) The Air or Vayu give rise to Agni so it called Vayoranih. Then sense of taste or ‘rasrupa’ the water element came. The the gandharupa or the source of smell came--the earth. Pauranic Expert Vettam Mani said that the universe remained in embryo form or in the bijarupa. "These Panchabhutas{five elements} were first divided into two (each was divided into two). Then by a process of the combination of these ten parts different substances were born....Each half of each of these five bhutas{elements} is again subdivided into four parts. These 1/8 parts are joined to the other halves and by combining them in other fractions of the material bodies(sthulasariras of all beings are made." wrote Vettam Mani. The cosmic body is the grand total of those material bodies discussed above. The first and pure manifestation of those five elements are the inner conscience and bodily organs like ear etc. However, the inner conscience or Antarkaranas assumes four state or forms. Once conception and doubt arise it is called Mind. But when there is no doubt arises is called Buddhi. The process of examination and re-examination of a subjects belongs to the state of intellect called citta. But with the feeling of "I" the ego or ahamkar bursts out. So we find the pure five elements gave rise to the inner conscience or Antarkarnana and then there are four states within it namely mind, buddhi, citta and ego. Vettam Mani explained "From the coarse (rajasic) aspect of the five sense organs originate the five organs of action like word, foot, hand, excretory and the genital organ, and also the five pranas (breaths) called prana, apana, samana, udhana and vyana. ....Prana is located in the heart, apana in the anus, samana in the nabhi (navel)udana in the throat and Vyana all over the body.....(Organs of knowldege 5, of action 5, and pranas 5,and buddhi 1,mind 1, the bodly is composes of these 17 factors". The sukshmasaria or the subtle body has two nature or Prakrati namely maya wherein the god is reflected. The other is Avidya seen by Jiva or living being who is receptable of sorrows. Through Vidya(Eternal Knowldege) and Avidya (ignorance) three forms of body emerge. Mani explained ‘He who is attached and is proud about the material body is called visva; he who attaches importance to the subtle bodly is called Taijisva, and who is aware of casual body is called Prajna.’ Likewise we see how the five elements manifested itself into 22 tattva (materials) which all go towards creation of a body. In the Devigita it is said that eighty-four lakh species of living beings have manifested from these five elements..... 5 elements
|
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Jun 4, 2017 12:42:12 GMT
Making up any excuse that you can to discredit what I have been saying, because you feel I don't meet your pompous ass terms to qualify as a pseudo-intellectual fop, who thinks because he has read a few philosophy books full of pretentious ass rhetoric, knows what he is talking about. Okay, you like taking on the the role of the anti-intellectual rube who dismisses complexity and scholarship as "pretentious ass rhetoric". I get it. That way, the fact that you've never bothered to learn anything about a subject you've decided to post about has an excuse. How comforting it must be to imagine you are so much smarter and wiser than the thousands of philosophers and scientists over the last century or so who have studied these issues very carefully and developed the necessary tools to talk about them. Talk about projection, it is you who are displaying bottomless arrogance, here, by thinking none of their work is worth paying attention to. Sorry, cupcake, but education matters. I've done more than "read a few philosophy books"--philosophy of mind is my academic specialty. It's a subject that doesn't just require more than the pithy, greeting card slogans of the kind you post; it demands more. Yes, once again you show that your understanding is only skin deep. That's a theme that seems to be coalescing around you. I chose my avatar because Doctor Faustus was a character who appeared in works of fiction during the Renaissance as a character who was supposed to represent the new thinking individual who turned away from the theocracy of the church and used his own smarts to rule his life and study the world. He's a symbol of the humanism which gave us the modern scientific age. I'm confident this is all news to you, having rejected all that pompous, worthless book-learnin' stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Jun 4, 2017 18:12:36 GMT
Very well, tell me more about the "5 elements". Space, action of stillness Air, action of movement Fire, action of transformation Water, action of fluidity Earth, action of cohesion Every part of our being, the world around us and the entire universe is comprised of these elements, both externally and internally. These elements also determine our individual constitution or dosha. It makes up the sum of our parts. The six tastes even contain these elements and that is why awareness of what foods we should eat and what is suitable for us can determine a healthy body, mind, spirit. You can check the internet regarding ayurveda and how taste and the elements can work in harmony with each other. Interesting, although it might help if a different term was used, like essence instead of element. Other cultures believed in 5 classical elements (ancient Greece, China), though in the western world the idea of quintessence gradually fell out of favor in the late Middle Ages, toward a more modern understanding of matter and space. In any case, thanks for the reply!
