|
|
Post by damngumby on Sept 26, 2019 15:12:33 GMT
1995 Cowboys, 10 pro-bowl players. The one and done 2007 Cowboys, 13 pro-bowl players. An NFL record. What a player did over an entire career in order to qualify for the hall of fame is immaterial to the season in question, so your argument has little merit. The debate is about talent and being a Pro Bowler is immaterial so your argument has NO merit. Uh, no. The “debate” is about the talent level of a team during a specific season. Talking about how great a player was over their entire career is just another instance of your inability to remain on point. Counting Hall of Fame players is a poor measure to determine the talent level of a team during a specific season … since a non-HoF player could be peaking during that season, contributing greatly to the overall talent level of the team … or a future HoF player could be having a down year, contributing very little to the team that season. Also, since achievements is a consideration in selecting a HoF candidate, any 2007 Cowboy player already has a strike against him … since they achieved nothing … which is my very point! |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Sept 26, 2019 22:51:43 GMT
The debate is about talent and being a Pro Bowler is immaterial so your argument has NO merit. Uh, no. The “debate” is about the talent level of a team during a specific season. No, your exact words were "the most talented team in NFL history, the 2007 Dallas Cowboys." When talking the most talented team in NFL history, the teams with more Hall of Fame players in their prime are the teams that are the most talented. Like I said, any player can have a good season, but it takes a great talent to have a Hall of Fame career.
|
|
|
|
Post by sdm3 on Sept 26, 2019 22:57:33 GMT
anthonyrocks can't decide if he should be delighted that he doesn't need to bump this thread or furious that the topic has been changed completely.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Sept 27, 2019 0:08:57 GMT
Uh, no. The “debate” is about the talent level of a team during a specific season. No, your exact words were ... Semantics will not save you. You, and only you, completely missed the point.
|
|
