|
|
Post by mstreepsucks on Feb 2, 2020 6:04:32 GMT
Here's the thing with this critic, apparently she was going to be some sort of script writer or something. On a Robert Altman movie. But when that didn't pan out, she then panned every movie afterwards that he did since. In other words slammed every movie, in a review. Gave it a negative review.
So therefore that's what I think of this critic, a vindictive crummy person.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2020 15:30:10 GMT
If you don't like her opinions, then don't read them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dramatic Look Gopher on Feb 2, 2020 15:36:26 GMT
I'll say this about Pauline Kael, she was an excellent critique writer but it was frustrating how she panned a lot of the important New Age Hollywood films of the 1970s, and that made her somewhat of a blowhard.
|
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Feb 2, 2020 16:42:57 GMT
Not my kind of critic, for all her obvious writing talent. I think when she went after something, often to an irrational level, she was like a dog with a bone. She could be outright dismissive at times.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Feb 3, 2020 0:37:25 GMT
Not my kind of critic, for all her obvious writing talent. I think when she went after something, often to an irrational level, she was like a dog with a bone. She could be outright dismissive at times. She was just a bitch. Let’s call a spade a spade. |
|
