|
Post by sostie on Oct 23, 2019 17:54:35 GMT
Nolan does. He's obsessed with Marvel. Nolan is an Oscar-winning, accomplished director who made history. Suicide Squad won Best Makeup and Hairstyling Oscar. Is David Ayer "Oscar-Winning"
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 23, 2019 17:56:34 GMT
Nolan is an Oscar-winning, accomplished director who made history. Suicide Squad won Best Makeup and Hairstyling Oscar. Is David Ayer "Oscar-Winning" Nolan had Oscar nominations as 'best director'. David Ayer hadn't. Said that, I'm glad that David Ayer directed a very good Batman Franchise installment anyway. The Bat is always ahead.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Oct 23, 2019 18:01:25 GMT
Suicide Squad won Best Makeup and Hairstyling Oscar. Is David Ayer "Oscar-Winning" Nolan had Oscar nominations as 'best director'. David Ayer hadn't. Don't backtrack ..you said "Oscar Winning" Holy shit! You were at zero credibility before that statement...and now you're in the minus
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 23, 2019 18:12:36 GMT
Nolan had Oscar nominations as 'best director'. David Ayer hadn't. Don't backtrack ..you said "Oscar Winning" Holy shit! You were at zero credibility before that statement...and now you're in the minus You know I'm right. Your trolling is so predictable. Awww. Boring.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Oct 23, 2019 18:17:12 GMT
Don't backtrack ..you said "Oscar Winning" Holy shit! You were at zero credibility before that statement...and now you're in the minus You know I'm right. Your trolling is so predictable. Awww. Boring. If you are a troll..well done...stringing out 2 threads on a theory proven wrong many times by facts. If not...Sudicide Squad!!!! Jesus
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 23, 2019 18:33:06 GMT
You know I'm right, deep down in your mind.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Oct 26, 2019 1:45:52 GMT
But kiddie movies like Endgame and far from home are in the 90+ on rt.
I want to thank rotten tomatoes for exposing themselves as the biggest scam in Hollywood now that the best comic film of the year is not even a real fresh on RT. this will get better when Joker gets best picture Oscar nom.
Anyone who is still denying critics are not biased to the MCU, to me is now so brainwashed by MARVEL they can't be saved.
How does captain marvel rate higher than joker? how is that movie even a fresh? same from far from home than is worse than the Garfield spiderman movies.
1: RT is part owned by WB, the people who made Joker, why would they be supressing their own movie? WB "owns" RT the same way I own Microsoft. I invest in a minority of Microsoft shares so I'm an "owner" of Microsoft. Similarly, WB invests in a minority percentage of RT (corporations often invest in other corporations). But WB has no control over how RT is run just like I have no control over how Microsoft is run even though I'm an "owner" of Microsoft.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Oct 26, 2019 3:38:51 GMT
1: RT is part owned by WB, the people who made Joker, why would they be supressing their own movie? WB "owns" RT the same way I own Microsoft. I invest in a minority of Microsoft shares so I'm an "owner" of Microsoft. Similarly, WB invests in a minority percentage of RT (corporations often invest in other corporations). But WB has no control over how RT is run just like I have no control over how Microsoft is run even though I'm an "owner" of Microsoft. That has nothing to do with anything you lunk head, WB owns a significant stake of RT, they own what 25% of it, compared to you who owns probably less than 0.0001% of Microsoft's stock, but this means WB would know if their films were having their critical ratings suppressed and maligned, doesn't mean they can change how RT works but does mean they know how it works, and if how it worked was to a constantly undermine their products as is often suggested anytime a MCU or Disney film is received in some way that can be seen as superior to a WB film, then do you not think they would blow the whistle on this?
WB & Universal own RT 25% and 75% by accounts, so why do Disney films get so much higher scores? why would those two film companies allow their investment to promote their competition over them so strongly?
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Oct 26, 2019 8:19:26 GMT
WB "owns" RT the same way I own Microsoft. I invest in a minority of Microsoft shares so I'm an "owner" of Microsoft. Similarly, WB invests in a minority percentage of RT (corporations often invest in other corporations). But WB has no control over how RT is run just like I have no control over how Microsoft is run even though I'm an "owner" of Microsoft. That has nothing to do with anything you lunk head, WB owns a significant stake of RT, they own what 25% of it, compared to you who owns probably less than 0.0001% of Microsoft's stock, but this means WB would know if their films were having their critical ratings suppressed and maligned, doesn't mean they can change how RT works but does mean they know how it works, and if how it worked was to a constantly undermine their products as is often suggested anytime a MCU or Disney film is received in some way that can be seen as superior to a WB film, then do you not think they would blow the whistle on this?
WB & Universal own RT 25% and 75% by accounts, so why do Disney films get so much higher scores? why would those two film companies allow their investment to promote their competition over them so strongly?
Wasn't it 30% for Warner Brothers and 70% for Universal?
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 26, 2019 10:01:00 GMT
Joke website. Who cares? Nobody in the real world.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Oct 26, 2019 16:15:19 GMT
That has nothing to do with anything you lunk head, WB owns a significant stake of RT, they own what 25% of it, compared to you who owns probably less than 0.0001% of Microsoft's stock, but this means WB would know if their films were having their critical ratings suppressed and maligned, doesn't mean they can change how RT works but does mean they know how it works, and if how it worked was to a constantly undermine their products as is often suggested anytime a MCU or Disney film is received in some way that can be seen as superior to a WB film, then do you not think they would blow the whistle on this?
