|
Post by dazz on Jul 10, 2019 6:16:23 GMT
Anyone else heard about this?
That would be the best scenario. MCU has really fucked up the Spider-Man character in Homecoming and Far From Home. And if you say that then...well we know it's not true because you are a compulsive liar coupled with no actual ability to judge a movie by it's quality, therefor no one should pay any attention to the horseshit that dribbles from your lips.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Jul 10, 2019 9:26:22 GMT
Anyone else heard about this?
That would be the best scenario. Poor dc-fan can't keep his story straight. He does care. ... and he's going to be crestfallen, once again. Betting against the MCU is like betting against the NE Patriots.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Jul 10, 2019 12:36:58 GMT
Seems dubious. Considering the failure of The Amazing Spider-Man series and that the movies had been progressively making less money domestically ever since the first one. Then being with Marvel is definitely in their best interest.
Still it looks like it's probably going to hit $1 billion just fine so it won't matter either way.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jul 10, 2019 18:11:07 GMT
That would be the best scenario. MCU has really fucked up the Spider-Man character in Homecoming and Far From Home. And if you say that then...well we know it's not true because you are a compulsive liar coupled with no actual ability to judge a movie by it's quality, therefor no one should pay any attention to the horseshit that dribbles from your lips. You don't have to take my word for it. Here's a great video created by a Spider-Man fan. It's the best review of Spider-Man: Far From Home. Brings up a lot of points that I've brought up before about why Spider-Man: Homecoming and Spider-Man: Far From Home are at the bottom of the list of Spider-Man movies, such as Peter repeatedly demonstrating that he still hasn't learned that "with great power comes great responsibility" and such as Homecoming and Far From Home being more about Tony Stark / Iron Man than Peter Parker / Spider-Man. Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 are 2 of the best superhero movies ever made. Spider-Man: Homecoming and Spider-Man: Far From Home have completely screwed up the Spider-Man character and are the 2 worst Spider-Man movies ever made.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Jul 10, 2019 18:31:02 GMT
And if you say that then...well we know it's not true because you are a compulsive liar coupled with no actual ability to judge a movie by it's quality, therefor no one should pay any attention to the horseshit that dribbles from your lips. You don't have to take my word for it. Here's a great video created by a Spider-Man fan. It's the best review of Spider-Man: Far From Home. Brings up a lot of points that I've brought up before about why Spider-Man: Homecoming and Spider-Man: Far From Home are at the bottom of the list of Spider-Man movies, such as Peter repeatedly demonstrating that he still hasn't learned that "with great power comes great responsibility" and such as Homecoming and Far From Home being more about Tony Stark / Iron Man than Peter Parker / Spider-Man. Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 are 2 of the best superhero movies ever made. Spider-Man: Homecoming and Spider-Man: Far From Home have completely screwed up the Spider-Man character and are the 2 worst Spider-Man movies ever made. So don't take your word for it take the opinion off this video that someone else posted and you being the unoriginal troll you are have now usurped for your own ends, we can take their word for things because they kind of say the same things you have said...?
Not hey check out this video it does a far better job explainming the faults I find to this interpretation of the character than I can, maybe a more rational person can explain things better, no just don't listen to me listen to this random fucking guy who says some dumb shit as me derp derp derp.
