|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Aug 26, 2019 23:57:40 GMT
August 25, 2019Laredo, Texas
The Laredo Morning News
Tornado Strikes Junkyard
Builds Working Automobile
When the tornado hit the Pull-It-Yourself-Junkyard at 9227 Dinwiddie Road just outside Laredo yesterday afternoon it built a working automobile. The 1959 Peugot 403 Cabriolet is similar to the one Lt. Columbo drove in the television series. The car was also filled with gas from a nearby work shed by the tornado. The key actually turned and the car started. It then drove itself to Walmart.
Atheists were gratified if somewhat surprised. "It's a one in a billion chance," said Dominic Gordon. "Even atheists are shocked."
All religion was of course cancelled as leaders in every denomination announced that the atheists had been right the whole time.
"To think," said Reverend John Lester, "that we have been teasing atheists for their limited intellectual capacity. Only to find out at last that we were the retarded ones. It's thoroughly embarrassing."
Many people wondered what they will do now on weekends and asked atheists for suggestions.
Square dancing, rugby, and caber tossing were suggested by Laura Petrie.
|
|
|
|
Post by koskiewicz on Aug 27, 2019 1:05:57 GMT
"fake news"
|
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Aug 27, 2019 1:11:54 GMT
This is the worst anti-science flat-earth excuse for not believing evolution since the watch analogy (the human eye is so complex it could not have evolved without a miracle just like you wouldn't expect to find a watch that had formed naturally). Ask any third grader and she can debunk that bunk. What makes it worse is that it, I guess, is supposed to be satirically funny.
It is just pathetic. Go back to school - and not that evangelical or Pentecostal church school you graduated from.
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Aug 27, 2019 3:04:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Santa PaulsLaugh on Aug 27, 2019 4:55:13 GMT
This is the worst anti-science flat-earth excuse for not believing evolution since the watch analogy (the human eye is so complex it could not have evolved without a miracle just like you wouldn't expect to find a watch that had formed naturally). Ask any third grader and she can debunk that bunk. What makes it worse is that it, I guess, is supposed to be satirically funny. It is just pathetic. Go back to school - and not that evangelical or Pentecostal church school you graduated from. The human eye evolved from an underwater creature. We can’t see as well on land as a fish sees in the ocean. www.popsci.com/article/science/how-humans-and-squid-evolved-have-same-eyes/
|
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Aug 27, 2019 10:18:15 GMT
This is the worst anti-science flat-earth excuse for not believing evolution since the watch analogy (the human eye is so complex it could not have evolved without a miracle just like you wouldn't expect to find a watch that had formed naturally). Ask any third grader and she can debunk that bunk. What makes it worse is that it, I guess, is supposed to be satirically funny. It is just pathetic. Go back to school - and not that evangelical or Pentecostal church school you graduated from. Do you want the honest truth? There is so much nonsense going around lately because people accept things blindly without understanding them or being able to explain them. Are you just as sick and tired of that as I am or more? I get the sense that you are not having as much fun with this as I am. One big problem is that some people are devious. I'm serious, they are. They will put fake science on the internet just to trap the "scientists" who merely copy things believing they're science. For example some explanations of the "twin paradox" on the internet are bad. They're just squiggly math symbols no one really gets. It can be fun though to watch the "scientists" swear they're true. Are you a product of American public schools? You got through? Not retarded? It's a good thing you're here then. You can point out the traps and help others avoid them. I know something about education. Students in elementary education necessarily have to learn things by rote at least until they have a sufficient foundation upon which to build arguments. They aren't ready to argue with their teachers, but that's okay. That will develop later. A third grader is not likely to spot the fake explanations of the twin paradox. That is not fair at all, devious people picking on kids like that. Of course most third graders are intelligent enough to avoid trying to resolve the twin paradox. I also doubt they can do anything but mindlessly repeat theories of RNA chains. I welcome your clear explanations how we know short RNA chains are going to do something later they haven't done in decades. What changes if anything? How or why will they stop tearing each other apart? I also welcome your clear explanations how anyone knows the temperature of the planet rose 1.5 degrees centigrade, and how anyone knows the level of the sea is one eighth inch higher. A lot of people are going to disregard such claims as ridiculous. They will dismiss you as a retarded fool who accepts things blindly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Aug 27, 2019 10:24:24 GMT
This is the worst anti-science flat-earth excuse for not believing evolution since the watch analogy (the human eye is so complex it could not have evolved without a miracle just like you wouldn't expect to find a watch that had formed naturally). Ask any third grader and she can debunk that bunk. What makes it worse is that it, I guess, is supposed to be satirically funny. It is just pathetic. Go back to school - and not that evangelical or Pentecostal church school you graduated from. The human eye evolved from an underwater creature. We can’t see as well on land as a fish sees in the ocean. www.popsci.com/article/science/how-humans-and-squid-evolved-have-same-eyes/ Eagles. I don't mean Glenn Frey.
