Taika Waititi to Direct 'Thor 4' (Exclusive)

Jul 17, 2019 5:53:25 GMT thenewnexus said:

Jul 17, 2019 5:23:35 GMT JudgeJuryDredd said:

Yeah let's not have an acclaimed filmmaker who delivered the best received Thor film, the best visual replication of Jack Kirby's design style, who also played one of the more memorable characters of that movie return for a sequel. 

No matter how the movie turns out it will most likely be a better representation of the character than Jigsaw in season 2 of The Punisher, Iron Fist in both seasons, and whatever was The Inhumans series. 

Shitnerok was too corny and had too much humor. No Darcy

No it wasnt too corny, that was more Dark World, it was a fresh take on the character, which flies against it being corny, it wasn't obvious, I mean Hela kills almost all of her people, to stop her Thor destroys his planet, closest thing that came to it was Loki's face turn, you could say the overuse of humour but  that's what made it fresh and surprising because they used humour in places the other films used romance, sorrow or hope.

Now too much humour is one thing did they over do it? imo a little, but then they atleast used humour for a reason in this film, you wanting Darcy in the film which is a comic relief character with no value, impact, meaning or  purpose in the films other than to be the comic relief that if removed doesn't alter the movie at all well that's just fucking stupid.

Stupid is also your other post, Taika coming back wont make the franchise or character worse, it will keep it as it is, now had you moaned something like "oh great and here I was hoping we could get back to a more serious Thor which would be an improvement" then that's fine, what makes Ragnarok a "bad" film for most who feel that way, which btw is not the opinion of most people, is that Ragnarok is a massive departure from the previous Thor films and character, Thor reacts worse to a hair cut than he does having watched his mother, father and brother "die" in front of him, he breaks up with the woman he gave up the throne of Asguard for off camera and doesn't really care and is now a utter fool, ok fair enough, but now he's already that character carrying on with the goofy persona which most fans actually love Thor for having now doesn't make it worse, it makes it the same as it's been for the last 2 years, the biggest critiques of Ragnarok are it's a little too jokey for some which is a minor complaint, and that it doesn't feel like a natural progression of the character from the other films, but that's because that Thor didn't connect with people and Marvel were like ok Taika do what you want, tear it down and rebuild, if they did that again now to make Thor more serious again it should get the same complaint, this has nothing to do with the last few movies and his character has done a 180, which would devalue the brand and character by not having a consistent tone or approach, which would be doubly dumb as the character has now finally really connected with fans and the last films with this version of Thor have been the most successful films of the 2 series he appears in, meaning this Thor is most peoples Thor.

In short, you dumb dude, dumb diddly dumb dumb...dumb.