|
|
Post by goz on Aug 27, 2019 22:25:05 GMT
This week a pertinent exchange between a theist and an atheist on the possibility of life on other planets in the universe.
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Aug 28, 2019 1:44:20 GMT
I scored another one!  |
|
|
|
Post by goz on Aug 28, 2019 3:59:32 GMT
I scored another one! Well done you.
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Aug 29, 2019 16:12:16 GMT
Bump
I gotta be more popular than this!😡
|
|
|
|
Post by fatpaul on Aug 29, 2019 16:23:27 GMT
A.K.A Hitchen's Razor: that given without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
|
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Aug 29, 2019 17:05:00 GMT
the first lady with the banging bodice
you think
the president holds up his copy
of that picture
of
his current wife's
jet cockpit straddle expose
while attempting
to penetrate her with his four inch hard on?
or he has someone hold it for him?
sjw 08/29/19 inspired at this very moment in time by what else is going into the congressional record.
from the 'boner series' of poems
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Aug 29, 2019 17:18:19 GMT
A.K.A Hitchen's Razor: that given without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Yeah, too bad Hitchens didn't follow his own advice when it came to supposed WMDs that were never found and supporting the Iraq War.
|
|
|
|
Post by fatpaul on Aug 29, 2019 17:24:32 GMT
A.K.A Hitchen's Razor: that given without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Yeah, too bad Hitchens didn't follow his own advice when it came to supposed WMDs that were never found and supporting the Iraq War. True, but still a good principle nevertheless that wasn't invented by him but more a modernization of the Latin proverb: quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Aug 29, 2019 21:50:07 GMT
A.K.A Hitchen's Razor: that given without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. When I try that the 'scientists' get all kinds of upset.
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Aug 29, 2019 22:21:34 GMT
A.K.A Hitchen's Razor: that given without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. When I try that the 'scientists' get all kinds of upset. No, it doesn't mean that YOU personally have to witness the evidence which is what you claim.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Aug 29, 2019 22:34:51 GMT
When I try that the 'scientists' get all kinds of upset. No, it doesn't mean that YOU personally have to witness the evidence which is what you claim. You obviously have a double standard for evidence. Are you really not aware?
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Aug 29, 2019 22:51:24 GMT
No, it doesn't mean that YOU personally have to witness the evidence which is what you claim. You obviously have a double standard for evidence. Are you really not aware? What 'double standard'?
|
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Aug 29, 2019 22:55:42 GMT
You obviously have a double standard for evidence. Are you really not aware? What 'double standard'? You believe in medicine with no more evidence than is available with proofs of the spirit.
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Aug 29, 2019 23:56:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Aug 30, 2019 0:21:23 GMT
Like you've ever said anything smart? Should I keep waiting?
|
|