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Aug 27, 2019 13:56:20 GMT
This is the worst anti-science flat-earth excuse for not believing evolution since the watch analogy (the human eye is so complex it could not have evolved without a miracle just like you wouldn't expect to find a watch that had formed naturally). Ask any third grader and she can debunk that bunk. What makes it worse is that it, I guess, is supposed to be satirically funny. It is just pathetic. Go back to school - and not that evangelical or Pentecostal church school you graduated from. The human eye evolved from an underwater creature. We can’t see as well on land as a fish sees in the ocean. www.popsci.com/article/science/how-humans-and-squid-evolved-have-same-eyes/ And the fish eye just happened out of nothing. Lol
|
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Aug 27, 2019 14:45:55 GMT
This is the worst anti-science flat-earth excuse for not believing evolution since the watch analogy (the human eye is so complex it could not have evolved without a miracle just like you wouldn't expect to find a watch that had formed naturally). Ask any third grader and she can debunk that bunk. What makes it worse is that it, I guess, is supposed to be satirically funny. It is just pathetic. Go back to school - and not that evangelical or Pentecostal church school you graduated from. No, I don't think he would do well in a real scientific setting, his talents lay elsewhere. He'd do well as an editor for a creationist magazine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Aug 27, 2019 16:06:51 GMT
This is the worst anti-science flat-earth excuse for not believing evolution since the watch analogy (the human eye is so complex it could not have evolved without a miracle just like you wouldn't expect to find a watch that had formed naturally). Ask any third grader and she can debunk that bunk. What makes it worse is that it, I guess, is supposed to be satirically funny. It is just pathetic. Go back to school - and not that evangelical or Pentecostal church school you graduated from. No, I don't think he would do well in a real scientific setting, his talents lay elsewhere. He'd do well as an editor for a creationist magazine. You're awful bossy for a person with such little information. You make Trump look like a lamb. Who would have thought that is possible?
|
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Aug 27, 2019 16:07:33 GMT
What was your first clue?
|
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Aug 27, 2019 17:17:06 GMT
No, I don't think he would do well in a real scientific setting, his talents lay elsewhere. He'd do well as an editor for a creationist magazine. You're awful bossy for a person with such little information. You make Trump look like a lamb. Who would have thought that is possible? In some cases a little information is sufficient to show a clear pattern.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Aug 27, 2019 17:27:44 GMT
Well at least you tried
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Aug 27, 2019 17:29:12 GMT
And the fish eye just happened out of nothing. Lol 
|
|
|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Aug 27, 2019 17:33:47 GMT
As far as what to do on Sunday … there's always  the halls are already set up in the church basements |
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Aug 27, 2019 17:50:33 GMT
And the fish eye just happened out of nothing. Lol Did a tornado whip that together too? Lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Catman 猫的主人 on Aug 27, 2019 17:53:16 GMT
And the fish eye just happened out of nothing. Lol
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Aug 27, 2019 17:53:36 GMT
Did a tornado whip that together too? Lol I don't think you understood what my post meant
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Aug 27, 2019 17:55:29 GMT
Did a tornado whip that together too? Lol I don't think you understood what my post meant Yes, I did -- 'strawman'. Not exactly rocket science.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Aug 27, 2019 18:11:47 GMT
I don't think you understood what my post meant Yes, I did -- 'strawman'. Not exactly rocket science. OK, so you acknowledge what you said was basically a lie. Thanks for admitting to that.
|
|
