|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 9, 2019 1:20:08 GMT
It has seen the end of Captain Marvel's audience RT score; it will soon see the end of the MCU as we know it.
Guys, what if this is the beginning of the end?
|
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Mar 9, 2019 1:32:19 GMT
Be careful my friend. That kind of talk angers all those socially awkward virgins that think cheese flat butt will see their white knight post and let them sniff her bottom. To them and RT all average or below reviews are trolls and no matter how ridiculously hyperbolic the positive reviews are they are legitimate.
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 9, 2019 1:34:23 GMT
Be careful my friend. That kind of talk angers all those socially awkward virgins that think cheese flat butt will see their white knight post and let them sniff her bottom. To them and RT all average or below reviews are trolls and no matter how ridiculously hyperbolic the positive reviews are they are legitimate. Sounds about right. What do you think of Metacritic? I've always found it much more reflective of movies' quality and less prone to the sort of ludicrousness ("97%) that occurs on RT, with respect to both critics and audience scores. |
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Mar 9, 2019 1:55:07 GMT
Be careful my friend. That kind of talk angers all those socially awkward virgins that think cheese flat butt will see their white knight post and let them sniff her bottom. To them and RT all average or below reviews are trolls and no matter how ridiculously hyperbolic the positive reviews are they are legitimate. Sounds about right. What do you think of Metacritic? I've always found it much more reflective of movies' quality and less prone to the sort of ludicrousness ("97%) that occurs on RT, with respect to both critics and audience scores. Metacritic is a better way to judge a movie I'm interested in seeing than RT for sure. RT seems to have long ago lost credibility on what was already a questionable rating system. If every critic rating it gave a movie what amounts to a grade of C it's still 100% on RT. If a person is being honest and not a hypocritical sjw they would admit the "trolls" are being more ethical than the RT shill critics. The "trolls" are doing what they do based on legit feelings while the critics are being paid in some way or form to pretend a below average genre movie borderline cringe fest is "important" and must see.
|
|
|
|
Post by hobowar on Mar 9, 2019 1:58:38 GMT
This will be a day long remembered. Nah
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 2:34:16 GMT
Metacritic is a better way to judge a movie I'm interested in seeing than RT for sure. RT Score / Metacritic Score Black Panther 97/88 (nominated; Best Picture) Spiderman into the Spiderverse 97/87 (winner; Best Animated Feature) The Dark Knight 94/84 Ironman 93/79 Logan 93/77 Wonder Woman 93/76 (not nominated; for anything) Spiderman Homecoming 92/73 The Avengers 92/69 Captain Marvel 79/65 Aquaman 65/55 ........................ Justice League 40/45 BvS 27/44 Suicide Squad 27/40 Superman Quest for Peace 12/24 Supergirl 10/42 Catwoman 9/27 From best to worst, both rating systems are pretty much in line, with a relatively consistant deviation between the two rating systems. Except for the really crappy movies, where the scoring flips. Metacritic tends to rate the crap significantly higher than RT does. Are those the ones you are most interested in seeing? For sure?
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 9, 2019 4:00:08 GMT
Metacritic is a better way to judge a movie I'm interested in seeing than RT for sure. RT Score / Metacritic Score Black Panther 97/88 (nominated; Best Picture) Spiderman into the Spiderverse 97/87 (winner; Best Animated Feature) The Dark Knight 94/84 Ironman 93/79 Logan 93/77 Wonder Woman 93/76 (not nominated; for anything) Spiderman Homecoming 92/73 The Avengers 92/69 Captain Marvel 79/65 Aquaman 65/55 ........................ Justice League 40/45 BvS 27/44 Suicide Squad 27/40 Superman Quest for Peace 12/24 Supergirl 10/42 Catwoman 9/27 From best to worst, both rating systems are pretty much in line, with a relatively consistant deviation between the two rating systems. Except for the really crappy movies, where the scoring flips. Metacritic tends to rate the crap significantly higher than RT does. Are those the ones you are most interested in seeing? For sure?
Nice try, but you left out the other end of the spectrum; the complete picture is that Metacritic is more reasonable, ranging from the plausible low end of ~25-40% and a similarly credible high end of ~85%, in contrast to the ludicrous and goofball clownshoes MCU RT score range of fucking 10-97%, which is absurd nonsense touted by only the biggest rubes. ETA: So my point stands. Innit? |
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Mar 9, 2019 4:06:41 GMT
White males will no longer rule the MCU.
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 9, 2019 4:23:35 GMT
White males will no longer rule the MCU. Nah, they will. |
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 11:43:31 GMT
RT Score / Metacritic Score Black Panther 97/88 (nominated; Best Picture) Spiderman into the Spiderverse 97/87 (winner; Best Animated Feature) The Dark Knight 94/84 Ironman 93/79 Logan 93/77 Wonder Woman 93/76 (not nominated; for anything) Spiderman Homecoming 92/73 The Avengers 92/69 Captain Marvel 79/65 Aquaman 65/55 ........................ Justice League 40/45 BvS 27/44 Suicide Squad 27/40 Superman Quest for Peace 12/24 Supergirl 10/42 Catwoman 9/27 From best to worst, both rating systems are pretty much in line, with a relatively consistant deviation between the two rating systems. Except for the really crappy movies, where the scoring flips. Metacritic tends to rate the crap significantly higher than RT does. Are those the ones you are most interested in seeing? For sure?
