|
|
Post by masterofallgoons on Nov 17, 2019 12:20:04 GMT
Cool man. See every post above this one for a response to this point. All they point out is the fact that *if* Myles Garrett hit him with a different spot of the helmet, then Rudolph would've been killed. And that's true. But it doesn't make what happened anymore violent than just playing the game. The issue isn't with the violence of the situation but the fact that it happened when it wasn't supposed to. Yes it does. As does the difference between doing something in the legal confines of the game for the purpose of a team's benefit as opposed to assaulting someone for a petty, personal fight. And what happened, ripping someone's helmet off and smashing it over his head, has no situation on which it's supposed to happen. The best explanation for your argument so far is that you were drunk. |
|
|
|
Post by Surly on Nov 17, 2019 13:58:09 GMT
Except if a guy punched someone in the face on the street he would get hit with some degree of assault charge. But if a guy clubs someone on the street over the head with a bat or a baton, now he gets additional and more severe charges.
Case closed.
*mic drop*
|
|
|
|
Post by 尺ロㄈにモイ州凡几 on Nov 17, 2019 14:03:40 GMT
All they point out is the fact that *if* Myles Garrett hit him with a different spot of the helmet, then Rudolph would've been killed. And that's true. But it doesn't make what happened anymore violent than just playing the game. The issue isn't with the violence of the situation but the fact that it happened when it wasn't supposed to. Ironic that you're making posts deriding the violence of football and your signature is what Tex Watson said when he entered the the Tate house to butcher everyone
Lol I’m not deriding the violence at all. I’m deriding the reactions to the violence. And to be honest, I forgot Tex Watson actually said that. Was really just quoting Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. |
|
|
|
Post by 尺ロㄈにモイ州凡几 on Nov 17, 2019 14:06:56 GMT
Except if a guy punched someone in the face on the street he would get hit with some degree of assault charge. But if a guy clubs someone on the street over the head with a bat or a baton, now he gets additional and more severe charges. Case closed. *mic drop* So what you’re saying is the dude should’ve just used his hands if he wanted to knock the guy out? Ok then. |
|
|
|
Post by Surly on Nov 17, 2019 14:17:59 GMT
Except if a guy punched someone in the face on the street he would get hit with some degree of assault charge. But if a guy clubs someone on the street over the head with a bat or a baton, now he gets additional and more severe charges. Case closed. *mic drop* So what you’re saying is the dude should’ve just used his hands if he wanted to knock the guy out? Ok then. He should’ve used his hands to settle a fight. Why is he trying to knock out anyone in the first place? That’s not helping your argument. |
|
|
|
Post by 尺ロㄈにモイ州凡几 on Nov 17, 2019 14:25:29 GMT
All they point out is the fact that *if* Myles Garrett hit him with a different spot of the helmet, then Rudolph would've been killed. And that's true. But it doesn't make what happened anymore violent than just playing the game. The issue isn't with the violence of the situation but the fact that it happened when it wasn't supposed to. Yes it does. As does the difference between doing something in the legal confines of the game for the purpose of a team's benefit as opposed to assaulting someone for a petty, personal fight. That's an argument for why he should've been punished, not an argument for why what he did was more violent than traditional football play.
|
|
|
|
Post by 尺ロㄈにモイ州凡几 on Nov 17, 2019 14:28:59 GMT
So what you’re saying is the dude should’ve just used his hands if he wanted to knock the guy out? Ok then. He should’ve used his hands to settle a fight. Why is he trying to knock out anyone in the first place? That’s not helping your argument. Do you even know what my argument is? I'm not sure that you do.
|
|
|
|
Post by stickman38 on Nov 17, 2019 15:48:59 GMT
It's not like it's nothing. It's a violent sport and everyone knows that. Players know that they take a risk when they take the field and everyone assumes that risk. They don't assume the risk of getting smashed in the bare head with a blunt force object after a play is over. Just as boxers assume the risk that taking punches to the head and the body entail, but if a guy pulled out a machete and stabbed someone in the chest then that's a different story. We are saying the same thing here, but you 'dropped the mic' as if you made some point that everyone in the world didn't already know and made some great insight, and I just don't understand how you could be so pleased with yourself for saying absolutely nothing. Also, for what it’s worth, my OP was an attempt to remind the soft little cunts on here who are calling for Myles Garrett’s head that they watch a sport where far more violent thing occur during the game. That was the point. And you missed it, chum.
If this was your point why didn't you just say it? I think you've figured out that your whole argument is rather weak and has no point, so now you're acting like we missed something. LOL!
How lame can you get?
Time to layoff the booze man, trust me.
|
|
|
|
Post by 尺ロㄈにモイ州凡几 on Nov 17, 2019 16:38:36 GMT
Also, for what it’s worth, my OP was an attempt to remind the soft little cunts on here who are calling for Myles Garrett’s head that they watch a sport where far more violent thing occur during the game. That was the point. And you missed it, chum.
If this was your point why didn't you just say it? I think you've figured out that your whole argument is rather weak and has no point, so now you're acting like we missed something. LOL!
How lame can you get?
Time to layoff the booze man, trust me.
But I did say it... |
|
|
|
Post by Surly on Nov 17, 2019 17:03:27 GMT
He should’ve used his hands to settle a fight. Why is he trying to knock out anyone in the first place? That’s not helping your argument. Do you even know what my argument is? I'm not sure that you do. Yeah I know what it is. The problem is it’s wrong. Intent is everything. And so are choices about how you go about something. That’s why I said what I said. If two guys are engaged in horseplay and one of them accidentally breaks an arm that’s different than some guy taking a crowbar to another guys arm and breaking it. If I’m watching two guys horseplay it’s not the same seeing a crowbar attack and cheering it on. *mic drop* |
|
|
|
Post by NJtoTX on Nov 17, 2019 17:12:33 GMT
Howie Long, Strahan, and Jimmy Johnson are all defending Garrett. Happens all the time, Garrett is a great guy who snapped in the moment. Strahan said he did the same thing to a guy in practice, and there was no punishment.
|
|
|
|
Post by 尺ロㄈにモイ州凡几 on Nov 17, 2019 18:19:57 GMT
Do you even know what my argument is? I'm not sure that you do. Yeah I know what it is. The problem is it’s wrong. Intent is everything. And so are choices about how you go about something. That’s why I said what I said. If two guys are engaged in horseplay and one of them accidentally breaks an arm that’s different than some guy taking a crowbar to another guys arm and breaking it. If I’m watching two guys horseplay it’s not the same seeing a crowbar attack and cheering it on. *mic drop* You’re really fixated on that mic drop thing I did. What’s up with that, mate? |
|
