|
|
Post by Jonesy1 on Apr 13, 2017 0:59:45 GMT
I saw this on Facebook and I'm stealing it.
Red pill makes you 10 years old again but you know everything that you know now.
Blue pill makes you 45 years old but with £50million (or equivalent amount in your own currency) in the bank.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catman 猫的主人 on Apr 13, 2017 2:01:48 GMT
Catman would take the mauve pill.
|
|
|
|
Post by romad on Apr 13, 2017 2:11:09 GMT
I like Catmans answer but I'd go for being 10 again and make some changes in my life. Then it's possible I would have that much or more money in the bank. But if I took the mauve pill, with my luck, I would end up 45 knowing everything I did when I was 10. |
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Apr 13, 2017 2:21:58 GMT
Red pill.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Apr 13, 2017 2:51:47 GMT
i'd take a coctail and vodka.
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Apr 13, 2017 3:01:39 GMT
Well, first, the blue pill still adds time for me. So I'd go for that. However, if the red pill involved traveling back in time in addition to making me 10 again, that would be my choice.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2017 7:56:58 GMT
Well, first, the blue pill still adds time for me. So I'd go for that. However, if the red pill involved traveling back in time in addition to making me 10 again, that would be my choice. Same here, being 45 again is still going back for me. I would definitely not want to be 10 again and do it all over |
|
siri
New Member
Lost my home at IMDB ... Finding a new one here
@siri
Posts: 15
 
|
Post by siri on Apr 13, 2017 9:18:01 GMT
Both would make me younger then I am now but I don't want to go back as far as being 10 again so I would take the blue.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Apr 13, 2017 9:47:07 GMT
Being just over the age of the blue pill, all that would do is make me richer and more comfortable, but wouldn't offer me a chance of change in terms of self-awareness which is something that has been evolved through my being.
Taking the red pill is a bit vauge, because knowing what one knows now, is only due to experience and maturity of where I am at now in my life. And I wouldn't want to be 10 in todays society, it would have to be back in my own timeline and decade and even if I was wiser and sharper, I don't know how a 10yr old boy is still going to make some headway with the experience of a 49yr old. It would be creepy and freaky for most. I don't know if I would want to relive all that again anyway, even if I have some fond memories of the 70's and 80's. It might not make much of a darn difference anyway.
I say neither, it is what it is as of now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Xcalatë on Apr 13, 2017 12:16:21 GMT
Red Pill, I loved my childhood up until age 13 and with all the knowledge of things that will happen I'm sure I could make some changes for the better.
|
|
|
|
Post by deeznutz on Apr 13, 2017 14:13:28 GMT
F being 10 with social media and shit, I'll take the money.
Don't fancy having my head on pulling girls later on that to my brain are children either proper wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Apr 13, 2017 15:11:33 GMT
Well, first, the blue pill still adds time for me. So I'd go for that. However, if the red pill involved traveling back in time in addition to making me 10 again, that would be my choice. Same here, being 45 again is still going back for me. I would definitely not want to be 10 again and do it all over I'd like being 10 again--at least knowing what I know now, but the money would be more important to me, even if I only have it from age 45. If I could also travel back in time, I'm confident that knowing what I know now, being a 10-year-old in 1972 I could make far more money than I've made. A few smart investments and I could have far more than $30 million or whatever it was. Plus I could fix a couple things that I wound up regretting, I could capitalize on some opportunities that I know are going to happen,I could help some folks avoid bad fates, etc. (Assuming that we could change some things, otherwise it would be pointless) But going back to being 10 years old while remaining in 2017, where everything is just as it is now, I don't have any confidence that I'd be able to make $30 million. So I'd rather have the money and less time in that case. |
|
|
|
Post by Jonesy1 on Apr 13, 2017 15:23:04 GMT
Just for clarification taking the red pill will involve traveling back in time to the year that you were 10.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2017 18:19:40 GMT
Same here, being 45 again is still going back for me. I would definitely not want to be 10 again and do it all over I'd like being 10 again--at least knowing what I know now, but the money would be more important to me, even if I only have it from age 45. If I could also travel back in time, I'm confident that knowing what I know now, being a 10-year-old in 1972 I could make far more money than I've made. A few smart investments and I could have far more than $30 million or whatever it was. Plus I could fix a couple things that I wound up regretting, I could capitalize on some opportunities that I know are going to happen,I could help some folks avoid bad fates, etc. (Assuming that we could change some things, otherwise it would be pointless) But going back to being 10 years old while remaining in 2017, where everything is just as it is now, I don't have any confidence that I'd be able to make $30 million. So I'd rather have the money and less time in that case. I do like the idea of being able to change things from the past but starting over would be too tiring  |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 14, 2017 7:23:48 GMT
Definitely the red pill. If I knew then what I know now, I would have a lot more than $50 million in the bank by the time I was 45.
|
|
|
|
Post by telegonus on Apr 14, 2017 9:40:42 GMT
No brainer for me: blue pill. I don't want to see all that much more of the 21st century and I like the money.  |
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Apr 14, 2017 10:36:08 GMT
Red pill
|
|
|
|
Post by klandersen on Apr 14, 2017 14:58:52 GMT
Hmm difficult one. The blue is very very tempting mid-40s AND SUPER RICH? I'm past 45 but not anywhere near Million$ rich so being slightly younger and enough $$ to basically buy whatever as I said is very tempting.
I think I'd go for the red, even though it means reliving the Disco era. Knowing what I know now like many others have said there are some regrets I would change.
|
|
|
|
Post by shangel on Apr 14, 2017 15:48:49 GMT
Just for clarification taking the red pill will involve traveling back in time to the year that you were 10. Glad you clarified that. No red pill for me, the first time was horrible enough. It would be blue pill, for me. |
|
|
|
Post by fangirl1975 on Apr 14, 2017 18:33:44 GMT
I'd go for the red pill. It would be an opportunity to make some different choices in my life.
|
|