Nice try, but you left out the other end of the spectrum; the complete picture is that Metacritic is more reasonable, ranging from the plausible low end of ~25-40% and a similarly credible high end of ~85%, in contrast to the ludicrous and goofball clownshoes MCU RT score range of fucking 10-97%, which is absurd nonsense touted by only the biggest rubes. ETA: So my point stands. Innit? One would think that a best picture nominee and the best animated feature winner would be an A grade move. Not a B+, like Metacritic rates them. The Dark Knight is only a B grade movie? Really? Logan is a C? Uh ... no. I think your point has fallen ... and can't get up.
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 9, 2019 15:23:45 GMT
Nice try, but you left out the other end of the spectrum; the complete picture is that Metacritic is more reasonable, ranging from the plausible low end of ~25-40% and a similarly credible high end of ~85%, in contrast to the ludicrous and goofball clownshoes MCU RT score range of fucking 10-97%, which is absurd nonsense touted by only the biggest rubes. ETA: So my point stands. Innit? One would think that a best picture nominee and the best animated feature winner would be an A grade move. Not a B+, like Metacritic rates them. The Dark Knight is only a B grade movie? Really? Logan is a C? Uh ... no. I think your point has fallen ... and can't get up. Nah, it hasn't. Superhero movies aren't for everyone and were never taken seriously (nor should they have ever been) before like three years ago; those scores seem accurate for a site encompassing shit like Citizen Kane. If that's a "100," I'm fine with any of the scores you cited. Unlike the clownshoes nonsense of Black FUCKING Panther, a throwaway bullshit character portrayed terribly in a mediocre piece of shit film, getting a "97%," which is so manifestly ludicrous to any thinking person as almost cause one's head to explode. You'd have to basically have no context for anything or be the most gullible mark alive to find RT a more accurate reflection than MC. Wait, you're the guy still taking the Patriots' plainly tainted Super Bowl "wins" seriously even though everyone stopped giving a shit about the NFL years ago, yeah? And going so far as to actually boast and shit-talk to other people in public without feeling abject shame or disgrace? ETA This is starting to make sense... Innit? |
|
|
|
Post by ShrunkenHeadonKnightBus on Mar 9, 2019 15:31:11 GMT
There’s simply too much emphasis put on a tomatometer rating, which is simply the % of reviews that recommend the movie. The average rating is a more accurate representation of how strong those recommendations are.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 16:38:32 GMT
One would think that a best picture nominee and the best animated feature winner would be an A grade move. Not a B+, like Metacritic rates them. The Dark Knight is only a B grade movie? Really? Logan is a C? Uh ... no. I think your point has fallen ... and can't get up. Nah, it hasn't. Superhero movies aren't for everyone and were never taken seriously (nor should they have ever been) before like three years ago; those scores seem accurate for a site encompassing shit like Citizen Kane. If that's a "100," I'm fine with any of the scores you cited. Unlike the clownshoes nonsense of Black FUCKING Panther, a throwaway bullshit character portrayed terribly in a mediocre piece of shit film, getting a "97%," which is so manifestly ludicrous to any thinking person as almost cause one's head to explode. You'd have to basically have no context for anything or be the most gullible mark alive to find RT a more accurate reflection than MC. Wait, you're the guy still taking the Patriots' plainly tainted Super Bowl "wins" seriously even though everyone stopped giving a shit about the NFL years ago, yeah? And going so far as to actually boast and shit-talk to other people in public without feeling abject shame or disgrace? ETA This is starting to make sense... Innit? You appear to have a lingering case of extreme butt-hurt over the RT score for Black Panther. ... despite it being a Best Picture nominee ... and despite your estemed Metacritic scoring it higher than most Best Picture winners. Are exploding heads the final stage of your unfortunate affliction? Any chance you can get a video of that? Discussions reflecting your extreme butt-hurt over the 6x World Champions, NE Patriots should be confined to the sports board. The MCU board is already overflowing with butt-hurt from the superhero crowd.
