|
|
Post by Vits on Jan 14, 2020 16:51:35 GMT
Yes seriously! Do you have some point somewhere vits? I said "Seriously" because this is so obvious that I didn't think it needed to clarify. The movement was done to prevent more sexual harassment, especially in the workplace, and to give women more job opportunities and better salaries. If you've come across a man-hating woman (because those do exist) and gotten into an arguement over this, I'm sorry, but they're the minority.
|
|
|
|
Post by bd74 on Jan 14, 2020 18:29:14 GMT
That's one way to look at it, but I guess it comes down to the voters in the end. The categories are voted for separately so there can be no guarantee a BP nom is going to get a Direction nom even if there are the same number of nominations in each category.I don't pay to much attention these days. So far of the nominations I've only seen Once Upon A Time in Hollywood. The directors branch no need to vote on best director for nominations. Once picture is voted for in the nomination process, and I believe that is the entire academy for picture nominations, then a director nod automatically goes with it. It then gets voted as per usual for winning ballots. It shouldn't matter how many other nominations a film gets. No actually it's only the producers' branch that selects the nominees for best picture.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jan 14, 2020 20:14:25 GMT
The directors branch no need to vote on best director for nominations. Once picture is voted for in the nomination process, and I believe that is the entire academy for picture nominations, then a director nod automatically goes with it. It then gets voted as per usual for winning ballots. It shouldn't matter how many other nominations a film gets. No actually it's only the producers' branch that selects the nominees for best picture. Then my point still stands regardless who votes picture and let director go in hand with the choice made. All members get to vote for a winner.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jan 14, 2020 20:20:18 GMT
Yes seriously! Do you have some point somewhere vits? I said "Seriously" because this is so obvious that I didn't think it needed to clarify. The movement was done to prevent more sexual harassment, especially in the workplace, and to give women more job opportunities and better salaries. If you've come across a man-hating woman (because those do exist) and gotten into an arguement over this, I'm sorry, but they're the minority. Just as men who treat women like s<>t are a minority. It’s not an epidemic like promoted. Women treat men like s<>t too, but it can be a different dynamic. The “me too” movement was not done to create more job opportunities and salaries in the workplace. It was about deriding men over sexual behaviour towards women. Sorry if you’ve been brainwashed. Appears that the majority have.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Jan 14, 2020 21:51:55 GMT
Sorry if you’ve been brainwashed. Funny how people who use that word are usually the ones who say the "brainwashed-iest" things. Appears that the majority have. And I suppose you for some reason are magically immune? I'm starting to see a pattern here with you thinking different from the rest and claiming you're the one who's right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jan 14, 2020 21:59:43 GMT
Sorry if you’ve been brainwashed. Funny how people who use that word are usually the ones who say the "brainwashed-iest" things. Appears that the majority have. And I suppose you for some reason are magically immune? I'm starting to see a pattern here with you thinking different from the rest and claiming you're the one who's right. I am not a chump sucker like most. I am immune to not buying into the woke propaganda bulls<>t that gets peddled. It appears you’re not.
|
|