fucking moron, also how has this Peter not learned with power comes responsibility? in Homecoming he is told to stay out of things, gets the suit taken off of him, has his gf's father threaten to murder him if he keeps messing with him, or let him be if he lets him be, and yet Peter still risks his life for no reason other than he has the power to stop Vulture and so he should, Spiderman 2 however has Peter abandon being Spider-Man because it's hard for him, he doesn't take a break, like for summer as MCU's 16 yo Peter wants to, 20 something Peter outright quits, and he only suits back up to save MJ who he proceeds to steal from her fiancé...that's a Peter that doesn't get the with great power comes great responsibility you deep fried fuckwit, also even if MCU Peter's hasn't figured it out yet who cares he's 16 FOR FUCK SAKE, you are how old and you still don't understand most things you demented shit bird.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jul 10, 2019 18:48:22 GMT
fucking moron, also how has this Peter not learned with power comes responsibility? 1. Peter is given a powerful new toy (EDITH) and the 1st thing Peter does is order a killer drone to attack a fellow classmate who just happens to be his competition for MJ. Really irresponsible. 2. Peter knows that a fire monster is going to attack Prague but Peter doesn't tell the 2 chaperones "Hey, I used to intern for Tony Stark. My former colleagues at Stark Industries texted me and told me that a fire monster is going to attack Prague similar to the water monster that attacked Venice. So you should not take the class to Prague." Uncle Ben was murdered by a thief because Peter took no action to stop the thief when he had a chance to (at least in the comics and the original Spider-Man movies; in MCU it's still doubtful if Uncle Ben was murdered). So now that Peter knows a fire monster is going to attack Prague and he has a chance to warn the 2 chaperones to keep his fellow classmates away from the attack, Peter once again takes no action? Looks like Peter still hasn't learned that "with great power comes great responsibility".
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Jul 10, 2019 18:56:18 GMT
fucking moron, also how has this Peter not learned with power comes responsibility? 1. Peter is given a powerful new toy (EDITH) and the 1st thing Peter does is order a killer drone to attack a fellow classmate who just happens to be his competition for MJ. Really irresponsible. 2. Peter knows that a fire monster is going to attack Prague but Peter doesn't tell the 2 chaperones "Hey, I used to intern for Tony Stark. My former colleagues at Stark Industries texted me and told me that a fire monster is going to attack Prague similar to the water monster that attacked Venice. So you should not take the class to Prague." Uncle Ben was murdered by a thief because Peter took no action to stop the thief when he had a chance to (at least in the comics and the original Spider-Man movies; in MCU it's still doubtful if Uncle Ben was murdered). So now that Peter knows a fire monster is going to attack Prague and he has a chance to warn the 2 chaperones to keep his fellow classmates away from the attack, Peter once again takes no action? Looks like Peter still hasn't learned that "with great power comes great responsibility". No it's not, except for you, you retarded cunt, god your poor parents, you drove them to drink didn't you? I cannot imagine anyone raising a stupid prick like you not needing a few stiff ones to get through the day, poor bastards.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Jul 10, 2019 19:01:06 GMT
fucking moron, also how has this Peter not learned with power comes responsibility? 1. Peter is given a powerful new toy (EDITH) and the 1st thing Peter does is order a killer drone to attack a fellow classmate who just happens to be his competition for MJ. Really irresponsible. 2. Peter knows that a fire monster is going to attack Prague but Peter doesn't tell the 2 chaperones "Hey, I used to intern for Tony Stark. My former colleagues at Stark Industries texted me and told me that a fire monster is going to attack Prague similar to the water monster that attacked Venice. So you should not take the class to Prague." Uncle Ben was murdered by a thief because Peter took no action to stop the thief when he had a chance to (at least in the comics and the original Spider-Man movies; in MCU it's still doubtful if Uncle Ben was murdered). So now that Peter knows a fire monster is going to attack Prague and he has a chance to warn the 2 chaperones to keep his fellow classmates away from the attack, Peter once again takes no action? Looks like Peter still hasn't learned that "with great power comes great responsibility". 1. You moron. What you're not telling is the truth. Peter accidentally orders a drone to kill his classmate. What he really wanted was an embarrassing photo of himself to be deleted. He didn't want to kill his classmate. 2. Again, you're a moron. Nick Fury needs Spider-Man to go to Prague, and he knows he's on a school trip. You missed the part where Peter takes his classmates to the opera, away from the Fire Elemental. Peter wanted to make sure his class was not in any danger. MCU Uncle Ben is not around anymore. We fans who know the character of Spider-Man knows his backstory, so we can figure it out on our own. But you're the only idiot who doesn't think Uncle Ben was murdered. Do you need everything spilled out to you?
