|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Nov 11, 2019 21:24:00 GMT
as you claim to be doing when you use your socks so your point is ? I wanted a sock so that assholes couldn't follow me from board to board. yeah .. you wanted to hide … lotta good it did when you kept forgetting to change your socks or let your real self use that name !  But enough about you .. we would not want this thread going super nova !
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 11, 2019 21:26:40 GMT
I wanted a sock so that assholes couldn't follow me from board to board. yeah .. you wanted to hide … lotta good it did when you kept forgetting to change your socks or let your real self use that name ! But enough about you .. we would not want this thread going super nova ! I have never forgotten. The admin outted both of them, so what difference does it make which one I post with? People know anyway. It doesn't mean I'm hiding.
|
|
|
|
Post by basmaticathury on Nov 11, 2019 21:29:55 GMT
Mohammad did use African slave labor to build the pulpit from where he preached. He did rape and pillage innocent peoples' lands. He SHOULD be lampooned!
|
|
|
|
Post by jillresurrected on Nov 11, 2019 21:33:09 GMT
Jill........
As you purport to be our resident expert; you should be aware that middle eastern people do not like to be called Oriental.
Also:
Your sentence should be written as; ".....you are not an Orientalist,".
They are Orientals. And I have spent far more time with Muslims, among Muslims than you ever did and ever will. I guess I know more about them than you do and I can assure you they don't have three nostrils or four eyes, as you seem to believe. You are no Orientalist. Zzzzzzziktir.
|
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Nov 11, 2019 22:19:06 GMT
Jill.....
You have lived my life? Interesting, dolt.
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 11, 2019 22:47:42 GMT
A cousin of mine has had dinner with him several times freely at my cousin's house in London, so I doubt this on first hand knowledge grounds, however I doubt Muslims of that generation are still pleased with him. Facts and you are not good friends. Does he still go by the same name?
Regardless, the point is that he did once have to go into hiding.
Yes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2019 22:51:31 GMT
Does he still go by the same name?
Regardless, the point is that he did once have to go into hiding.
Yes. Some countries have backed off while some still hold resentment. I imagine he will be looking over his shoulder for the rest of his life. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salman_Rushdie
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 11, 2019 23:11:12 GMT
Thanks for posting that link. It gives me a chance to post something erudite that he wrote. Yes, he will have a lifelong problem, however he has friends in high places both in the UK and the USA. To me it remains old news and he moves freely about the world ( I think with the exception of Pakistan) under his own name, probably not bothering nor wanting to visit fundamentalist Muslim countries. He is certainly not in 'hiding' in that sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Nov 12, 2019 0:40:26 GMT
yeah .. you wanted to hide … lotta good it did when you kept forgetting to change your socks or let your real self use that name ! But enough about you .. we would not want this thread going super nova ! I have never forgotten. The admin outted both of them, so what difference does it make which one I post with? People know anyway. It doesn't mean I'm hiding. When someone is posting under two or more separate accounts, it tells a great deal. A good example of this is BioSaliva/ThatsASucker. In his case he needed somebody to upvote his posts. In the current case, let the obvious speak for itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by jillresurrected on Nov 12, 2019 1:52:58 GMT
I have never forgotten. The admin outted both of them, so what difference does it make which one I post with? People know anyway. It doesn't mean I'm hiding. When someone is posting under two or more separate accounts, it tells a great deal. A good example of this is BioSaliva/ThatsASucker. In his case he needed somebody to upvote his posts. In the current case, let the obvious speak for itself. Which sock was Heeeyyy trolling under? BATouttaheck
|
|
|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Nov 12, 2019 1:59:05 GMT
When someone is posting under two or more separate accounts, it tells a great deal. A good example of this is BioSaliva/ThatsASucker. In his case he needed somebody to upvote his posts. In the current case, let the obvious speak for itself. Which sock was Heeeyyy trolling under? BATouttaheck She seems to do her active trolling under the one where she calls herself "heeeeeeeeeey" .. the others that I saw were her "hidden" ones where she tried (and failed) to be a different kinder, gentler person.
|
|
|
|
Post by jillresurrected on Nov 12, 2019 2:01:24 GMT
She seems to do her active trolling under the one where she calls herself "heeeeeeeeeey" .. the others that I saw were her "hidden" ones where she tried (and failed) to be a different kinder, gentler person. All HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEYYYYYYYYS were morons as far as I was concerned. Which were the hidden accounts? I am guilty of having had socks and being found out myself. But she was among those who picked most on it. That's why I am interested.