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 9, 2019 17:18:09 GMT
Nah, it hasn't. Superhero movies aren't for everyone and were never taken seriously (nor should they have ever been) before like three years ago; those scores seem accurate for a site encompassing shit like Citizen Kane. If that's a "100," I'm fine with any of the scores you cited. Unlike the clownshoes nonsense of Black FUCKING Panther, a throwaway bullshit character portrayed terribly in a mediocre piece of shit film, getting a "97%," which is so manifestly ludicrous to any thinking person as almost cause one's head to explode. You'd have to basically have no context for anything or be the most gullible mark alive to find RT a more accurate reflection than MC. Wait, you're the guy still taking the Patriots' plainly tainted Super Bowl "wins" seriously even though everyone stopped giving a shit about the NFL years ago, yeah? And going so far as to actually boast and shit-talk to other people in public without feeling abject shame or disgrace? ETA This is starting to make sense... Innit? You appear to have a lingering case of extreme butt-hurt over the RT score for Black Panther. ... despite it being a Best Picture nominee ... and despite your estemed Metacritic scoring it higher than most Best Picture winners. Are exploding heads the final stage of your unfortunate affliction? Any chance you can get a video of that? Discussions reflecting your extreme butt-hurt over the 6x World Champions, NE Patriots should be confined to the sports board. The MCU board is already overflowing with butt-hurt from the superhero crowd. So basically you concede the argument. |
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 18:14:27 GMT
You appear to have a lingering case of extreme butt-hurt over the RT score for Black Panther. ... despite it being a Best Picture nominee ... and despite your estemed Metacritic scoring it higher than most Best Picture winners. Are exploding heads the final stage of your unfortunate affliction? Any chance you can get a video of that? Discussions reflecting your extreme butt-hurt over the 6x World Champions, NE Patriots should be confined to the sports board. The MCU board is already overflowing with butt-hurt from the superhero crowd. So basically you concede the argument. butt-hurt ≠ an argument
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 9, 2019 18:19:10 GMT
So basically you concede the argument. butt-hurt ≠ an argument Sure, but an argument = an argument, and you didn't refute mine. RT is like a hysterical Brie Larson screaming at the top of her lungs and prone to ridiculous and irrational mood swings, whereas MC is obviously much more fair and balanced. |
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 19:50:36 GMT
Sure, but an argument = an argument, and you didn't refute mine. RT is like a hysterical Brie Larson screaming at the top of her lungs and prone to ridiculous and irrational mood swings, whereas MC is obviously much more fair and balanced. That is not an argument. You have presented no facts in this thread, just your butt-hurt opinions. On the other hand, I have compared the RT and MC scores for a number of superhero movies and found the ranking to be in agreement for the top movies. The difference, RT scores them from 97 to 65 (32 pt differential) and MC scores them from 88 to 55 (33 pt differential). In fact, one could easily argue that the RT score is more inline with how people view these top movies when they give a 90+ score to the likes of BP, TDK, Logan and The Avengers instead of spreading the scores out over 19 points, like MC does.
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 9, 2019 20:14:24 GMT
Sure, but an argument = an argument, and you didn't refute mine. RT is like a hysterical Brie Larson screaming at the top of her lungs and prone to ridiculous and irrational mood swings, whereas MC is obviously much more fair and balanced. That is not an argument. You have presented no facts in this thread, just your butt-hurt opinions. On the other hand, I have compared the RT and MC scores for a number of superhero movies and found the ranking to be in agreement for the top movies. The difference, RT scores them from 97 to 65 (32 pt differential) and MC scores them from 88 to 55 (33 pt differential). In fact, one could easily argue that the RT score is more inline with how people view these top movies when they give a 90+ score to the likes of BP, TDK, Logan and The Avengers instead of spreading the scores out over 19 points, like MC does. You compared them and then came to the opposite conclusion that the data supports because it suited your purposes. But it's irrelevant since nobody will ever take RT seriously again after the CM fiasco. |
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 21:31:27 GMT
That is not an argument. You have presented no facts in this thread, just your butt-hurt opinions. On the other hand, I have compared the RT and MC scores for a number of superhero movies and found the ranking to be in agreement for the top movies. The difference, RT scores them from 97 to 65 (32 pt differential) and MC scores them from 88 to 55 (33 pt differential). In fact, one could easily argue that the RT score is more inline with how people view these top movies when they give a 90+ score to the likes of BP, TDK, Logan and The Avengers instead of spreading the scores out over 19 points, like MC does. You compared them and then came to the opposite conclusion that the data supports because it suited your purposes. But it's irrelevant since nobody will ever take RT seriously again after the CM fiasco. Another unsupported statement. If RT suddenly ceased to exist and I wanted to see what the top rated superhero movie is, I could go to MC and discover that it is ... Black Panther! I'd then notice that Ironman is a 9 points lower than BP and Logan is 11 points lower. WTH? Those movies are nearly as good as BP. Surely they should score within a few points of BP. And Aquaman at 55. I'd have to dismiss that one as just another failed DCEU endeavor, only marginally better than JL. Catwoman, Supergirl, Suicide Squad. The Metacritic score would suggest that there is some redeemable quality to those movies, when there really is none. There is a reason why RT is much more relevant than MC. I have shown you why. No doubt, this time next year you will still be whinning about the RT score and Metacritic will still be a bit player.
|
|
|
|
Post by merh on Mar 9, 2019 21:47:21 GMT
It has seen the end of Captain Marvel's audience RT score; it will soon see the end of the MCU as we know it. Guys, what if this is the beginning of the end? CM Day 1-$61 mill WW Day 1-$38 mill. June opening. Summer WW Day 2-$35 mill What, that a character created in the 60s is outperforming a character who has represented the most famous female superhero since WWII
|
|
