|
Post by cupcakes on Apr 15, 2017 12:50:43 GMT
tpfkar You've shown yourself to be the trustworthy sort. Okay, I can't throw stones when it comes to drunken posts, but so far there's been nothing I was embarrassed enough to self-delete.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Apr 15, 2017 12:52:49 GMT
the spirit of poetry waits not upon the chortling of the mimes. Yet here we are, still waiting on some actual poetry. ^Chortling mime.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Apr 15, 2017 13:13:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 15, 2017 13:19:43 GMT
Freemasonry is a religion. And it's a racist religion. And my thread about the Book of Enoch is still sitting there with no hits. That's okay. If Aj qualifies it as relevant, I'll be covered for another week.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Apr 15, 2017 13:24:11 GMT
Freemasonry is a religion. Debatable. And my thread about the Book of Enoch is still sitting there with no hits. Last time I looked, it had 62 views.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 15, 2017 13:26:43 GMT
Freemasonry is a religion. Debatable. And my thread about the Book of Enoch is still sitting there with no hits. Last time I looked, it had 62 views. 62 views and 0 replies. As soon as a thread is posted it racks up views very quickly.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Apr 15, 2017 13:28:43 GMT
Debatable. Last time I looked, it had 62 views. 62 views and 0 replies. As soon as a thread is posted it racks up views very quickly. 62 is still about three times more an average thefleetsin thread generated before I put him on ignore.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 15, 2017 13:34:44 GMT
62 views and 0 replies. As soon as a thread is posted it racks up views very quickly. 62 is still about three times more an average thefleetsin thread generated before I put him on ignore. Why did you put him on ignore? Do not his stinky and hateful poems support your antireligious agenda?
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Apr 15, 2017 13:38:16 GMT
Debatable. Last time I looked, it had 62 views. 62 views and 0 replies. As soon as a thread is posted it racks up views very quickly. 62 views mean about 20 real instances of views but could be anywhere between 18-21. Each time you open a thread it adds 3 views and if you take the page back and forward without refreshing then it counts 2 views. And then there are bots but bots probably don't work on RFS because it is protected from public view. So 62 views would actually mean about 20 views. 300 views would actually mean about 100 views.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Apr 15, 2017 13:40:10 GMT
Why did you put him on ignore? Why did I put a spammer on ignore who not only spams but usually fails to contribute positive posts to other threads? Good question. Time for unignore I guess. EDIT: Aj_JuneI discovered a glitch in the unignore function when you have the "Block this member's threads" option checked. If you simply remove the poster from your block list, the threads still stay blocked. To view the threads again, you then have to block the poster again (which does not offer a "Block this member's threads" option), then go to your privacy settings, uncheck the "Block this member's threads" checkbox, and remove again. Just a message for the board admins. I'm too lazy right now to look up a tech support forum.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Apr 15, 2017 13:50:44 GMT
Why did you put him on ignore? Why did I put a spammer on ignore who not only spams but usually fails to contribute positive posts to other threads? Good question. Time for unignore I guess. EDIT: Aj_June I discovered a glitch in the unignore function when you have the "Block this member's threads" option checked. If you simply remove the poster from your block list, the threads still stay blocked. To view the threads again, you then have to block the poster again (which does not offer a "Block this member's threads" option), then go to your privacy settings, uncheck the "Block this member's threads" checkbox, and remove again. Just a message for the board admins. I'm too lazy right now to look up a tech support forum. Thanks a lot, phe_de. I will remember this and reply back when any other member complains of it. I remember someone mentioning the same thing (the problem not the solution as you did) just a day or two ago.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Apr 15, 2017 13:56:14 GMT
Why did I put a spammer on ignore who not only spams but usually fails to contribute positive posts to other threads? Good question. Time for unignore I guess. EDIT: Aj_June I discovered a glitch in the unignore function when you have the "Block this member's threads" option checked. If you simply remove the poster from your block list, the threads still stay blocked. To view the threads again, you then have to block the poster again (which does not offer a "Block this member's threads" option), then go to your privacy settings, uncheck the "Block this member's threads" checkbox, and remove again. Just a message for the board admins. I'm too lazy right now to look up a tech support forum. Thanks a lot, phe_de. I will remember this and reply back when any other member complains of it. I remember some mentioning the same thing (the problem not the solution as you did) just a day or two ago. Okay, well now you've got a second member complaining about it. At first I was ignoring Blade but then decided then decided the comedy value was too much to miss and encountered the same problem as phe de. I haven't even tried the solution he mentioned but it seems there at least is one.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 15, 2017 17:40:10 GMT
62 views and 0 replies. As soon as a thread is posted it racks up views very quickly. 62 views mean about 20 real instances of views but could be anywhere between 18-21. Each time you open a thread it adds 3 views and if you take the page back and forward without refreshing then it counts 2 views. And then there are bots but bots probably don't work on RFS because it is protected from public view. So 62 views would actually mean about 20 views. 300 views would actually mean about 100 views. Thanks. I was wondering if bots might be involved. I was on a website some years ago and was told that a portion of the views were actually from bots.
|
|
|
Post by koskiewicz on Apr 15, 2017 19:16:54 GMT
...bad poesy is just that...bad poesy...!!!
|
|