|
|
Post by drystyx on Apr 8, 2019 15:24:35 GMT
True story or fake news.
Okay, editing this so the illiterate ones can stop whining about technicalities. I never dreamed they'd get so hysterical and emotional, nor that they would rant and rave incoherently. I really touched a nerve, but I didn't mean to.
True story or fake news?
A large woman was baby sitting a newborn for a couple.
Both people in the couple were ex convicts, and both were dealing drugs. They threatened the lady with bodily harm if she didn't watch their baby. They left no food, no diapers, no money, and it was doubtful they would return. The large woman was behind in rent, and the landlord was ready to evict her on any pretext. The landlord was going to be there in three hours to check on her. She didn't want a scene. Being homeless would be her end. She knew that.
The large woman sat the baby on the easy chair and took off her clothes to shower. The phone rang.
She started to pick up the phone, but then tripped onto the chair, and the baby got stuck in her crack. She couldn't remove the baby. The baby could breath, his nose outside the crack.
The woman went to the nearest clinic, where the doctor said he could remove the baby with a scalpel, in just a few minutes, but it would kill the baby. Otherwise, the woman would have to wait for a more complex operation, which would take hours. It was her choice.
She was afraid the couple would return and destroy her place and she would be evicted and homeless, soon dead. So she opted to kill the baby.
The doctor killed the baby, and some people outside protested, calling for the police to arrest the doctor, but there were more people standing between them and the doctor, telling the protestors to mind their own business.
Not taking sides here. I don't know why people think I'm advocating anything. I don't know what is moral.
Is this a true story or fake news?
True story or fake news?
|
|
|
|
Post by gameboy on Apr 8, 2019 15:34:31 GMT
Lame abortion analogy since the baby was not connected to the mother's organs and did not develop inside her.
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Apr 8, 2019 16:25:08 GMT
Lame abortion analogy since the baby was not connected to the mother's organs and did not develop inside her. There's no way you can make that relevant, being developed inside her. The baby does some developing, even if just growing, wherever the baby is. Now, if that is relevant, the length of time, then of course if the big woman is caretaker of an invalid in her home, and the invalid is annoying for a few hours, the lady has no right to end the invalid's life. But if the lady has to care for the invalid for eight months, by all means, that's annoying, and the care for the invalid is invading her body in the stress it causes and physically affecting her, and it is her right to choose whether to kill the invalid or not, especially if it's convenient for her, and the invalid is in her home. Quite annoying, yes. I see your point. It's whatever is convenient for the one choosing to play God. How dare anyone stick their nose in her business! I just want to know the ground rules of the society we live in. If those are the ground rules, I want to know. I take no sides. Back to the issue. Is this a true story or fake news?
|
|
|
|
Post by gameboy on Apr 8, 2019 18:05:30 GMT
Lame abortion analogy since the baby was not connected to the mother's organs and did not develop inside her. There's no way you can make that relevant, being developed inside her. The baby does some developing, even if just growing, wherever the baby is. Now, if that is relevant, the length of time, then of course if the big woman is caretaker of an invalid in her home, and the invalid is annoying for a few hours, the lady has no right to end the invalid's life. But if the lady has to care for the invalid for eight months, by all means, that's annoying, and the care for the invalid is invading her body in the stress it causes and physically affecting her, and it is her right to choose whether to kill the invalid or not, especially if it's convenient for her, and the invalid is in her home. Quite annoying, yes. I see your point. It's whatever is convenient for the one choosing to play God. How dare anyone stick their nose in her business! I just want to know the ground rules of the society we live in. If those are the ground rules, I want to know. I take no sides. Back to the issue. Is this a true story or fake news? The point is that under our concept of government the state has no right to dictate that a woman be unselfish and carry a fetus in her womb if she objects. The woman may be a selfish pig. However it's her body, and by every conservative and/or liberal interpretation of a democratic government, the state cannot force us to be ethical. As for fake or true, I've heard stories of women who were so obese they didn't know they were pregnant until the baby was delivered. So? this has nothing to do with the Constitutional question. The woman is guilty of manslaughter.
