|
|
Post by hi224 on Jan 11, 2020 4:05:12 GMT
your thoughts on it all.
|
|
|
|
Post by wolf359 on Jan 11, 2020 6:39:47 GMT
I am alright with it.
Heck, I am even alright with them bringing dead actors back to life with CGI (like what they did with Peter Cushing in "ROGUE ONE" although I know that they also used an actor name Guy Henry to stand in for him, basically play his character, and also do his voice).
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Jan 11, 2020 8:20:14 GMT
I'm OK with them as long as they're used sparingly and/or discreetly.
|
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jan 11, 2020 9:15:45 GMT
Still needs a lot of work.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jan 11, 2020 10:58:50 GMT
on the big screen I always found it jarring, on the small screen it's acceptable and often superior to make up or stand ins.
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Jan 11, 2020 14:58:21 GMT
I'm not a fan.
The only one that looked decent was Jackson in Captain Marvel and that's only because they had a lot of footage to work with.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jan 11, 2020 16:36:20 GMT
I'm fine with it as long as it doesn't look terrible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jan 11, 2020 19:58:43 GMT
If it is contextual within the films framework.
|
|
|
|
Post by rogerthat on Jan 11, 2020 20:43:40 GMT
Still needs a lot of work. Agreed |
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Jan 11, 2020 20:57:23 GMT
It's a breakthrough in visual effects when done right. The one performed on Samuel L. Jackson in Captain Marvel and Michael Douglas in the Ant-Man films are by far the best examples of the technology. The one done on Patrick Stewart in X-Men Origins: Wolverine looks not quite there due to lighting issues that it makes his skin look plastic.
|
|
