|
|
Post by geode on Aug 21, 2019 3:06:36 GMT
Signed a deal, but it does not expand on the nature of that deal or on its finances. It doesn't matter in a discussion of the ownership of Ancestry.com as this has no bearing on that.
|
|
|
|
Post by geode on Aug 21, 2019 10:22:24 GMT
Why are you bringing MY religion into this?
Are you aware that analogy is a basic tool of reasoning? The fact that it happens to be YOUR church is irrelevant. I chose it because, just like the LDS church, the Catholic church is a centralized organization (unlike Protestants, Jews, and Muslims). So, the point of the analogy becomes clear (at least to nearly everyone). I have no problem at all with the content of your link. The problem is all yours, in that you created a thread to make an assertion not backed up anywhere in that article. (I went over all that in my first post; no need to repeat).
I have asked you (simple yes or no) if you still stand by your assertion that the Mormon Church owns Ancestry.com. You've now posted to me twice since then, and still refuse to answer. Instead, you decided to slander me with the label of "bigot", and when I challenged you to either give an example to back up your charge or withdraw it, you do neither one. And that means that you are content to show yourself off on this thread as a simple slanderer. Strange that you, as a Catholic, are OK wearing that label, since (according to Catholic education) the word "devil" means slanderer. www.catholiceducation.org/en/culture/catholic-contributions/the-devil-the-fallen-angel.html
I surprised that you didn't mention that in what responses she has made to you that she used bigotry.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 21, 2019 10:34:18 GMT
Are you aware that analogy is a basic tool of reasoning? The fact that it happens to be YOUR church is irrelevant. I chose it because, just like the LDS church, the Catholic church is a centralized organization (unlike Protestants, Jews, and Muslims). So, the point of the analogy becomes clear (at least to nearly everyone). I have no problem at all with the content of your link. The problem is all yours, in that you created a thread to make an assertion not backed up anywhere in that article. (I went over all that in my first post; no need to repeat).
I have asked you (simple yes or no) if you still stand by your assertion that the Mormon Church owns Ancestry.com. You've now posted to me twice since then, and still refuse to answer. Instead, you decided to slander me with the label of "bigot", and when I challenged you to either give an example to back up your charge or withdraw it, you do neither one. And that means that you are content to show yourself off on this thread as a simple slanderer. Strange that you, as a Catholic, are OK wearing that label, since (according to Catholic education) the word "devil" means slanderer. www.catholiceducation.org/en/culture/catholic-contributions/the-devil-the-fallen-angel.html
I surprised that you didn't mention that in what responses she has made to you that she used bigotry. Is it bigotry to say that the LDS are all one big happy family? 
|
|
|
|
Post by geode on Aug 22, 2019 3:49:42 GMT
I surprised that you didn't mention that in what responses she has made to you that she used bigotry. Is it bigotry to say that the LDS are all one big happy family? Nope. And you are not a bigot for writing this.
|
|