|
|
|
|
Post by mslo79 on Apr 8, 2019 19:22:45 GMT
gameboyMaybe not, but it makes no sense for society to make it easier for women to kill their own kid through the evil act of abortion.
|
|
|
|
Post by OpiateOfTheMasses on Apr 8, 2019 21:19:05 GMT
True story or fake news. A 400 pound naked lady was baby sitting a newborn, and forgot he was on a chair, and she sat on him. She was nervous, because she was forced to baby sit by the baby's parents, who were out doing drugs. They were violent people, and she was scared of them. They didn't want to be annoyed with the baby. The baby was immersed in her butt, but could breath, his nose just outside the butt I'll change that. It appears the true news is that the baby traversed all the way from the butt to her crotch, but the nose could breath outside the crotch. So the lady went to a clinic and said the baby was invasive, and had to be exterminated. The doctor agreed that it was her choice, and so he gleefully snipped away at the crying baby. Then some people outside wanted the doctor put in jail, but more people insisted those people should mind their own business. True story or fake news? Your written English is so bad as to be almost unintelligible. Stick to posting links or just copying and pasting things.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Apr 8, 2019 21:20:15 GMT
True story or fake news. A 400 pound naked lady was baby sitting a newborn, and forgot he was on a chair, and she sat on him. She was nervous, because she was forced to baby sit by the baby's parents, who were out doing drugs. They were violent people, and she was scared of them. They didn't want to be annoyed with the baby. The baby was immersed in her butt, but could breath, his nose just outside the butt I'll change that. It appears the true news is that the baby traversed all the way from the butt to her crotch, but the nose could breath outside the crotch. So the lady went to a clinic and said the baby was invasive, and had to be exterminated. The doctor agreed that it was her choice, and so he gleefully snipped away at the crying baby. Then some people outside wanted the doctor put in jail, but more people insisted those people should mind their own business. True story or fake news? Your written English is so bad as to be almost unintelligible. Stick to posting links or just copying and pasting things. Well yeah, he's a cat, what do you expect?
|
|
|
|
Post by OpiateOfTheMasses on Apr 8, 2019 21:23:35 GMT
Your written English is so bad as to be almost unintelligible. Stick to posting links or just copying and pasting things. Well yeah, he's a cat, what do you expect? Did you mean twat?
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Apr 8, 2019 21:24:20 GMT
True story or fake news. A 400 pound naked lady was baby sitting a newborn, and forgot he was on a chair, and she sat on him. She was nervous, because she was forced to baby sit by the baby's parents, who were out doing drugs. They were violent people, and she was scared of them. They didn't want to be annoyed with the baby. The baby was immersed in her butt, but could breath, his nose just outside the butt I'll change that. It appears the true news is that the baby traversed all the way from the butt to her crotch, but the nose could breath outside the crotch. So the lady went to a clinic and said the baby was invasive, and had to be exterminated. The doctor agreed that it was her choice, and so he gleefully snipped away at the crying baby. Then some people outside wanted the doctor put in jail, but more people insisted those people should mind their own business. True story or fake news? Your written English is so bad as to be almost unintelligible. Stick to posting links or just copying and pasting things. Unlike your posts, my post is crystal clear. You, on the other hand, have never been able to communicate in your longer posts. In fact, your two sentences of your post above is poor communication. You just have a problem with good communicators. I've read you long winded ramblings, and you have to admit your ramblings are totally unintelligible, and poor English. Ironic that you, of all people, would say that. I assume you're just trolling again. I understand your jealousy at my superior communication skills, but your should really just try to get better instead of flaunt your jealousy. I pity you, but you are very annoying., you have to admit.
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Apr 8, 2019 21:30:34 GMT
gameboy Maybe not, but it makes no sense for society to make it easier for women to kill their own kid through the evil act of abortion. What does it have to do with you what decision a woman makes about her own body, life and future?