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jul 10, 2019 19:07:46 GMT
1. Peter is given a powerful new toy (EDITH) and the 1st thing Peter does is order a killer drone to attack a fellow classmate who just happens to be his competition for MJ. Really irresponsible. 2. Peter knows that a fire monster is going to attack Prague but Peter doesn't tell the 2 chaperones "Hey, I used to intern for Tony Stark. My former colleagues at Stark Industries texted me and told me that a fire monster is going to attack Prague similar to the water monster that attacked Venice. So you should not take the class to Prague." Uncle Ben was murdered by a thief because Peter took no action to stop the thief when he had a chance to (at least in the comics and the original Spider-Man movies; in MCU it's still doubtful if Uncle Ben was murdered). So now that Peter knows a fire monster is going to attack Prague and he has a chance to warn the 2 chaperones to keep his fellow classmates away from the attack, Peter once again takes no action? Looks like Peter still hasn't learned that "with great power comes great responsibility".you're a moron. Nick Fury needs Spider-Man to go to Prague, and he knows he's on a school trip. You missed the part where Peter takes his classmates to the opera, away from the Fire Elemental. Peter wanted to make sure his class was not in any danger. 1st, why the fuck does Nick Fury need Spider-Man to go to Prague? Spider-Man's webs were fucking useless against a water monster. So what the fuck use would Spider-Man's webs be against a fire monster? 2nd, oh yeah, being at an opera house within walking distance of a plaza where they expect the fire monster to attack is really going to keep the class safe. Yeah, it's not like any of the students can ditch the opera, like Peter planned to do, and walk that long distance to the plaza, where the carnival that the entire class wanted to go to was happening. MCU Uncle Ben is not around anymore. We fans who know the character of Spider-Man knows his backstory, so we can figure it out on our own. But you're the only idiot who doesn't think Uncle Ben was murdered. The fact that Peter knew a fire monster was going to attack Prague and had a chance to warn the 2 chaperones to keep the class away from the attack but took no action to warn them (similar to how Spider-Man had a chance to stop the thief but took no action to stop the thief) pretty much confirms that Uncle Ben was never murdered by a thief in MCU and that MCU Peter never learned that "with great power comes great responsibility". Like I said, MCU has completely fucked up the Spider-Man character.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Jul 10, 2019 19:34:56 GMT
Spiderman 2 however has Peter abandon being Spider-Man because it's hard for him Sure sounds like someone who didn't quite learn the lesson that "with great power comes great responsibility". And just like that, dc-fan's entire argument goes poof!
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Jul 10, 2019 21:30:27 GMT
It's broken the 600m barrier...
$603,778,859
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Jul 10, 2019 21:57:23 GMT
I could be wrong so correct me If I am, but this is just the total value of the the campaign. This isn't the amount of money spent by Sony. This would include the value of say a Burger King Commercial that Burger King paid for but pimped Far From Home. I read another article that I can't find now that broke it down.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Jul 10, 2019 22:11:35 GMT
You don't need to be so hostile dazz. Ease up on the insults. This is a friendly joyous place.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Jul 11, 2019 8:09:24 GMT
You don't need to be so hostile dazz . Ease up on the insults. This is a friendly joyous place. You don't let me have any fun.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Jul 11, 2019 8:39:10 GMT
Is Spider-Man not that popular in North America? Because I've noticed that every Spider-Man film has had a low domestic box office.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Jul 11, 2019 11:14:55 GMT
Is Spider-Man not that popular in North America? Because I've noticed that every Spider-Man film has had a low domestic box office. The Raimi movies were massive. All three of them made the opening day record and two of them made the opening weekend record. The only reason Spider-man 2 didn't was because it opened on a Tuesday. With inflation the first two are in the Top 10 most successful superhero movies, the original not far off from Infinity War. All three did better than any Iron Man or Captain America movie. The Amazing Spider-man movies didn't do very well though. From Spider-man to The Amazing Spider-man 2 they did keep making less and less money. They've seemed to be on the up since. This new one could make $400 million, it's running ahead of Guardians of the Galaxy 2 so far. Also for the Spider-man PS4 game it says "In the United States, Spider-Man sold 3.3 million units—including those bundled with the PS4 console—in its first three days of release, making it the fastest-selling first-party video game release in Sony's history, narrowly beating another PS4 exclusive God of War's 3.1 million sold in May 2018."