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jun 4, 2017 22:40:12 GMT
Okay, you like taking on the the role of the anti-intellectual rube who dismisses complexity and scholarship as "pretentious ass rhetoric". I get it. That way, the fact that you've never bothered to learn anything about a subject you've decided to post about has an excuse. How comforting it must be to imagine you are so much smarter and wiser than the thousands of philosophers and scientists over the last century or so who have studied these issues very carefully and developed the necessary tools to talk about them. Talk about projection, it is you who are displaying bottomless arrogance, here, by thinking none of their work is worth paying attention to. Sorry, cupcake, but education matters. I've done more than "read a few philosophy books"--philosophy of mind is my academic specialty. It's a subject that doesn't just require more than the pithy, greeting card slogans of the kind you post; it demands more. Yes, once again you show that your understanding is only skin deep. That's a theme that seems to be coalescing around you. I chose my avatar because Doctor Faustus was a character who appeared in works of fiction during the Renaissance as a character who was supposed to represent the new thinking individual who turned away from the theocracy of the church and used his own smarts to rule his life and study the world. He's a symbol of the humanism which gave us the modern scientific age. I'm confident this is all news to you, having rejected all that pompous, worthless book-learnin' stuff. So now I get your resume, as though you feel it does give you credibility for your academic pompousness and sense of self-superiority. I thought as much and like I already mentioned, I am not impressed with what you "think" you know. While education is important, perhaps one of the most important aspects of what a human being does with their lives, look at all the so-called intellectual educated fops like yourself who are taking charge and think they can tell others about the way things are. Leading the impressionable into degrees of bulls<>t. What a freakin' confounded mess of confusion and chaos. Yes, that says so much right there about how misguided you really are. And sunshine, it is all projection, that is how we create Yes, I already know you only go skin deep and yet dress it up as academia, when in reality you are deluded and superficial. Oh, and what a rebel you are, choosing an avatar of something that represented a new thinking individual, when it doesn't change the fact that his character still sold out his soul for personal gain and arrogant self-serving means. Yes, as I thought, you will dismiss that aspect, as long as you can gain one-upmanship over others to prove some arrogant point, when it is really only shrouded in deceit and ego.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jun 4, 2017 22:48:56 GMT
Interesting, although it might help if a different term was used, like essence instead of element. Other cultures believed in 5 classical elements (ancient Greece, China), though in the western world the idea of quintessence gradually fell out of favor in the late Middle Ages, toward a more modern understanding of matter and space. In any case, thanks for the reply!  Yes, essence is good, yet I would relate that term to the subtle aspects of the body and being. Like the "eternal" as expressed in that Dr's article. I like to hear about the Hindu philosophy, due to it being more about connectedness and a way of life. It makes so much more sense to me, when every aspect of our lives comes down to the essence of the these elements which comprise the universe, and it can create so much more clarity and self-awareness.
|
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Jun 5, 2017 10:55:18 GMT
I thought as much and like I already mentioned, I am not impressed with what you "think" you know. Good for you. The fact remains that the entirety of your contribution to this thread is empty, know-nothing nonsense. All you are capable of is making meaningless slogans. And when you get called out, you call into question the very idea that scholarship is important. That's anti-intellectualism at its most pathetic. Proud of yourself?
