|
|
Post by itsthatguyme on Apr 13, 2017 6:49:18 GMT
He never has been. I'm not saying he doesn't have appeal or makes shitty movies or is s bad director. No. I like him. Just saying, his range is very limited. He shows like 2 emotions the every single movie he does. He's same the same guy whether he's a cop or a cowboy or whatever. I recently re-watched The Unforgiven and I had to cringe at several scenes. His timing is horrible. His line delivery was so off. I'm suprised nobody has ever criticized him before. Why do ppl like Steven Segal , Arnie and Sly Stone get knocked but Clint gets a pass? He's just as terrible as any run of the mill action hero. Yes, he has directed and starred in many critically acclaimed movies but let's not get carried away. He is what he is. Gruff , stone faced , serious guy. That's it.
|
|
|
|
Post by deeznutz on Apr 13, 2017 13:57:53 GMT
I disagree the man is a legend sure his range is limited to the tough guy. But his directing is good and you could say the same about lots of actors including John Wayne. If you find your niche and your good at it ....
|
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Apr 13, 2017 14:33:38 GMT
Most actors and actresses don't have spectacular range. The list of them who can and have played drastically different roles is very sparse imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemaniac22 on Apr 13, 2017 15:12:13 GMT
Good actor but he can't openly express himself like an actor is supposed to. Must be something about his genes. I see something similar about his son Scott.
I don't know. Maybe that's how people were in the thirties. My dad also shares some similar character traits. Stone faced doesn't show emotions. Rarely laughs out load. Introvert personality My dad was born in 1948
|
|
|
|
Post by TheOriginalPinky on Apr 13, 2017 15:13:27 GMT
I agree with you. I saw four movies of his the other day, and without exception, it was the same guy. He's a good director, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by koskiewicz on Apr 13, 2017 15:33:01 GMT
...hmmm...actors like Bela Lugosi, Boris Karloff, Bogie and Gable all fell into a similar mold. Clint is one of a kind like those others mentioned in this post.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jerk on Apr 13, 2017 15:36:46 GMT
I wouldnt disgree with you but I wouldn't call him a bad actor either.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jonesy1 on Apr 13, 2017 15:37:10 GMT
That's it, now you've upset him. 
|
|
|
|
Post by nausea on Apr 13, 2017 15:49:28 GMT
That's just a little thing to think about when you are cooking.
|
|
|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Apr 13, 2017 16:08:47 GMT
itsthatguymeTo be fair, in many of the films he has made he is tough type guys who are expected to have a certain air about them. He isn't making the scripts up as he goes along. He is doing what he has been hired to do and does it well. For variety how about The Bridges of Madison County, Paint Your Wagon , Honkeytonk Man and various other lighter fare ? Eastwood Filmography
|
|
|
|
Post by Times Up on Apr 13, 2017 16:29:46 GMT
Clint Eastwood? Music teacher at the Apollo theater?
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Apr 13, 2017 18:16:13 GMT
Totally agree, and it's not even debatable, yet you step on an icon of the feeble minded here.
It's undeniable, even in the examples some have tried to name to show he can do something besides lowly grunt or groan, that we can find in all these movies the gamut of Clint's expressions and emotions...all one of them.
As a director, you're correct, he's technically what Hollywood and what all the estates have loved in directing and arts, even before movies. He is a manipulator. For example, manipulating people into feeling empathy for a homicidal maniac "killer of women and children" in UNFORGIVEN. That works for the sheep and those who haven't been through life in the streets, but to the streetwise he is a predator of naive fools. He certainly fits the traditional mode of director, and in that sense he is one of the best.
I don't trust people who try to manipulate me, for good reason. Barely survived it. Many people don't survive it, or become crippled for it.
I prefer the honest directors, who don't hide behind manipulation. DeMille and Verhoeven in an inspired way. And even Tarantino, in his uninspired negative way, lampoons the very manipulation of others, and gets respect from both sides.
And if we take the one director most people at least slightly respect...Hitchcock...we see a bit of manipulation, but it is very subtle and slight. Not nearly as overpowering and self righteous as Eastwood is.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheOriginalPinky on Apr 13, 2017 18:20:49 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2017 18:28:45 GMT
He's limited but does the job if the part fits. Of the three you mentioned Arnie is the closest in that respect. Stallone often tries to emote and fails while Segal is bland and has to make up for that by wobbling his head.
|
|
|
|
Post by angel on Apr 13, 2017 21:17:10 GMT
It's a mistake to equate a (so called) lack of range with bad acting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix101 on Apr 13, 2017 21:48:53 GMT
What you said about Clint Eastwood could easily be written about for John Wayne.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2017 22:16:28 GMT
If you had replaced "actor" with "director" maybe you'd have something.
|
|