|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Dec 22, 2021 16:56:16 GMT
Not gonna get into reading the 8 pages of material, but my opinion: Rodgers is a more accurate passer. He throws fewer interceptions and is more consistent. He's also much more athletic, and is a true threat to scramble for first downs. Brady has the longevity, which is not to be completely written off. He's 45 years old, and what he is doing at that age is absolutely astounding. "Clutch" is also a real thing, if you don't believe in it, you probably watch more football through a box score than a television screen. The playoff numbers aren't even close, and the obvious edge is to Brady here. "Rodgers is way better than Brady" is a difficult statement to evaluate. In the regular season, I'd rather have Aaron Rodgers as my QB. In the playoffs, I'll take Brady. Rodgers will come nowhere near close to Brady's decorations in the playoffs, even if he won the next 3 superbowls. Define that. Brady has a better winning percentage, more 4th qtr comebacks, more wins (regular and postseason), more championships, more TD passes (all by a mile), and has only missed 19 games in his career. (A full season to a knee injury, 4 games due to a bogus suspension.) Brady has 10 more losses and 135 more wins. They both have 53 road losses on their career; Rodgers has 61 road wins while Brady has 119. Rodgers throws fewer INTs and he has a stronger arm, that's where the argument ends for him. When it comes to consistency, nobody approaches Brady. And I agree with you, "Clutch" is absolutely real. Rodgers is 11-9 in the playoffs while Brady is 34-11. This was a troll thread started by a guy who used to periodically post 'Cheaties' Wheaties box pictures of the Patriots, he never really had a leg to stand on. I'm all for a healthy debate from a serious minded individual on the topic, I just don't see how anyone can make an argument for Rodgers as the GOAT when there are several QBs with a better argument, not just Brady.
|
|