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jun 6, 2017 12:47:18 GMT
I thought as much and like I already mentioned, I am not impressed with what you "think" you know. Good for you. The fact remains that the entirety of your contribution to this thread is empty, know-nothing nonsense. All you are capable of is making meaningless slogans. And when you get called out, you call into question the very idea that scholarship is important. That's anti-intellectualism at its most pathetic. Proud of yourself? Whatever!  I have contributed plenty here, and that is what you have gone into avoidance about. All you have done is refute and play devil's advocate, because I called you out on your phony pseudo-intellectualism. Not used to that are you? You are not doing yourself or anyone else any big favors in the long run. I don't do pride if I can help it, that is another of your own personal projections of denial, because you thrive on pride and ego and demand that others respect you and pat you on the back for being a pretentious fop. Typical, pompous ass phony academic who really knows jack squat, apart from the sopholistic rhetorical knowledge amassed by memory retention and getting all caught up in the physical matter and ego notion of body and self. Gees, I'm really impressed! Nice going fool! 
|
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jun 6, 2017 15:14:18 GMT
Very well, tell me more about the "5 elements". Space, action of stillness Air, action of movement Fire, action of transformation Water, action of fluidity Earth, action of cohesion Every part of our being, the world around us and the entire universe is comprised of these elements, both externally and internally. These elements also determine our individual constitution or dosha. It makes up the sum of our parts. The six tastes even contain these elements ...
Er ... didn't the idea of the Classical Elements go out with the ark? (or at least by the time of Lavoisier, say?) although I have read that some modern scientists see a parallel between them and the four states of matter: solid, liquid, gas and weakly ionized plasma. But perhaps you mean something else again, although the definition "every part is comprised of" screams 'elements', Also calling stillness an 'action' sounds odd. For then what is non-action?
I'm guessing that Dr. Gautam Chatterjee is not a doctor of physics as since time, and space, came into existence at a point known by science then they can be hardly 'eternal'. While the notion of the 'ether' is more dodo science.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jun 7, 2017 2:37:00 GMT
Space, action of stillness Air, action of movement Fire, action of transformation Water, action of fluidity Earth, action of cohesion Every part of our being, the world around us and the entire universe is comprised of these elements, both externally and internally. These elements also determine our individual constitution or dosha. It makes up the sum of our parts. The six tastes even contain these elements ... Er ... didn't the idea of the Classical Elements go out with the ark? (or at least by the time of Lavoisier, say?) although I have read that some modern scientists see a parallel between them and the four states of matter: solid, liquid, gas and weakly ionized plasma. But perhaps you mean something else again, although the definition "every part is comprised of" screams 'elements', Also calling stillness an 'action' sounds odd. For then what is non-action?
I'm guessing that Dr. Gautam Chatterjee is not a doctor of physics as since time, and space, came into existence at a point known by science then they can be hardly 'eternal'. While the notion of the 'ether' is more dodo science. Yes, you do appear as a dodo, due to your dismissal. The "idea" of the Classical Elements, is what comprises EVERYTHING and still does. The ark has nothing to do with it, or better said, they were what created the ark.  Matter is impermanent and constantly changing, and only looking for meaning in what is perceived as tangible or tactile in this world and universe is very limiting, very constricting and also ignorant. If you are still, you are performing the action of stillness. Doing nothing, is doing something. Everything operates on action and there is no escaping this. Every action reaps consequence and that is about then taking responsibility. Even thought is an action.
|
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jun 7, 2017 8:16:39 GMT
An ad hominem right off the bat tells the reader more about you than I, and is to be regretted. I am sorry but the notion of the classical elements is dead science. It might suit a form of speculation, one away from the physical sciences, to form such archaic definitions to make a rhetorical point but that that does not effect that truth. Also there is no logical reason why meaning cannot be extracted from something which is temporary as opposed from something permanent. In fact your view would be quite nihilist, since existence is mortal and yet millions find meaning in life. You still haven't explained how, in your interpretation of reality, non-action can be said to ever exist at all. There is too long for one bumper sticker. Can't you boil it down some?