|
|
|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Nov 12, 2019 2:07:12 GMT
jillresurrectedNot for me to say ….she assumes everyone knows that they are actually her since she was officially "outted" but sometimes she behaves herself on them so … 
|
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Nov 12, 2019 2:29:22 GMT
Thanks for posting that link. It gives me a chance to post something erudite that he wrote. Yes, he will have a lifelong problem, however he has friends in high places both in the UK and the USA. To me it remains old news and he moves freely about the world ( I think with the exception of Pakistan) under his own name, probably not bothering nor wanting to visit fundamentalist Muslim countries. He is certainly not in 'hiding' in that sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by goz on Nov 12, 2019 2:42:01 GMT
Thanks for posting that link. It gives me a chance to post something erudite that he wrote. Yes, he will have a lifelong problem, however he has friends in high places both in the UK and the USA. To me it remains old news and he moves freely about the world ( I think with the exception of Pakistan) under his own name, probably not bothering nor wanting to visit fundamentalist Muslim countries. He is certainly not in 'hiding' in that sense. Why would I expect anything sensible, intellectual or of international interest from Americans? even though he lives in the US. There's probably some crappy conspiracy theory anti Muslim YouTube vid you can watch on the subject at your level! BTW Two things I am deeply suspicious of on here are things designated by the stupid and anti-intellectual, 'common sense' and 'common knowledge'. They are meaningless terms. BTW again: Do you think that admin just gave you 'Carte Blanche' to address me, in his recent post? If you are thinking of harassing me as in previous months years and on multiple message boards.....think again.
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 12, 2019 3:41:48 GMT
When someone is posting under two or more separate accounts, it tells a great deal. A good example of this is BioSaliva/ThatsASucker. In his case he needed somebody to upvote his posts. In the current case, let the obvious speak for itself. Which sock was Heeeyyy trolling under? BATouttaheck I don't troll, and my socks were not used for trolling. The admin posted them, so it's no secret which ones they are. I had my FlipperSmile acct since the forum was created and used it to post on the Soapbox and other boards. The admin outed it for no other reason than to be a dick.
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Nov 12, 2019 4:05:26 GMT
She seems to do her active trolling under the one where she calls herself "heeeeeeeeeey" .. the others that I saw were her "hidden" ones where she tried (and failed) to be a different kinder, gentler person. That wouldn't be a sock, stupid. That's just changing the name on my account. I deleted my 'ruby' sock acct after the admin outed it, and the name on it was FlipperSmile.
|
|
|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Nov 12, 2019 4:11:17 GMT
She seems to do her active trolling under the one where she calls herself "heeeeeeeeeey" .. the others that I saw were her "hidden" ones where she tried (and failed) to be a different kinder, gentler person. That wouldn't be a sock, stupid. That's just changing the name on my account. I deleted my 'ruby' sock acct after the admin outed it, and the name on it was FlipperSmile. Ever notice that your latest "cute little doggy" looks like he is looking at you after being punished for peeing on the floor ?
|
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Nov 12, 2019 4:42:02 GMT
So you are expecting this to be common knowledge here in the U.S.A? Why would I expect anything sensible, intellectual or of international interest from Americans? even though he lives in the US. There's probably some crappy conspiracy theory anti Muslim YouTube vid you can watch on the subject at your level! BTW Two things I am deeply suspicious of on here are things designated by the stupid and anti-intellectual, 'common sense' and 'common knowledge'. They are meaningless terms. BTW again: Do you think that admin just gave you 'Carte Blanche' to address me, in his recent post? If you are thinking of harassing me as in previous months years and on multiple message boards.....think again.
BTW, stop telling John what to do. That is also rude.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 12, 2019 5:27:43 GMT
Discrediting the speaker does not address the 'information' that is being spoken. Ad homs are weak copouts for those who can't refute the argument. So you see, as you're attacking the speaker, the argument goes unchallenged. I'd just like to reiterate my thoughts on this. What you are saying is wrong, in my opinion. If someone that is talking on any given subject is known to be a hater of that subject, whatever it is, then of course that is relevant. She is known for her anti-Muslim stance, so yes that is important and is directly relevant to the subject she is talking about. The motivation for her lecture is certainly worthy of discussion, but what about what she said? Do we just ignore that because of the reason she might be saying it? Do we presume she's lying or otherwise incorrect so we can easily dismiss it as such? I feel like I'm playing Hot Potato by myself here. She tried to condense 1,400 years into 5 minutes. I'm going to try to condense her 5 minutes into two paragraphs: So, that's her account of the history of Islam, paraphrased by me. Some scenes were edited out for brevity. Bear in mind, I don't care if it's accurate or not. The point is that her entire 5-minute summary consists of verifiable information. Her agenda, whatever that may or may not be, has no bearing on the ability to disprove her lecture and therefore preventing some fool like me from believing it and therefore accommodating her plan to rule the world or whatever. The focus should be on what was said, not who said it. Unless, of course, you'd rather ad hom than participate in the discussion being offered by the OP. 
|
|
