|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 0:41:12 GMT
English teacher, IT expert, Biblical scholar, mind reader, translator.... You're lying again, prog. I have never ever said I was a Bible scholar, but hey at least I can read!  |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 0:43:15 GMT
And this again? Very emotive, very inaccurate but a great substitute for thought and reasoned argument... |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 0:45:21 GMT
No, it wasn't a translation, it was an edit as the meaning of the sentance was changed. So you keep saying - as I don't know Swedish, I have to trust you are telling the truth. Maybe because the original was incorrect? You hadn't thought of that of course. |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 0:47:23 GMT
What type of judgment are we talking about? Because we are asked to call out sinful behavior ...which homosexuality is. Jesus told us NOT to judge. He didn't add "but you can if people are gay". No, he didn't. He did say "don't be a hypocrite - don't judge others when your behaviour is worse". Also, the Bible doesn't end with the Gospel of John, as you've been told. |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 0:48:58 GMT
But we are asked to call out sinful behavior....which homosexuality is. Maybe if you are an old testa-mentalist, but not if you are a Christian... Jesus came and brought the new covenant, and the new commandment... Love each other, and don't judge... (there was no clause a, exemption 1, against gays)... You've been told countless times that the New Testament also condemns homosexuality. Jesus' silence on the subject does not mean consent. |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 0:51:00 GMT
I bring you the new covenant, and the new commandment... my followers will be known by keeping the new commandment... I am the baddest mother fucker in the manor, so word up" I may be paraphrasing the last bit, but that is what he meant. That's precisely what he didn't say. Neither did he say "party on homosexual dudes". |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2017 0:51:05 GMT
Jesus told us NOT to judge. He didn't add "but you can if people are gay". No, he didn't. He did say "don't be a hypocrite - don't judge others when your behaviour is worse". Also, the Bible doesn't end with the Gospel of John, as you've been told. Then stop. |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 0:53:46 GMT
No the bible says that and God decided it. Shut up Blade. . Your hatreds and feuds are not wanted on this board, so take your limp-wristed tantrums elsewhere. |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 0:56:26 GMT
Yes, according to the bible, you know, gods will, you should let your famuily starve and god also says that you should kill people. " There's this little thing called common sense." Oh, sweet irony, common sence tells us that homosexuuality is natural. So you've never heard of the New Testament? Oh and common sense doesn't tell us that anal sex is natural - given the health problems it causes, how can it be? |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 0:59:09 GMT
tpfkar "So if your job requires you to work on Sundays you should let your family starve?  There's this little thing called common sense. "So you put your "common sense" above God's instructions? Those are God's instructions for the ancient Israel theocracy, not for us now. What do you expect medical professionals to do? We are not bound by the Old Testament. www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/why-we-are-not-bound-by-everything-in-the-old-law |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Feb 23, 2017 1:05:15 GMT
And this again? Very emotive, very inaccurate but a great substitute for thought and reasoned argument... Very provocative, very accurate and a great example for truth and a reasoned argument against hypocrital and prejudiced sows like yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by yezziqa on Feb 23, 2017 1:06:00 GMT
No, it wasn't a translation, it was an edit as the meaning of the sentance was changed. So you keep saying - as I don't know Swedish, I have to trust you are telling the truth. Maybe because the original was incorrect? You hadn't thought of that of course. No, as many words were changes as time had moved on. One of the words were "kjortel" a traditional swedish clothing, but when the new edition of the bible was made, no one wore them anymore, so they changed it to "skjorta" which mean shirt. And don't worry about whether I think or not, I think to much, and you are not the first person I've had this conversation with. |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 1:07:22 GMT
Being saved from what? The likes of you? . Christians should love all, not pick and choose who to love or what law to follow. We don't do that. The Bible continues after the Gospel of John, as do Jesus' "laws". Jesus isn't the "free sex hippie" many here like to pretend he is. He's not freaking Jim Morrison of the Doors! |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 1:09:12 GMT
Too bad for you, but I do care about children. But only the straight ones right, you bigoted phony! There are no "non-straight" children. All children are heterosexual and no amount of molestation and paedophilia changes that. |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 1:10:44 GMT
Grow up. I started work as a translator in 2013. You'll never know for whom or of what. Supes must be kept away from the enterprise. Yeah you never volunteer information do you Ada? That was information I "volunteered" to show I know what I am talking about. That doesn't entitle you to snoop and sneer. |
|
|
|
Post by yezziqa on Feb 23, 2017 1:11:57 GMT
Yes, according to the bible, you know, gods will, you should let your famuily starve and god also says that you should kill people. " There's this little thing called common sense." Oh, sweet irony, common sence tells us that homosexuuality is natural. So you've never heard of the New Testament? Oh and common sense doesn't tell us that anal sex is natural - given the health problems it causes, how can it be? And you have never heard about reading the whole conversation? It's the person I answered that don't think that the teachings of the new testament is something to follow as a christian. How did homosexuality suddenly become anal sex? Oh, right, you think everything is about making babies and that nothing have to do with love, companionship etc. Homosexuality is natural, we see it in the animal kingdom aswell. |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 1:12:18 GMT
No, he didn't. He did say "don't be a hypocrite - don't judge others when your behaviour is worse". Also, the Bible doesn't end with the Gospel of John, as you've been told. Then stop. I am not being a hypocrite, so what are you whining about? |
|
|
|
Post by yezziqa on Feb 23, 2017 1:21:26 GMT
3- however that does not mean that edits haven't been made to the bible in translations because of previous mistakes or altered to fit a culture of the time. Because of previous mistakes, probably - the KJV, (the atheist's favourite) is often guilty of mistakes. But to "fit the culture of the time", not a chance! Do you really think that would go un-noticed? Considering that just a few percent could read and even fewer understand the language the bible was written in, plus that the munks translating the bibles never had the chance to travel to those countries to learn the subtle nuances to fully understand it, so yes, any rational person realizes that it highly likely that changes have been made over time. |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 1:27:23 GMT
How did homosexuality suddenly become anal sex? Oh, right, you think everything is about making babies and that nothing have to do with love, companionship etc. Homosexuality is natural, we see it in the animal kingdom aswell. No, we don't see homosex in the animal kingdom we see it in zoos under situations of stress - but even if we did, people should act as animals do? Incest and cannibalism should be fine then. I have noted companionship in lesbian relationships, but male homosexuality is purely transactional, and what else can they do but anal sex? |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 23, 2017 1:29:41 GMT
Because of previous mistakes, probably - the KJV, (the atheist's favourite) is often guilty of mistakes. But to "fit the culture of the time", not a chance! Do you really think that would go un-noticed? Considering that just a few percent could read and even fewer understand the language the bible was written in, plus that the munks translating the bibles never had the chance to travel to those countries to learn the subtle nuances to fully understand it, so yes, any rational person realizes that it highly likely that changes have been made over time. Utter nonsense, and excuse making. There are no changes - scholars have verified that. www.gotquestions.org/Bible-reliable.html |
|
There's this little thing called common sense. "