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Apr 8, 2019 21:32:56 GMT
Your written English is so bad as to be almost unintelligible. Stick to posting links or just copying and pasting things. Unlike your posts, my post is crystal clear. You, on the other hand, have never been able to communicate in your longer posts. In fact, your two sentences of your post above is poor communication. You just have a problem with good communicators. I've read you long winded ramblings, and you have to admit your ramblings are totally unintelligible, and poor English. Ironic that you, of all people, would say that. I assume you're just trolling again. I understand your jealousy at my superior communication skills, but your should really just try to get better instead of flaunt your jealousy. I pity you, but you are very annoying., you have to admit. I agree with the others. This post as an analogy to abortion is stupid and has many logical flaws, factual errors and is too ill written and expressed to be worth a serious reply.
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Apr 8, 2019 21:48:30 GMT
Unlike your posts, my post is crystal clear. You, on the other hand, have never been able to communicate in your longer posts. In fact, your two sentences of your post above is poor communication. You just have a problem with good communicators. I've read you long winded ramblings, and you have to admit your ramblings are totally unintelligible, and poor English. Ironic that you, of all people, would say that. I assume you're just trolling again. I understand your jealousy at my superior communication skills, but your should really just try to get better instead of flaunt your jealousy. I pity you, but you are very annoying., you have to admit. I agree with the others. This post as an analogy to abortion is stupid and has many logical flaws, factual errors and is too ill written and expressed to be worth a serious reply. Translation: The original post of Dry Styx makes too much sense, and I'm jealous of his superior intellect, and I want to just lie about it. Incidentally, I decided to go to Opiate's first page of posts, to show how incoherent Opiate is. I could choose about any of Opiate's incoherent ramblings, but this one proves my point that Opiate cannot communicate: Anyone who believes that has any coherence at all is a sock puppet of Opiate, and I only say that to give such a toady the benefit of the doubt. Your jealousy is so apparent that a caveman can see it.
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Apr 8, 2019 21:54:02 GMT
I agree with the others. This post as an analogy to abortion is stupid and has many logical flaws, factual errors and is too ill written and expressed to be worth a serious reply. Translation: The original post of Dry Styx makes too much sense, and I'm jealous of his superior intellect, and I want to just lie about it. Incidentally, I decided to go to Opiate's first page of posts, to show how incoherent Opiate is. I could choose about any of Opiate's incoherent ramblings, but this one proves my point that Opiate cannot communicate: Anyone who believes that has any coherence at all is a sock puppet of Opiate, and I only say that to give such a toady the benefit of the doubt. Your jealousy is so apparent that a caveman can see it. I wasn't talking about Opiate I was talking about your OP. The fact that you think that a fat naked woman sitting on a newborn and it becomes lodged in either her butt crack or her vagina then being surgically removed, is in any way analogous to a pregnant woman getting an abortion, pretty much says it all about how incredibly silly/stupid you are. BTW he is correct about scientific method and the logic of the negative.
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Apr 8, 2019 22:10:15 GMT
Translation: The original post of Dry Styx makes too much sense, and I'm jealous of his superior intellect, and I want to just lie about it. Incidentally, I decided to go to Opiate's first page of posts, to show how incoherent Opiate is. I could choose about any of Opiate's incoherent ramblings, but this one proves my point that Opiate cannot communicate: Anyone who believes that has any coherence at all is a sock puppet of Opiate, and I only say that to give such a toady the benefit of the doubt. Your jealousy is so apparent that a caveman can see it. I wasn't talking about Opiate I was talking about your OP. The fact that you think that a fat naked woman sitting on a newborn and it becomes lodged in either her butt crack or her vagina then being surgically removed, is in any way analogous to a pregnant woman getting an abortion, pretty much says it all about how incredibly silly/stupid you are. BTW he is correct about scientific method and the logic of the negative. Thank you very much for proving my point. Opiate's statement was incoherent babbling, so there's no way to know if it's correct. It's just a bunch of words placed together in no coherent form. You've proven my point. Whomever reads this to Goz, best not mention that to her. I don't need her to fuss in her straight jacket and babble words for you to post for her. Just tell her that she's "special", and that you care for her. Give her a lollipop and let her click her heels together in joy. Bill the lollipop to Opiate (whose disability check is surely as monumental as the one Goz gets) should pay for it easily.
