|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Jan 6, 2020 21:51:39 GMT
On a scale of one to ten, I just have to break down and give her a perfect ten. That smile, that hair, those eyes! Just lovely.  |
|
|
|
Post by onethreetwo on Jan 6, 2020 21:54:03 GMT
I'd say she's a 7. I can see a dozen prettier faces at the local mall at any given time.
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Jan 6, 2020 22:03:14 GMT
I'd say she's a 7. I can see a dozen prettier faces at the local mall at any given time. I might be able to agree with you on that (not prettier, no way, but certainly pretty), but Farrah had a magnetism that was just there. It wasn't just that she was very pretty to look at, but she had a rare innate grace.
|
|
|
|
Post by rogerthat on Jan 6, 2020 22:48:06 GMT
I give her an 8.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catman 猫的主人 on Jan 6, 2020 22:54:27 GMT
Catman found her eyes off-putting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Jan 7, 2020 1:39:18 GMT
I never really got into her (or the rest of the Angels) at the time. I can see that she was good looking but not in a way that appeals to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Jan 7, 2020 1:44:28 GMT
A 6.
She was never really much beyond the hairstyle.
There were a lot prettier women (Marylin Munster for example-even though she was the ugly one in the family).
|
|
|
|
Post by Sulla on Jan 7, 2020 1:54:13 GMT
Yes, she's a 10 for me, too.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jan 7, 2020 1:58:00 GMT
6/10. Nice but not glamorous.
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Jan 7, 2020 2:11:39 GMT
Yes, she's a 10 for me, too. Finally! 
|
|
|
|
Post by RiP, IMDb on Jan 7, 2020 2:23:33 GMT
11/10!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Jan 7, 2020 2:29:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by RiP, IMDb on Jan 7, 2020 2:32:38 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2020 2:59:55 GMT
I go 8, but that's judging her by the time. Tastes change, today she'd be lower.
|
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Jan 7, 2020 3:17:21 GMT
5 - She never did much for me. I found Jaclyn Smith, Cheryl Ladd, and even Kate Jackson far more attractive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jan 7, 2020 3:22:36 GMT
8
I’d realistically say 7, but her own special unique radiance bumps her up a notch. She was very pretty, but not beautiful. I think Jaclyn Smith and Tanya Roberts were better looking.
|
|
|
|
Post by edzeppelin on Jan 7, 2020 3:51:29 GMT
On a scale of one to ten, I just have to break down and give her a perfect ten. That smile, that hair, those eyes! Just lovely. 10/10. I still remember the first time I saw her, before Charlie's Angels or anything else. She appeared for a little over a minute in a bit on the second episode (s1e02) of "The Partridge Family" titled "The Sound of Money." Watch Danny Bonaduce's eyes. (I was about the same age at the time.) His attention only flickers off the object(s) of focus for a split second, then lock on again like a tractor-beam. The whole scene. I probably did the same thing at the time. (I'll bet someone asked Danny about her hairstyle, he probably said the same thing I did; "she has hair?"
|
|
|
|
Post by Ass_E9 on Jan 7, 2020 4:08:41 GMT
7
Pretty loopy.
|
|
|
|
Post by millar70 on Jan 7, 2020 4:53:19 GMT
She was a beauty, but for hot 70's tv girls, I'll take Susan Dey or Suzanne Somers over Farrah.
Well, 1st season of Three's Company Suzanne Somers that is......1st season Chrissy Snow was yummy!
|
|
|
|
Post by gameboy on Jan 7, 2020 5:11:25 GMT
She's obviously high as a kite.
|
|
