|
|
Post by Morgana on Jan 12, 2020 9:06:08 GMT
There's no need for another one. The first one is fine. All these re-makes make me think they are more about the director's vanity than anything else - they think they can do better than the original.
|
|
|
|
Post by HumanFundRecipient on Jan 12, 2020 15:57:39 GMT
(Not so) Sadly, it will be beaten to the punch by "In the Heights".
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jan 12, 2020 16:47:24 GMT
I'd rather had the TINTIN sequel instead.
|
|
|
|
Post by Morgana on Jan 12, 2020 18:38:14 GMT
There's no need for another one. The first one is fine. All these re-makes make me think they are more about the director's vanity than anything else - they think they can do better than the original. I would like to see it, because I like the story and music. The original is classic and was filmed as a 70mm spectacle. I think we are in good hands with Spielberg at the helm, although he is only shooting on 35mm. He will want it to look grittier I would say. I hope you are right.
|
|