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jun 7, 2017 9:42:00 GMT
An ad hominem right off the bat tells the reader more about you than I, and is to be regretted. I am sorry but the notion of the classical elements is dead science. It might suit a form of speculation, one away from the physical sciences, to form such archaic definitions to make a rhetorical point but that that does not effect that truth. Also there is no logical reason why meaning cannot be extracted from something which is temporary as opposed from something permanent. In fact your view would be quite nihilist, since existence is mortal and yet millions find meaning in life. You still haven't explained how, in your interpretation of reality, non-action can be said to ever exist at all. There is too long for one bumper sticker. Can't you boil it down some? Well I'm sure that Dr. Gautam Chatterjee wouldn't be impressed about the same passive ad-hominen you directed at him, or I doubt he would even care. Yes, you are still the dodo and your responses are regrettable, because you don't appear to grasp the simple concept of action and consequence which consumes our lives.  If you feel that what forms the whole fabric of the universe and creation of our human existence is dead science, then perhaps you are dead inside yourself. You have been influenced by your own ego mind and intellect, and just like the image in your avatar, are allowing yourself to be a puppet. Who's meaning anyway? Yours, mine, the postmans? Everything has all the meaning it needs just as it stands, without any preconceived notions or personal judgements placed on it, which is what we tend to do most often as humans. Things are what they are, and ultimately, any other labels, tags, associations, attachments, condemnations etc, we place on things IS meaningless. To use Chatterjee's term, "perishable". You also contradict yourself by commenting there is no logical reason why "meaning" can't be extracted from something, then make a bold arrogant claim yourself that existence is mortal and then that millions are reaching for meaning to life. What does this even imply? Perhaps you need more clarity here. There is no separateness from anything and it is all whole and one and complete. Even many that believe in an afterlife and a separate notion of God, appear like they are at least coming into some understanding of a greater force at play. The only thing is, they don't grasp— and it appears like you don't either—they are the greater force and power. Not a drop in the ocean, but the whole ocean so to speak, or not just a star, but the whole cosmos. How does one expect to take any responsibility for their "actions" in life, if it all just about the mortal physical self? People will just do what they want to otherwise— which is what most appear to do anyway—and think they can get away with it. Look at the state of flux most of the world is in, and all due to not acting appropriately and accordingly to our purpose here on earth. I don't quite get what you mean about the "truth". The truth about what? That when our physicals die, that's it! Like many posters on this thread, who are caught up in their pseudo-superior head space of knowledge, when they are only misguided and have misplaced notions about their being. Where is the "wisdom" behind all this, which does lead to the truth. I have commented countless times on this post, that "purpose" and "contribution" is the reason why we are here. There are karmic debts to pay and without being too harsh on ourselves that is how the universe operates. When one becomes aware of this, how is that being nihilistic? If anything, it is about taking "responsibility" and being awake. I think you need to explain what your notion of non-action is, since AGAIN, it is ALL action. How can something be non-action, when that is what drives and motivates us. Even if one is sitting still and deep into mediation, and letting the physical world drop by and not moving or thinking, they are still performing an action.
