|
|
Post by goz on Apr 1, 2019 2:25:30 GMT
Tsk tsk.
She hasn't actually said anything yet!
I will answer any thread I feel like thanks all the same Erjenious.
|
|
|
|
Post by rizdek on Apr 1, 2019 9:21:21 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2019 11:40:59 GMT
We don't have that in the NJB. It says 'fill'. Isn't 'replenenish' a mistranslation in the Protestant KJV? Haven't they corrected it yet? |
|
|
|
Post by rizdek on Apr 1, 2019 12:22:09 GMT
We don't have that in the NJB. It says 'fill'. Isn't 'replenenish' a mistranslation in the Protestant KJV? Haven't they corrected it yet? NJB? Nut Job Bible? Just kidding.
"Isn't 'replenenish' a mistranslation"
I think it is...as the words are currently used. I guess in the days of the KJV the word they used was sometimes synonymous with just "fill" even if now it tends to mean re-fill.
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Apr 1, 2019 15:23:11 GMT
And you accuse me of telling you what you believe. Philosophers and even atheists discuss the Bible. It doesn't have to have anything to do with religion. I am only repeating what you said. Great. Now you know what replenish means. Great thread. An improvement I must say! Good, because I have no doubt you're as clueless about the book of Genesis as you and your scientist twits are about consciousness.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2019 15:34:52 GMT
I am only repeating what you said. Great. Now you know what replenish means. Great thread. An improvement I must say! Good, because I have no doubt you're as clueless about the book of Genesis as you and your scientist twits are about consciousness. Oh dear... Are you a part of this whole anti-science thing that seems to be sweeping some sections of US society? |
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Apr 1, 2019 16:15:16 GMT
if your referring to text in a holy book, you just make up the definition as your agenda changes to fit your current needs. it's easier that way and it's worked for christians since jesus bailed.
|
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Apr 1, 2019 18:50:07 GMT
i've been workin' on the payload
after trillions of dollars
had been
leeched from
every tom
dick and butcher holler
through out
the united states of hysteria
it was concluded
by
unanimous dissent
that
even though
your money is yours to vent
you can't expect
just any old democracy
to circumvent
every known tax code
because you believe
your god invented the loop hole
right after he raped adam
for not
paying his fair share
of the rent.
sjw 04/01/19 inspired at this very moment in time by oh lordie lordie where is all that there money disappearing to.
from the 'blasphemy series' of poems
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Apr 1, 2019 20:18:54 GMT
We don't have that in the NJB. It says 'fill'. Isn't 'replenenish' a mistranslation in the Protestant KJV? Haven't they corrected it yet? If Adam and Eve were the only people on Earth, had two sons first before Seth, then who did Cain marry when he left the family after he murdered Abel? He had run away, then married. How can only two people 'replenish' an entire planet in such a short period of time?
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Apr 1, 2019 21:21:56 GMT
We don't have that in the NJB. It says 'fill'. Isn't 'replenenish' a mistranslation in the Protestant KJV? Haven't they corrected it yet? If Adam and Eve were the only people on Earth, had two sons first before Seth, then who did Cain marry when he left the family after he murdered Abel? He had run away, then married. How can only two people 'replenish' an entire planet in such a short period of time? Indeed. Wow, after only two thousand years (give or take a few centuries here and there) it is OUR Heeeeey that has found the fatal flaw in its logic! I knew she could do it! 
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Apr 1, 2019 22:57:18 GMT
If Adam and Eve were the only people on Earth, had two sons first before Seth, then who did Cain marry when he left the family after he murdered Abel? He had run away, then married. How can only two people 'replenish' an entire planet in such a short period of time? Indeed. Wow, after only two thousand years (give or take a few centuries here and there) it is OUR Heeeeey that has found the fatal flaw in its logic! I knew she could do it! Yeah, but the 'failed logic' is in the interpretation, not the story. It doesn't say that they were the only people on Earth.
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Apr 1, 2019 23:03:51 GMT
Indeed. Wow, after only two thousand years (give or take a few centuries here and there) it is OUR Heeeeey that has found the fatal flaw in its logic! I knew she could do it! Yeah, but the 'failed logic' is in the interpretation, not the story. It doesn't say that they were the only people on Earth. I guess that is what 'interpretation' actually is? Maybe you could make a thread about it!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2019 6:44:53 GMT
We don't have that in the NJB. It says 'fill'. Isn't 'replenenish' a mistranslation in the Protestant KJV? Haven't they corrected it yet? If Adam and Eve were the only people on Earth, had two sons first before Seth, then who did Cain marry when he left the family after he murdered Abel? He had run away, then married. How can only two people 'replenish' an entire planet in such a short period of time? Don't ask me 🤷 I don't take that literally. |
|
|
|
Post by Morgana on Apr 2, 2019 7:22:40 GMT
Doesn't it mean that something came before, and now it needs to be 're'plenished? That's not how I see it. I see it as meaning that something was empty and now is replenished, meaning full.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Apr 2, 2019 9:05:31 GMT
The reason for the question is to illustrate how the Bible is misinterpreted, even though the information is right there. Clearly, Adam and Eve were not the first humans on Earth. Not according to evolutionary theory anyway.
|
|
