|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Nov 25, 2019 19:54:38 GMT
Has anyone else noticed that now they seem to ONLY be doing movies and characters based on real life incidents and portrayals of real life figures?
They even teamed up for Sully.
What is up with that?
Why are they not doing 100% fiction anymore?
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Nov 25, 2019 20:17:19 GMT
Well what about Toy Story 4, The Circle, Inferno, Ithaca, Cloud Atlas, Larry Crowne, etc. for Hanks?
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Nov 25, 2019 20:32:54 GMT
Eastwood is kind of old to portray the new stranger in town.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Nov 25, 2019 20:38:45 GMT
Well what about Toy Story 4, The Circle, Inferno, Ithaca, Cloud Atlas, Larry Crowne, etc. for Hanks? They should have given a cameo to Clint Eastwood for Toy Story 4, what a missed oppurtunity. He could play a cowboy doll as reference to his old western days, even have a showdown between him and Woody with "Good, the bad, and the Ugly" theme playing.
|
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Nov 25, 2019 22:01:26 GMT
Eastwood is kind of old to portray the new stranger in town. Well, I would ask if you feel lucky, punk if I could lift this gun.... Don't just stand there laughing at me. Help me out, will ya?
|
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Nov 25, 2019 22:34:17 GMT
Well what about Toy Story 4, The Circle, Inferno, Ithaca, Cloud Atlas, Larry Crowne, etc. for Hanks? Mr. Rogers, Bridge of Spies, Sully, The Post, Capt. Phillips, Walt Disney...
|
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Santa PaulsLaugh on Nov 25, 2019 22:44:33 GMT
They have to power in Hollywood buy up or become attached to stories that interest them. Right now, it's movies based on reality.
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Nov 25, 2019 22:47:20 GMT
Tom Hanks have played in 79 movies and he has played real life people in what 9 or 10 of them, so yes he clearly only play real life people in movies, If you ignore the 69 or 70 movies where he did not do that.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Nov 25, 2019 23:37:29 GMT
Eastwood is kind of old to portray the new stranger in town. Yeah, According to WIKIPEDIA (which I know is not always reliable) Clint Eastwood is actually 89 years old right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Nov 26, 2019 3:18:42 GMT
Tom Hanks have played in 79 movies and he has played real life people in what 9 or 10 of them, so yes he clearly only play real life people in movies, If you ignore the 69 or 70 movies where he did not do that. Which is why I wrote in the OP: Has anyone else noticed that now they seem to ONLY be doing movies and characters based on real life incidents and portrayals of real life figures? Eastwood is kind of old to portray the new stranger in town. Yeah, According to WIKIPEDIA (which I know is not always reliable) Clint Eastwood is actually 89 years old right now. Never hurts to ever double check anything you read on Wiki.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Nov 26, 2019 21:22:05 GMT
Now I’m left wondering what their next collaboration would look like?
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Nov 27, 2019 19:12:35 GMT
Has anyone else noticed that now they seem to ONLY be doing movies and characters based on real life incidents and portrayals of real life figures? They even teamed up for Sully. What is up with that? Why are they not doing 100% fiction anymore? I don't think that it's a bad thing at all that they are both doing films like that.
I mean they both have every right in the world to do the films and roles that they want to do and if those are the types of films and roles that they do want to do then good for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Nov 27, 2019 19:16:41 GMT
I'd at any rate prefer it if Hanks stuck to portraying real-life characters whom he at least vaguely resembles. Sully wasn't bad, but no amount of makeup, prostheses or acting technique could convince me he was Walt Disney or Fred Rogers.
|
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Nov 27, 2019 19:25:45 GMT
Now I’m left wondering what their next collaboration would look like? Tom Hanks plays.... a younger Clint Eastwood. While Clint Eastwood plays.... an older Tom Hanks. Directed by Tom Eastwood. In a Clint Hanks production.
|
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Nov 27, 2019 19:28:20 GMT
Has anyone else noticed that now they seem to ONLY be doing movies and characters based on real life incidents and portrayals of real life figures? They even teamed up for Sully. What is up with that? Why are they not doing 100% fiction anymore? I don't think that it's a bad thing at all that they are both doing films like that.
I mean they both have every right in the world to do the films and roles that they want to do and if those are the types of films and roles that they do want to do then good for them.
I'm not complaining. Just pointing it out. I'm not really much of a fan of either one. At least not to where I wanna go see it in the theatre. Last two CE movies I watched was The Mule, the excellent and underrated Honky Tonk Man and Dirty Harry. I can't remember the last Hanks one.
|
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Nov 27, 2019 19:29:42 GMT
I'd atany rate prefer it if Hanks stuck to portraying real-life characters whom he at least vaguely resembles. Sully wasn't bad, but no amount of makeup, prostheses or acting technique could convince me he was Walt Disney or Fred Rogers. TBH I find his voice annoying which is another reason why I'll stick with the original Rogers.
|
|