|
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jun 7, 2017 10:16:37 GMT
Well I'm sure that Dr. Gautam Chatterjee wouldn't be impressed about the same passive ad-hominen you directed at him, or I doubt he would even care. It is not an insult, not even a passive one, to note that someone is strictly factually incorrect. Neither is it an insult to assume that someone is not a scientist based on their scientifically inaccurate views. But I am naturally pleased you do not dispute your own attempt(s) at rudeness. To which continued personal insult the same observations apply as before. I have less issue with notions of actions and consequences (why should I? it goes all the way back to Newton and beyond) Than the archaic way of seeing reality through the classical elements which science has long left behind. But I think you really know that. As already mentioned, such terms are find in a rhetorical framework but are not evidenced by physics. Remember what I keep saying about ad hominems ? I do. 'Meaning' is something ascribed to an object or idea by the personality. ('Meanings' are also different from definitions) It is arguable that things do not have 'meaning' other than those ascribed, although you are right that different meanings need apply. The only meaning given to nature is that by man, but at least so far you haven't thrown in the pathetic fallacy as is so often the case. It implies that meaning is attached by many to that which is impermanent and that meanings can vary from person to person, culture to culture, religion to religion. What did you think I meant? This naturally depends on an agreement on what 'it' is lol Oh I see; so people are really 'the greater power and force'... the 'whole cosmos'. Got it. This aggrandisement is both interesting and revealing. Is this force an active, deliberate force then? Or does it just hang about, waiting to be recognised by people such as yourself? Here you appear to assume that there is more than the mortal self. It appears you are big on metaphysical assumptions. And here you seem to be arguing for the necessity of absolute, objective morality. Is that really a can of worms you wish to open? You are also assuming we have a 'purpose' in life - other than that which we habitually give ourselves - which is unproven, at least outside of the credulities of scripture. You tell us, you are the one making the assertions without evidence. You are naturally free to hold to your purposes and make contributions. But I bear no responsibility. That wasn't answering my question. Evasion noted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jun 7, 2017 10:53:12 GMT
Blah, blah, blah!.......... You are attempting to refute my points by being a dodo and playing devil's advocate and evading the essence of what I have given you. Am I supposed to give you credence for your own limited and circular rhetoric, when your aren't telling me anything, and I couldn't care less about what you have to say about my ad-hominens. Perhaps you need to hear them.  You appear to want to impress on how much knowledge you possess and are too much of a cynic to make any headway with me. Doesn't that make your life appear miserable at times? You and many others on this thread haven't told me a blind thing about the nature of the universe or understanding of what it is really all about. All I see is how obstinate and totally in denial you are becoming. Yes, please buy into aggrandisement about your being, for that is my whole point. Not your ego mindset, but your conscious awareness. Do you see yourself as just a wilting flower, or a majestic field of all the beauty and astonishment nature has to behold. At the risk of constantly repeating myself and sounding like a scratchy record, argue for your limitations, then you can keep them. Isn't that what I was also implying? Meaning can be varied and abstract for each and everyone of us, and at the end of the day, the genuine and whole essence is found within, without the ego notion of the minds confounded and vengeful meanings to gain control. Oh, and it is all physics and science, even the perishable and eternal aspects of the elements. After all, it DOES come down the elements that encompass everything and the actions they transcribe too. That is your eternal conSCIENCEness awareness. Believe in whatever you want, you are after all the master creator of your own universe. Take onus for this and all that surrounds your being.
|
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jun 7, 2017 11:30:12 GMT
You are attempting to refute my points by being a dodo Still don't remember what I said about personal remarks, eh? We are not all on the side of the angels, my friend. The essence of what you are saying appears to be a series of assumptions. Without evidence for your opinions, one can be forgiven for a trenchant and pertinent response. Your defensiveness in light of this, I think quite reasonable, approach is significant. You mean like when I say that meaning is arguably a given, and not an inherent, quality? Or that 'ether' and the classical elements to describe reality have long been dead in the water? I am, naturally, sorry that you 'couldn't care less' about things. I, do. I like to mention such things since an ad hominem is a type of fallacy, hence by repeatedly employing this type of response you are disputing fallaciously. I hope that helps. Anger is a sign that you are feeling defensive. And emojis are not arguments, by the way... In fact I am more interested in how you are impressing your own meanings on reality through a series of unsupported assertions. I would be sorry if your response here suggests an inferiority complex. On the contrary one is much happier when the beguiling fog of credulity and illogicality is stripped away. For whatever remains, no matter how uncomfortable, is more likely to be the correct view. Why does reality have to be 'about something' at all? Why can't things just 'be'? It may be the nature of things that, in this universe at least, they have randomly settled on one way that can be that stands over others, and that is a 'brute fact'. I don't deny anything. You will note that I have not said that anything you assert is necessarily wrong; just largely unfounded and thus open to interrogation. I am sorry if this process irks. As already said, you just seem to be projecting meaning which most suits you onto reality, to which of course you are perfectly entitled to do. But this does not mean that one ought to drag in the classical elements as modern way of understanding and hope to remain scientific about it. Esoteric thinking, of course, can include all sorts of imaginative and broadly conceived stuff; but that does not necessarily mean it is an accurate way of things. But your projection of, baldly, 'people = cosmos' is the biggest extension of the ego one might imagine! And without mind we are just matter, without any contemplation of our place in things at all, so I am not even sure how this would work out. (Why would the mind be 'vengeful' by the way?) Such platitudes are still too long for a bumper sticker, I am afraid, while 'conscienceness' is not even a word. And we've already covered the idea of those 'elements', haven't we? Or don't you care less here, either?
