|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Apr 8, 2019 22:26:00 GMT
Its slow but I always liked it.
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Apr 8, 2019 22:27:11 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Apr 8, 2019 23:07:03 GMT
It’s a great movie, but No Country for Old Men still deserved the Best Picture win over it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eλευθερί on Apr 9, 2019 1:15:23 GMT
There Will Be Boredom
4/10
|
|
|
|
Post by NormanClature on Apr 9, 2019 1:30:03 GMT
It was for a while after it came out. Not that I dislike the film, but people were saying it'd be ranked with Citizen Kane as the best movie ever made and the defining movie of the 2000s. Now that hype seems to have fizzled a bit and I barely even see people talk about it anymore. But it's a very good movie and more accurately rated now. "Citizen Kane" is the Citizen Kane of overrated movies. 
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Apr 9, 2019 1:41:49 GMT
Checked out a few minutes of it to see what all the hype was about. Boresville. Pick up the pace a bit, will ya? Sheesh. You're wrong. But that's okay. The only one that loses out is you.
|
|
|
|
Post by jakesully on Apr 9, 2019 5:38:13 GMT
It’s a great movie, but No Country for Old Men still deserved the Best Picture win over it. Yeah would definitely agree there. The Oscars got it right that year.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Apr 9, 2019 5:47:27 GMT
I agree that There Will Be Blood is not a great movie. The character played by Daniel Day-Lewis is unchanging. He never develops. Even after admitting that he did wrong to his son, nothing comes from it. He is the same at the beginning as at the end.
BUT...as I have said many times before, people rate movies as they perceive them. They NEVER "overate" them. To claim that someone has "overrated" a film means that the person rated it wrong. No one is "wrong" in an opinion or perception of a film. It is wrong, it a place ruled by opinion, to say that anything can be "overrated." That's an insult.
|
|