WB & Universal own RT 25% and 75% by accounts, so why do Disney films get so much higher scores? why would those two film companies allow their investment to promote their competition over them so strongly?
Wasn't it 30% for Warner Brothers and 70% for Universal? I have no idea tbh, but it's in that same range and the split works the same regardless, what WB doesn't own Universal does, or what AT&T doesn't own & Comcast does I guess at this point.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Oct 31, 2019 6:49:19 GMT
Joke website. Who cares? Nobody in the real world. Well, you said Batwoman is a great show, so there goes your credibility
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 31, 2019 10:33:16 GMT
Joke website. Who cares? Nobody in the real world. Well, you said Batwoman is a great show, so there goes your credibility Great show for what it is. "Batwoman" doesn't want to be a masterpiece like "Doom Patrol". It's a great entertaining superhero action-adventure show, if you're able to tell the difference. Hopefully for your IQ... lol. Joker will win Oscars, kid. Trust me.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Oct 31, 2019 18:14:49 GMT
Well, you said Batwoman is a great show, so there goes your credibility Great show for what it is. "Batwoman" doesn't want to be a masterpiece like "Doom Patrol". It's a great entertaining superhero action-adventure show, if you're able to tell the difference. Hopefully for your IQ... lol. Joker will win Oscars, kid. Trust me. Sure, if Batwoman aims to make Flash or Arrow look like masterpieces then it succeeds
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 31, 2019 19:44:53 GMT
Great show for what it is. "Batwoman" doesn't want to be a masterpiece like "Doom Patrol". It's a great entertaining superhero action-adventure show, if you're able to tell the difference. Hopefully for your IQ... lol. Joker will win Oscars, kid. Trust me. Sure, if Batwoman aims to make Flash or Arrow look like masterpieces then it succeeds The first 2 seasons of Arrow are superb. Batwoman's cinematography is vastly better that both the shows anyway. Flash had some good moments. The greatest superhero TV live action show in history is DOOM PATROL.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 1, 2019 4:22:10 GMT
Sure, if Batwoman aims to make Flash or Arrow look like masterpieces then it succeeds The first 2 seasons of Arrow are superb. Batwoman's cinematography is vastly better that both the shows anyway. Flash had some good moments. The greatest superhero TV live action show in history is DOOM PATROL. Yeah,no
|
|
dnno1
Sophomore
@dnno1
Posts: 321
Likes: 151
|
Post by dnno1 on Nov 4, 2019 11:34:14 GMT
His movies won. AND... have you ever seen the list of ACCOLADES that Nolan and his movies won? Nolan is already regarded as a legend. Sorry, MCU kids. You said he's an Oscar-winning director, and that's clearly not the case. Can't you tell the difference between the two? RT is RN by former Disney execs. They are prepping up Disney pics to bolster the Disney stock in the portfolios. So much for the minority stake the WB has in that outfit.
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Nov 6, 2019 1:11:06 GMT
You said he's an Oscar-winning director, and that's clearly not the case. Can't you tell the difference between the two? RT is RN by former Disney execs. They are prepping up Disney pics to bolster the Disney stock in the portfolios. So much for the minority stake the WB has in that outfit. 1. That's irrelevant. 2. Have you ever heard about employees disliking their former bosses? 3. 25 to 30% is not exactly a minority stake.
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Nov 6, 2019 9:49:52 GMT
RT is RN by former Disney execs. They are prepping up Disney pics to bolster the Disney stock in the portfolios. So much for the minority stake the WB has in that outfit. 1. That's irrelevant. 2. Have you ever heard about employees disliking their former bosses? 3. 25 to 30% is not exactly a minority stake. I've worked in a subsidiary of a larger controlling Corp. If the Parent company even thinks you are helping out the competition they would lay waste to your executive board. The other 85 to 70% is owned by NBC Universal isn't it? Another competitor to Disney. (also by definition 25 to 30 percent is a minority stake as it's less than 50% but not a minor stake) Also part of the deal when WB sold the majority of the stock was that WB stays a creative partner. dnno1 it's not like RT is creating or changing the critics reviews. The critics send in their reviews and have the option to say if they believe their review is fresh or rotten if it seems it's close. People tend to kill the messenger here. Lets just look at Alladin, Tommorowland, Dumbo, Through the Looking Glass, The Lone Ranger, 4 out of 5 Pirates Movies, mars needs moms, etc etc
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Nov 7, 2019 20:35:12 GMT
By the way, talking with the TRUE and serious posters of this thread:
I don't see any "significant" parallelism with Taxi Driver, other than the mental issue (common with hundreds of movies out there anyway). I don't see any strict similitude between Arthur and Travis, and I've watched "Taxi Driver" at least 3 times. So I don't get why reviewers and critics keep throwing the name "Taxi Driver" in the middle just to make their reviews sound more interesting.
They are two vastly different characters with vastly different aspects, and each of them represents a different problematic world.
Said that, the style, the direction, the cinematography of the movies are also different.
Am I wrong?
|
|