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Apr 8, 2019 22:41:31 GMT
I wasn't talking about Opiate I was talking about your OP. The fact that you think that a fat naked woman sitting on a newborn and it becomes lodged in either her butt crack or her vagina then being surgically removed, is in any way analogous to a pregnant woman getting an abortion, pretty much says it all about how incredibly silly/stupid you are. BTW he is correct about scientific method and the logic of the negative. Thank you very much for proving my point. Opiate's statement was incoherent babbling, so there's no way to know if it's correct. It's just a bunch of words placed together in no coherent form. You've proven my point. Whomever reads this to Goz, best not mention that to her. I don't need her to fuss in her straight jacket and babble words for you to post for her. Just tell her that she's "special", and that you care for her. Give her a lollipop and let her click her heels together in joy. Bill the lollipop to Opiate (whose disability check is surely as monumental as the one Goz gets) should pay for it easily. AGAIN, I was not talking about Opiate, I was referring to YOUR OP. If you were any more defensive apologist and delusional in this post, you would be crawling backwards right up that fat woman's arse.
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Apr 8, 2019 23:12:05 GMT
Thank you very much for proving my point. Opiate's statement was incoherent babbling, so there's no way to know if it's correct. It's just a bunch of words placed together in no coherent form. You've proven my point. Whomever reads this to Goz, best not mention that to her. I don't need her to fuss in her straight jacket and babble words for you to post for her. Just tell her that she's "special", and that you care for her. Give her a lollipop and let her click her heels together in joy. Bill the lollipop to Opiate (whose disability check is surely as monumental as the one Goz gets) should pay for it easily. AGAIN, I was not talking about Opiate, I was referring to YOUR OP. If you were any more defensive apologist and delusional in this post, you would be crawling backwards right up that fat woman's arse. I asked you not to read these posts aloud to Goz. Now she'll tumble out into the middle of the street again and yell obscenities and all the other critters like her will traipse out there, fumbling in their straight jackets, yelling "I'm mad as a wet hen, and I'm not going to take it any more!" Do you really want that? Is that so exciting for you?
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Apr 8, 2019 23:15:44 GMT
AGAIN, I was not talking about Opiate, I was referring to YOUR OP. If you were any more defensive apologist and delusional in this post, you would be crawling backwards right up that fat woman's arse. I asked you not to read these posts aloud to Goz. Now she'll tumble out into the middle of the street again and yell obscenities and all the other critters like her will traipse out there, fumbling in their straight jackets, yelling "I'm mad as a wet hen, and I'm not going to take it any more!" Do you really want that? Is that so exciting for you? ...and yet more defensive stupidity...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2019 2:37:34 GMT
WTF did I just read for crying out loud 🤪
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Apr 9, 2019 3:15:58 GMT
WTF did I just read for crying out loud 🤪 I can't help being reminded of the story of the vicar who turned up in the emergency room with a potato stuck up his arse. When asked what happened, he claimed that he was hanging kitchen curtains and fell on the potato that he was just about to have for dinner, (clerical trousers notwithstanding!).
|
|
|
|
Post by OpiateOfTheMasses on Apr 9, 2019 21:26:21 GMT
I agree with the others. This post as an analogy to abortion is stupid and has many logical flaws, factual errors and is too ill written and expressed to be worth a serious reply. Translation: The original post of Dry Styx makes too much sense, and I'm jealous of his superior intellect, and I want to just lie about it. Incidentally, I decided to go to Opiate's first page of posts, to show how incoherent Opiate is. I could choose about any of Opiate's incoherent ramblings, but this one proves my point that Opiate cannot communicate: Anyone who believes that has any coherence at all is a sock puppet of Opiate, and I only say that to give such a toady the benefit of the doubt. Your jealousy is so apparent that a caveman can see it. Do you really find that complicated?!? Do you struggle with everyday life? Do you have some sort of aide to help you navigate through the challenges of the day like crossing the road and doing your grocery shopping? I am seeing now that we should just pity you and all of your outbursts are probably just related to your disability... Let us know when if they find a treatment programme for you. Good luck with the rehabilitation!
|
|