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jun 7, 2017 21:40:31 GMT
MORE blah, blah, blah................................and dodo— it's your word, and absolutely perfect—droppings.  As I thought, you are just playing games and stringing words together to make roundabout, incohesive sentences that are not grounded in anything that is supported by anything other than what you have been brainwashed and conditioned to believe. Yes, science is important, just not when it's taught by egotistical, pseudo-intellectual and unconnected beings who think it is just about matter and space only. You will have to go so much deeper, if you are to get the gist about the action and essence of the elements and how they DO go right back to formation of the Universe and our being as we know it, not to mention our consciousness which IS eternal. Perhaps though, you may find this a bit confronting, as you may not like what you find. All the best, inferior physical, caught up in ones own conceit being.
|
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Jun 8, 2017 10:26:37 GMT
 As I thought, you are just playing games and stringing words together to make roundabout, incohesive sentences that are not grounded in anything that is supported by anything other than what you have been brainwashed and conditioned to believe. Hilarious considering that this is a perfect description of everything you've posted here. Literally perfect. Let us know how your claims that "consciousness is eternal" are grounded in anything other than your ridiculous faith in outdated religious metaphysics. This should be rich.
|
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jun 8, 2017 11:48:47 GMT
MORE blah, blah, blah................................and dodo— it's your word, and absolutely perfect—droppings.  As I thought, you are just playing games and stringing words together to make roundabout, incohesive sentences that are not grounded in anything that is supported by anything other than what you have been brainwashed and conditioned to believe. Still not understood what I said about making personal attacks, eh? I am not aware of any one who thinks this. As already mentioned, the notion of the classical elements is dead science. And how do you know that the consciousness is eternal (or is necessarily separate from the mechanics of body for that instance?) I am not the only one to ask this. It is a shame to see you not wishing to engage, but just insult and leave. Ah well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jun 8, 2017 12:25:40 GMT
As I thought, you are just playing games and stringing words together to make roundabout, incohesive sentences that are not grounded in anything that is supported by anything other than what you have been brainwashed and conditioned to believe. Hilarious considering that this is a perfect description of everything you've posted here. Literally perfect. Let us know how your claims that "consciousness is eternal" are grounded in anything other than your ridiculous faith in outdated religious metaphysics. This should be rich. You have no richness, It's all headspace with you. You can't even acknowledge that what I wrote describes you perfectly as well as that other puppet poster. Most people with any common sense and "innate" intelligence, something you lack, would see that you are just operating from the sense of self-superiority and boring ass pseudo academia.  Most of what you write is rhetorical bullsh!t and pretends to tell much, when in fact it tells little. Perhaps what you really need to do is reevaluate yourself. I won't be holding my breath though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jun 8, 2017 13:38:44 GMT
I am not aware of any one who thinks this. As already mentioned, the notion of the classical elements is dead science. And how do you know that the consciousness is eternal (or is necessarily separate from the mechanics of body for that instance?) I am not the only one to ask this. You do now. How do you know that the consciousness isn't eternal? I am not the only one to ask this. Oh, I forgot! Not worth asking you, you have told me jack squat.
|
|