|
|
Post by mortsahlfan on Dec 22, 2019 20:57:31 GMT
Years after, they're still using his name to distort and mislead... How can he rate a movie he's never seen?
This world is one big fraud..

|
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Dec 22, 2019 21:00:43 GMT
Not gonna let the notable handicap of being dead stop him.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Dec 22, 2019 21:28:34 GMT
Hey, if James Dean and Carrie Fisher can still act, Ebert can still rate.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Dec 22, 2019 21:43:45 GMT
It is extremely misleading in this case. It needs to say RogerEbert.com.
I'd be okay with that, because that is the website that the review is coming from.
|
|
|
|
Post by mortsahlfan on Dec 22, 2019 23:23:08 GMT
It is extremely misleading in this case. It needs to say RogerEbert.com. I'd be okay with that, because that is the website that the review is coming from. Why not attribute it to the person who wrote it? Because they know Ebert is the most recognized movie critic ever.. And its not just movies - it seems like so much of the world is being manipulated. And in today's age, the bad information gets spread in the millions within seconds.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Dec 23, 2019 1:54:50 GMT
It is extremely misleading in this case. It needs to say RogerEbert.com. I'd be okay with that, because that is the website that the review is coming from. Why not attribute it to the person who wrote it? Because they know Ebert is the most recognized movie critic ever.. And its not just movies - it seems like so much of the world is being manipulated. And in today's age, the bad information gets spread in the millions within seconds. You answered your own question there.
|
|
|
|
Post by mortsahlfan on Dec 23, 2019 14:38:03 GMT
Why not attribute it to the person who wrote it? Because they know Ebert is the most recognized movie critic ever.. And its not just movies - it seems like so much of the world is being manipulated. And in today's age, the bad information gets spread in the millions within seconds. You answered your own question there. What do you mean exactly?
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Dec 23, 2019 14:55:36 GMT
You answered your own question there. What do you mean exactly?
Why not attribute it to the person who wrote it? Because they know Ebert is the most recognized movie critic ever.. And its not just movies - it seems like so much of the world is being manipulated. And in today's age, the bad information gets spread in the millions within seconds.
|
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Dec 23, 2019 15:03:57 GMT
Hey, if James Dean and Carrie Fisher can still act, Ebert can still rate. Tom Clancy is still writing books too, even though he's been dead since 2013.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Dec 23, 2019 15:14:36 GMT
You know, when it comes to all of the Movie Reviews that Roger Ebert and even Gene Siskel ever did in their careers.....I think that the Most Funniest was (to me at least) their review of "POLTERGEIST 3".
|
|
|
|
Post by mortsahlfan on Dec 23, 2019 18:44:58 GMT
You know, when it comes to all of the Movie Reviews that Roger Ebert and even Gene Siskel ever did in their careers.....I think that the Most Funniest was (to me at least) their review of "POLTERGEIST 3".
Ha - I couldn't even finish the first one!
|
|