|
|
Post by msdemos on Jul 18, 2019 19:11:30 GMT
 SAVE FERRIS
|
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Jul 18, 2019 20:42:19 GMT
100? Fcuk that. I'll take the under here.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jul 18, 2019 21:09:50 GMT
The future!
|
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Jul 18, 2019 21:52:01 GMT
I'd take the long life. It'd be cool to see the Tricentennial of the USA since I was born on the year of the Bicentennial. I wouldn't mind just being in good health in a modest house sitting on a back porch somewhere in small town Texas watching the occasional car pass by.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nora on Jul 19, 2019 0:11:27 GMT
why would anyone chose the option with shorter life? if you did, tell me more pls. 5 years is So Short...
|
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Jul 19, 2019 0:54:37 GMT
Years. Easy.
|
|
|
|
Post by mecano04 on Jul 19, 2019 1:31:15 GMT
why would anyone chose the option with shorter life? if you did, tell me more pls. 5 years is So Short... Just for the chance to live the dream!
Money can give you access to more means to accomplish whatever you want to accomplish.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sulla on Jul 19, 2019 2:19:41 GMT
This sounds like one of those Twilight Zone episodes where I choose the hundred years, but get framed for murder and sent to prison for life.  |
|
|
|
Post by jamesbamesy on Jul 19, 2019 2:21:44 GMT
Well if I end up becoming rich for the next 82 years of my life, than I’d go with Option 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ass_E9 on Jul 19, 2019 2:33:01 GMT
Is it a painless death either way?
|
|
|
|
Post by mslo79 on Jul 19, 2019 5:06:16 GMT
Naturally one will side with the living longer option (i.e. option #2 in the poll).
because $1mil, while a lot, is not THAT much and even if you were given $1billion, 5 years is next to nothing which makes it flat out not worth it unless you are old enough (say something like 75-80+ years old) to where you might not make it 5 years then in which case taking the $1mil would be worth considering especially if you knew your time on earth was limited.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lucy on Jul 19, 2019 6:39:56 GMT
Million dollars..at least in my final years, I'll be living the best years of my life!
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Jul 19, 2019 7:28:10 GMT
Well, 5 really awesome years could outweigh another 73 mediocre-to-shit ones. Though 1mil is a little low for such a trade off.
|
|
|
|
Post by Xcalatë on Jul 19, 2019 8:17:15 GMT
1 Million inst really that much but living to 100 sounds like a curse so I'll take the money and burn trough it in 5 years before checking out.
|
|
|
|
Post by klandersen on Jul 19, 2019 19:18:01 GMT
At this time of my life I'd go with the living to 100. If I were in my late 70s or older I mighy go with the million bucks and spend half to 3/4 of it, leaving the rest to my nephew(s)
|
|
|
|
Post by lordquesterjones on Jul 19, 2019 19:24:02 GMT
why would anyone chose the option with shorter life? if you did, tell me more pls. 5 years is So Short... Because you can get through a shit load of drink, women and drugs in 5 years, with a million $'s.
And not have to work whilst doing it; and them.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordquesterjones on Jul 19, 2019 19:28:14 GMT
Is it a painless death either way? Option 1: You go out in a drug induced haze whilst having a threesome with two of your favourite porn stars.
Option 2: You live to 100, but have a massive stoke in your early 40's and have to spend the rest of your life drinking your food through a straw and pissing through a catheter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Xcalatë on Jul 19, 2019 20:04:02 GMT
why would anyone chose the option with shorter life? if you did, tell me more pls. 5 years is So Short... Because 5 years of living comfortably is better than decades of going through the motions until you die?
|
|
|
|
Post by Nora on Jul 19, 2019 21:50:59 GMT
why would anyone chose the option with shorter life? if you did, tell me more pls. 5 years is So Short... Because you can get through a shit load of drink, women and drugs in 5 years, with a million $'s.
And not have to work whilst doing it; and them.
one milion is not that much. thats not even enough to get a nice place and a fancy car. and if u found some nice woman u would surely regret not being able to live longer to enjoy jwr. and drinking is a cheap hobby u can do that now too i bet  |
|
|
|
Post by Nora on Jul 19, 2019 21:52:20 GMT
why would anyone chose the option with shorter life? if you did, tell me more pls. 5 years is So Short... Because 5 years of living comfortably is better than decades of going through the motions until you die? u can change your life during those decades and make money and live any way you want. why give up preventively? you never know whats just around the corner. |
|