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Jul 11, 2019 11:19:35 GMT
Is Spider-Man not that popular in North America? Because I've noticed that every Spider-Man film has had a low domestic box office. The Raimi movies were massive. All three of them made the opening day record and two of them made the opening weekend record. The only reason Spider-man 2 didn't was because it opened on a Tuesday. With inflation the first two are in the Top 10 most successful superhero movies, the original not far off from Infinity War. All three did better than any Iron Man or Captain America movie. The Amazing Spider-man movies didn't do very well though. From Spider-man to The Amazing Spider-man 2 they did keep making less and less money. They've seemed to be on the up since. This new one could make $400 million, it's running ahead of Guardians of the Galaxy 2 so far. Also for the Spider-man PS4 game it says "In the United States, Spider-Man sold 3.3 million units—including those bundled with the PS4 console—in its first three days of release, making it the fastest-selling first-party video game release in Sony's history, narrowly beating another PS4 exclusive God of War's 3.1 million sold in May 2018." The 2002 film made over $400 million Domestically, which is good, but look at the 2 and 3. There's definitely a drop in the domestic. I just find it odd that Spidey hasn't been pushing at least $400 million Domestically, given that he's a popular character.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Jul 11, 2019 11:43:23 GMT
The Raimi movies were massive. All three of them made the opening day record and two of them made the opening weekend record. The only reason Spider-man 2 didn't was because it opened on a Tuesday. With inflation the first two are in the Top 10 most successful superhero movies, the original not far off from Infinity War. All three did better than any Iron Man or Captain America movie. The Amazing Spider-man movies didn't do very well though. From Spider-man to The Amazing Spider-man 2 they did keep making less and less money. They've seemed to be on the up since. This new one could make $400 million, it's running ahead of Guardians of the Galaxy 2 so far. Also for the Spider-man PS4 game it says "In the United States, Spider-Man sold 3.3 million units—including those bundled with the PS4 console—in its first three days of release, making it the fastest-selling first-party video game release in Sony's history, narrowly beating another PS4 exclusive God of War's 3.1 million sold in May 2018." The 2002 film made over $400 million Domestically, which is good, but look at the 2 and 3. There's definitely a drop in the domestic. I just find it odd that Spidey hasn't been pushing at least $400 million Domestically, given that he's a popular character. Same should be said for Batman then as well then, outside of the first film and the last 2 Nolan movies Batman films even with inflation fail to meet $400m, adjust for inflation all 3 Raimi films went over $400m domestically.
Also why $400m why not $300m?
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Jul 11, 2019 12:00:26 GMT
The 2002 film made over $400 million Domestically, which is good, but look at the 2 and 3. There's definitely a drop in the domestic. I just find it odd that Spidey hasn't been pushing at least $400 million Domestically, given that he's a popular character. Same should be said for Batman then as well then, outside of the first film and the last 2 Nolan movies Batman films even with inflation fail to meet $400m, adjust for inflation all 3 Raimi films went over $400m domestically.
Also why $400m why not $300m?
Not just Batman, but even Superman has had a lackluster domestic. Hell a film starring BOTH Batman and Superman didn't even hit past $400 million. $300 million isn't terrible but I believe that these films could have made more than they did. Which makes me believe that the domestic audience aren't into the film's that much.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Jul 11, 2019 13:15:56 GMT
The 2002 film made over $400 million Domestically, which is good, but look at the 2 and 3. There's definitely a drop in the domestic. I just find it odd that Spidey hasn't been pushing at least $400 million Domestically, given that he's a popular character. I suppose like the first Batman and Superman, the original movie will be the most successful because it's never been done before. Age of Ultron dropped off a lot from the first too. Spider-man 2 didn't drop too badly really especially compared to Batman Returns. Spider-man 3 opened just as good but the poor reception and that Shrek 3 and Pirates of the Caribbean 3 opened the same month caused that to drop again. Then the franchise fatigue starts to kick in and The Amazing Spider-man retold the origin story all over again, it was also sandwiched in between The Avengers and The Dark Knight Rises. Then the second one got a poor reception so another drop. But yeah this probably won't make as much as Captain Marvel even though that character isn't nearly as popular as Spider-man.
|
|